Re: Bug#400597: Please also depend on texlive as an alternative to tetex
Norbert Preining <preining <at> logic.at>
2006-12-01 14:15:50 GMT
Hi all!
On Fre, 01 Dez 2006, uphr <at> stud.uni-karlsruhe.de wrote:
> hi Norbert - I'm CC'ing you because this is about the "alternative
> dependency on tetex and texlive" issue.
No problem, only that I am in Vietnam and not very good connected, and
no chance to do any devel work. Better is to ALWAYS!!! Cc the right
list:
debian-tex-maint <at> lists.debian.org
>
> Zitat von Roberto Suarez Soto <turgon <at> debian.org>:
> >On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 03:17:11PM +0100, uphr <at> stud.uni-karlsruhe.de wrote:
> >
> >>I guess cdcover can be used with the texlive TeX distribution as well
> >>as with TeTeX. As texlive is in Debian (and TeTeX is discontinued),
> >>please allow texlive as an alternative dependency for cdcover. The
> >>latex-ucs package also does this, for example.
> >
> > Ok, fine. The only problem is that I don't know anything about
> >Texlive, and I don't know if there is possible to substitute each tetex-*
> >package for the equivalent in texlive. I.e., could this "Depends" line be
> >the
> >right one?
> >
> > Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, tetex-bin | texlive-bin, tetex-base |
> > texlive-base, tetex-extra | texlive-extra
>
> Two of the texlive packages you list there do not exist, texlive-bin
(Continue reading)