RE: Red Hat Network ...
Scott Taylor <scott <at> dctchambers.com>
2003-03-04 15:21:57 GMT
At 04:11 AM 3/04/03, Shaw, Marco wrote:
>OK, so I'm a RHCE, and haven't used many other distribs.
Oh! How M$ of you to get a piece of paper saying so.
> This, in my opinion, is not a valid reason to thrash anyone.
What? The fact that you got a piece of paper?
>As long as RH still makes patches available for their products,
RH makes patches? Patches for which product?
> charging for RHN is acceptable as far as I'm concerned.
Businesses charging for services, hmm, I think that's the only thing you
said here that makes and sense.
> > and yet another reason NOT to depend on RH ...
Well put Terry, depend only on yourself. Still, there is nothing wrong
with RH, other than they are looking more and more like M$ every day. Oh
well, someone has to make money off this thing, and RH has put a lot into
it, they deserve to get some back, as do others that back and support Linux.
So, now for all the time RHN saves me in searching for downloads to keep my
one out ten servers up-to-date, I'm not going to whine about filling out a
simple little survey. I might fudge anything personal and give them my
freemail.com address that I never check, but what can it hurt to give them
2-3 minutes, even 10 minutes, of your time every 60 days. Compared to the