Sarbajit Roy | 17 Apr 04:23 2014
Picon

Re: [IAC#RG] VIGILANCE PETITION : Concerning Shri Amarjit Singh (Under Secretary) & CPIO

To:
Shri Shyamal Kumar Sarkar
Secretary/DoPT

Sir,

Sub:  Bribery of your Dept officers, including yourself,  by Shri K.B. "Anna" Hazare / his associates such as a) Mr. Arvind Kejriwal IRS, b) Mr. Shanti Bhushan, Sr. Adv. c) Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Adv. d) Justice (Retd). Santosh Hegde.

Please refer to the recent automated email received from the DARPG's CPGRAM system informing me that my complaint no. DOPAT/E/2012/00654 dated 11 Aug 2012 was disposed off on 05 Feb 2014 with the casual remark "submitted in file No.104/49/2014-AVD.I on 05.02.2014"

It is very strange that a duly registered Public Grievance which is meant to be disposed off in 2 (or at the most 3) months is closed and consigned to file after almost 2 years in such a highly sensitive matter.

As it is an open secret that you are a highly pliable (ie. one who lacks spine) officer, I would request you to kindly ensure personally that the true copy of the entire file as mentioned (which presumably contains the information I requested) be conveyed to me immediately (and not later than 7 days from today) and free of cost so that I may know (in terms of section 4 RTI Act 2005) the reasons for this corrupt administrative action of your Dept. and take such further action as I deem fit.

with best wishes

Er. Sarbajit Roy
National Convenor,
India Against Corruption, jan andolan

B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024


On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
To:
Shri Shyamal Kumar Sarkar
Secretary/DoPT

Sir,

Kindly advise me of the outcome of the below appended vigilance
complaint dt. 19/04/2011I sent to your department's CVO. It is
pertinent to mention that such complaints are to be disposed off
within 3 months as per the CVC notification dated 23.05.2000 but the same appears to be pending for over 2 years now.

with best wishes

Er. Sarbajit Roy
National Convenor, India Against Corruption, jan andolan

B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024

On 4/19/11, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> To:
> Shri Alok Kumar
> Chief Vigilance Officer/Ministry of Personnel
>
> BY EMAIL
>
> 19-April-2011
>
> Sir
>
> I am caused to complain that the following officers of your Ministry
> have corruptly accepted illegal gratification on behalf of one Mr.
> "Anna" Hazare and his associates to not discharge their official
> duties to provide me information I demanded from them under the
> statutory process of Right To Information Act 2005 (section 4). It is
> pertinent that I sought to know why Mr Anna Hazare and his associates
> were favoured over me for appointment to a Committee for drafting
> Central Lok Pal Bill falling under your Ministry's subject allocation.
>
> 1) Mr  Amarjit Singh (Under Secretary AVD-IV)/CPIO
> 2) Mr K.G.Verma / Director RTI
> 3) Mr. Rajiv Kapur / Joint Secretary AT&A
>
> I am appending inline the messages I sent to all of the above on
> 11-April-2011 and earlier which is self explanatory.
>
> I request you to kindly take all necessary measures to ensure that the
> above officers carry out their duties in a honest manner. I am ready,
> able and willing to provide any further assistance and clarifications
> you may require. I would be obliged if you would kindly acknowledge
> receipt of this email.
>
> Yours faithfully
>
> Sarbajit Roy
>
> B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024
>
> Tel: 09311448069


On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
To:
Shri Shyamal Kumar Sarkar
Secretary/DoPT

Sir,

Kindly advise me of the outcome of the below appended vigilance
complaint dt. 19/04/2011I sent to your department's CVO. It is
pertinent to mention that such complaints are to be disposed off
within 3 months as per the CVC notification dated 23.05.2000 but the
same appears to be pending for over 2 years now.

with best wishes

Er. Sarbajit Roy
National Convenor, India Against Corruption, jan andolan
B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024

