headers
Gustin Johnson | 1 Jun 2009 02:31
Picon

Re: [64studio-devel] Rtirq


Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi :)
> 
> I still try to fix the trouble with sync on my machine. Does anybody 
> have experiences with http://alsa.opensrc.org/Rtirq? As I reported 
> yesterday, unfortunately Rui's site still is off-line.
> 
I have been in the field without internet access for two days, but as of
right now the site is alive and kicking.

> I see that the script is installed to 3.0-beta3 by default. Is there 
> anything I can do, to check if everything is optimized?

Optimization is a deep rabbit hole, make sure it works first.
Optimization is also not going to solve your problems, crappy and buggy
hardware is still crappy and buggy even after optimization.
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Gustin Johnson | 1 Jun 2009 05:07
Picon

Re: [64studio-users] Rtirq


Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> Hi :)
>>
>> I still try to fix the trouble with sync on my machine. Does anybody 
>> have experiences with http://alsa.opensrc.org/Rtirq? As I reported 
>> yesterday, unfortunately Rui's site still is off-line.
>>
>> I see that the script is installed to 3.0-beta3 by default. Is there 
>> anything I can do, to check if everything is optimized?
>>
>> Best,
>> Ralf
> 
> PS:
> 
> I'm confused about the rtirq package, because I can't find the script.
> 
> /.
> /usr
> /usr/share
> /usr/share/doc
> /usr/share/doc/rtirq
> /usr/share/doc/rtirq/copyright
> /usr/share/doc/rtirq/changelog.Debian.gz

Obviously these are documentation.

> /etc
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |
headers
Ralf Mardorf | 1 Jun 2009 10:20

Re: [64studio-users] Rtirq


> In the future, the "file" utility is pretty handy:
> file  /etc/init.d/rtirq
> /etc/init.d/rtirq: Bourne-Again shell script text executable
Hi Gustin :)

before I wrote my request I tried to run it, but it didn't work :(, but 
it might be because I made typos, similar to the one I did some seconds ago:

spinymouse-sudo <at> 64studio:~$ /etc/init.d/rtirq ststus

  Usage: /etc/init.d/rtirq {[re]start|stop|reset|status}

:D

Maybe the RTPRIO of the USB MIDI DEVICE is bad?

spinymouse-sudo <at> 64studio:~$ /etc/init.d/rtirq status

  PID CLS RTPRIO  NI PRI %CPU STAT COMMAND   
  411 FF      90   - 130  0.0 S<   IRQ-8   RTC
 2349 FF      85   - 125  0.0 S<   IRQ-21  PCI SOUND CARD
  971 FF      80   - 120  0.0 S<   IRQ-16   
 1366 FF      80   - 120  0.0 S<   IRQ-19   
 1370 FF      79   - 119  0.0 S<   IRQ-17  USB MIDI DEVICE
 1399 FF      78   - 118  0.0 S<   IRQ-18   
  403 FF      75   - 115  0.0 S<   IRQ-1   
  402 FF      74   - 114  0.0 S<   IRQ-12   
  104 FF      50   -  90  0.0 S<   IRQ-9   
  995 FF      50   -  90  0.0 S<   IRQ-22
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Ralf Mardorf | 1 Jun 2009 10:31

Re: Rtirq

Or is the IRQ of the timer bad? What does the sync the RTC or the timer?

Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> In the future, the "file" utility is pretty handy:
>> file  /etc/init.d/rtirq
>> /etc/init.d/rtirq: Bourne-Again shell script text executable
>>     
> Hi Gustin :)
>
> before I wrote my request I tried to run it, but it didn't work :(, but 
> it might be because I made typos, similar to the one I did some seconds ago:
>
> spinymouse-sudo <at> 64studio:~$ /etc/init.d/rtirq ststus
>
>   Usage: /etc/init.d/rtirq {[re]start|stop|reset|status}
>
> :D
>
> Maybe the RTPRIO of the USB MIDI DEVICE is bad?
>
> spinymouse-sudo <at> 64studio:~$ /etc/init.d/rtirq status
>
>   PID CLS RTPRIO  NI PRI %CPU STAT COMMAND   
>   411 FF      90   - 130  0.0 S<   IRQ-8   RTC
>  2349 FF      85   - 125  0.0 S<   IRQ-21  PCI SOUND CARD
>   971 FF      80   - 120  0.0 S<   IRQ-16   
>  1366 FF      80   - 120  0.0 S<   IRQ-19   
>  1370 FF      79   - 119  0.0 S<   IRQ-17  USB MIDI DEVICE
>  1399 FF      78   - 118  0.0 S<   IRQ-18   
>   403 FF      75   - 115  0.0 S<   IRQ-1
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Ralf Mardorf | 1 Jun 2009 10:46

Re: PS: Qtractor wishlist

Hi :)

I guess this mail also belongs to the 64 Studio lists, but not to other 
lists.

Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
> On Sun, May 31, 2009 23:15, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>   
>> I guess that you're still busy by programming some 'standard' features,
>> so I won't write to you 'please add this, please add that'.
>>
>> I wrote that it's a PITA, to do settings, because of seg faults. It's
>> not too hard, it's able to work relaxed, so don't worry about this.
>>
>>     
>
> laetst qtractor 0.4.1 has a nasty bug that makes it crash half of the
> times you load a session with midi tracks. it is even more probable to
> crash if  you have a multi-core machine (cpus > 2). this nasty has been
> already squashed in cvs.
>
> you're welcome to check out and build from qtractor cvs (current version
> as 0.4.1.1339) where bugs get nailed on a daily basis. you can also
> experience a few new features as well ;)
>   

The 64 Studio beta version don't makes the jack.h available by it's 
repositories and because I read about troubles when compiling Jack, I 
won't compile Jack myself and that's why I can't compile Qtractor at the 
moment. I'm running Qtractor using jackdmp on a dual-core machine.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
64 Studio | 1 Jun 2009 15:28
Favicon

Re: [64 Studio] #488: Add Tascam US 122 & US 122L support (was: Add Tascam US 122 & US 122L support (to kernel))

#488: Add Tascam US 122 & US 122L support
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
 Reporter:  rosea.grammostola@...  |        Owner:  free
     Type:  enhancement                  |       Status:  new 
 Priority:  normal                       |    Milestone:  3.0 
Component:  build                        |      Version:      
 Severity:  normal                       |   Resolution:      
 Keywords:                               |  
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
Changes (by daniel@...):

  * milestone:  => 3.0

Comment:

 The bug for the US 122 is simply that the udev rules for this device are
 not present in the udev package. The U122L has a different chip inside and
 is probably harder to support.

--

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.64studio.com/64studio/ticket/488#comment:1>
64 Studio <http://trac.64studio.com/64studio>
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
64 Studio | 1 Jun 2009 16:07
Favicon

Re: [64 Studio] #488: Add Tascam US 122 & US 122L support

#488: Add Tascam US 122 & US 122L support
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
 Reporter:  rosea.grammostola@...  |        Owner:  free
     Type:  enhancement                  |       Status:  new 
 Priority:  normal                       |    Milestone:  3.0 
Component:  build                        |      Version:      
 Severity:  normal                       |   Resolution:      
 Keywords:                               |  
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------

Comment(by rosea.grammostola@...):

 "that the udev rules for this device are not present in the udev package"

 ok, so how to fix this?

 AFAIK US122L does work in Jaunty now:

 http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1127282&highlight=tascam+jaunty

--

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.64studio.com/64studio/ticket/488#comment:2>
64 Studio <http://trac.64studio.com/64studio>
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Michael Alexander | 1 Jun 2009 16:14

Re: [64 Studio] #488: Add Tascam US 122 & US 122L support (was: Add Tascam US 122 & US 122L support (to kernel))

Way Cool!

Looks like I'm drivin' down to Bakersfield today to pick one of these up, and I can now FINALLY start recording my stuff using Linux instead of windows!!!





On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 6:28 AM, 64 Studio <tickets-ljUBoSVpJTpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
#488: Add Tascam US 122 & US 122L support
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
 Reporter:  rosea.grammostola-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org  |        Owner:  free
    Type:  enhancement                  |       Status:  new
 Priority:  normal                       |    Milestone:  3.0
Component:  build                        |      Version:
 Severity:  normal                       |   Resolution:
 Keywords:                               |
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
Changes (by daniel-ljUBoSVpJTpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org):

 * milestone:  => 3.0


Comment:

 The bug for the US 122 is simply that the udev rules for this device are
 not present in the udev package. The U122L has a different chip inside and
 is probably harder to support.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.64studio.com/64studio/ticket/488#comment:1>
64 Studio <http://trac.64studio.com/64studio>

_______________________________________________
64studio-devel mailing list
64studio-devel <at> lists.64studio.com
http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-devel

_______________________________________________
64studio-devel mailing list
64studio-devel@...
http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-devel
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
64 Studio | 1 Jun 2009 17:20
Favicon

Re: [64 Studio] #488: Add Tascam US 122 & US 122L support

#488: Add Tascam US 122 & US 122L support
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
 Reporter:  rosea.grammostola@...  |        Owner:  free
     Type:  enhancement                  |       Status:  new 
 Priority:  normal                       |    Milestone:  3.0 
Component:  build                        |      Version:      
 Severity:  normal                       |   Resolution:      
 Keywords:                               |  
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------

Comment(by daniel@...):

 You could file a bug against Debian's udev package for US122 support. The
 US122L has a completely different driver, see:
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/329437

--

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.64studio.com/64studio/ticket/488#comment:3>
64 Studio <http://trac.64studio.com/64studio>
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Daniel James | 1 Jun 2009 17:20
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: [64 Studio] #488: Add Tascam US 122 & US 122L support

Hi Michael,

> Looks like I'm drivin' down to Bakersfield today to pick one of these 
> up, and I can now FINALLY start recording my stuff using Linux instead 
> of windows!!!

If you buy a US122L you will probably have some tweaking to do, see:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/329437

Eventually I hope we will support both models out of the box. As an 
alternative you could look at getting a class-compliant USB audio 
interface, there are many to choose from.

Cheers!

Daniel
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane