2 Apr 2007 21:23
Re: Linden Lab (Second Life) using Debian
Adrian von Bidder <avbidder <at> fortytwo.ch>
2007-04-02 19:23:39 GMT
2007-04-02 19:23:39 GMT
On Monday 26 March 2007 16.24:25 MJ Ray wrote: > [...] too much news-style ick in the user > list. That would make it have less impact, as readers will notice and > may discount it as marketing more than reports. Hmm. This begs the question of the purpose of this users list. * we want to show that many people do indeed use Debian, and use it for some stated reason. --> mostly marketing. * we want to know who uses Debian so that we can improve Debian to better serve our users. --> more market research than marketing. I always assumed the list to be more the first kind of list than the second, but of course, as I've shown in this discussion, I'm not involved too deeply in how this list is created. I have, however, never seen anybody refer to list entries in discussions about improving Debian - IMHO the second kind of feedback is coming in via bugs.d.o and the various mailing lists. (... topic drift: it is in such situations where I always feel the www pages could really profit from a clearer structure[0], e.g. by using subdomains or clear visual distinctions - color schema, whatever: a part for people who don't know about Debian and stumbled over the name, a part for Debian users, from newbie to expert, and a part for people contributing (or wanting to) to Debian (DD and others.) Obviously there's overlap since we want people in the first category to become people in the 2nd, and people there to become people in the 3rd category, so there's always going to be grey areas. Now the entries in the users list would certainly be written differently(Continue reading)

RSS Feed