Dhruba Bandopadhyay | 1 Aug 2003 10:00
Picon
Favicon

Re: Gentoo cvs changelog emails

Mike Frysinger wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Wednesday 30 July 2003 11:19, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote:
> 
>>On 27 July 2003 I received a cvs changelog email and thought that the
>>list may have been resurrected from the dungeons but once again it has
>>stopped.  Any further news?
> 
> 
> it's being worked on, it should start working properly soon

Thanks.  It seems to be working now.

Would it be possible to omit entries that mention only a manifest 
fixing?  It's just that there's so many of them everytime (done by 
scripts I presume) the email becomes really long.

With regards.

--
gentoo-dev <at> gentoo.org mailing list

Philip Hofstetter | 1 Aug 2003 12:42
Picon

Re: ebuild for kontact: looking for testers

Hi,

Dewet Diener wrote:

> On Wednesday 30 July 2003 16:56, Jason Waldhelm wrote:
> 
>>The ebuild works great - no errors; however, it seems the OpenPGP
>>plugin (specifically, GnuPG) does not work.  Each time a message is
> 
> 
> I haven't seen this -- both my OpenPGP and GnuPG plugins work without 
> problems.

and I have exactly this problem with KMail. This really seems to be a 
bug of some kind - though not reproducable on every setup.

After selecting the right plugin for about 10 times, it begins to work - 
until I restart KMail, where it begins to fail again.

Philip

--
gentoo-dev <at> gentoo.org mailing list

Michael Cummings | 1 Aug 2003 12:52
Picon
Favicon

Re: Gentoo cvs changelog emails

As the one that got it working, I'm biased...

I'd say no to that (unless outvoted of course) on the grounds that a
manifest change *is* worthy of note. It means that the checksum has
changed on one of the files listed. 

On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 09:00:14AM +0100, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> 
> Thanks.  It seems to be working now.
> 
> Would it be possible to omit entries that mention only a manifest 
> fixing?  It's just that there's so many of them everytime (done by 
> scripts I presume) the email becomes really long.
> 
> With regards.
> 
> 
> --
> gentoo-dev <at> gentoo.org mailing list
> 

--

-- 

-----o()o---------------------------------------------
              |  http://www.gentoo.org/
              |  #gentoo-dev  on irc.freenode.net
Gentoo Dev    |  #gentoo-perl on irc.freenode.net
Perl Guy      |
              |  GnuPG Key ID:       AB5CED4E9E7F4E2E
(Continue reading)

Paul de Vrieze | 1 Aug 2003 14:11
Picon
Favicon

Re: Gentoo cvs changelog emails

On Friday 01 August 2003 12:52, Michael Cummings wrote:
> As the one that got it working, I'm biased...
>
> I'd say no to that (unless outvoted of course) on the grounds that a
> manifest change *is* worthy of note. It means that the checksum has
> changed on one of the files listed.
>

I would say that a change of manifest is caused by a change in the files that 
are "manifested", as such I believe there is not much added value to manifest 
changes.

Paul

--

-- 
Paul de Vrieze
Researcher
Mail: pauldv <at> cs.kun.nl
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
Michael Cummings | 1 Aug 2003 14:20
Picon
Favicon

Re: Gentoo cvs changelog emails

On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 06:52:33AM -0400, Michael Cummings wrote:
> As the one that got it working, I'm biased...

Egads, someone install an email nanny. "the one that got it working"
totally voids all of the work that kurt and rob did on getting this
going, and I more than humbly withdraw that statement - Kurt, Rob,
please accept my apologies, I wrote that in haste and should not have
taken any kind of singular credit - this was a group effort through and
through, and my part was only in the last stages. Someone please shoot
me.

--
gentoo-dev <at> gentoo.org mailing list

robh | 1 Aug 2003 13:59
Picon
Favicon

Re: Gentoo cvs changelog emails

Oh please,

All of you get a grip. The cvs change emails should list whats changed
in CVS. If a manifest has changed, it should be listed.

Filtering out things some deem un-importanet it stupid.

Get over it.

