2 Sep 2011 15:27
Re: new blas infrastructure and prefix
<fbissey <at> slingshot.co.nz>
2011-09-02 13:27:25 GMT
2011-09-02 13:27:25 GMT
Quoting Johan Hattne <jhattne <at> lbl.gov>: > On 30 Aug 2011, at 12:49, fbissey <at> slingshot.co.nz wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> So I was looking at the science overlay from my prefix on OS X. >> And portage wanted me to upgrade my blas/cblas/lapack stack to the >> new structure. I know they are marked ~x86 and ~amd64 but it doesn't >> look good considering that I had a working stack in my prefix before. >> >> So I may make things a little more prefix friendly (OS X in particular) >> in the coming days. I am also thinking of adding an ebuild to use the >> native vectorize framework on OS X, unless someone strongly objects to it. > > Hi Francois; > > With the CBLAS reference implementations, you may run into a problem > with the test suite on Darwin. I tried to sort this out earlier this > year (see > http://icl.cs.utk.edu/lapack-forum/archives/lapack/msg00997.html), > but I'm not even sure upstream recognises the problem. Please let me > know if at least you can reproduce the issue, and then maybe we can > try again to get it fixed. > Looking at that thread they don't seem to see a problem. I haven't tackled cblas-reference yet but I have made an ebuild to use the vectorize framework from apple on OS X (I'll put it in the overlay soonish) and the test suite for lapack-reference totaly failed when built with either blas-reference or vectorize. I am guessing that it must be similar to what you got with(Continue reading)
RSS Feed