1 Oct 2005 23:38
Re: New xterm packages.
Thomas Dickey <dickey <at> saltmine.radix.net>
2005-10-01 21:38:47 GMT
2005-10-01 21:38:47 GMT
David Mart?nez Moreno <ender <at> debian.org> wrote: > El Mi=E9rcoles, 28 de Septiembre de 2005 02:52, Thomas Dickey escribi=F3: >> David Mart?nez Moreno <ender <at> debian.org> wrote: >> > But I could not infer the configure options from the Imakefile. >> >> The Imakefile is essentially hardcoded - originally a few things such as >> the logging and active icon were defined there, but the configure script >> turns on/off all of the compiled features. > I thought that. Could you please tell me if more or less the options that > send are the same that were in use until now? You have far more experience > with the Imakefile than me... While at the same time, I don't know that much about the Debian packaging. However, you seem to be referring to this line in the ".diff" file: + ./configure --enable-logging --enable-wide-chars --enable-luit --enable-256-color --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man The --enable-luit is redundant (it's set by --enable-wide-chars). Otherwise I don't see anything odd. >> The patch to the resource file is about all I'd expect to see for >> customization anyway, other than a selection of configure options. > Yes, it is, apart from some typos I found. I am attaching them to this mail. thanks (will review/etc) -- --(Continue reading)
RSS Feed