Re: z shell question
martin yazdzik <yazdzik <at> nyct.net>
2008-02-10 11:27:40 GMT
mv ~/.zshrc ~/.zshrc.unused
cp /etc/skel/.zshrc ~/.zshrc
Indeed, Mika, as always, you repaired the issue -
In the meantime, since that version of grub, 0.97-30 has the known bug that running grub-update changes hdd location descriptions, the subscibers need to know not to use that version from debian unstable.
The question, on a different level, could be re-phrased as to why it takes udevd more than twenty-five seconds to populate when booting via lilo, since both boot loaders should work. An eternity when one boots the laptop five times a day....
That is why I suppose the ski patrol runs the slopes before the public ;) and we run experimental partitions.....
Thanks again for the immense amount of work you do to give all of us a totally reliable distro.
Best,
Martin
|
Chi troppo vuole nulla stringe
|
<div>
<br><blockquote type="CITE">
mv ~/.zshrc ~/.zshrc.unused<br>cp /etc/skel/.zshrc ~/.zshrc<br>
</blockquote>
<br><br>
Indeed, Mika, as always, you repaired the issue - <br><br>
In the meantime, since that version of grub, 0.97-30 has the known bug that running grub-update changes hdd location descriptions, the subscibers need to know not to use that version from debian unstable. <br><br>
The question, on a different level, could be re-phrased as to why it takes udevd more than twenty-five seconds to populate when booting via lilo, since both boot loaders should work. An eternity when one boots the laptop five times a day....<br><br>
That is why I suppose the ski patrol runs the slopes before the public ;) and we run experimental partitions.....<br><br>
Thanks again for the immense amount of work you do to give all of us a totally reliable distro.<br><br>
Best,<br>
Martin<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%"><tr>
<td>
Chi troppo vuole nulla stringe
</td>
</tr></table>
</div>