headers
64 Studio | 1 Aug 2009 20:45
Favicon

[64 Studio] #504: update Zynaddsubfx to 2.4.0

#504: update Zynaddsubfx to 2.4.0
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
 Reporter:  calamandrei@...  |       Owner:  free      
     Type:  enhancement            |      Status:  new       
 Priority:  normal                 |   Milestone:            
Component:  packages               |     Version:  3.0 beta 3
 Severity:  minor                  |    Keywords:            
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
 A new version of zynaddsubfx is out with a lot of improvements, check out
 http://zynaddsubfx.sourceforge.net/news.html

--

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.64studio.com/64studio/ticket/504>
64 Studio <http://trac.64studio.com/64studio>
Permalink | Reply | 7 comments |
headers
Ralf Mardorf | 4 Aug 2009 12:21

X settings for 3.0-beta3, previously Urgent: Ubuntu's X settings

Hi :)

I guess this is something the developers list should take note off. If 
somebody from the developers list should reply, please reply to the 
users list and/or directly to me.

Gustin Johnson wrote:
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>   
>> Ubuntu only has a mystic 'xorg.conf' different to the configurations by 
>> other Linux distros.
>>     
> Yes, this is an attempt to make things easier.

After I set the proprietary ATI driver without success, I tried 
different xorg.conf settings for the VESA driver I used before and 
couldn't get back a resolution of 1024x768. It's non-transparent were or 
in which way the settings needs to be done. I tried different settings 
for xorg.conf, all settings failed. I've got a backup of my 64 Studio, 
but don't know which files I need to restore. Just restoring xorg.conf 
fails. For me this is an attempt to make Linux become as non-transparent 
as Windows, but Windows has got the advantage to work and not to fail 
for issues like this, so transparency isn't needed from this point of 
view. I don't know any other Linux distro that makes easy to do things 
as complicated as Ubuntu does.

Do I need to restore the whole 64 Studio by my backup, just because the 
proprietary ATI stuff failed? If this would happen for the Debian based 
2.1, I only need to restore the xorg.conf and for doing this I even 
don't need a backup of the xorg.conf.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Ralf Mardorf | 4 Aug 2009 17:53

Re: X settings for 3.0-beta3, previously Urgent: Ubuntu's X settings


> Hi :)
>
> I guess this is something the developers list should take note off. If 
> somebody from the developers list should reply, please reply to the 
> users list and/or directly to me.
>
> Gustin Johnson wrote:
>> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>  
>>> Ubuntu only has a mystic 'xorg.conf' different to the configurations 
>>> by other Linux distros.
>>>     
>> Yes, this is an attempt to make things easier.
>
> After I set the proprietary ATI driver without success, I tried 
> different xorg.conf settings for the VESA driver I used before and 
> couldn't get back a resolution of 1024x768. It's non-transparent were 
> or in which way the settings needs to be done. I tried different 
> settings for xorg.conf, all settings failed. I've got a backup of my 
> 64 Studio, but don't know which files I need to restore. Just 
> restoring xorg.conf fails. For me this is an attempt to make Linux 
> become as non-transparent as Windows, but Windows has got the 
> advantage to work and not to fail for issues like this, so 
> transparency isn't needed from this point of view. I don't know any 
> other Linux distro that makes easy to do things as complicated as 
> Ubuntu does.
>
> Do I need to restore the whole 64 Studio by my backup, just because 
> the proprietary ATI stuff failed? If this would happen for the Debian
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Daniel James | 5 Aug 2009 12:38
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: [64 Studio] #504: update Zynaddsubfx to 2.4.0

Hi calamandrei,

>  A new version of zynaddsubfx is out with a lot of improvements, check out
>  http://zynaddsubfx.sourceforge.net/news.html

That's excellent news, I'm really pleased this synth is being actively 
developed again.

Cheers!

Daniel
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Ralf Mardorf | 5 Aug 2009 19:49

Re: Driver for Linux x86_64 Integrated/Motherboard Radeon Xpress 1250

*Hi Mario* :)

thank you for the quick reply. I guess I got your email, before I sent 
my request ;). I'll use a search engine to get some knowhow and in 
addition I'll ask the 64 Studio developers, if they can post a howto for 
noobs to their homepage someday.

I hope it's okay that I also sent this private mail to the mailing 
lists, to avoid mistakes by forwarding your information in my on words, 
but on broken English.

Cheers,
Ralf

*Hi lists* :)

please read Mario's information, maybe this is something from interest 
for the distro.

My requests are available here:
http://lists.64studio.com/pipermail/64studio-users/2009-August/003443.html
http://lists.64studio.com/pipermail/64studio-users/2009-August/003444.html

There's only a useful output in 
/var/lib/dkms/fglrx/8.593/build/make.sh.log, but not in make.log.

spinymouse-sudo <at> 64studio:~$ cat /var/lib/dkms/fglrx/8.593/build/make.sh.log
AMD kernel module generator version 2.1
.
Active kernel:
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
64 Studio | 5 Aug 2009 22:49
Favicon

Re: [64 Studio] #489: Ardour 2.8 crashes on rhythm ferret launch with unhandled exception

#489: Ardour 2.8 crashes on rhythm ferret launch with unhandled exception
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  daniel@...  |        Owner:  free
     Type:  defect               |       Status:  new 
 Priority:  highest              |    Milestone:  3.0 
Component:  packages             |      Version:      
 Severity:  blocker              |   Resolution:      
 Keywords:                       |  
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------

Comment(by quentin@...):

 This is working correctly in ardour 2.8.2

 When ardour 2.8.2 or 2.8.3 (when released) could get added to the 64
 Studio repositories, this ticket can be closed.

--

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.64studio.com/64studio/ticket/489#comment:1>
64 Studio <http://trac.64studio.com/64studio>
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Daniel James | 6 Aug 2009 12:02
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: [64 Studio] #489: Ardour 2.8 crashes on rhythm ferret launch with unhandled exception

Hi Quentin,

> This is working correctly in ardour 2.8.2

Great! I had reported the bug upstream, so it's good to know the Ardour
team are responsive to these crashing bugs.

> When ardour 2.8.2 or 2.8.3 (when released) could get added to the 64 
> Studio repositories, this ticket can be closed.

Yep, we definitely need this for 3.0.

Cheers!

Daniel
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane