Hello, I'm on etch, I've finally managed to make a deb-pakage of this sampler that I wanted to try, though it uses scons for building, i haven't been able to build it. I must confess I've used alien to convert a rpm package (shame !), but it works and seems stable. It'd be interresting to have it in the stable branch, so If you are interested , i can send it to you. Cheers Marc
Hi Greger, you wrote: > hello all, > I am new to this list so I want to ask if this is a good place to ask > practical questions concerning adjusting recording soundlevel for a > hammerfall soundcard? 64studio-users@... is probably a better place to ask if you want help from other users. This list is more useful for discussing software fixes and solutions with other developers and testers. http://64studio.com/forum/ is also worth checking out. Also; just go ahead and ask your question. The more concise and straightforward your question is, the better we can answer it. People are generally very helpful and friendly round here, so don't be afraid to be direct and to the point.cheers, tim
Hi All, I did an apt-get update and apt-get upgrade tonight and got the message: The following packages have been kept back: aeolus ardour blender I don't use synaptic, so I don't think that's the problem. (There is evidently a bug if you switch between synaptic and apt, sorry I can't remember the details that my friend patiently explained to me.) Is there something wrong with my sources.list.d/64studio.list file? I'm trying to keep a straight 64 Studio "testing" on my machine, the only other things I've brought in were the codecs from debian-multimedia, and Apache, MySQL and a few Perl modules from Etch. Btw, if I'm getting the codecs from debian-multimedia, don't I need to include that line when I upgrade? The packages from etch will be covered by the security updates, so I comment the regular etch line out. As an aside, I'm thinking that for those of use who are used to using apt instead of synaptic, it might be helpful to put up a page explaining the differences with Debian, which just uses /etc/apt/sources.list instead of the other files. $ cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/64studio.list # Stable 64 Studio repository #deb http://apt.64studio.com/64studio/stable 64studio main(Continue reading)
Hi all, http://lists.64studio.com/pipermail/64studio-devel/2008-May/005693.html 1: synaptic This is with a clean install...2.1rc..upgraded to 64studio testing. If you upgrade 2.1rc, you will get a clean upgrade, wine will need re-upgrade on completion. You may not have a clean install? and this can make a big difference. Up to the release below the etch/builds upgraded the same as the 2.1rc. I have followed the method half a dozen times now, The first try gave problems, The rest were fine, You have to follow Free's instruction to the letter. If you dont remove non-free sources / 3rd party repositories The upgrade gets more difficult. 2: synaptic This release is the move back to Audacity 1.3.3-1 (64studio_master_i386.iso 28-May-2008 14:46 798M) I don't know why but the upgrade changed with this etch/build. (libpam0g) gave errors. It stops synaptic, and you can't continue. I closed synaptic, opened a terminal and ran #apt-get -f install and then restarted synaptic to complete the upgrade. which it did. Sources used for upgrade: deb http://apt.64studio.com/64studio/stable/ 64studio main deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ etch main deb http://apt.64studio.com/64studio/testing/ 64studio main(Continue reading)
Hi Susan, Susan Dridi wrote: > Hi All, > > I did an apt-get update and apt-get upgrade tonight and got the message: > > The following packages have been kept back: > aeolus ardour blender > > I am using "i386". The 64studio here, the one I keep at 64studio testing, is keeping these back. blender flac gigedit if I type in a terminal # dpkg -l | grep "ardour" ardour = 2.4.1-1~etch1 are you on the same version? even if I enable 64studio backports, I have no ardour on hold. > I don't use synaptic, so I don't think that's the problem. (There is > evidently a bug if you switch between synaptic and apt, sorry I can't > remember the details that my friend patiently explained to me.) > > Thank you for this info, I am going to google to find out more. The upgrade to lenny I did this morning (on a testing disk) was much better when I didn't touch synaptic. I am going to have to find out about this bug(Continue reading)
