Moritz Muehlenhoff | 1 Nov 08:31 2011
Picon

Bug#647252: CVE-2011-4063: Remote crash vulnerability in SIP channel driver

Package: asterisk
Severity: grave
Tags: security

Please see http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/security/AST-2011-012.html

Apparently stable/oldstable is not affected, please but double-check.

Cheers,
        Moritz
Debian FTP Masters | 1 Nov 17:33 2011
Picon

ptlib_2.6.7-2.1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable


Accepted:
libpt-dbg_2.6.7-2.1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
  to main/p/ptlib/libpt-dbg_2.6.7-2.1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
libpt-dev_2.6.7-2.1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
  to main/p/ptlib/libpt-dev_2.6.7-2.1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
libpt-doc_2.6.7-2.1_all.deb
  to main/p/ptlib/libpt-doc_2.6.7-2.1_all.deb
libpt2.6.7_2.6.7-2.1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
  to main/p/ptlib/libpt2.6.7_2.6.7-2.1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
ptlib_2.6.7-2.1.debian.tar.gz
  to main/p/ptlib/ptlib_2.6.7-2.1.debian.tar.gz
ptlib_2.6.7-2.1.dsc
  to main/p/ptlib/ptlib_2.6.7-2.1.dsc

Override entries for your package:
libpt-dbg_2.6.7-2.1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb - extra debug
libpt-dev_2.6.7-2.1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb - optional libdevel
libpt-doc_2.6.7-2.1_all.deb - extra doc
libpt2.6.7_2.6.7-2.1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb - optional libs
ptlib_2.6.7-2.1.dsc - source libs

Announcing to debian-devel-changes <at> lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 634502 637944 

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Debian Bug Tracking System | 1 Nov 17:36 2011
Picon

Bug#634502: marked as done (ptlib: debian/control uses hardcoded list of non-Linux architectures)

Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2011 16:33:39 +0000
with message-id <E1RLHHP-0002ty-L0 <at> franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#634502: fixed in ptlib 2.6.7-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #634502,
regarding ptlib: debian/control uses hardcoded list of non-Linux architectures
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner <at> bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

--

-- 
634502: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=634502
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner <at> bugs.debian.org with problems
Picon
From: Robert Millan <rmh <at> debian.org>
Subject: ptlib: debian/control uses hardcoded list of non-Linux architectures
Date: 2011-07-18 14:12:04 GMT
(Continue reading)

Debian Bug Tracking System | 1 Nov 17:36 2011
Picon

Bug#637944: marked as done (FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64)

Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2011 16:33:39 +0000
with message-id <E1RLHHP-0002u5-Lw <at> franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#637944: fixed in ptlib 2.6.7-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #637944,
regarding FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner <at> bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

--

-- 
637944: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637944
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner <at> bugs.debian.org with problems
Picon
From: Robert Millan <rmh <at> debian.org>
Subject: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64
Date: 2011-08-15 21:45:16 GMT
(Continue reading)

Debian testing watch | 1 Nov 17:39 2011
Picon

rtpproxy 1.2.1-1.1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the rtpproxy source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.2.1-1
  Current version:  1.2.1-1.1

--

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.
Debian FTP Masters | 1 Nov 18:26 2011
Picon

Processing of opal_3.6.8~dfsg-2.1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes

opal_3.6.8~dfsg-2.1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  opal_3.6.8~dfsg-2.1.dsc
  opal_3.6.8~dfsg-2.1.debian.tar.gz
  libopal3.6.8_3.6.8~dfsg-2.1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
  libopal-dev_3.6.8~dfsg-2.1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
  simpleopal_3.6.8~dfsg-2.1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
  libopal-dbg_3.6.8~dfsg-2.1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
  libopal-doc_3.6.8~dfsg-2.1_all.deb

