bugzilla-daemon | 27 Feb 20:08 2015

[Bug 8862] Yum hangs when updating to smeserver-1.3-12.el6.sme.noarch

Please DO NOT REPLY to this mail or send email to the developers about this bug.

Please follow-up to Bugzilla via Bug 8862.

Have you checked the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)?

Please also take the time to read "How to Report Bugs Effectively"
Bug ID Summary Classification Product Version Hardware OS Status Severity Priority Component Assignee Reporter QA Contact
8862
Yum hangs when updating to smeserver-1.3-12.el6.sme.noarch
Contribs
SME Contribs
9.0
---
---
UNCONFIRMED
normal
P3
smeserver-sogo
federico.simoncelli <at> gmail.com
jesper.holck <at> ibsgaarden.dk
contribteam <at> lists.contribs.org

Created attachment 5016 [details] Copy of the terminal input and output when trying to update smesever-sogo with yum Using yum, and enabling the stephdl repo, I tried to update smeserver-sogo, but yum just stoppped, please see the attached copy of the terminal input andoutput.
You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are the QA Contact for the bug.
<div>
Please DO NOT REPLY to this mail or send email to the developers about this bug.<br><br>
Please follow-up to Bugzilla via <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Yum hangs when updating to smeserver-1.3-12.el6.sme.noarch" href="http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8862">Bug 8862</a>.<br><br>
Have you checked the <a href="http://wiki.contribs.org/SME_Server:Documentation:FAQ">Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)</a>?<br><br>
Please also take the time to read "<a href="http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html">How to Report Bugs Effectively</a>"<br><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>Bug ID
          <td>
<a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Yum hangs when updating to smeserver-1.3-12.el6.sme.noarch" href="http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8862">8862</a>
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Summary
          <td>Yum hangs when updating to smeserver-1.3-12.el6.sme.noarch
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Classification
          <td>Contribs
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Product
          <td>SME Contribs
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Version
          <td>9.0
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Hardware
          <td>---
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>OS
          <td>---
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Status
          <td>UNCONFIRMED
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Severity
          <td>normal
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Priority
          <td>P3
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Component
          <td>smeserver-sogo
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Assignee
          <td>federico.simoncelli <at> gmail.com
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Reporter
          <td>jesper.holck <at> ibsgaarden.dk
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>QA Contact
          <td>contribteam <at> lists.contribs.org
          </td>
        </tr>
</table>
<p>
        </p>
<div>
        Created <span class=""><a href="attachment.cgi?id=5016" name="attach_5016" title="Copy of the terminal input and output when trying to update smesever-sogo with yum">attachment 5016</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=5016&amp;action=edit" title="Copy of the terminal input and output when trying to update smesever-sogo with yum">[details]</a></span>
Copy of the terminal input and output when trying to update smesever-sogo with
yum

Using yum, and enabling the stephdl repo, I tried to update smeserver-sogo, but
yum just stoppped, please see the attached copy of the terminal input
andoutput.
        </div>

      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
</div>
bugzilla-daemon | 23 Feb 12:12 2015

[Bug 8859] FEATURE REQUEST: All permission map for the server in a single web form

Please DO NOT REPLY to this mail or send email to the developers about this bug.

Please follow-up to Bugzilla via Bug 8859.

Have you checked the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)?

Please also take the time to read "How to Report Bugs Effectively"
Bug ID Summary Classification Product Version Hardware OS Status Severity Priority Component Assignee Reporter QA Contact
8859
FEATURE REQUEST: All permission map for the server in a single web form
Contribs
SME Contribs
9.0
---
---
UNCONFIRMED
normal
P3
smeserver-shared-folders
daniel <at> firewall-services.com
jorge.gonzalez <at> daikon.es
contribteam <at> lists.contribs.org

This is not a bug report, but a feature request. First, I'd like to thank the writer of this contrib, for it solves THE single one problem which in my experience was limiting the SME Server, that is, the single group permission for each i-bay. With this contrib I can completely map my (user->shared_resource) permission matrix, without having to do anything special. First let's describe the (extremely common) scenario: - Let's say that I have 8 shares and 15 groups of people. The people is already assigned to groups, and I have perfectly documented which groups have access to which share, and what kind of access (RO, RW, No access). - For convenience, I have this info laid out as a table, where groups are vertically on the left, shares are horizontally on top, and I annotate one of (RO,RW,none) in each intersection of group-row + share-column. - If I want to deploy this configuration with SME Shared Folders (it was not possible to do it cleanly with I-bays), I need to walk the share list on top, and adjust the permissions for each and every group, for that share. This procedure needs to be done for each of the shared folders. - I have to go through configuration of all shares one by one. Now for the feature request :-): - It would be ABSOLUTELY GREAT if I could assign the permissions for ALL shares and ALL groups in one, single administrative page. Shares horizontally, groups and users vertically (as they are now), but all shares in one page. Maybe saher names would need to be laid out vertically, or at least at a 45 degree tilt, so that the matrix does not grow too much horizontally. - Intersections could be coloured in Blue (RO), Green (RW) and Grey (No access) for all groups, users and shares. - I would not touch the administrative page for each of the shares, but instead perhaps add a "Massive Share permissions Assignment" page to the admin interface, to implement this. With this feature implemented, this new page would be THE definitive permission page for the SME Server: all information related to group permission in just one view. Thanks in advance, and again thanks for the contrib. Regards Jorge
You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are the QA Contact for the bug.
<div>
Please DO NOT REPLY to this mail or send email to the developers about this bug.<br><br>
Please follow-up to Bugzilla via <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - FEATURE REQUEST: All permission map for the server in a single web form" href="http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8859">Bug 8859</a>.<br><br>
Have you checked the <a href="http://wiki.contribs.org/SME_Server:Documentation:FAQ">Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)</a>?<br><br>
Please also take the time to read "<a href="http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html">How to Report Bugs Effectively</a>"<br><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>Bug ID
          <td>
<a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - FEATURE REQUEST: All permission map for the server in a single web form" href="http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8859">8859</a>
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Summary
          <td>FEATURE REQUEST: All permission map for the server in a single web form
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Classification
          <td>Contribs
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Product
          <td>SME Contribs
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Version
          <td>9.0
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Hardware
          <td>---
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>OS
          <td>---
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Status
          <td>UNCONFIRMED
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Severity
          <td>normal
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Priority
          <td>P3
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Component
          <td>smeserver-shared-folders
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Assignee
          <td>daniel <at> firewall-services.com
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Reporter
          <td>jorge.gonzalez <at> daikon.es
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>QA Contact
          <td>contribteam <at> lists.contribs.org
          </td>
        </tr>
</table>
<p>
        </p>
<div>
        This is not a bug report, but a feature request.

First, I'd like to thank the writer of this contrib, for it solves THE single
one problem which in my experience was limiting the SME Server, that is, the
single group permission for each i-bay. With this contrib I can completely map
my (user-&gt;shared_resource) permission matrix, without having to do anything
special.

First let's describe the (extremely common) scenario:

- Let's say that I have 8 shares and 15 groups of people. The people is already
assigned to groups, and I have perfectly documented which groups have access to
which share, and what kind of access (RO, RW, No access).

- For convenience, I have this info laid out as a table, where groups are
vertically on the left, shares are horizontally on top, and I annotate one of
(RO,RW,none) in each intersection of group-row + share-column.

- If I want to deploy this configuration with SME Shared Folders (it was not
possible to do it cleanly with I-bays), I need to walk the share list on top,
and adjust the permissions for each and every group, for that share. This
procedure needs to be done for each of the shared folders.

- I have to go through configuration of all shares one by one.

Now for the feature request :-):

- It would be ABSOLUTELY GREAT if I could assign the permissions for ALL shares
and ALL groups in one, single administrative page. Shares horizontally, groups
and users vertically (as they are now), but all shares in one page. Maybe saher
names would need to be laid out vertically, or at least at a 45 degree tilt, so
that the matrix does not grow too much horizontally.

- Intersections could be coloured in Blue (RO), Green (RW) and Grey (No access)
for all groups, users and shares.

- I would not touch the administrative page for each of the shares, but instead
perhaps add a "Massive Share permissions Assignment" page to the admin
interface, to implement this.

