1 Oct 2002 03:33
Re: Re[2]: DOC vs. IDE
CMZ <linuxbios <at> hello.org>
2002-10-01 01:33:31 GMT
2002-10-01 01:33:31 GMT
There are rumors that CF aren't reliable as DOC, is that true ? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ronald G Minnich" <rminnich <at> lanl.gov> To: "Steve M. Gehlbach" <steve <at> nexpath.com> Cc: <linuxbios <at> clustermatic.org> Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 3:47 AM Subject: RE: Re[2]: DOC vs. IDE > On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, Steve M. Gehlbach wrote: > > > CF is less than 1/2 the price of DOC, so I have never really understood why > > DOC became popular. > > because the doc chip was a transparent replacement for the BIOS chip. > That's the only reason. > > OUr 1024-node cluster uses CF in the primary IDE slot. > > ron > > _______________________________________________ > Linuxbios mailing list > Linuxbios <at> clustermatic.org > http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios > _______________________________________________ Linuxbios mailing list(Continue reading)
ron
_______________________________________________
Linuxbios mailing list
Linuxbios <at> clustermatic.org
RSS Feed