headers
Debian Bug Tracking System | 1 Mar 2008 14:36
Picon

Bug#468493: marked as done (Wish: Installing texlive without documentation?)


Your message dated Sat, 1 Mar 2008 14:32:47 +0100
with message-id <20080301133247.GG27281 <at> gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#468493: Wish: Installing texlive without documentation?
has caused the Debian Bug report #468493,
regarding Wish: Installing texlive without documentation?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner <at> bugs.debian.org
immediately.)

--

-- 
468493: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=468493
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner <at> bugs.debian.org with problems
Picon Favicon
From: Florian Schanda <ma1flfs <at> cs.bath.ac.uk>
Subject: Wish: Installing texlive without documentation?
Date: 2008-02-29 11:28:00 GMT
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Debian testing watch | 2 Mar 2008 00:39

texinfo 4.11.dfsg.1-4 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the texinfo source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 4.11.dfsg.1-3
  Current version:  4.11.dfsg.1-4

--

-- 
This email is automatically generated; henning <at> makholm.net is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Debian testing watch | 3 Mar 2008 00:39

luatex 0.22.0.svn080220-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the luatex source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.20.2-1
  Current version:  0.22.0.svn080220-1

--

-- 
This email is automatically generated; henning <at> makholm.net is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
DDPOMail robot | 3 Mar 2008 10:11
Picon
Favicon

Some of your Debian packages might need attention

Dear Debian TeX maintainers,

The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s)
you maintain in Debian:

=== lmodern:
= This package has 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release:
- #466036 <http://bugs.debian.org/466036>
  lmodern: etch->lenny upgrade fails
  This is a Release-Critical bug!

=== tex-common:
= This package has 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release:
- #467330 <http://bugs.debian.org/467330>
  tex-common: Must force the transition to texlive upon upgrade to lenny
  This is a Release-Critical bug!

=== texlive-base:
= This package has 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release:
- #454330 <http://bugs.debian.org/454330>
  tetex-extra -- Doesn't purge all files after piuparts Install+Upgrade+Purge test
  Bug part of a release goal: piuparts-clean archive

=== xmltex:
= This package has 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release:
- #429564 <http://bugs.debian.org/429564>
  xmltex: unmet Recommends on passivetex
  Bug part of a release goal: no unmet recommends

This is an automated mail. These mails are sent monthly.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Ralf Stubner | 3 Mar 2008 21:12
Picon

Bug#468493: Wish: Installing texlive without documentation?

On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 18:46 +0000, Florian Schanda wrote:
> On Saturday 01 March 2008 13:32:47 Norbert Preining wrote:
> > On Fr, 29 Feb 2008, Florian Schanda wrote:
> > > When installing texlive or anything that depends on it (such as prosper),
> > > a huge amount of documentation and language specific things are
> > > installed.
> >
> > Wrong. You either installed one of the transitional tetex-* packages
> > depending on a huge amount of texlive packages (necessary evil to cover
> > all files from former tetex packages), or you are installing recommended
> > packages. Most texlive packages split off the doc files into -doc
> > packages which are only recommended, socalling aptitude with
> > --without-recommended etc will NOT install those files.
> 
> This is the output of apt-get install prosper:
> 
> The following extra packages will be installed:
>   doc-base docbook-xml dvipdfmx gs gs-common gs-gpl latex-beamer latex-xcolor
[...]
>   xpdf-common xpdf-reader xpdf-utils
> 0 upgraded, 83 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
> Need to get 347MB of archives.
> After this operation, 711MB of additional disk space will be used.

Might it be that you are using lenny? A crucial fact that you didn't
tell us, because you didn't use reportbug on your report. In that case
it is clear: The version of prosper in lenny still uses tetex-*
packages as default dependencies. However, as we already explained,
the tetex-* packages have been replaced by metapackages that bring in
quite a lot of texlive-* packages. The prosper version in sid does not
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Debian testing watch | 4 Mar 2008 00:39

context 2008.01.28-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the context source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 2008.01.02-1
  Current version:  2008.01.28-1

--

-- 
This email is automatically generated; henning <at> makholm.net is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Jens Seidel | 4 Mar 2008 14:30

Bug#469294: texlive-base-bin: /usr/bin/thumbpdf: deprecated Perl warning

Package: texlive-base-bin
Version: 2007.dfsg.1-2
Severity: minor

Hi,

debiandoc2latexpdf uses thumbpdf which always warns:

defined( <at> array) is deprecated at /usr/bin/thumbpdf line 816.
        (Maybe you should just omit the defined()?)

thumbpdf is Perl code and contains indeed a defined() in line 816. Could
you please check whether it is save to remove it?

Jens
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Jens Seidel | 4 Mar 2008 16:18

Bug#469305: texlive-latex-base: Incompatibility between babel and hyperref results in catcode error in color.sty

Package: texlive-latex-base
Version: 2007-13
Severity: normal

Hi,

ccreating a PDF file for the document dselect-beginner from DDP fails
for language sk with the following error:

(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/graphics/color.sty
! Missing number, treated as zero.
<to be read again> 
                   ^
                   l.28 \catcode`\^^A
                                     =\catcode`\%
                                     ? q

There is no problem with latex, only pdflatex is affected.

##################################
minimal input file

\documentclass[11pt,slovak]{book}

\usepackage{ifpdf}
\usepackage{babel}

\ifpdf
\usepackage[colorlinks=true,unicode]{hyperref}
\else
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Frank Küster | 4 Mar 2008 23:20
Picon
Favicon

Bug#469294: texlive-base-bin: /usr/bin/thumbpdf: deprecated Perl warning

Jens Seidel <jensseidel <at> users.sf.net> wrote:

> Package: texlive-base-bin
> Version: 2007.dfsg.1-2
> Severity: minor
>
> Hi,
>
> debiandoc2latexpdf uses thumbpdf which always warns:
>
> defined( <at> array) is deprecated at /usr/bin/thumbpdf line 816.
>         (Maybe you should just omit the defined()?)
>
> thumbpdf is Perl code and contains indeed a defined() in line 816. Could
> you please check whether it is save to remove it?

No, sorry, we cannot. The TeX Task Force is too low on manpower to be
able to do that. Either you do it yourself and provide a
(backwards-compatible) patch, or you ask the upstream author for help
(Heiko Oberdiek IIRC).

Regards, Frank
--

-- 
Frank Küster
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Gábor Braun | 5 Mar 2008 09:48
Picon
Favicon

Bug#469437: lmodern: New upstream version: 1.106

Package: lmodern
Version: 1.010x-4
Severity: wishlist

I would appreciate if you would package version 1.106 of Latin Modern fonts.

Note that that the .otf files have been renamed, as well as PostScript Type1 
internal font names together with all the map files.

Best wishes,

	Gábor Braun

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (650, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-5-686
Locale: LANG=hu_HU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=hu_HU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages lmodern depends on:
ii  defoma                       0.11.10-0.1 Debian Font Manager -- automatic f
ii  tex-common                   1.10        common infrastructure for building
ii  xfonts-utils                 1:1.0.1-1   X Window System font utility progr

lmodern recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane