bug report from grml-medium

Hi,

How to do bug report from grml-medium? 

I mean, I can't paste into link2, and I don't want to re-type everything character by character. 

Does anyone know some small-footprint browser that can let me paste into web forms?

Thanks

--

-- 
Tong (remove underscore(s) to reply)
  http://xpt.sourceforge.net/techdocs/
  http://xpt.sourceforge.net/tools/

Re: bug report from grml-medium

* Tong Sun <mlist4suntong <at> yahoo.com> [Mon May 31, 2010 at 08:55:10PM -0700]:

> How to do bug report from grml-medium? 

> I mean, I can't paste into link2, and I don't want to re-type everything character by character. 

> Does anyone know some small-footprint browser that can let me paste into web forms?

Does using a paste service like http://paste.debian.net/ or
http://paste.pocoo.org/ and providing the URL in the bugreport work
for you? ftp/scp/...-ing the output to one of your own systems and
reporting the bug from the non-Grml system afterwards is another
option.

Reminds me that I'd like to have a nice paste client on Grml,
I just filled http://bts.grml.org/grml/issue864

regards,
-mika-

* Tong Sun <mlist4suntong <at> yahoo.com> [Mon May 31, 2010 at 08:55:10PM -0700]:

> How to do bug report from grml-medium? 

> I mean, I can't paste into link2, and I don't want to re-type everything character by character. 

> Does anyone know some small-footprint browser that can let me paste into web forms?

Does using a paste service like http://paste.debian.net/ or

Re: bug report from grml-medium

On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 10:37:12 +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:

> Reminds me that I'd like to have a nice paste client on Grml, I just
> filled http://bts.grml.org/grml/issue864

That'd be great.

Thanks!

--

-- 
Tong (remove underscore(s) to reply)
  http://xpt.sourceforge.net/techdocs/
  http://xpt.sourceforge.net/tools/

Re: bug report from grml-medium

Tong Sun <mlist4suntong <at> yahoo.com> wrote:

> Does anyone know some small-footprint browser that can let me paste into web forms?

lynx

Re: bug report from grml-medium

On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 16:45:08 +1000, Jason White wrote:

>> Does anyone know some small-footprint browser that can let me paste
>> into web forms?
> 
> lynx

Thanks Jason.

 <at> mika, lynx is a tool that I miss in grml-medium for other reasons as 
well. Can we have it in future releases?

Thanks

--

-- 
Tong (remove underscore(s) to reply)
  http://xpt.sourceforge.net/techdocs/
  http://xpt.sourceforge.net/tools/

aufs-modules for grml 2010.04 release

On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:49:35 +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:

> Grml 2010.04 with codename Grmlmonster

Hi, 

The Grml 2010.04 uses kernel v2.6.33, but I didn't find the corresponding 
aufs-modules-2.6.33 or aufs-modules-2.6.33-grml64 packages. 

How do I get aufs support under Grml 2010.04?

Thanks

--

-- 
Tong (remove underscore(s) to reply)
  http://xpt.sourceforge.net/techdocs/
  http://xpt.sourceforge.net/tools/

Re: aufs-modules for grml 2010.04 release

* T o n g <mlist4suntong <at> yahoo.com> [Sun Jun 06, 2010 at 04:54:49AM +0000]:
> On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:49:35 +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:

> > Grml 2010.04 with codename Grmlmonster

> The Grml 2010.04 uses kernel v2.6.33, but I didn't find the corresponding 
> aufs-modules-2.6.33 or aufs-modules-2.6.33-grml64 packages. 

> How do I get aufs support under Grml 2010.04?

It's included in the kernel:

% zgrep AUFS /proc/config.gz | grep =y
CONFIG_AUFS_FS=y
CONFIG_AUFS_BRANCH_MAX_127=y
CONFIG_AUFS_BDEV_LOOP=y

regards,
-mika-

* T o n g <mlist4suntong <at> yahoo.com> [Sun Jun 06, 2010 at 04:54:49AM +0000]:
> On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:49:35 +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:

> > Grml 2010.04 with codename Grmlmonster

> The Grml 2010.04 uses kernel v2.6.33, but I didn't find the corresponding 
> aufs-modules-2.6.33 or aufs-modules-2.6.33-grml64 packages. 

> How do I get aufs support under Grml 2010.04?

Re: aufs-modules for grml 2010.04 release

On Sun, 06 Jun 2010 22:19:04 +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:

>> How do I get aufs support under Grml 2010.04?
> 
> It's included in the kernel:

Ok, no stand-alone aufs-modules any more. Nice.

--

-- 
Tong (remove underscore(s) to reply)
  http://xpt.sourceforge.net/techdocs/
  http://xpt.sourceforge.net/tools/

Re: aufs-modules for grml 2010.04 release

* T o n g <mlist4suntong <at> yahoo.com> [Sun Jun 06, 2010 at 10:48:58PM +0000]:
> On Sun, 06 Jun 2010 22:19:04 +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:

> >> How do I get aufs support under Grml 2010.04?

> > It's included in the kernel:

> Ok, no stand-alone aufs-modules any more. Nice.

Jepp, though no guarantees that it will stay the same in the future. :)

The in-kernel approach has the advantage that it has less effort for
the user. On the other hand you're bound to a specific aufs version
(without updating the kernel you won't get a newer aufs version) and
debugging isn't as easy as well.

Let's see what upcoming kernels and patches bring. :)

regards,
-mika-

* T o n g <mlist4suntong <at> yahoo.com> [Sun Jun 06, 2010 at 10:48:58PM +0000]:
> On Sun, 06 Jun 2010 22:19:04 +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:

> >> How do I get aufs support under Grml 2010.04?

> > It's included in the kernel:

> Ok, no stand-alone aufs-modules any more. Nice.

Re: [PATCH] grml-chroot enhance: fail-safe when umount fails

Tong Sun wrote:
> Revisiting an old issue.
> 
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Michael Gebetsroither
> <gebi <at> sbox.tugraz.at <mailto:gebi <at> sbox.tugraz.at>> wrote:
> 
>     Tong Sun wrote:
> 
>     NACK as this causes problems with multiple grml-chroots running.
> 
>     > ---
>     >  usr_sbin/grml-chroot |    2 +-
>     >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>     >
>     > diff --git a/usr_sbin/grml-chroot b/usr_sbin/grml-chroot
>     > index eb9cefc..bce9c50 100755
>     > --- a/usr_sbin/grml-chroot
>     > +++ b/usr_sbin/grml-chroot
>     >  <at>  <at>  -56,7 +56,7  <at>  <at>  function mountit
>     >  function umount_all
>     >  {
>     >      for i in $MOUNTED_; do
>     > -        umount "${DEST_}/$i"
>     > +        umount "${DEST_}/$i" || umount -l "${DEST_}/$i"
>     >      done
>     >  }
>     >
> 
> 
> In this case, the sentence in man, "After COMMAND exits, mounts are