Armin K. | 3 Aug 13:38 2015
Picon

Disowning packages

Hi,

Anyone interested in some (all) of my packages? I don't
have the time to maintain them anymore.

broadcom-wl

mesa-git
lib32-mesa-git

llvm-svn
lib32-llvm-svn

libclc-svn

libgxim
imsettings
im-chooser

https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/?SeB=m&K=Krejzi

Arch Website Notification | 3 Aug 10:07 2015

Signoff report for [community-testing]

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 6 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 36 packages missing signoffs
* 26 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)

== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (6 total) ==

* fail2ban-0.9.3-1 (any)
* python-networkx-1.10-1 (any)
* mongodb-3.0.5-1 (i686)
* opencc-1.0.3-1 (i686)
* mongodb-3.0.5-1 (x86_64)
* opencc-1.0.3-1 (x86_64)

== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (34 total) ==

* fail2ban-0.9.3-1 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* python-networkx-1.10-1 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
(Continue reading)

Sebastian Lau | 3 Aug 09:44 2015
Picon

Two licenses (GPL and custom) on a package - split up or not

Hi,

After asking their maintainers in AUR3, I just adopted a few packages
that I'll need in AUR4.

Three of them were definitions for Brother printers I'm using.
My question: Brother is using GPL2 for their cupswrapper part [0] and a
custom license for their lpr part [1].
I also adopted the package for Brother's HL3040CN which original
maintainer bundled both parts in one package [2].
Shall I split this package up into a GPL and a custom part like in [0]
and [1]?

Regards,

Sebastian

-----------
[0] https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/brother-ql700-cupswrapper/
[1] https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/brother-ql700-lpr/
[2] https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3040cn/

Arch Website Notification | 2 Aug 10:07 2015

Signoff report for [community-testing]

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 37 packages missing signoffs
* 26 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)

== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (35 total) ==

* glm-0.9.6.3-2 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* darktable-1.6.7-3 (i686)
    0/1 signoffs
* evtest-1.33-1 (i686)
    0/1 signoffs
* gimp-ufraw-0.22-3 (i686)
    0/1 signoffs
* gluon-0.71.0-8 (i686)
    0/1 signoffs
* kphotoalbum-4.6.2-2 (i686)
    0/1 signoffs
* krename-4.0.9-5 (i686)
(Continue reading)

Itay Grudev | 1 Aug 14:16 2015

AUR 4 Submission Problem

Gentlemen,

I am trying to commit a package through Git to your new system. The process is really straight-forward but
I’ve stumbled upon an error, when pushing the repo, which I cannot resolve.

remote: error: The following errors occurred when parsing .SRCINFO in commit
remote: error: e129d11255f3c1b7e5ba3ab705e6547427c31528:
remote: error: line 4: unexpected new section not starting with 'pkgname' found
remote: error: line 5: unexpected new section not starting with 'pkgname' found
remote: error: line 6: unexpected new section not starting with 'pkgname' found
remote: error: line 7: unexpected new section not starting with 'pkgname' found
remote: error: line 8: unexpected new section not starting with 'pkgname' found
remote: error: line 9: unexpected new section not starting with 'pkgname' found
remote: error: line 10: unexpected new section not starting with 'pkgname' found
remote: error: line 11: unexpected new section not starting with 'pkgname' found
remote: error: line 12: unexpected new section not starting with 'pkgname' found
remote: error: line 13: unexpected new section not starting with 'pkgname' found
remote: error: line 14: unexpected new section not starting with 'pkgname' found
remote: error: hook declined to update refs/heads/master
To ssh://aur@.../imperial.git
 ! [remote rejected] master -> master (hook declined)
error: failed to push some refs to 'ssh://aur@.../imperial.git'

The contents of the .SRCINFO are as follows:

# Generated by makepkg 4.2.1
# Sat Aug  1 11:23:19 UTC 2015
pkgbase = imperial
        pkgdesc = Plays the Imperial March using the beep utility
        pkgver = 1.1
(Continue reading)

Arch Website Notification | 1 Aug 10:07 2015

Signoff report for [community-testing]

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 2 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 38 packages missing signoffs
* 26 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)

== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) ==

* evtest-1.33-1 (i686)
* evtest-1.33-1 (x86_64)

== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (36 total) ==

* glm-0.9.6.3-2 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* sweethome3d-5.0-1 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* darktable-1.6.7-3 (i686)
    0/1 signoffs
* evtest-1.33-1 (i686)
    0/1 signoffs
(Continue reading)

Arch Website Notification | 31 Jul 10:07 2015

Signoff report for [community-testing]

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 39 packages missing signoffs
* 26 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)

== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (37 total) ==

* avr-libc-1.8.1-4 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* glm-0.9.6.3-2 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* sweethome3d-5.0-1 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* avr-gcc-5.2.0-1 (i686)
    0/1 signoffs
* darktable-1.6.7-3 (i686)
    0/1 signoffs
* gimp-ufraw-0.22-3 (i686)
    0/1 signoffs
* gluon-0.71.0-8 (i686)
(Continue reading)

Arch Website Notification | 30 Jul 10:07 2015

Signoff report for [community-testing]

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 39 packages missing signoffs
* 26 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)

== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (37 total) ==

* avr-libc-1.8.1-4 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* glm-0.9.6.3-2 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* sweethome3d-5.0-1 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* avr-gcc-5.2.0-1 (i686)
    0/1 signoffs
* darktable-1.6.7-3 (i686)
    0/1 signoffs
* gimp-ufraw-0.22-3 (i686)
    0/1 signoffs
* gluon-0.71.0-8 (i686)
(Continue reading)

Simon Hanna | 29 Jul 16:52 2015

Re: Password reset (reg mailbox has been deleted)

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 03:00:32PM +0300, Radislav Golubtsov wrote:
> Ciao Giancarlo,
> 
> OK. Let it be. I'll create a new account for that. But wonder whether my old one will be purged somewhen and I
will be able to use my old username? - If it is non-active for a long period of time, why to keep it anyway? But,
of course, I understand that there is no way to prove its privacy though.
> 
AFAIK old accounts will be purged in about a week because of the transition to aur4.
If you haven't used your account for some time, chances are it got deleted by now...
Your accounts for the bugtracker, ... are not affected by this
and please bottom-post...
Arch Website Notification | 29 Jul 10:07 2015

Signoff report for [community-testing]

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 39 packages missing signoffs
* 26 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)

== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (37 total) ==

* avr-libc-1.8.1-4 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* glm-0.9.6.3-2 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* sweethome3d-5.0-1 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* avr-gcc-5.2.0-1 (i686)
    0/1 signoffs
* darktable-1.6.7-3 (i686)
    0/1 signoffs
* gimp-ufraw-0.22-3 (i686)
    0/1 signoffs
* gluon-0.71.0-8 (i686)
(Continue reading)

Giancarlo Razzolini | 28 Jul 16:15 2015
Picon

Re: Fw: Re: Password reset (reg mailbox has been deleted)

Em 28-07-2015 09:00, Radislav Golubtsov escreveu:
> OK. Let it be. I'll create a new account for that. But wonder whether my old one will be purged somewhen and I
will be able to use my old username? - If it is non-active for a long period of time, why to keep it anyway? But,
of course, I understand that there is no way to prove its privacy though.
There are user purges now and then, so you might regain your username in
the future. But the purges, AFAIK, are manual, no automatic purging.

Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini


Gmane