Hi all, .....Day 3..... (64studio_master_i386.iso 28-May-2008 14:46 798M) (audacity 1.3.3-1~etch1). Susan wrote: (There is evidently a bug if you switch between synaptic and apt)..... If you stay with synaptic OR apt the upgrade is fine. My first impression confirms the apt/synaptic bug. The Image change was not relevant to the upgrade problems I saw with the first synaptic upgrade. Mixing synaptic and apt was the problem. # cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/64studio.list # Stable 64 Studio repository deb http://apt.64studio.com/64studio/stable/ 64studio main # Debian deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ etch main contrib non-free deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ lenny main contrib non-free deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ lenny main contrib non-free # Debian Sid # deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ sid main contrib non-free # Security updates deb http://security.debian.org/ etch/updates main deb http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main contrib deb-src http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main contrib(Continue reading)
Hi Dave, |--==> dave writes: d> # apt-get install qsynth d> dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/qsynth_0.2.5-2.2_i386.deb d> (--unpack): d> trying to overwrite `/usr/share/applications/qsynth.desktop', which is d> also in package 64studio-themes d> # apt-get remove --purge 64studio-themes d> The following packages will be REMOVED d> 64studio* 64studio-themes* d> # apt-get install qsynth d> Setting up qsynth (0.2.5-2.2) ... Thanks for the report, I didn't notice this bug when I performed my tests. It can be fixed in the testing branch, but unfortunately the ISO images of the final 2.0 have already been built.. I'm not sure what to do. Ciao! Free
Hi Free, > I'm not sure > what to do. This may affect users going from 2.0 to 2.1 by apt. I need to test for this and report back. If it does turn out to be a problem, I hope we can fix it in the stable branch and make a 2.1.1 image. My install tests of the 'final' 2.1 images went perfectly, by the way. The only bugs are the known bugs
Hi Dave and All, dave wrote: > Hi Susan, > > Susan Dridi wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I did an apt-get update and apt-get upgrade tonight and got the message: >> >> The following packages have been kept back: >> aeolus ardour blender >> >> > I am using "i386". > The 64studio here, the one I keep at 64studio testing, > is keeping these back. > blender flac gigedit > if I type in a terminal > # dpkg -l | grep "ardour" > ardour = 2.4.1-1~etch1 > are you on the same version? I forgot to say, I'm using the 64 bit version of 64 Studio 2.1. I installed 2.0 and then upgraded to 2.1. $sudo dpkg -l | grep "ardour" 2.0.3-2~bpo.1(Continue reading)
Hi, d> # apt-get install qsynth d> dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/qsynth_0.2.5-2.2_i386.deb d> (--unpack): d> trying to overwrite `/usr/share/applications/qsynth.desktop', which is d> also in package 64studio-themes d> # apt-get remove --purge 64studio-themes d> The following packages will be REMOVED d> 64studio* 64studio-themes* d> # apt-get install qsynth d> Setting up qsynth (0.2.5-2.2) ... FE> Thanks for the report, I didn't notice this bug when I performed my FE> tests. It can be fixed in the testing branch, but unfortunately the FE> ISO images of the final 2.0 have already been built.. I'm not sure FE> what to do. Thinking twice the best thing would be to tell users to set our lenny backports repository too before upgrading: deb http://apt.64studio.com/backports lenny-backports main when doing the upgrade. I've already uploaded a fixed 64studio-themes package there, and we will need it anyway to offer major upgrades like a new kernel. Please let me know if this fixes the problem for you. Ciao!(Continue reading)
RSS Feed2 | |
|---|---|
21 | |
1 | |
1 | |
12 | |
4 | |
24 | |
19 | |
13 | |
28 | |
7 | |
6 | |
3 | |
7 | |
80 | |
108 | |
7 | |
23 | |
123 | |
50 | |
62 | |
156 | |
147 | |
92 | |
7 | |
15 | |
22 | |
12 | |
30 | |
56 | |
75 | |
136 | |
61 | |
83 | |
161 | |
67 | |
14 | |
31 | |
96 | |
76 | |
205 | |
210 | |
308 | |
535 | |
241 | |
147 |