With this feature implemented, this new page would be THE definitive permission
page for the SME Server: all information related to group permission in just
one view.

Thanks in advance, and again thanks for the contrib.
Regards
Jorge
        </div>

      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
</div>
bugzilla-daemon | 13 Feb 09:42 2015

[Bug 8847] Domain name hardcoded, not considering virtual domains

Please DO NOT REPLY to this mail or send email to the developers about this bug.

Please follow-up to Bugzilla via Bug 8847.

Have you checked the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)?

Please also take the time to read "How to Report Bugs Effectively"
Bug ID Summary Classification Product Version Hardware OS Status Severity Priority Component Assignee Reporter QA Contact
8847
Domain name hardcoded, not considering virtual domains
Contribs
SME Contribs
9.0
---
---
CONFIRMED
normal
P3
smeserver-sogo
federico.simoncelli <at> gmail.com
hsingfoo <at> gmail.com
contribteam <at> lists.contribs.org

The domain name being served by Sogo is hard coded and always defaults to the main domain name. Virtual domains or sub domains can not be 'selected'. Common practice is to have e.g. local.mydomain.com and add the real domain e.g. mydomain.com as a virtual domain, and the domain that Sogo will handle. Suggestion: Add db sogod key MailDomain and set this by default to the primary domain name. Change routines that use {$DomainName} to evaluate the new db key instead, and regenerate the conf file based on the MailDomain key. User can set the MailDomain key to the real mail domain instead of primary domain
You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are the QA Contact for the bug.
<div>
Please DO NOT REPLY to this mail or send email to the developers about this bug.<br><br>
Please follow-up to Bugzilla via <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_CONFIRMED " title="CONFIRMED - Domain name hardcoded, not considering virtual domains" href="http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8847">Bug 8847</a>.<br><br>
Have you checked the <a href="http://wiki.contribs.org/SME_Server:Documentation:FAQ">Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)</a>?<br><br>
Please also take the time to read "<a href="http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html">How to Report Bugs Effectively</a>"<br><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>Bug ID
          <td>
<a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_CONFIRMED " title="CONFIRMED - Domain name hardcoded, not considering virtual domains" href="http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8847">8847</a>
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Summary
          <td>Domain name hardcoded, not considering virtual domains
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Classification
          <td>Contribs
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Product
          <td>SME Contribs
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Version
          <td>9.0
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Hardware
          <td>---
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>OS
          <td>---
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Status
          <td>CONFIRMED
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Severity
          <td>normal
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Priority
          <td>P3
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Component
          <td>smeserver-sogo
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Assignee
          <td>federico.simoncelli <at> gmail.com
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Reporter
          <td>hsingfoo <at> gmail.com
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>QA Contact
          <td>contribteam <at> lists.contribs.org
          </td>
        </tr>
</table>
<p>
        </p>
<div>
        The domain name being served by Sogo is hard coded and always defaults to the
main domain name. Virtual domains or sub domains can not be 'selected'.

Common practice is to have e.g. local.mydomain.com and add the real domain e.g.
mydomain.com as a virtual domain, and the domain that Sogo will handle.

Suggestion:
Add db sogod key MailDomain and set this by default to the primary domain name.
Change routines that use {$DomainName} to evaluate the new db key instead, and
regenerate the conf file based on the MailDomain key.

User can set the MailDomain key to the real mail domain instead of primary
domain
        </div>

      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
</div>
bugzilla-daemon | 6 Feb 23:04 2015

[Bug 8838] Password aging won't activate

Please DO NOT REPLY to this mail or send email to the developers about this bug.

Please follow-up to Bugzilla via Bug 8838.

Have you checked the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)?

