Andrew Shugg | 1 May 11:27
Picon

Re: Insignificant apache package buglet

Quoth Andrew Shugg:
> I might just be feeling too picky today.
> 
> In my apache-1.3.23-1 package, the following symlink is dangling:
> 
> /usr/share/doc/apache/icons -> ../../../apache/icons
> 
> Presumably it should be ../../apache/icons or pointing absolute to
> /usr/share/apache/icons ...
> 
> This symlink is in the current package file listing so I don't think
> it's cruft left over from a previous install.
> 
> Andrew.

Cleaning up a loose end:

I'd searched the BTS before posting this to the list and hadn't found
anything, but it turned out that there was indeed a bug report for this
problem (#136554) that was closed with the upload of 1.3.24-1.

Andrew.

-- 
Andrew Shugg <andrew <at> neep.com.au>                   http://www.neep.com.au/

"Just remember, Mr Fawlty, there's always someone worse off than yourself."
"Is there?  Well I'd like to meet him.  I could do with a good laugh."

--

-- 
(Continue reading)

Andrew Shugg | 1 May 12:37
Picon

Apache piped logs with ash as /bin/sh

Hi all,

I haven't found a mention of this in the BTS and was wondering if anyone
might be able to shed some light.

With 'ash' installed, /bin/sh is symlinked to /bin/ash instead of the
default of /bin/bash.  This generally results in all sorts of
interesting things as non-POSIX #!/bin/sh scripts start breaking.

What's concerning me though is that piped logs in Apache are now
spawning two processes per logfile directive, rather than just the one
that I was seeing with bash as /bin/sh.

For example:

My virtual hosts currently talk to cronolog.

  CustomLog "|cronolog /var/log/apache/DOMAIN/%Y/%Y-%m-access.log" combined

With ash as /bin/sh, we can see that there is a 'sh' forked for every
'cronolog'.  (Dropping %CPU, %MEM, VSZ, RSS, TTY from 'ps fauxw' output.)

root     28400      S    Apr29   1:35 /usr/sbin/apache
root      2102      SW   08:29   0:00  \_ [sh]
root      2106      SW   08:29   0:00  |   \_ [cronolog]
root      2103      SW   08:29   0:00  \_ [sh]
root      2107      SW   08:29   0:00  |   \_ [cronolog]
root      2104      SW   08:29   0:00  \_ [sh]
root      2109      SW   08:29   0:00  |   \_ [cronolog]
root      2105      SW   08:29   0:00  \_ [sh]
(Continue reading)

Daniel Jacobowitz | 1 May 16:57
Picon
Favicon

Re: Apache piped logs with ash as /bin/sh

On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 06:37:41PM +0800, Andrew Shugg wrote:
> My virtual hosts currently talk to cronolog.
> 
>   CustomLog "|cronolog /var/log/apache/DOMAIN/%Y/%Y-%m-access.log" combined

Try:
    CustomLog "|exec cronolog /var/log/apache/DOMAIN/%Y/%Y-%m-access.log" combined

> If anyone has some suggestions to keep my httpd children process count
> of order N rather than 2N I'd be grateful.  =)

Order N is the same as order 2N :P

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

--

-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-request <at> lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster <at> lists.debian.org

Andrew Shugg | 1 May 19:24
Picon

Re: Apache piped logs with ash as /bin/sh

Quoth Daniel Jacobowitz:
> Try:
>     CustomLog "|exec cronolog /var/log/apache/DOMAIN/%Y/%Y-%m-access.log" combined

That will probably do the job.  But won't a /bin/sh still be spawned to
process that 'exec'?  I'd rather avoid the needless process creation and
destruction (now that I'm aware of it).  Certainly on a slow system this
sort of thing matters ...

> > If anyone has some suggestions to keep my httpd children process count
> > of order N rather than 2N I'd be grateful.  =)
> 
> Order N is the same as order 2N :P

*baf*  You know what I meant.  ;P

Then again, ash is so lightweight (82k vs 511k for bash on i386) that
I'm probably just fretting needlessly here.

Thanks for the reassurance Daniel.  =)

Andrew.

-- 
Andrew Shugg <andrew <at> neep.com.au>                   http://www.neep.com.au/

"Just remember, Mr Fawlty, there's always someone worse off than yourself."
"Is there?  Well I'd like to meet him.  I could do with a good laugh."

--

-- 
(Continue reading)

Matthew Wilcox | 4 May 15:02
Picon
Favicon

[kevin.thompson <at> alias.net.au: Debian : Apache-ssl and Apache-common Packages]


Ugh... the patches required to make mod_proxy work need to be applied
to apache-ssl too.  Christoph, do you have time to do this soon?

