Bug#653620: marked as done (packages.debian.org: [INTL:pl] Please enable Polish translation)

Your message dated Sun, 1 Jan 2012 12:29:52 +0100
with message-id <20120101112952.GA21496 <at> anguilla.debian.or.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#653620: packages.debian.org: [INTL:pl] Please enable Polish translation
has caused the Debian Bug report #653620,
regarding packages.debian.org: [INTL:pl] Please enable Polish translation
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner <at> bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

--

-- 
653620: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653620
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner <at> bugs.debian.org with problems

From: Michał Kułach <michal.kulach <at> gmail.com>
Subject: packages.debian.org: [INTL:pl] Please enable Polish translation
Date: 2011-12-29 20:32:28 GMT

Re: changelog to tzdata missing

Holger Wansing <linux <at> wansing-online.de>
> MJ Ray <mjr <at> phonecoop.coop> wrote:
> > Latest version in http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/t/tzdata/
> > is 2011n-0squeeze1 - anyone know why?
> 
> See
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=650941#34

That explains it. I found some similar bugs when searching but not
that one.

Thanks!
--

-- 
MJ Ray (slef), member of www.software.coop, a for-more-than-profit co-op.
http://koha-community.org supporter, web and library systems developer.
In My Opinion Only: see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html
Available for hire (including development) at http://www.software.coop/

Bug#654205: Please optimize the site for handheld devices

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: www.debian.org <at> packages.debian.org
Usertags: design

----- Forwarded message from Martin Zobel-Helas <zobel <at> ftbfs.de> -----

Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 18:21:04 +0100
From: Martin Zobel-Helas <zobel <at> ftbfs.de>
To: debian-www <at> lists.debian.org
Subject: www.debian.org website optimization for handheld devices

Hi,

i played around a bit with our main page today, to have it better
viewable on handheld devices like cell phones.

The change i did was quite trivial:

--- index.html.1        2011-11-17 15:41:29.000000000 +0000
+++ index.html  2011-11-18 16:00:48.000000000 +0000
 <at>  <at>  -7,6 +7,9  <at>  <at> 
   <meta name="Description" content="Debian GNU/Linux is a free
distribution of the GNU/Linux operating system. It is maintained and
updated through the work of many users who volunteer their time and
effort.">
   <meta name="Generator" content="WML 2.0.11 (19-Aug-2006)">
   <meta name="Modified" content="2011-11-17 15:41:19">
+  <meta name="viewport" content="initial-scale=1.0;maximum-scale=1.0; minimum-scale=1.0;
user-scalable=0; width=device-width">

Who's using Debian?

Name of organization: Wavecon GmbH

Organization type: Commercial:

Debian is the defaultoperatingsystem at Wavecon, that is installed for
customers and own usage. We have about 25 Workstations and 1500 Servers
running Debian oder Debian-based systems

--

-- 
Wavecon GmbH | Ludwigstrasse 2 | 90763 Fuerth
HR/HRN: 10780 | GF: Cemil Degirmenci
Ust-ID: DE251398082| Telefon 0800-WAVECON (+49 911-1206581)
Mobil: +49 176 206 4 77 55 | Fax +49 911 212 923 3
Web: wavecon.de | E-Mail + Jabber cd <at> wavecon.de

Bug#654246: packages.debian.org: 'similar packages' includes other suites

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

It was pointed out to me that
<http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/aufs-tools> shows 'similar
packages' including module packages for Linux 2.6.26, which are
incompatible with this version of aufs-tools.  This is not in itself
something that could reasonably be determined by the web site.
However, these packages are not part of 'wheezy' and would not
normally be present or available on a testing/unstable installation.

Please limit the suggestion of similar packages to the selected suite.