Please also take the time to read "How to Report Bugs Effectively"
Bug ID Summary Classification Product Version Hardware OS Status Severity Priority Component Assignee Reporter QA Contact CC Depends on
8838
Password aging won't activate
Contribs
SME Contribs
8.1
---
---
CONFIRMED
normal
P3
smeserver-password
support <at> dungog.net
stephdl <at> de-labrusse.fr
contribteam <at> lists.contribs.org
stephdl <at> de-labrusse.fr, vasarhelyizsolt <at> hotmail.com, zamboni <at> mind-at-work.it
8823

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #8823 +++ Sorry I have to report this, been using 1.0.0.34 on latest 8.1, but after updating LDAP details from directory and selecting update with new defaults existing users, the password contrib broke. It would not reactivate existing user, expire would show "never 7". Tried different setting and browsers, have read through the bugs, but finally downgraded to 1.0.0.25.el4 (couldn't find anything in between). It now gives a error saving password properties error but it seems to work. Any ideas how to fix 1.0.0.34? I think this is closely related to 5915. One other thing, old SME7 version seems to work much faster for 100 users, it only sets db values and doesn't run 5 events for each user, but it works.
You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are the QA Contact for the bug.
<div>
Please DO NOT REPLY to this mail or send email to the developers about this bug.<br><br>
Please follow-up to Bugzilla via <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_CONFIRMED " title="CONFIRMED - Password aging won't activate" href="http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8838">Bug 8838</a>.<br><br>
Have you checked the <a href="http://wiki.contribs.org/SME_Server:Documentation:FAQ">Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)</a>?<br><br>
Please also take the time to read "<a href="http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html">How to Report Bugs Effectively</a>"<br><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>Bug ID
          <td>
<a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_CONFIRMED " title="CONFIRMED - Password aging won't activate" href="http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8838">8838</a>
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Summary
          <td>Password aging won't activate
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Classification
          <td>Contribs
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Product
          <td>SME Contribs
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Version
          <td>8.1
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Hardware
          <td>---
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>OS
          <td>---
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Status
          <td>CONFIRMED
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Severity
          <td>normal
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Priority
          <td>P3
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Component
          <td>smeserver-password
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Assignee
          <td>support <at> dungog.net
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Reporter
          <td>stephdl <at> de-labrusse.fr
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>QA Contact
          <td>contribteam <at> lists.contribs.org
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>CC
          <td>stephdl <at> de-labrusse.fr, vasarhelyizsolt <at> hotmail.com, zamboni <at> mind-at-work.it
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Depends on
          <td>8823
          </td>
        </tr>
</table>
<p>
        </p>
<div>
        +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed" title="RESOLVED FIXED - Password aging won't activate" href="show_bug.cgi?id=8823">Bug #8823</a> +++

Sorry I have to report this, been using 1.0.0.34 on latest 8.1,
but after updating LDAP details from directory and selecting
update with new defaults existing users, the password contrib broke.

It would not reactivate existing user, expire would show "never 7".

Tried different setting and browsers, have read through the bugs,
but finally downgraded to 1.0.0.25.el4 (couldn't find anything in between).

It now gives a error saving password properties error but it seems to work.

Any ideas how to fix 1.0.0.34? I think this is closely related to 5915.

One other thing, old SME7 version seems to work much faster for 100 users,
it only sets db values and doesn't run 5 events for each user, but it works.
        </div>

      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
</div>
bugzilla-daemon | 6 Feb 09:34 2015

[Bug 8836] Global symbol "%smtpd" requires explicit package name

Please DO NOT REPLY to this mail or send email to the developers about this bug.

Please follow-up to Bugzilla via Bug 8836.

Have you checked the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)?

Please also take the time to read "How to Report Bugs Effectively"
Bug ID Summary Classification Product Version Hardware OS Status Severity Priority Component Assignee Reporter QA Contact
8836
Global symbol "%smtpd" requires explicit package name
Contribs
SME Contribs
8.1
---
---
CONFIRMED
normal
P3
smeserver-fetchmail
schirrms <at> schirrms.net
stephdl <at> de-labrusse.fr
contribteam <at> lists.contribs.org

# expand-template /etc/fetchmail ERROR in /etc/e-smith/templates//etc/fetchmail/90fetchmail: Program fragment delivered error <<Global symbol "%smtpd" requires explicit package name at /etc/e-smith/templates//etc/fetchmail/90fetchmail line 344. Global symbol "%smtpd" requires explicit package name at /etc/e-smith/templates//etc/fetchmail/90fetchmail line 344.>> at template line 1 ERROR: Template processing failed for //etc/fetchmail: 1 fragment generated errors at /sbin/e-smith/expand-template line 45 we crash the template /etc/fetchmail du to /etc/e-smith/templates//etc/fetchmail/90fetchmail the fix will be done quickly
You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are the QA Contact for the bug.
<div>
Please DO NOT REPLY to this mail or send email to the developers about this bug.<br><br>
Please follow-up to Bugzilla via <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_CONFIRMED " title='CONFIRMED - Global symbol "%smtpd" requires explicit package name' href="http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8836">Bug 8836</a>.<br><br>
Have you checked the <a href="http://wiki.contribs.org/SME_Server:Documentation:FAQ">Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)</a>?<br><br>
Please also take the time to read "<a href="http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html">How to Report Bugs Effectively</a>"<br><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>Bug ID
          <td>
<a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_CONFIRMED " title='CONFIRMED - Global symbol "%smtpd" requires explicit package name' href="http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8836">8836</a>
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Summary
          <td>Global symbol "%smtpd" requires explicit package name
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Classification
          <td>Contribs
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Product
          <td>SME Contribs
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Version
          <td>8.1
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Hardware
          <td>---
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>OS
          <td>---
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Status
          <td>CONFIRMED
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Severity
          <td>normal
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Priority
          <td>P3
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Component
          <td>smeserver-fetchmail
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Assignee
          <td>schirrms <at> schirrms.net
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>Reporter
          <td>stephdl <at> de-labrusse.fr
          </td>
        </tr>
<tr>QA Contact
          <td>contribteam <at> lists.contribs.org
          </td>
        </tr>
</table>
<p>
        </p>
<div>
        # expand-template /etc/fetchmail
ERROR in /etc/e-smith/templates//etc/fetchmail/90fetchmail: Program fragment
delivered error &lt;&lt;Global symbol "%smtpd" requires explicit package name at
/etc/e-smith/templates//etc/fetchmail/90fetchmail line 344.
Global symbol "%smtpd" requires explicit package name at
/etc/e-smith/templates//etc/fetchmail/90fetchmail line 344.&gt;&gt; at template line
1
ERROR: Template processing failed for //etc/fetchmail: 1 fragment generated
errors
 at /sbin/e-smith/expand-template line 45

we crash the template /etc/fetchmail du to
/etc/e-smith/templates//etc/fetchmail/90fetchmail

the fix will be done quickly
        </div>

      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
</div>
bugzilla-daemon | 5 Feb 05:46 2015

[Bug 8779] Keep a copy of all emails - not working

Please DO NOT REPLY to this mail or send email to the developers about this bug.

Please follow-up to Bugzilla via Bug 8779.

Have you checked the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)?

Please also take the time to read "How to Report Bugs Effectively"
changed bug 8779
What Removed Added
Status UNCONFIRMED CONFIRMED
CC   hsingfoo <at> gmail.com
Component smeserver-zarafa Wiki
Assignee dmay <at> myezserver.com docteam <at> lists.contribs.org
Product SME Contribs SME Server Documentation
QA Contact contribteam <at> lists.contribs.org  
Ever confirmed   1

