Arch Website Notification | 24 Nov 10:07 2014

Signoff report for [community-testing]

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 2 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 21 packages missing signoffs
* 3 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)

== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) ==

* performous-1.0-1 (i686)
* performous-1.0-1 (x86_64)

== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (19 total) ==

* freevo-1.9.0-14 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* acpi_call-1.1.0-15 (i686)
    0/1 signoffs
* bbswitch-0.8-19 (i686)
    0/1 signoffs
* envoy-11.1-1 (i686)
    0/1 signoffs
(Continue reading)

Arch Website Notification | 23 Nov 10:07 2014

Signoff report for [community-testing]

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 14 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 25 packages missing signoffs
* 3 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)

== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (14 total) ==

* acpi_call-1.1.0-15 (i686)
* bbswitch-0.8-19 (i686)
* r8168-8.039.00-4 (i686)
* rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-13 (i686)
* tp_smapi-0.41-56 (i686)
* vhba-module-20140629-10 (i686)
* virtualbox-modules-4.3.20-2 (i686)
* acpi_call-1.1.0-15 (x86_64)
* bbswitch-0.8-19 (x86_64)
* r8168-8.039.00-4 (x86_64)
* rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-13 (x86_64)
* tp_smapi-0.41-56 (x86_64)
* vhba-module-20140629-10 (x86_64)
(Continue reading)

Rob McCathie | 23 Nov 04:10 2014
Picon

Our troll is going another round

Hello AUR general,

Some of you may remember this:
https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2014-July/029069.html

Our troll recently tried to sneak back on to our forums and of course 
got banned, and now they're throwing another little tantrum.

All my packages are flagged out of date once again, when none of them 
are, and the package delete request for my aqualung package is not 
legitimate.

This is the troll's account:
https://aur.archlinux.org/account/bomberman

Again the troll is attempting to cause problems with other services 
outside of Manjaro's, again AUR is one of them. Apologies.

--
Regards,

Rob McCathie

Lukas Fleischer | 23 Nov 00:07 2014
Picon

AUR 3.5.0 released

Hello,

I am pleased to announce that AUR 3.5.0 has been released. The official
AUR setup [1] has already been updated.

This release adds support for architecture-specific sources (resp.
provides, conflicts, replaces) and for .SRCINFO, both of which will be
included in the next pacman release. Apart from that, the package list
and package base list are now official and available at [2, 3]. There
have also been a couple of internal changes and bug fixes.

For a comprehensive list of changes, please consult the Git log [4]. As
usual, bugs should be reported to the AUR bug tracker [5].

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.gz
[3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase.gz
[4] https://projects.archlinux.org/aur.git/log/?id=v3.5.0
[5] https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?project=2

Arch Website Notification | 22 Nov 10:07 2014

Signoff report for [community-testing]

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 6 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 15 packages missing signoffs
* 3 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)

== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (6 total) ==

* cantata-1.5.0-2 (i686)
* goobox-3.2.1-2 (i686)
* nemo-extensions-2.4.0-2 (i686)
* cantata-1.5.0-2 (x86_64)
* goobox-3.2.1-2 (x86_64)
* nemo-extensions-2.4.0-2 (x86_64)

== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (13 total) ==

* freevo-1.9.0-14 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* cantata-1.5.0-2 (i686)
    0/1 signoffs
(Continue reading)

Alfredo Palhares | 21 Nov 13:32 2014
Picon

Please delete texlive-gantt

Hello,

Please delete texlive-gantt[1]

The package is now in textlive-latexextra

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/texlive-gantt/

Arch Website Notification | 21 Nov 10:07 2014

Signoff report for [community-testing]

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 2 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 1 fully signed off package
* 10 packages missing signoffs
* 5 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)

== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) ==

* envoy-11.1-1 (i686)
* envoy-11.1-1 (x86_64)

== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (8 total) ==

* freevo-1.9.0-14 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* envoy-11.1-1 (i686)
    0/1 signoffs
* gtkpod-2.1.4-3 (i686)
    0/1 signoffs
* ifuse-1.1.3-2 (i686)
    0/1 signoffs
(Continue reading)

Doug Newgard | 20 Nov 19:34 2014

Unsupported architectures in the AUR

Through searching, I've found discussions about people adding
unsupported architectures (specifically arm and ppc) to their current
i686/x86_64 PKGBUILDs. Nobody has a problem with that (I don't,
either). What I haven't found is any discussion about packages that are
*exclusively* for one of these architectures. Is this something that's
allowed or not?

Doug

Arch Website Notification | 20 Nov 10:07 2014

Signoff report for [community-testing]

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 1 fully signed off package
* 8 packages missing signoffs
* 5 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)

== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) ==

* freevo-1.9.0-14 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* gtkpod-2.1.4-3 (i686)
    0/1 signoffs
* ifuse-1.1.3-2 (i686)
    0/1 signoffs
* gtkpod-2.1.4-3 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* ifuse-1.1.3-2 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* uwsgi-2.0.7-6 (x86_64)
    1/2 signoffs

(Continue reading)

Arch Website Notification | 19 Nov 10:07 2014

Signoff report for [community-testing]

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/

There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 1 fully signed off package
* 11 packages missing signoffs
* 8 packages older than 14 days

(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)

== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (9 total) ==

* freevo-1.9.0-14 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* salt-2014.7.0-1 (any)
    0/2 signoffs
* avr-gcc-4.9.2-1 (i686)
    0/1 signoffs
* gtkpod-2.1.4-3 (i686)
    0/1 signoffs
* ifuse-1.1.3-2 (i686)
    0/1 signoffs
* avr-gcc-4.9.2-1 (x86_64)
    0/2 signoffs
* gtkpod-2.1.4-3 (x86_64)
(Continue reading)

arnaud gaboury | 18 Nov 12:25 2014
Picon

mediawiki skin

Hi,

I am setting a mediawiki.

I wonder what skin does our archlinux wiki use. Is it a custom one (if
yes, is there any place I can find it) or a  listed mediawiki skin.

As a side question, are archlinux mediawiki settings open and
available somewhere?

TY for hint.

--

-- 

google.com/+arnaudgabourygabx


Gmane