Ben.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

www.debian.org: converting the website to UTF-8)

Your message dated Mon, 02 Jan 2012 16:32:32 -0400
with message-id <4F021460.7070700 <at> debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#567781: Moving the website to UTF-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #567781,
regarding www.debian.org: converting the website to UTF-8
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner <at> bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

--

-- 
567781: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=567781
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner <at> bugs.debian.org with problems

From: Simon Paillard <simon.paillard <at> resel.enst-bretagne.fr>
Subject: www.debian.org: converting the website to UTF-8
Date: 2010-01-31 12:19:31 GMT
(Continue reading)

www.debian.org: Please provide source for pdf-graphics in devel/debian-med/News/2009/20090214.wml

On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 05:29:31AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > >> [1] devel/debian-med/News/2009/authorstat_med.pdf

The creation of this pdf is based on the content of a database.
It is not possible to include this into the Makefile to create
translated WML pages.

> > >>     devel/debian-med/News/2009/dmstats1.pdf

This can be created using the data file available at

   http://people.debian.org/~tille/talks/200808_med/debian_med_stats.dat

using the script

   http://people.debian.org/~tille/talks/200808_med/debian_med_stats1

> The files were made by Andreas Tille, and their inclusion was discussed in the
> following thread.
> 
>   http://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2008/10/msg00040.html
> 
> Andreas can probably give more details, but following URLs are relevant to the
> generation of the graphes.
> 
>   http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2009/01/msg00161.html
> 
>   http://people.debian.org/~tille/liststats

These graps are manually updated each month.  The location has moved to

Re: Who's *still* or *not* using Debian?

Hi,

Le 15/11/2011 21:11, David Prévot a écrit :
> On 14/11/2011 14:47, Kåre Thor Olsen wrote:

>> I think some organisations may have guidelines restricting what can be
>> published on their website, or perhaps they don't want to give this
>> information on their own website

I removed this optional request from the proposed patch, and just
committed the “don't specify version” mention as suggested by Andrei:
actually, asking for a Debian mention usually lead to some
misunderstanding, and as Kåre suggested, some (maybe half) of them can't
comply, so this information might be useless anyway :/. Of course, I
also removed it from the mails I continue sending to users.

Status update : focusing on the 125 oldest users submitted, I already
managed to update 32 (2 more on their way) and remove 39. Some of the
remaining ones have already replied, but most of the them haven't (I
already contacted twice at least two persons of these organizations).
It's more difficult than I thought to remove data from a user who
doesn't respond, especially when you find evidences that they are still
using Debian (e.g. to run their public web server), so I continue to try
and contact them (but it becomes more and more difficult to actually
find someone willing to respond to such request).

Not answering the “Automating the handling of various partners lists”
part of the mail right now, but let me just state that I find Andrei's
ideas great. Please note that mirrors [1] and CD vendors [2] are already
handled with a submission form, and that the first one even trigger a

Bug#388141: Handling the copyright mess of the website

Hi,

Since this year began with the website being free of the old charset
mess, I wonder if we could continue, and try to address as much as we
can of the copyright/license mess, starting with the copyright.

Talking on IRC with Rhonda and others, we came to the conclusion that
even if we'll have trouble to handle the previous mess, nothing should
stop us to address the future one.

I don't know what would be the best approach for future contributors
(i.e. I don't know if we'll need to ask them explicitly for their
consent, or if a page on our website would be enough), but for current
and past contributors, we need their consent.

We could contact every current contributor, and ask them if they are OK to:
- grant copyright of their future contributions to SPI;
- grant copyright of their past contributions to SPI.

If they refuse to grant copyright of their future contributions to SPI,
or if they don't respond, the first action would be to remove their
commit access, so starting at <date> 2012, all the new content of the
website will be copyright SPI.

We'll then have to contact previous contributors (that don't have commit
access anymore) and ask them to grant copyright of their previous
contributions to SPI.

Once the cleanup is done for future contribution, starting at <date>, we
can tag all previous pages that are not fully copyright SPI, using a tag

Please Confirm that you are rfdsfds fdsfdsdsf of fdsfdsfdsfdsfdsf,