headers
Jeffrey Lim | 1 Feb 2005 08:47
Picon
Gravatar

is it my imagination? md5 problem with arch-0.7.base.iso

hi guys, i've tried downloading the 0.7 base iso from a few mirrors
and noted the md5sums, but it seems as if the stated md5sum and the
actual one for the iso seems to be different:

The md5sum that i get for arch-0.7-base.iso is

0d8bd1986f8f2e24de637ae2ef6bf112,

vs

d99a44e33ed79e85b4d0e6d9155d8f05 in arch-0.7.base.md5sum

Is anybody else encountering this? I have tried searching on google,
and the arch forums, but found nothing relating to this matter.

-jf
Permalink | Reply | 6 comments |
headers
Christian E. López Finnberg | 1 Feb 2005 10:14

Re: is it my imagination? md5 problem with arch-0.7.base.iso

I just yesterday burn a copy of it and the md5sum was the official one.

-- 

Saludos,

 Christian E. López Finnberg
 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria

El Martes, 1 de Febrero de 2005 07:47, Jeffrey Lim escribió:
> hi guys, i've tried downloading the 0.7 base iso from a few mirrors
> and noted the md5sums, but it seems as if the stated md5sum and the
> actual one for the iso seems to be different:
>
> The md5sum that i get for arch-0.7-base.iso is
>
> 0d8bd1986f8f2e24de637ae2ef6bf112,
>
> vs
>
> d99a44e33ed79e85b4d0e6d9155d8f05 in arch-0.7.base.md5sum
>
> Is anybody else encountering this? I have tried searching on google,
> and the arch forums, but found nothing relating to this matter.
>
> -jf
>
> _______________________________________________
> arch mailing list
> arch <at> archlinux.org
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Jeffrey Lim | 1 Feb 2005 10:23
Picon
Gravatar

Re: is it my imagination? md5 problem with arch-0.7.base.iso

On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:14:50 +0000, Christian E. López Finnberg
<christian <at> finnberg.net> wrote:
> I just yesterday burn a copy of it and the md5sum was the official one.
>

I assume then that u mean d99a44e33ed79e85b4d0e6d9155d8f05 in
arch-0.7.base.md5sum?

which mirror did u download it from?

-jf
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Linus Casassa | 1 Feb 2005 13:43
Picon

Re: nforce install kernel 2.6.10

can you send the PKGBUILD or the partch you applied to nvidia driver
for kernel 2.6.10 or 2.6.10-mm3? the patch must fix all the:

error: too few arguments to function

so that everyone can use it.
thanks :)

(I know hi all ready did it, thats why I'm not doing it :P)

On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:52:25 -0300, Yonathan Dossow <kronin.d <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> hi, i have problems installing nforce package, modules not build.
> 
> here is the log:
> 
> nforce-installer log file '/var/log/nvidia-nforce-installer.log'
> creation time: Fri Jan  7 13:45:20 2005
> 
> option status:
>   license pre-accepted      : true
>   expert                    : false
>   uninstall                 : false
>   driver info               : false
>   no precompiled interface  : true
>   no ncurses color          : false
>   no questions              : true
>   silent                    : false
>   Installer install prefix  : /usr
>   kernel source path        : (not specified)
>   net kernel install path   : (not specified)
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
Linus Casassa | 1 Feb 2005 14:07
Picon

Re: nforce install kernel 2.6.10

can you send the PKGBUILD or the partch you applied to nvidia driver
for kernel 2.6.10 or 2.6.10-mm3? the patch must fix all the:

error: too few arguments to function

so that everyone can use it.
thanks :)

(I know hi all ready did it, thats why I'm not doing it :P)

On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:52:25 -0300, Yonathan Dossow <kronin.d <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> hi, i have problems installing nforce package, modules not build.
> 
> here is the log:
> 
> nforce-installer log file '/var/log/nvidia-nforce-installer.log'
> creation time: Fri Jan  7 13:45:20 2005
> 
> option status:
>   license pre-accepted      : true
>   expert                    : false
>   uninstall                 : false
>   driver info               : false
>   no precompiled interface  : true
>   no ncurses color          : false
>   no questions              : true
>   silent                    : false
>   Installer install prefix  : /usr
>   kernel source path        : (not specified)
>   net kernel install path   : (not specified)
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Yonathan Dossow | 1 Feb 2005 17:23
Picon

Re: nforce install kernel 2.6.10

Linus Casassa wrote:

>can you send the PKGBUILD or the partch you applied to nvidia driver
>for kernel 2.6.10 or 2.6.10-mm3? the patch must fix all the:
>  
>
nvidia 1.0.6629-4 works fine with kernel26 mm3
and for nforce here is the patch

>error: too few arguments to function
>
>so that everyone can use it.
>thanks :)
>
>(I know hi all ready did it, thats why I'm not doing it :P)
>
>On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:52:25 -0300, Yonathan Dossow <kronin.d <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>hi, i have problems installing nforce package, modules not build.
>>
>>here is the log:
>>
>>nforce-installer log file '/var/log/nvidia-nforce-installer.log'
>>creation time: Fri Jan  7 13:45:20 2005
>>    
>>
[...]

