Failed to add overlay "science"

Hello,

Is this a problem with firewall? I do have to run emerge-webrsync to
update portage.

Thanks,

--
Valmor

* Running command "/usr/bin/git clone
"git://git.overlays.gentoo.org/proj/sci.git/" 
"/usr/portage/local/layman/science""...
Initialized empty Git repository in
/usr/portage/local/layman/science/.git/
git.overlays.gentoo.org[0: 66.219.59.40]: errno=Connection timed out
fatal: unable to connect a socket (Connection timed out)
* Failed to add overlay "science".

-> ping 66.219.59.40
PING 66.219.59.40 (66.219.59.40) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 66.219.59.40: icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=49.3 ms
64 bytes from 66.219.59.40: icmp_seq=2 ttl=53 time=49.3 ms
64 bytes from 66.219.59.40: icmp_seq=3 ttl=53 time=49.1 ms
64 bytes from 66.219.59.40: icmp_seq=4 ttl=53 time=49.3 ms

Re: octave forge

markusle wrote:
> 
> We had a long time
> ago agreed to go with 3., simply because of the fact that the
> octave-forge.eclass does most of the work at this point and there is hence
> no good reason to add a new category to the portage tree which contains
> many
> tens of split octave-forge ebuilds that by themselves simply call the
> eclass
> and hence don't do anything but waste space. 
> 

I've just started following this list, so I was wondering what the status of
octave-forge is on the overlay? As you know, there might be a SoC project to
write something to handle the octave packages including octave-forge, but I
was wondering if there was any development in this direction in the last
month or so?

juantxorena wrote:
> 
> Hopefully GCC-4.3 is going to be stabilized soon. Is there any comment 
> on this? 
> 

Does anyone know if this is still a problem?

Thanks,

--Alex

Re: octave forge

Re: octave forge

On Sunday March 22 atsui wrote:
> markusle wrote:
> > 
> > We had a long time
> > ago agreed to go with 3., simply because of the fact that the
> > octave-forge.eclass does most of the work at this point and there
> > is hence no good reason to add a new category to the portage tree
> > which contains many
> > tens of split octave-forge ebuilds that by themselves simply call
> > the eclass
> > and hence don't do anything but waste space. 
> > 
> 
> I've just started following this list, so I was wondering what the
> status of octave-forge is on the overlay? As you know, there might be
> a SoC project to write something to handle the octave packages
> including octave-forge, but I was wondering if there was any
> development in this direction in the last month or so?

The last work has been Markus eclass implementation which is what you
see in the science overlay with git.

> juantxorena wrote:
> > 
> > Hopefully GCC-4.3 is going to be stabilized soon. Is there any
> > comment on this? 
> > 
> 
> Does anyone know if this is still a problem?

This is work in progress. Still some packages are not compiling with
gcc-4.3. octave-3 is fine with it. The only worry here is that we want
to have octave-3 stabilize, which is currently being done.

--

-- 
Sébastien

ccp4-6.1.1

Hello everybody,

I would like to finally announce the long outstanding the version bump of ccp6 to the latest release 6.1.1.

Donnie did alot of work in splitting the big ccp4 package into smaller ones, so that changes and fixes
in the single components can be included more easily.
You will still install ccp4 with the __sci-chemistry/ccp4-6.1.1__ package, which is now the meta package
for following splits

sci-libs/ccp4-libs							the libs
sci-chemistry/ccp4i							the interface
sci-chemistry/{mosflm,imosflm,refmac,molrep,xia2,balbes,...}		the splitted programs

The introduced changes can but hopefully won't lead to breakage of some components. Some testing was
done, but there might be some more issues to cope with. Therefor we are looking for some testers. I will
unmask the package in the sci overlay today. Everyone who has tasks to run on ccp4 is kindly asked to
try it on the new version and report issues. Perhaps you also can report positive testings, so that we
can get it soon into the tree.

Another bump which was done side by side to ccp4 was coot to the latest stable version (0.5.2). This is
now also availably in sci overlay.

Thanks, justin

missing octave-forge-* packages

Hello,

I have emerged the science overlay recently and when I look for the 
octave-forge modules, nothing is available. Shouldn't they be listed 
when I issue an emerge search?

