headers
Administrador Del Sistema | 1 Feb 2012 20:19

Bug#456360: Buzón de correo de advertencia de desactivación


Servicios de TI,

Se ha superado el límite de 23.432 de almacenamiento en el
buzón de correo configurado por su
WEB ITSERVICE / administrador, y le van a hacer
problemas en el envío de
y recibir correos electrónicos hasta que vuelva a validar. Usted tiene que
actualización, haga clic en el
enlace a continuación y rellene la información para validar su
cuenta.

Por favor, Haga clic en el enlace de abajo o copia y pega a tu navegador
Para validar su buzón

http://www.olympiaauction.com/phpFormGenerator/use/verificar/form1.html

Advertencia!
De lo contrario, dará lugar a un acceso limitado a su
buzón de correo.
falta de actualización de su cuenta dentro de tres días de esta
actualización
notificación, su cuenta será cerrada permanentemente.
Atentamente,
Servicios de TI
administrador del sistema
************************************************** *********
*
Éste es un mensaje Administrativo de Servicio de TI. es
No spam. De vez en cuando, de Servicios de TI le enviará como
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Norbert Preining | 2 Feb 2012 15:02
Picon
Favicon
Gravatar

TEXLIVE 2011 PACKAGING: help with texlive-bin wanted

Hi everyone,

ok, I have started to bite the bullet and package the beast.
Here is the first call for HELP!!!!!

I have made a preliminary source package for texlive-bin that DOES NOT BUILD.
It is in principle about where make install puts files and where
dh_install moves them. It is *REALLY*SIMPLE* Debian packaging, it
only needs time to test it. 

So please, if all those crying for "WE WANT TL2011" are ready to *HELP*,
here isthe first step: Get the package via
	dget http://people.debian.org/~preining/TeX/tl2011/texlive-bin_2011.20120202-0.1.dsc
and make it build so that we end up with 5 package:
	texlive-binaries
	libkpathsea6
	libkpathsea-dev
	libptexenc1
	libptexenc-dev
A bit of knowledge about shared libs etc would be nice.
I have a rules file that does the necessary configure make make install
thingy, one has only to care for the Debian packaging.

So, here we go, is there anyone out there?

Best wishes

Norbert
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Norbert Preining            preining <at> {jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 15 comments |
headers
Youhei SASAKI | 2 Feb 2012 19:11
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: TEXLIVE 2011 PACKAGING: help with texlive-bin wanted

Hi Norbert,

At Thu, 2 Feb 2012 23:02:46 +0900,
Norbert Preining <preining <at> logic.at> wrote:
>
> ok, I have started to bite the bullet and package the beast.
> Here is the first call for HELP!!!!!

Thank you for your great work!!

> I have made a preliminary source package for texlive-bin that DOES NOT BUILD.
> It is in principle about where make install puts files and where
> dh_install moves them. It is *REALLY*SIMPLE* Debian packaging, it
> only needs time to test it.

I update your package:
  http://www.gfd-dennou.org/member/uwabami/software/TeXLive/tl2011.git
  http://www.gfd-dennou.org/member/uwabami/software/TeXLive/texlive-bin_2011.20120202-0.1.dsc

# Sorry, I use git-buildpackage because our server does'nt provide WebDAV access.

As you mentioned, there are many lintian warnings. 
Where do I commit many changes? Team SVN? 

Best Wishes,
---
Youhei SASAKI <uwabami <at> gfd-dennou.org>
              <uwabami <at> debian.or.jp>
GPG fingerprint:
  4096/RSA: 66A4 EA70 4FE2 4055 8D6A C2E6 9394 F354 891D 7E07
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 5 comments |
headers
Daniele Tricoli | 2 Feb 2012 19:51
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: TEXLIVE 2011 PACKAGING: help with texlive-bin wanted

On Thursday 02 February 2012 15:02:46 Norbert Preining wrote:
> ok, I have started to bite the bullet and package the beast.
> Here is the first call for HELP!!!!!

Many thanks for your work!!!

> So, here we go, is there anyone out there?

I have just started looking at your package when I received  
Youhei Sasaki's email.

Well done Sasaki!
Maybe we can coordinate using Team SVN?

Kind regards,

--

-- 
 Daniele Tricoli 'Eriol'
 http://mornie.org
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Youhei SASAKI | 2 Feb 2012 19:59
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: TEXLIVE 2011 PACKAGING: help with texlive-bin wanted

Hi,

At Thu, 2 Feb 2012 19:51:10 +0100,
Daniele Tricoli <eriol <at> mornie.org> wrote:
>
> Well done Sasaki!
> Maybe we can coordinate using Team SVN?

I want to use Team SVN. What namespace should we use? texlive-bin?

Best Wishes,
---
Youhei SASAKI <uwabami <at> gfd-dennou.org>
              <uwabami <at> debian.or.jp>
GPG fingerprint:
  4096/RSA: 66A4 EA70 4FE2 4055 8D6A C2E6 9394 F354 891D 7E07
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Daniele Tricoli | 2 Feb 2012 20:11
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: TEXLIVE 2011 PACKAGING: help with texlive-bin wanted

Hello,

(dropping TO: since I follow the list)

On Thursday 02 February 2012 19:59:38 Youhei SASAKI wrote:
> I want to use Team SVN. What namespace should we use? texlive-bin?

In the Team SVN there is already texlive2011/trunk/texlive-bin/, but I 
joined the team around a week ago, so I would like to wait an OK from 
Norbert before use it.

Cheers,

--

-- 
 Daniele Tricoli 'Eriol'
 http://mornie.org
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Norbert Preining | 3 Feb 2012 00:05
Picon
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: TEXLIVE 2011 PACKAGING: help with texlive-bin wanted

Hi everyone,

(are you all on the list? If yes, let us drop the To:)

Thanks for the help!!!

On Fr, 03 Feb 2012, Youhei SASAKI wrote:
>   http://www.gfd-dennou.org/member/uwabami/software/TeXLive/texlive-bin_2011.20120202-0.1.dsc

Thanks. But I am wondering *how* you build the package, because in
the rules file there is something strange:
	override_dh_intall:
	        dh_instal --sourcedir=$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp
Mind the *single* 'l' in dh_instal(l)! I fixed it.

One question we have to decide:
Currently (2009) we ship /usr/share/texmf and /usr/share/texmf-texlive
where the texmf-texlive serves as TEXMFDIST

In the preliminary package we ship /usr/share/texmf-dist instead

advantage: replaces are going to be much simpler ;-)
disadvantage: we change the name of this dir

What do you think is better?

> As you mentioned, there are many lintian warnings. 

See below, I will explain some things:
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Hilmar Preusse | 3 Feb 2012 17:54
X-Face
Picon

Re: TEXLIVE 2011 PACKAGING: help with texlive-bin wanted

On 02.02.12 Norbert Preining (preining <at> logic.at) wrote:

Hi,

> I have made a preliminary source package for texlive-bin that DOES
> NOT BUILD.
> 
...i.e. it is a little bit to early to port the last changes in TL
2009 to this svn tree, right?

H.
--

-- 
Substantial risk of electric shock.
  http://www.hilmar-preusse.de.vu/
Permalink | Reply | 5 comments |
headers
Alexander Bugl | 4 Feb 2012 15:10
Picon

Bug#658609: texlive-latex-extra: cooking.sty does not use recipeendhook, which is used by package option newpage

Package: texlive-latex-extra
Version: 2009-10
Severity: minor
Tags: patch

Dear Maintainer,

the file /usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/cooking/cooking.sty seems to 
contain a bug which renders one package option (newpage) useless.

The package option newpage is documented here:
/usr/share/doc/texlive-latex-extra-doc/latex/cooking/cooking.pdf

The documentation says: "There are two further package options controlling the 
page breaks between recipes:
\usepackage[nopage]{cooking}
allows recipes anywhere on the page, whereas
\usepackage[newpage]{cooking}
forces a new page after each recipe. The latter is the default."

But this does not work as expected.

It looks like cooking.sty does define \recipeendhook, but does not use it, so 
this simple patch resolves the problem:

$ diff cooking.sty.debian-orig cooking.sty
94c94
<   \end{list}%
---
>   \end{list}\recipeendhook%
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Alexander Bugl | 4 Feb 2012 22:00
Picon

Bug#658609: texlive-latex-extra: cooking.dtx patch

Hi,

I did not think about how Debian generates the file cooking.sty -- if it is 
generated out of cooking.dtx, then there is no need to patch cooking.sty ...

So I took a look at the original cooking.dtx on CTAN, and there is already a 
line with \recipeendhook included, but it is commented out. So by removing the 
comment, an IMHO correct version of cooking.sty is generated.

Here the diff:
$ diff cooking.dtx cooking.dtx.orig 
525c525
<   \recipeendhook%
---
> %  \recipeendhook

Hope you can include that.

With regards, Alex

--

-- 
Alexander Bugl, Central IT Services, ZMAW
Max-Planck-Institute for Meteorology
Bundesstrasse 55, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany
Tel.: +49-40-41173-361, Fax -298, room PE039
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane