Bug#235513: marked as done (webpage claims razor woody package depends on packages not in woody)

Your message dated Mon, 1 Mar 2004 00:53:15 +0100
with message-id <20040229235315.GJ1519 <at> djpig.de>
and subject line Bug#235513: webpage claims razor woody package depends on packages not in woody
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Feb 2004 21:11:32 +0000
>From debian-bugs <at> brisammon.fastmail.fm Sun Feb 29 13:11:32 2004
Return-path: <debian-bugs <at> brisammon.fastmail.fm>
Received: from deneb.fac.cs.cmu.edu [128.2.198.60] 
	by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AxYDk-0006Rp-00; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 13:11:32 -0800
Received: from ASYNC1-CS1.NET.CS.CMU.EDU ([128.2.188.129])
          by deneb.fac.cs.cmu.edu id aa29492; 29 Feb 2004 16:11 EST
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 (debian 2.5-1) with nmh-1.0.4+dev
From: Brian Sammon <debian-bugs <at> brisammon.fastmail.fm>
To: submit <at> bugs.debian.org
Subject: webpage claims razor woody package depends on packages not in woody
Mime-Version: 1.0

www.debian.org: Missing 'How to report a bug in Debian' link)

Your message dated Mon, 1 Mar 2004 04:35:48 +0100
with message-id <20040301033547.GO1519 <at> djpig.de>
and subject line Bug#235277: www.debian.org: Missing 'How to report a bug in Debian' link
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Feb 2004 11:45:17 +0000
>From runesk <at> trondheim.linpro.no Sat Feb 28 03:45:17 2004
Return-path: <runesk <at> trondheim.linpro.no>
Received: from bender.trd.linpro.no (trondheim.linpro.no) [195.1.156.67] 
	by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Ax2uC-0003Gp-00; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 03:45:16 -0800
Received: (qmail 2077 invoked by uid 7065); 28 Feb 2004 11:45:12 -0000
Message-ID: <20040228114512.2076.qmail <at> trondheim.linpro.no>
From: "Rune Nordbøe Skillingstad" <runesk <at> linpro.no>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit <at> bugs.debian.org>
Subject: www.debian.org: Missing 'How to report a bug in Debian' link
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 12:45:12 +0100

www.debian.org: translation statistics pages lack distrib.po

Package: www.debian.org
Version: 20040301
Severity: normal

http://www.debian.org/devel/website/stats/<lang> pages have
statistics on po/*.po files.  However, it lacks distrib.po.

I imagine webwml/english/po/Makefile lacks something on distrib.po.

---
Tomohiro KUBOTA <kubota <at> debian.org>
http://www.debian.or.jp/~kubota/

www.debian.org: translation statistics pages lack distrib.po)

Your message dated Mon, 1 Mar 2004 13:31:34 +0100
with message-id <20040301123134.GB826 <at> djpig.de>
and subject line Bug#235590: www.debian.org: translation statistics pages lack distrib.po
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Mar 2004 11:01:09 +0000
>From debian <at> tmail.plala.or.jp Mon Mar 01 03:01:08 2004
Return-path: <debian <at> tmail.plala.or.jp>
Received: from c151240.vh.plala.or.jp (mps8.plala.or.jp) [210.150.151.240] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AxlAa-0006xI-00; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 03:01:08 -0800
Received: from msvc2.plala.or.jp ([172.23.8.210]) by mps8.plala.or.jp
          with SMTP
          id <20040301110103.WQBL18669.mps8.plala.or.jp <at> msvc2.plala.or.jp>
          for <submit <at> bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 20:01:03 +0900
Received: ( 15234 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2004 20:01:03 +0900
Received: from unknown (HELO mpb2.plala.or.jp) (172.23.8.17)
  by msvc2 with SMTP; 1 Mar 2004 20:01:01 +0900

www.debian.org: ports/alpha is out of date and original author does not respond

Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2004-03-01
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

Hello,
the ports/alpha tree is quite old, with lots of outdated information.
It should be updated. I corrected some problems in the attached diff
files.

Further I noticed that news.wml is not linked from anywhere. I would
suggest removing it, because the latest information in it is not very
peculiar to alpha and the other entries are no longer news. This would
also remove "postgresql-noopt.diff.gz" which is quite outdated,
especially considering that even when potato was released the
README.Debian suggested *not* to use this postgres but rather to
upgrade to a 7.x version (The reason I started testing back then).