-> emerge --search octave-forge
Searching...
[ Results for search key : octave-forge ]
[ Applications found : 1 ]

*  sci-mathematics/octave-forge
       Latest version available: 2006.03.17
       Latest version installed: [ Not Installed ]
       Size of files: 3,639 kB
       Homepage:      http://octave.sourceforge.net/
       Description:   A collection of custom scripts, functions and 
extensions for GNU Octave
       License:       as-is

In particular, I am looking for octave-forge-image.

-> emerge -vp octave-forge-image

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!

emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "octave-forge-image".

However I do have ebuilds for it:

-> locate octave-forge-image
/usr/portage/local/layman/science/sci-mathematics/octave-forge-image
/usr/portage/local/layman/science/sci-mathematics/octave-forge-image/Manifest
/usr/portage/local/layman/science/sci-mathematics/octave-forge-image/octave-forge-image-1.0.8.ebuild
/usr/portage/local/layman/science/sci-mathematics/octave-forge-image/files
/usr/portage/local/layman/science/sci-mathematics/octave-forge-image/files/octave-forge-image-1.0.6-imagemagick.patch
/usr/portage/local/layman/science/sci-mathematics/octave-forge-image/ChangeLog
/usr/portage/local/layman/science/sci-mathematics/octave-forge-image/metadata.xml
/usr/portage/local/layman/science/sci-mathematics/octave-forge-image/octave-forge-image-1.0.6.ebuild

Thanks for your inputs.

--

-- 
Valmor

Re: missing octave-forge-* packages

Valmor de Almeida wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I have emerged the science overlay recently and when I look for the
> octave-forge modules, nothing is available. Shouldn't they be listed
> when I issue an emerge search?
> 
> -> emerge --search octave-forge
> Searching...
> [ Results for search key : octave-forge ]
> [ Applications found : 1 ]
> 
> *  sci-mathematics/octave-forge
>       Latest version available: 2006.03.17
>       Latest version installed: [ Not Installed ]
>       Size of files: 3,639 kB
>       Homepage:      http://octave.sourceforge.net/
>       Description:   A collection of custom scripts, functions and
> extensions for GNU Octave
>       License:       as-is
> 
> In particular, I am looking for octave-forge-image.
> 
> -> emerge -vp octave-forge-image
> 
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
> 
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> 
> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "octave-forge-image".
> 
> 
> However I do have ebuilds for it:
> 
> -> locate octave-forge-image
> /usr/portage/local/layman/science/sci-mathematics/octave-forge-image
> /usr/portage/local/layman/science/sci-mathematics/octave-forge-image/Manifest
> 
> /usr/portage/local/layman/science/sci-mathematics/octave-forge-image/octave-forge-image-1.0.8.ebuild
> 
> /usr/portage/local/layman/science/sci-mathematics/octave-forge-image/files
> /usr/portage/local/layman/science/sci-mathematics/octave-forge-image/files/octave-forge-image-1.0.6-imagemagick.patch
> 
> /usr/portage/local/layman/science/sci-mathematics/octave-forge-image/ChangeLog
> 
> /usr/portage/local/layman/science/sci-mathematics/octave-forge-image/metadata.xml
> 
> /usr/portage/local/layman/science/sci-mathematics/octave-forge-image/octave-forge-image-1.0.6.ebuild
> 
> 
> Thanks for your inputs.
> 
check your overlay path in /etc/make.conf and layman.conf.

Re: missing octave-forge-* packages

Valmor:

    You may need to do the following:

 * Messages for package app-portage/layman-1.1.1:

 * Select an overlay and add it using
 * layman -a overlay-name
 * If this is the very first overlay you add with layman,
 * you need to append the following statement to your
 * /etc/make.conf file:
 *
 * source /usr/portage/local/layman/make.conf
 *
 * If you modify the 'storage' parameter in the layman
 * configuration file (/etc/layman/layman.cfg) you will
 * need to adapt the path given above to the new storage
 * directory.
 * Please add the 'source' statement to make.conf only AFTER
 * you added your first overlay. Otherwise portage will fail.

BobS

Re: missing octave-forge-* packages

Bob Slawson wrote:
> Valmor:
> 
> * If this is the very first overlay you add with layman,
> * you need to append the following statement to your
> * /etc/make.conf file:
> 
> BobS

Indeed. I should have known.

Thanks,

--
Valmor