>>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Pierre Schmitz | 1 Feb 2005 17:51
Picon

Need help for German ArchLinux-Site

Hello,

for all those out there who understand German language:

Vor kurzem hatte ich die Idee eine Deutschsprachige Seite für ArchLinux ins 
Netz zu stellen. Kern des Ganzen sollte ersteinmal ein Forum werden.

Wie es nun scheint, gibt es hierfür tatsächlich einen Bedarf. Seit kurzem sind 
täglich neue Anmeldungen zu registrieren und die Besucherzahl hat sich um 
eine dreistellige Zahl pro Tag erhöht. 

Ein Grund ist sicherlich auch der sehr gute Pagerank bei Google. Das Forum 
liegt beim Suchbegriff "archlinux" für deutschsprachige Seiten auf Platz eins 
(warum auch immer).

Weshalb wende ich mich nun an die Mailinglist? Um diesen recht guten Start zu 
nutzen wäre es schön, wenn sich einige Leute finden würden und die Foren 
unterstützen. Dabei reicht es für den Anfang völlig aus, wenn wir das Forum 
mit Leben füllen könnten und hier mehr als zwei aktive Besucher wären. 

Deshalb mein Aufruf: Besucht und nutzt das Forum, auch wenn bzw. gerade weil 
es dort noch sehr ruhig zugeht.

Ich könnte mir durchaus vorstellen, daß man dies später noch erweitern könnte. 
Man könnte mehr oder weniger eine Übersetzung der Hauptseite anbieten und 
enger mit dem i18n-Prijekt zusammenzuarbeiten um z.B. Pacman und Co zu 
übersetzen.

Die Seite und das Forum findet ihr unter http://archlinux.laber-land.de
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Rosenstrauch, David | 1 Feb 2005 18:11

grub update

I noticed that grub was updated yesterday, with the basic menu.lst file
changed to reference a splash image (splash.xpm.gz).  But there doesn't seem
to be a splash.xpm.gz included in the new package.  Is this an oversight?  Or
are we to supply our own?  If the latter, is there any problem if I leave that
line in the grub menu.lst even if I don't have a splash image, or will grub
barf when I boot up?

(Hmmm.  Or maybe there's some Arch recommended repository of splash artwork we
should check out?)

Thanks,

DR

==============================================================================
This message is for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you received
this message in error please delete it and notify us. If this message was
misdirected, CSFB does not waive any confidentiality or privilege. CSFB
retains and monitors electronic communications sent through its network.
Instructions transmitted over this system are not binding on CSFB until they
are confirmed by us. Message transmission is not guaranteed to be secure.
==============================================================================
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
interia.pl | 1 Feb 2005 18:22
Picon
Favicon

Re: nforce install kernel 2.6.10

On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 10:07:29 -0300
Linus Casassa <lcasassa <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> can you send the PKGBUILD or the partch you applied to nvidia driver
> for kernel 2.6.10 or 2.6.10-mm3? the patch must fix all the:
> 
> error: too few arguments to function
> 
> so that everyone can use it.
> thanks :)
> 
> (I know hi all ready did it, thats why I'm not doing it :P)
> 
>

So, when can we actually anticipate the patched version of kernel 2.6.10 for nforcers??? 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
TANI hosting, DUUUUUUUZO transferu... > http://link.interia.pl/f1846
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
j l | 1 Feb 2005 19:08
Picon
Favicon

Re: is it my imagination? md5 problem with arch-0.7.base.iso

 d99a44e33ed79e85b4d0e6d9155d8f05
is what I get from my iso. I have used it to install.
Try a torrent and see what happens.

--- Jeffrey Lim <jfs.world <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> hi guys, i've tried downloading the 0.7 base iso
> from a few mirrors
> and noted the md5sums, but it seems as if the stated
> md5sum and the
> actual one for the iso seems to be different:
> 
> The md5sum that i get for arch-0.7-base.iso is
> 
> 0d8bd1986f8f2e24de637ae2ef6bf112,
> 
> vs
> 
> d99a44e33ed79e85b4d0e6d9155d8f05 in
> arch-0.7.base.md5sum
> 
> Is anybody else encountering this? I have tried
> searching on google,
> and the arch forums, but found nothing relating to
> this matter.
> 
> -jf
> 
> _______________________________________________
> arch mailing list
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |

Gmane