Arch Website Notification | 1 Jul 10:07 2015

Signoff report for [community-testing]

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 2 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)

== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) ==

* lightdm-1:1.14.0-4 (i686)
    0/1 signoffs
* lightdm-1:1.14.0-4 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs

== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1. foutrelis - 2 signoffs
2. bisson - 2 signoffs
3. eworm - 1 signoffs
4. lcarlier - 1 signoffs

(Continue reading)

Arch Website Notification | 30 Jun 10:07 2015

Signoff report for [community-testing]

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 2 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)

== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) ==

* lightdm-1:1.14.0-4 (i686)
    0/1 signoffs
* lightdm-1:1.14.0-4 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs

== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

Giovanni Santini | 30 Jun 09:56 2015
Picon

Thinking about repackaging... Should I?

Hello everybody,
I'm actually the maintainer of the gcc44-multilib package, that can be
found here: https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/gcc44-multilib/
After taking a look at the gcc49-multilib package, I had thoughts about
rewriting the PKGBUILD or not.
How could I choose about this?
I just want to know what do you think about this specific package, but
also in general (if in the future I'll have the same problem, what
should I do?).
--

-- 
Giovanni Santini
My blog: http://giovannisantini.tk
My code: https://github.com/ItachiSan
My GPG: 2FADEBF5

Arch Website Notification | 29 Jun 10:07 2015

Signoff report for [community-testing]

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 6 packages missing signoffs
* 1 package older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)

== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) ==

* perl-graphviz-2.18-1 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* python-tox-2.1.1-1 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* python-xcffib-0.3.2-1 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* scrapy-1.0.0-1 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* lightdm-1:1.14.0-4 (i686)
    0/1 signoffs
* lightdm-1:1.14.0-4 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs

(Continue reading)

Jozef Riha | 29 Jun 07:34 2015
Picon

cannot push to remote repository

hello,

anyone can please help me to understand why i am unable to push
linux-pae{,-docs,-headers} into aur4? the pkgbuild was orphaned in aur3 for
a long time, i adopted it today, but no luck.

git-receive-pack: permission denied: jose1711
fatal: Could not read from remote repository.

Please make sure you have the correct access rights
and the repository exists.

[remote "origin"]
        url = ssh://aur@.../linux-pae.git

thank you,

jose

Arch Website Notification | 28 Jun 10:07 2015

Signoff report for [community-testing]

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 158 packages missing signoffs
* 2 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)

== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (158 total) ==

* perl-graphviz-2.18-1 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* python-tox-2.1.1-1 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* python-xcffib-0.3.2-1 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* scrapy-1.0.0-1 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* clearsilver-0.10.5-18 (i686)
    0/1 signoffs
* collectd-5.5.0-1 (i686)
    0/1 signoffs
* dnssec-tools-2.1-2 (i686)
(Continue reading)

Jakub Klinkovsk√Ĺ | 27 Jun 14:58 2015
Picon

How to list packages on AUR4?

Hi,

the bot for updating the links to official and AUR packages on the wiki [1][2]
has been using [3] to get the list of packages present on the AUR. While there
is also [4] for the AUR4 branch, it seems in fact to be a list of AUR (not 4)
packages (e.g. my packages which have not been transferred yet are in both
lists). Is this feature being dropped, is it a bug or have I just missed
something?

[1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Lahwaacz.bot
[2] https://github.com/lahwaacz/wiki-scripts/blob/master/update-package-templates.py
[3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.gz
[4] https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages.gz

--

-- 
jlk
Arch Website Notification | 27 Jun 10:07 2015

Signoff report for [community-testing]

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 158 packages missing signoffs
* 2 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)

== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (158 total) ==

* perl-graphviz-2.18-1 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* python-tox-2.1.1-1 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* python-xcffib-0.3.2-1 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* scrapy-1.0.0-1 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* clearsilver-0.10.5-18 (i686)
    0/1 signoffs
* collectd-5.5.0-1 (i686)
    0/1 signoffs
* dnssec-tools-2.1-2 (i686)
(Continue reading)

Arch Website Notification | 26 Jun 10:07 2015

Signoff report for [community-testing]

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 2 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 158 packages missing signoffs
* 2 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)

== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) ==

* lightdm-1:1.14.0-4 (i686)
* lightdm-1:1.14.0-4 (x86_64)

== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (158 total) ==

* perl-graphviz-2.18-1 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* python-tox-2.1.1-1 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* python-xcffib-0.3.2-1 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* scrapy-1.0.0-1 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
(Continue reading)

Arch Website Notification | 25 Jun 10:07 2015

Signoff report for [community-testing]

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 2 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 157 packages missing signoffs
* 2 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)

== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) ==

* puppet-4.2.0-1 (any)
* python-tox-2.1.1-1 (any)

== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (157 total) ==

* perl-graphviz-2.18-1 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* puppet-4.2.0-1 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* python-tox-2.1.1-1 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* python-xcffib-0.3.2-1 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
(Continue reading)

Eduardo Machado | 25 Jun 02:15 2015
Picon

Error on trying to migrate 2 python packages

I am having some trouble when trying to update 2 of my packages to AUR4.

They are python-sievelib and python-rrdtool.

I proceeded like all the others, but when i try to push i receive this
message bellow:

     Connection closed by 5.9.250.164
     fatal: Could not read from remote repository.

     Please make sure you have the correct access rights
     and the repository exists.

The only thing that they differ from others is that they are python2 only,
but i used a model with packagebase and just commented out the python3
part, lasting only the python2 part. Could it be messing the AUR4?

Can anyone enlighten me?

Best regards,

Eduardo.


Gmane