----- Forwarded message from Kevin Thompson <kevin.thompson <at> alias.net.au> -----

Envelope-to: willy <at> ftp.uk.linux.org
Delivery-date: Sat, 04 May 2002 04:51:07 +0100
Subject: Debian : Apache-ssl and Apache-common Packages
Date: Sat, 4 May 2002 11:54:14 +0800
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4417.0
Thread-Topic: Debian : Apache-ssl and Apache-common Packages
Thread-Index: AcHzH1qrM1qeaGy8R0mBn2WG1dntRA==
From: "Kevin Thompson" <kevin.thompson <at> alias.net.au>
To: <willy <at> debian.org>

Hello:

pn  apache                      <none>                      (no
description available)
ii  apache-common               1.3.24-3                    Support
files for all Apache webservers
ii  apache-ssl                  1.3.24.2+1.47-2             Versatile,
high-performance HTTP server with SSL support
ii  libapache-mod-auth-mysql    3.2-1                       Apache
module for MySQL authentication

With the last upgrade of apache-ssl | apache-common following the weekly
(Continue reading)

Christoph Martin | 4 May 16:04
Picon
Picon
Favicon

Re: [kevin.thompson <at> alias.net.au: Debian : Apache-ssl and Apache-common Packages]

Am Sam, 2002-05-04 um 15.02 schrieb Matthew Wilcox:
> 
> Ugh... the patches required to make mod_proxy work need to be applied
> to apache-ssl too.  Christoph, do you have time to do this soon?
> 

I'll try to do a new version of apache-ssl based on apache 1.3.24-3.

Christoph
Picon

Bug#109322: marked as done (apache-ssl: Suboptimal conf file)

Your message dated 04 May 2002 16:34:25 +0200
with message-id <1020522866.17141.8.camel <at> inigo>
and subject line 109322 can't reproduce
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Aug 2001 11:59:40 +0000
From carlos <at> andago.com Mon Aug 20 06:59:40 2001
Return-path: <carlos <at> andago.com>
Received: from (correo.interno.andago.com) [213.4.23.178] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 15YniV-0005jw-00; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 06:59:40 -0500
Received: from salamanca.internal.virtualoffice.es (pc36 [192.168.2.36])
	by correo.interno.andago.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3EC8CD9227; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:59:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by salamanca.internal.virtualoffice.es (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 2435744011; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:55:47 +0200 (CEST)
From: Carlos Salamanca <carlos <at> andago.com>
Subject: apache-ssl: Suboptimal conf file
(Continue reading)

Debian Installer | 4 May 18:02
Picon
Favicon

apache-ssl_1.3.24.3+1.48-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED


Accepted:
apache-ssl_1.3.24.3+1.48-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/a/apache-ssl/apache-ssl_1.3.24.3+1.48-1.diff.gz
apache-ssl_1.3.24.3+1.48-1.dsc
  to pool/main/a/apache-ssl/apache-ssl_1.3.24.3+1.48-1.dsc
apache-ssl_1.3.24.3+1.48-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/apache-ssl/apache-ssl_1.3.24.3+1.48-1_i386.deb
apache-ssl_1.3.24.3+1.48.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/a/apache-ssl/apache-ssl_1.3.24.3+1.48.orig.tar.gz
Announcing to debian-devel-changes <at> lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--

-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-request <at> lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster <at> lists.debian.org

Nick | 7 May 01:07

(unknown)

I have a connection with 32 IP's
Running Debian 2.2

Some info:
Gateway 210.15.251.133
end user IP  210.15.251.133
Netmast 255.255.255.224

eth1 is the adapter setup.
An extract of my network file.

/sbin/ifconfig eth1 210.15.251.134  broadcast 210.15.251.164  netmask
255.255.255.224

/sbin/ifconfig eth1:2 210.15.251.160 netmask 255.255.255.224 broadcast
210.15.251.164

I want to make 210.15.251.160 accessible to the out side world.
ATM i can ping 210.15.251.160 from the same box, but it is not visible to
the outside.
Have I made an error or is it not routed properly from my isp ?
Any help is appreciated

Regards
Nick

--

-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-request <at> lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster <at> lists.debian.org

(Continue reading)

Picon

Bug#146211: apache-ssl: redirects give http instead of https

Package: apache-ssl
Version: 1.3.24.3+1.48-1
Severity: important

Hello,

After the upgrade from 1.3.24.2+1.47 I noticed that (with the standard
minial debian installation of apache-ssl) when I executed

	lynx -trace https://localhost/dwww

I saw that the apache-ssl server generated a redirect
to http://localhost:443/dwww/ instead of a redirect to
https://localhost/dwww/ this caused lynx to try an http connection
instead of an https connection; and that failed of course!

I looked through the changes and could only see the changes to the
proxy services which I am not using. The additional change is the
use of ap_getline instead of getline.

Thanks and regards,

Kapil.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux nmlinux47 2.4.18 #1 Tue Apr 9 06:25:08 IST 2002 i686 unknown

Versions of the packages apache-ssl depends on:
ii  apache-common  1.3.24-3       Support files for all Apache webservers
(Continue reading)


Gmane