--

-- 
rob holland - [ tigger <at> gentoo.org ]
irc://irc.freenode.net/#gentoo as tigger^
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tigger/tigger <at> gentoo.org.asc
Dewet Diener | 1 Aug 2003 14:32

mod_perl with new perl module handling

Hi

I just want to cross-check with others on the list before reporting 
this as a bug, but I'm currently baffled by the following problem:

I just updated to perl-5.8.0-r12, after uninstalling the blocking 
modules and reinstalling them afterwards.  I also re-emerged 
locale-maketext-1.06, since the 1.03 distributed with perl is too old 
for RT[1].  Now, from regular command-line perl, everything works as 
intended -- RT's dependency checker reports that the installed version 
of Locale::Maketext >= 1.04.  However, trying to fire up apache2 and 
mod_perl, results in the following in my error_log:

[Fri Aug 01 14:20:40 2003] [error] Locale::Maketext version 1.04 
required--this is only version 1.03 at /usr/local/rt3/lib/RT/I18N.pm 
line 33.

This leads me to the conclusion that mod_perl is not scanning  <at> INC in 
the correct order, as command-line perl is.  Does anyone else have a 
similar experience using mod_perl and external modules?

I have tried everything thinkable -- remerging perl, libperl, mod_perl, 
apache2, etc. etc. ad nauseum;  I even ran the libperl-rebuilder.  No 
dice :(

Also, on a side note:  How can apache2 be unmasked, without 
mod_perl-1.99*?  I'm not referring to the fact that it is probably 
still unstable, but rather that it leaves no solution for people 
running apache1 to upgrade cleanly.

(Continue reading)

Aron Griffis | 1 Aug 2003 16:13
Picon
Favicon

Re: Gentoo cvs changelog emails

Paul de Vrieze wrote:	[Fri Aug 01 2003, 08:11:11AM EDT]
> I would say that a change of manifest is caused by a change in the
> files that are "manifested", as such I believe there is not much added
> value to manifest changes.

I'd prefer if the cvs changelog emails are left as-is.  They can be
filtered client-side if that's preferred.  Here's a working .procmailrc
recipe:

:0 fw
* ^From: cvs <at> gentoo.org
* ^Subject: gentoo-x86 CVS ChangeLog
|perl -0777 -pe 's/^2\d{3}-[^\n]*\n\n[^:]+:\s*(Manifest(,\s*)?)+:.*?(?=^2)//gms'

Aron

--
gentoo-dev <at> gentoo.org mailing list

Paul de Vrieze | 1 Aug 2003 16:16
Picon
Favicon

db-4.0.14 marked testing


Ok, 

I have finally marked db-4.0.14 as testing. This version now uses versioned 
symbols so that it can coexist with db-3. All packages that use db should 
automatically link to db-4 if they support it, and else link to db-3. If that 
is not the case (and there is no comment to that respect in the changelog) 
please report it in bugzilla.

The versioned symbols cause problems with a number of packages that don't know 
of the possibility. They look for the unversioned symbols in the library 
which are obviously not there. This could cause problems.

All headers are in version specific dirs. So if you need the db3 headers, they 
are in /usr/include/db3/db.h . To get best compatibility there are links in 
/usr/include that point to the latest version of the header. db-3.2.9-r6 is 
changed to follow this.

The same thing holds for libdb.so, it is automatically set up to point to the 
latest library. If you want to link db-3.2.9 then specify -ldb-3 instead of 
-ldb. Some packages try -ldb3 which will not work, as that is not the 
recommended way of db versioning.

Last the utilities that come with db also have the version number in their 
name, so db_archive is now called db3_archive for db3 and db4_archive for 
db4. This way they can coexist.

Paul

--

-- 
(Continue reading)

Peter Johanson | 1 Aug 2003 17:25
Picon
Favicon

gpsdrive-1.33 marked x86

hey all,

just a quick note that i marked gpsdrive-1.33 stable on x86. This update is
minor, and mainly fixes the online map downloading which when lacking
makes gpsdrive largely useless...

-pete

--

-- 
Peter Johanson
<latexer <at> gentoo.org>

Key ID = 0x6EFA3917
Key fingerprint = A90A 2518 57B1 9D20 9B71  A2FF 8649 439B 6EFA 3917

Gmane