Comment # 7 on bug 8779 from Based on comment #5 morphing into documentation bug. Set status.
You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are the QA Contact for the bug.
<div>
Please DO NOT REPLY to this mail or send email to the developers about this bug.<br><br>
Please follow-up to Bugzilla via <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_CONFIRMED " title="CONFIRMED - Keep a copy of all emails - not working" href="http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8779">Bug 8779</a>.<br><br>
Have you checked the <a href="http://wiki.contribs.org/SME_Server:Documentation:FAQ">Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)</a>?<br><br>
Please also take the time to read "<a href="http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html">How to Report Bugs Effectively</a>"<br><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:hsingfoo <at> gmail.com" title="Hsing-Foo Wang &lt;hsingfoo <at> gmail.com&gt;"> <span class="fn">Hsing-Foo Wang</span></a>
</span> changed
              <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_CONFIRMED " title="CONFIRMED - Keep a copy of all emails - not working" href="http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8779">bug 8779</a>
          <br><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>What
            Removed
            Added
          </tr>
<tr>
<td>Status</td>
           <td>UNCONFIRMED
           </td>
           <td>CONFIRMED
           </td>
         </tr>
<tr>
<td>CC</td>
           <td>
               &nbsp;
           </td>
           <td>hsingfoo <at> gmail.com
           </td>
         </tr>
<tr>
<td>Component</td>
           <td>smeserver-zarafa
           </td>
           <td>Wiki
           </td>
         </tr>
<tr>
<td>Assignee</td>
           <td>dmay <at> myezserver.com
           </td>
           <td>docteam <at> lists.contribs.org
           </td>
         </tr>
<tr>
<td>Product</td>
           <td>SME Contribs
           </td>
           <td>SME Server Documentation
           </td>
         </tr>
<tr>
<td>QA Contact</td>
           <td>contribteam <at> lists.contribs.org
           </td>
           <td>
               &nbsp;
           </td>
         </tr>
<tr>
<td>Ever confirmed</td>
           <td>
               &nbsp;
           </td>
           <td>1
           </td>
         </tr>
</table>
<p>
        </p>
<div>
            <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_CONFIRMED " title="CONFIRMED - Keep a copy of all emails - not working" href="http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8779#c7">Comment # 7</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_CONFIRMED " title="CONFIRMED - Keep a copy of all emails - not working" href="http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8779">bug 8779</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:hsingfoo <at> gmail.com" title="Hsing-Foo Wang &lt;hsingfoo <at> gmail.com&gt;"> <span class="fn">Hsing-Foo Wang</span></a>
</span>
        Based on <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=8779#c5">comment #5</a> morphing into documentation bug. Set status.
        </div>

      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
</div>
bugzilla-daemon | 3 Feb 19:37 2015

[Bug 8828] fail2ban fail to start

Please DO NOT REPLY to this mail or send email to the developers about this bug.

Please follow-up to Bugzilla via Bug 8828.

Have you checked the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)?

Please also take the time to read "How to Report Bugs Effectively"

Comment # 5 on bug 8828 from hi working good thank you Daniel
You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are the QA Contact for the bug.
<div>
Please DO NOT REPLY to this mail or send email to the developers about this bug.<br><br>
Please follow-up to Bugzilla via <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - fail2ban fail to start" href="http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8828">Bug 8828</a>.<br><br>
Have you checked the <a href="http://wiki.contribs.org/SME_Server:Documentation:FAQ">Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)</a>?<br><br>
Please also take the time to read "<a href="http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html">How to Report Bugs Effectively</a>"<br><p>
        </p>
<div>
            <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - fail2ban fail to start" href="http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8828#c5">Comment # 5</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - fail2ban fail to start" href="http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8828">bug 8828</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:sibony88 <at> gmail.com" title="david &lt;sibony88 <at> gmail.com&gt;"> <span class="fn">david</span></a>
</span>
        hi
working good thank you Daniel
        </div>

      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
</div>
bugzilla-daemon | 3 Feb 17:47 2015

[Bug 8828] fail2ban fail to start

Please DO NOT REPLY to this mail or send email to the developers about this bug.

Please follow-up to Bugzilla via Bug 8828.

Have you checked the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)?

Please also take the time to read "How to Report Bugs Effectively"