Also a recent discussion[1] centered around the SRM-HOWTO, MILO-HOWTO and 
FAQ-HOWTO, which are not linked, and should be removed. I am currently
updating them, but now I even see bugfixes on them instead of their
removal and/or correspondence to me; especially since the SRM-HOWTO will
soon be uploaded as part of the aboot-package.

My diff contains several notes starting with "#HK" which are comments
and/or suggestions.

I contacted the orignal site author (Chris Chimelis) a month ago but
he has not even confirmed the arrival of my mail, therefor I post this
as a bug now.

www.debian.org: ports/alpha is out of date and original author does not respond

Hello Frank,
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 03:01:35PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> You've attached one patch two times (links.wml) under two different
> names, so I guess there is one patch missing now (sys_types.wml).

I attached the corrected -diff for sys_types.wml.

Greetings

         Helge

--

-- 
Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys.               Helge.Kreutzmann <at> itp.uni-hannover.de
  gpg signed mail preferred    gpg-key: finger kreutzm <at> rigel.itp.uni-hannover.de
    64bit GNU powered                  http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm
       Help keep free software "libre": http://www.freepatents.org/

--- sys_types.wml.orig	Tue Jun 18 21:26:26 2002
+++ sys_types.wml	Thu Jan 29 18:28:39 2004
 <at>  <at>  -2,7 +2,12  <at>  <at> 
 #include "$(ENGLISHDIR)/ports/alpha/menu.inc"

 <p>
-This probably isn't a complete list, so if you see something that is not on here or something that is
incorrect please <a href="mailto:chris <at> debian.org">let me know</a>.
+This probably isn't a complete list, so if you see something that is not on here or something that is
incorrect please <a href="mailto:chris <at> debian.org">let me know</a>. Please note that 
+<a href="http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/gnumach.html">GNUMach</a>
+currently only supports

www.debian.org: ports/alpha is out of date and original author does not respond

On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 02:22:26PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Version: N/A; reported 2004-03-01
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
> 
> Hello,
> the ports/alpha tree is quite old, with lots of outdated information.
> It should be updated. I corrected some problems in the attached diff
> files.

You've attached one patch two times (links.wml) under two different
names, so I guess there is one patch missing now (sys_types.wml).

Gruesse,
--

-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig <at> debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/

Bug#235116: packages.debian.org should show when file list wast updated

Hi Frank!

> On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 03:27:21PM +0100, Wolfram Quester wrote:
> > Package: www.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > 
> > When clicking on
> > http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_contents.pl?searchmode=filelist&word=openuniverse&version=unstable&arch=i386
> 
> The Contents files are only updated once a week.
Thanks for your very fast reply! 
But if that is the case it would be usefull when on bottom or on top of
the search pages there would be a line like 
"The list of files in that package was last updated on <date>."

Best regards/Danke und viele Grüße,

Wolfi
> 
> Gruesse,
> -- 
> Frank Lichtenheld <djpig <at> debian.org>
> www: http://www.djpig.de/

Processed: reopening 235116, severity of 235116 is wishlist ...

Processing commands for control <at> bugs.debian.org:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reopen 235116
Bug#235116: www.debian.org: packages.debian.org lists files of old packages
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

> severity 235116 wishlist
Bug#235116: www.debian.org: packages.debian.org lists files of old packages
Severity set to `wishlist'.

> retitle 235116 www.debian.org: packages.debian.org should show when database of file lists wast updated
Bug#235116: www.debian.org: packages.debian.org lists files of old packages
Changed Bug title.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#235116: packages.debian.org should show when file list wast updated

tags #235116 pending
tags #235459 pending
thanks

On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 08:02:04PM +0100, Wolfram Quester wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 03:27:21PM +0100, Wolfram Quester wrote:
> > > Package: www.debian.org
> > > Severity: normal
> > > 
> > > When clicking on
> > > http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_contents.pl?searchmode=filelist&word=openuniverse&version=unstable&arch=i386
> > 
> > The Contents files are only updated once a week.
> Thanks for your very fast reply! 
> But if that is the case it would be usefull when on bottom or on top of
> the search pages there would be a line like 
> "The list of files in that package was last updated on <date>."

Done that. Should be visible after tomorrow evening's CVS run.

Gruesse,
--

-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig <at> debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/