Greetings,

	Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
Debian FTP Masters | 1 Nov 18:33 2011
Picon

opal_3.6.8~dfsg-2.1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable


Accepted:
libopal-dbg_3.6.8~dfsg-2.1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
  to main/o/opal/libopal-dbg_3.6.8~dfsg-2.1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
libopal-dev_3.6.8~dfsg-2.1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
  to main/o/opal/libopal-dev_3.6.8~dfsg-2.1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
libopal-doc_3.6.8~dfsg-2.1_all.deb
  to main/o/opal/libopal-doc_3.6.8~dfsg-2.1_all.deb
libopal3.6.8_3.6.8~dfsg-2.1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
  to main/o/opal/libopal3.6.8_3.6.8~dfsg-2.1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
opal_3.6.8~dfsg-2.1.debian.tar.gz
  to main/o/opal/opal_3.6.8~dfsg-2.1.debian.tar.gz
opal_3.6.8~dfsg-2.1.dsc
  to main/o/opal/opal_3.6.8~dfsg-2.1.dsc
simpleopal_3.6.8~dfsg-2.1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
  to main/o/opal/simpleopal_3.6.8~dfsg-2.1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb

Override entries for your package:
libopal-dbg_3.6.8~dfsg-2.1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb - extra debug
libopal-dev_3.6.8~dfsg-2.1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb - optional libdevel
libopal-doc_3.6.8~dfsg-2.1_all.deb - extra doc
libopal3.6.8_3.6.8~dfsg-2.1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb - optional libs
opal_3.6.8~dfsg-2.1.dsc - source libs
simpleopal_3.6.8~dfsg-2.1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb - optional comm

Announcing to debian-devel-changes <at> lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 637955 

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
(Continue reading)

Debian Bug Tracking System | 1 Nov 18:36 2011
Picon

Bug#637955: marked as done (FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64)

Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2011 17:33:15 +0000
with message-id <E1RLID5-0000vw-7T <at> franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#637955: fixed in opal 3.6.8~dfsg-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #637955,
regarding FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner <at> bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

--

-- 
637955: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637955
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner <at> bugs.debian.org with problems
Picon
From: Robert Millan <rmh <at> debian.org>
Subject: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64
Date: 2011-08-15 23:22:11 GMT
(Continue reading)

Tzafrir Cohen | 2 Nov 09:43 2011

Bug#647008: asterisk-modules: uninstallable on s390 (libvpb0 removed)

On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:32:37PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Package: asterisk-modules
> Version: 1:1.8.4.4~dfsg-2
> Severity: serious
> 
> Hi,
> 
> vpb-driver (and thus libvpb0) was removed on s390 (see #644051).  This
> means that asterisk-modules is now uninstallable on that architecture in
> unstable (and by extension asterisk).

Right now asterisk has in the build dependency:

  libvpb-dev [linux-any]

If I want to encode this extra limitation (!s390 !s390x) I would have to
use either:

  libvpb-dev [!hurd-any !kfreebsd-any !s390 !s390x]

or:

  libvpb-dev [linux-any], libvpb-dev [!s390 !s390x]

Which of those would be preffered?

As a side note, vpb-driver has: "Architecture: any" for all of its
packages, even though it is linux-specific, AFAIK (and fails to build on
hurd and kfreebsd[1])

(Continue reading)

Ron | 2 Nov 12:12 2011
Picon

Bug#647008: asterisk-modules: uninstallable on s390 (libvpb0 removed)

On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 10:43:19AM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:32:37PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Package: asterisk-modules
> > Version: 1:1.8.4.4~dfsg-2
> > Severity: serious
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > vpb-driver (and thus libvpb0) was removed on s390 (see #644051).  This
> > means that asterisk-modules is now uninstallable on that architecture in
> > unstable (and by extension asterisk).
> 
> Right now asterisk has in the build dependency:
> 
>   libvpb-dev [linux-any]
> 
> If I want to encode this extra limitation (!s390 !s390x) I would have to
> use either:
> 
>   libvpb-dev [!hurd-any !kfreebsd-any !s390 !s390x]
> 
> or:
> 
>   libvpb-dev [linux-any], libvpb-dev [!s390 !s390x]
> 
> Which of those would be preffered?
> 
> 
> As a side note, vpb-driver has: "Architecture: any" for all of its
> packages, even though it is linux-specific, AFAIK (and fails to build on
(Continue reading)


Gmane