Comment # 4 on bug 8828 from (In reply to david from comment #3) > hi and thank you > the output is : > > [root <at> sme9 ~]# rpm -qa | grep -P 'sope|sogo' > [root <at> sme9 ~]# db configuration show sogod | grep -v DbPassword > sogod=service > ACLsSendEMailNotifications=no > AdminUsers=admin > DraftsFolder=Drafts > SentFolder=Sent > TCPPort=20000 > status=enabled > [root <at> sme9 ~]# > > i dont have sogo installed so why does the db configuration show sogo ? You had it installed once. Maybe you reinstalled the server and restored from a backup since, but the DB is still here. For now, you can do: db configuration setprop sogod status disabled signal-event fail2ban-conf And fail2ban will start, but I'll add some checks to be sure the jail isn't enabled if the log file doesn't exist
You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are the QA Contact for the bug.
<div>
Please DO NOT REPLY to this mail or send email to the developers about this bug.<br><br>
Please follow-up to Bugzilla via <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - fail2ban fail to start" href="http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8828">Bug 8828</a>.<br><br>
Have you checked the <a href="http://wiki.contribs.org/SME_Server:Documentation:FAQ">Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)</a>?<br><br>
Please also take the time to read "<a href="http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html">How to Report Bugs Effectively</a>"<br><p>
        </p>
<div>
            <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - fail2ban fail to start" href="http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8828#c4">Comment # 4</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - fail2ban fail to start" href="http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8828">bug 8828</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:daniel <at> firewall-services.com" title="Daniel B. &lt;daniel <at> firewall-services.com&gt;"> <span class="fn">Daniel B.</span></a>
</span>
        (In reply to david from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=8828#c3">comment #3</a>)
<span class="quote">&gt; hi and thank you 
&gt; the output is :
&gt; 
&gt; [root <at> sme9 ~]# rpm -qa | grep -P 'sope|sogo'
&gt; [root <at> sme9 ~]# db configuration show sogod | grep -v DbPassword
&gt; sogod=service
&gt;     ACLsSendEMailNotifications=no
&gt;     AdminUsers=admin
&gt;     DraftsFolder=Drafts
&gt;     SentFolder=Sent
&gt;     TCPPort=20000
&gt;     status=enabled
&gt; [root <at> sme9 ~]#
&gt; 
&gt; i dont have sogo installed so why does the db configuration show sogo ?</span>

You had it installed once. Maybe you reinstalled the server and restored from a
backup since, but the DB is still here.

For now, you can do:

db configuration setprop sogod status disabled
signal-event fail2ban-conf

And fail2ban will start, but I'll add some checks to be sure the jail isn't
enabled if the log file doesn't exist
        </div>

      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
</div>
bugzilla-daemon | 3 Feb 17:44 2015

[Bug 8828] fail2ban fail to start

Please DO NOT REPLY to this mail or send email to the developers about this bug.

Please follow-up to Bugzilla via Bug 8828.

Have you checked the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)?

Please also take the time to read "How to Report Bugs Effectively"

Comment # 3 on bug 8828 from hi and thank you the output is : [root <at> sme9 ~]# rpm -qa | grep -P 'sope|sogo' [root <at> sme9 ~]# db configuration show sogod | grep -v DbPassword sogod=service ACLsSendEMailNotifications=no AdminUsers=admin DraftsFolder=Drafts SentFolder=Sent TCPPort=20000 status=enabled [root <at> sme9 ~]# i dont have sogo installed so why does the db configuration show sogo ?
You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are the QA Contact for the bug.
<div>
Please DO NOT REPLY to this mail or send email to the developers about this bug.<br><br>
Please follow-up to Bugzilla via <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - fail2ban fail to start" href="http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8828">Bug 8828</a>.<br><br>
Have you checked the <a href="http://wiki.contribs.org/SME_Server:Documentation:FAQ">Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)</a>?<br><br>
Please also take the time to read "<a href="http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html">How to Report Bugs Effectively</a>"<br><p>
        </p>
<div>
            <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - fail2ban fail to start" href="http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8828#c3">Comment # 3</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - fail2ban fail to start" href="http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8828">bug 8828</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:sibony88 <at> gmail.com" title="david &lt;sibony88 <at> gmail.com&gt;"> <span class="fn">david</span></a>
</span>
        hi and thank you 
the output is :

[root <at> sme9 ~]# rpm -qa | grep -P 'sope|sogo'
[root <at> sme9 ~]# db configuration show sogod | grep -v DbPassword
sogod=service
    ACLsSendEMailNotifications=no
    AdminUsers=admin
    DraftsFolder=Drafts
    SentFolder=Sent
    TCPPort=20000
    status=enabled
[root <at> sme9 ~]#

i dont have sogo installed so why does the db configuration show sogo ?
        </div>

      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
</div>
bugzilla-daemon | 3 Feb 15:57 2015

[Bug 8828] fail2ban fail to start

Please DO NOT REPLY to this mail or send email to the developers about this bug.

Please follow-up to Bugzilla via Bug 8828.

Have you checked the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)?

Please also take the time to read "How to Report Bugs Effectively"

Comment # 2 on bug 8828 from Thanks for opening this bug. The SOGo jail should only be enabled if you have SOGo installed and enabled, in which case you should have the logfile /var/log/sogo.log. Please, show: rpm -qa | grep -P 'sope|sogo' db configuration show sogod | grep -v DbPassword
You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are the QA Contact for the bug.
<div>
Please DO NOT REPLY to this mail or send email to the developers about this bug.<br><br>
Please follow-up to Bugzilla via <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - fail2ban fail to start" href="http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8828">Bug 8828</a>.<br><br>
Have you checked the <a href="http://wiki.contribs.org/SME_Server:Documentation:FAQ">Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)</a>?<br><br>
Please also take the time to read "<a href="http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html">How to Report Bugs Effectively</a>"<br><p>
        </p>
<div>
            <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - fail2ban fail to start" href="http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8828#c2">Comment # 2</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - fail2ban fail to start" href="http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8828">bug 8828</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:daniel <at> firewall-services.com" title="Daniel B. &lt;daniel <at> firewall-services.com&gt;"> <span class="fn">Daniel B.</span></a>
</span>
        Thanks for opening this bug. The SOGo jail should only be enabled if you have
SOGo installed and enabled, in which case you should have the logfile
/var/log/sogo.log.

Please, show:

rpm -qa | grep -P 'sope|sogo'
db configuration show sogod | grep -v DbPassword
        </div>

      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
</div>
bugzilla-daemon | 2 Feb 19:57 2015

[Bug 8828] fail2ban fail to start

Please DO NOT REPLY to this mail or send email to the developers about this bug.

Please follow-up to Bugzilla via Bug 8828.

Have you checked the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)?

Please also take the time to read "How to Report Bugs Effectively"
changed bug 8828
What Removed Added
CC   stephdl <at> de-labrusse.fr
Component e-smith-*/smeserver-* packages smeserver-fail2ban
Assignee bugteam <at> lists.contribs.org daniel <at> firewall-services.com
Product SME Server 9.X SME Contribs
QA Contact bugteam <at> lists.contribs.org contribteam <at> lists.contribs.org

Comment # 1 on bug 8828 from moving to contribs
You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are the QA Contact for the bug.
<div>
Please DO NOT REPLY to this mail or send email to the developers about this bug.<br><br>
Please follow-up to Bugzilla via <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - fail2ban fail to start" href="http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8828">Bug 8828</a>.<br><br>
Have you checked the <a href="http://wiki.contribs.org/SME_Server:Documentation:FAQ">Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)</a>?<br><br>
Please also take the time to read "<a href="http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html">How to Report Bugs Effectively</a>"<br><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:stephdl <at> de-labrusse.fr" title="Stephane de Labrusse &lt;stephdl <at> de-labrusse.fr&gt;"> <span class="fn">Stephane de Labrusse</span></a>
</span> changed
              <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - fail2ban fail to start" href="http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8828">bug 8828</a>
          <br><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>What
            Removed
            Added
          </tr>
<tr>
<td>CC</td>
           <td>
               &nbsp;
           </td>
           <td>stephdl <at> de-labrusse.fr
           </td>
         </tr>
<tr>
<td>Component</td>
           <td>e-smith-*/smeserver-* packages
           </td>
           <td>smeserver-fail2ban
           </td>
         </tr>
<tr>
<td>Assignee</td>
           <td>bugteam <at> lists.contribs.org
           </td>
           <td>daniel <at> firewall-services.com
           </td>
         </tr>
<tr>
<td>Product</td>
           <td>SME Server 9.X
           </td>
           <td>SME Contribs
           </td>
         </tr>
<tr>
<td>QA Contact</td>
           <td>bugteam <at> lists.contribs.org
           </td>
           <td>contribteam <at> lists.contribs.org
           </td>
         </tr>
</table>
<p>
        </p>
<div>
            <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - fail2ban fail to start" href="http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8828#c1">Comment # 1</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - fail2ban fail to start" href="http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8828">bug 8828</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:stephdl <at> de-labrusse.fr" title="Stephane de Labrusse &lt;stephdl <at> de-labrusse.fr&gt;"> <span class="fn">Stephane de Labrusse</span></a>
</span>
        moving to contribs
        </div>

      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
</div>

Gmane