1 Jul 02:47
Re: ia32-libs depends on ia32-apt-get ?
Steve Langasek <vorlon <at> debian.org>
2009-07-01 00:47:09 GMT
2009-07-01 00:47:09 GMT
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 06:52:34PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > Patches implementing what? I don't see any public discussion of an agreed > > design for the package manager. > Patches for dpkg to accept the Multi-Arch field as a tristate of Yes, > No or missing and for packages to set that field. It's been > yes/no/missing in all the mails about multiarch for years and suddnely > you changed the string. Based on feedback from Guillem as dpkg maintainer (among others). It does no good to have a spec that's stable for years if it gains no traction with the maintainers of the packages where it has to be implemented. > >> made the whole thing need a full release cycle for a transition due to > >> DEBIAN/control format changes > > You appear to be referring to > > <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MultiarchSpec#Extended%20semantics%20of%20per-architecture%20package%20relationships>. > > What do you propose as an alternative that would let us achieve multiarch > > sooner? Multiarch has already failed to get traction for more than two > Look at perl for example: > Package: perl-base > Provides: perlapi-5.10.0 > I suggest to also provide perlabi-$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE) or > perlabi-(Continue reading)5.10.0-$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE). Perl extensions that need a > matching ABI can then easily depend on the right package.
RSS Feed