On 4/19/11, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> To:
> Shri Alok Kumar
> Chief Vigilance Officer/Ministry of Personnel
>
> BY EMAIL
>
> 19-April-2011
>
> Sir
>
> I am caused to complain that the following officers of your Ministry
> have corruptly accepted illegal gratification on behalf of one Mr.
> "Anna" Hazare and his associates to not discharge their official
> duties to provide me information I demanded from them under the
> statutory process of Right To Information Act 2005 (section 4). It is
> pertinent that I sought to know why Mr Anna Hazare and his associates
> were favoured over me for appointment to a Committee for drafting
> Central Lok Pal Bill falling under your Ministry's subject allocation.
>
> 1) Mr  Amarjit Singh (Under Secretary AVD-IV)/CPIO
> 2) Mr K.G.Verma / Director RTI
> 3) Mr. Rajiv Kapur / Joint Secretary AT&A
>
> I am appending inline the messages I sent to all of the above on
> 11-April-2011 and earlier which is self explanatory.
>
> I request you to kindly take all necessary measures to ensure that the
> above officers carry out their duties in a honest manner. I am ready,
> able and willing to provide any further assistance and clarifications
> you may require. I would be obliged if you would kindly acknowledge
> receipt of this email.
>
> Yours faithfully
>
> Sarbajit Roy
>
> B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024
>
> Tel: 09311448069
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:23 AM
> Subject: Re: DEMAND for Information u/s 4(4) of RTI Act 2005
> To: dirrti-dopt-R9E+szwozl8@public.gmane.org, diradmn-R9E+szwozl8@public.gmane.org, jsata-R9E+szwozl8@public.gmane.org
>
>
> To:
> Joint-Secretary / ATA/ DoPT (and public grievance officer) for necessary
> action
>
> Sir,
>
> I refer to the rejection (truncated) email below.
>
> I am now aggrieved that the duly designated/notified CPIO under you is
> refusing to accept / rejecting my RTI related email as below. I have
> obtained (by faithfully copy-pasting) the email ID of the CPIO from
> the persmin website today.
>
> Please ensure that I receive the demanded information immediately so
> as to resolve my grievance as I am concerned that this is a systemic
> failure and not individual one.
>
> NB: Apparently cc's of the said bounced email have been received by
> Dir/RTI and Dir/Admin of DoPT without bouncing back..
>
> Yours faithfully
>
> Sarbajit Roy
> B-59 Defence Colony
> New Delhi 110024
> TeL ; 09311448069
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:09 AM
> Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
> To: sroy.mb-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
>
> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
>
>     usavd4-R9E+szwozl8@public.gmane.org
>
> Technical details of permanent failure:
> Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the
> recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for
> further information about the cause of this error. The error that the
> other server returned was: 550 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected
> usavd4-R9E+szwozl8@public.gmane.org (state 17).
>
> ----- Original message -----
>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Received: by 10.204.127.29 with SMTP id e29mr3887919bks.52.1302460741212;
> Sun,
>  10 Apr 2011 11:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: by 10.204.37.195 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 11:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 00:09:01 +0530
> Message-ID: <BANLkTinpqMsPCRenZeMDFzoti0zwkT1DpA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
> Subject: DEMAND for Information u/s 4(4) of RTI Act 2005
> From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb <at> gmail.com>
> To: usavd4-R9E+szwozl8@public.gmane.org, dirrti-dopt-R9E+szwozl8@public.gmane.org, diradmn-R9E+szwozl8@public.gmane.org
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dab507d05afd04a094c583
>
> To:
> Shri Amarjit Singh (AVD-4)/DoPT,
> Central Public Information Officer/RTI Act
>
> 10-April-2010
>
> BY EMAIL
>
> Sir
>
> I refer to recent media reports concerning the purported setting up of
> Committee(s) for Central Lok Pal legislation referring *inter-alia* to the
> unprecedented step of including various members of public / civil society
> in
> it. I also refer to questions answered in Lok Sabha during the past 1 year
> by the Hon'ble MoS/DoPT on the status of Central Lok Pal legislation. In
> the
> interest of brevity I am not specifying these reports/questions since these
> are matters of record.
>
> Accordingly, I am caused to *DEMAND* the following information be *
> DISSEMINATED* suitably to me free of cost in the electronic form *
> IMMEDIATELY* to safeguard my Fundamental Rights listed in the Constitution
> of India. I am given to understand from the Persmin website today that you
> are the dealing CPIO for "Central Lok Pal legislation".
>
> NB: As this is a DEMAND for information dissemination u/s 4(4) r/w
> sub-sections 4(1)(b), 4(1)(c), 4(1)(d) and 4(3) of RTI Act 2005, I am not
> required to pay the Rs.10 application fee prescribed for "requests" for
> information made u/s 6(1) of RTI Act.
>
> Information required
>
> 1) Copy of all notifications or orders or circulars or any other official
> communication constituting committee(s) / council(s) / board(s) by whatever
> noun or description etc in connection with
> a) the formulation (incl. drafting) of Central  Lok Pal legislation, or
> b) advising on the formulation of Central Lok Pal legislation,
> as the case may be.
>
> 2)  All relevant facts concerning the formulation of the Central Lok Pal
> legislation.
>
> 3)  Provide reasons why I was not appointed / nominated to the said
> committee(s) / council(s) /  boards(s) etc.. I say that I am an affected
> person for this limited purpose. In the alternative the reasons why a few
> other members of the public / civil society (if any) were appointed /
> nominated may be disseminated to me.
>

Post: "indiaresists@..."
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@..."
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" 
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Sarbajit Roy | 11 Apr 20:27 2014
Picon

[HumJanenge] Wanted Patriots

Dear HumJanenge members

As most of us know, this list group evolved thus

HumJanenge (Yahoo) - 600 members , which begat
RTI_India (Yahoo) - 800 members, which begat
HumJanenge (Google) -  3,400 members, which begat
India Against Corruption, 53,000+ subscribers

The next stage of the IAC (r)evolution is being planned / executed.

We need highly dedicated patriots who are prepared to devote at least 5 hours a week to this non-political project.

This offer to apply is first being made to the HumJanenge Googlegroups list.

Applications by email to: "1924.hra-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org"

(Not everyone who applies will be selected)

NAME: ___________________

ADDRESS: _______________

EMAIL ___________________

AGE: _____________________

RTI ACTIVISM _______________

MEMBER OF ANY NGO : (names)
__________________

MEMBER / SUPPORTER OF ANY POLITICAL PARTY (names)
______________________________

BRIEF WRITEUP ON ONESELF. (300 characters):
_________________________________________
_________________________________________
_________________________________________

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "HumJanenge Forum People's Right to Information, RTI Act 2005" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to HumJanenge+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Joshi NM | 8 Apr 12:30 2014
Picon

[IAC#RG] Why people beat Arvind Kejriwal?

AK gets beaten up by people time and again.
I think in Indian election history, He is a campaigner who got inked+beaten; highest number of times.

Every time ordinary attacker is thrashed severely. Normally, police would arrest people from both sides in a public fight for beating each others.

AK claims, without naming, attackers are sent by political parties like congress or BJP. But police is silent on this issue after recording statement of attackers.
Even media is also silent, apart from loud noise.

Do people not have right to know the truth?

--
Best Regards,
-Joshi NM
Post: "indiaresists@..."
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@..."
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" 
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Sarbajit Roy | 5 Apr 15:37 2014
Picon

[IAC#RG] Fwd: Attn: Grievance Officer "Indiatimes.com"

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Subject: Attn: Grievance Officer "Indiatimes.com"

ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED COMMUNICATION per Section 2(1)(ta) Information Technology Act 2000 r/w Rule 3(4) of Information Technology (Intermediaries Guidelines) Rules, 2011 issued for redressal of grievance under the laws of India.

To:
The Grievance Officer / Mr. Anand Vaishnav,
(appointed under Information Technology (Intermediaries Guidelines) Rules, 2011)
INDIATIMES.COM

Sir,

Sub: Fabricated story "Ford Foundation, Modi link stumps IAC leader"

Please refer the webpage shared / uploaded at communication link (URL:)
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/lok-sabha-elections-2014/news/Ford-Foundation-Modi-link-stumps-IAC-leader/articleshow/33194345.cms

The webpage content published by you is baseless, inaccurate, defamatory and a fiction fabricated by your website for sensationalism. IAC is a strictly non-political movement and does not indulge in actions such as you have described. It seems that mischievous elements are out to malign / impersonate our anti-corruption movement by misrepresenting public disclosures on IAC's websites.

The said person named in the story, Nitin Chavan, is not known to us, and is not a part of India Against Corruption movement ("IAC"). As such he is hardly an "IAC Leader" as mischievously headlined in your story, or else you may establish the same to our satisfaction.

REJOINDER: If it is true that Ford Foundation has given money to Gujarat Government or its agencies, the official statement of India Against Corruption is that M/s Ford Foundation should be expelled from India if their action(s) is illegal, and that all persons in Gujarat Government who received or accepted any illegal monies from Ford Foundation must be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

Accordingly, kindly retract / correct your story and print IAC's rejoinder. within 36 hours as prescribed in IT(IG) Rules 2011, as continuance of the story on your website is affecting the IAC and may lead to grievance escalation / claims on you.

With best wishes

Yours faithfully

Sarbajit Roy
National Convenor
India Against Corruption

B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024 (India)

Mob: 08010205897

http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in/
http://indiaagainstcorruption.org.in/
http://indiaagainstcorruption.us/
http://iacmumbai.in/

Attachment (Verify This Message with Penango.p7s): application/pkcs7-signature, 4559 bytes
Post: "indiaresists@..."
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@..."
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" 
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Sarbajit Roy | 5 Apr 12:24 2014
Picon

[IAC#RG] Fwd: Information on FC Donation of Rs. 1.24 Crs in cash

Dear IAC subscribers,

Mr. Ajay Sharma of Rajiv Gandhi Foundation has replied .
As he is not a list member, his reply is forwarded below,
and I shall be replying to him separately. In case any
of our subscribers have inputs, please email me/the list.

Sarbajit

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ajay Sharma <ajay@...>
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2014 12:32:31 +0530
Subject: RE: Information on FC Donation of Rs. 1.24 Crs in cash
To: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb@...>, indiaresists
<indiaresists@...>

Dear Mr Roy,

At the outset, we state that the contents of your E-mail are baseless,
devoid of any truth. The tenor of the mail is not only incorrect but based
on surmises and conjectures.

We are unaware of your credentials, identity, bona fides and therefore do
not wish to communicate further as it is apparent that your mail is in the
nature of a phishing enquiry.

We consider this issue closed from our end.

Regards

Ajay Sharma

-----Original Message-----
From: Sarbajit Roy [mailto:sroy.mb@...]
Sent: 31 March 2014 01:17
To: ajay@...; indiaresists
Subject: Information on FC Donation of Rs. 1.24 Crs in cash

To:
Mr. Ajay Sharma,
Rajiv Gandhi Foundation
Jawahar Bhawan, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Road
New Delhi 110001

Dear Sir

We have come to know that a cash deposit in foreign currency for about
Rs.1.24 crores was credited into account of M/s RGF on 31-03.2013 to
reconcile certain personal expenses incurred abroad for Office
Bearer(s) of RGF and is now in form of FD with Bank.

We would be obliged to know if the said amount will be reflected in
the personal name(s) of the concerned office bearer / trustee if
he/she is standing for the Parliamentary elections, and also the
source of the foreign currency/funds.

Kindly revert ASAP as India Against Corruption is preparing its
profile-list of Parliamentary candidates for circulation among its
membership.

With best wishes

Sarbajit
National Convenor
India Against Corruption

cc: to all IAC members
Post: "indiaresists@..."
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@..."
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" 
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Ravi George | 3 Apr 08:51 2014
Picon

[IAC#RG] Corruption doesn't look like a big issue for the majority


All,

Judging from what comes through the media, it seems as though only about 5 to 10 % of today’s electorate in
India are concerned about corruption.

The major issues seem to be Price Rise, Development, Drinking water, Electric Power, Unemployment etc. I
now feel that these issues have to be given more importance than a set of people always trying to find fault
with any large money transactions.

Regards
Ravi George
Post: "indiaresists@..."
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@..."
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" 
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Sarbajit Roy | 31 Mar 18:08 2014
Picon

Re: [IAC#RG] Information on FC Donation of Rs. 1.24 Crs in cash

Dear Devinder ji

The Trust Law (will have to check if RGF is a public or a private
trust) is clear that trustees cannot misuse trust assets for personal
purposes.

As we have great many CAs and other finance professionals on this
list, they can correct me if I say it is clear that the return filed
by RGF is just a dummy return to be filed within due date, and
thereafter it will either go missing or some supplementary return will
be filed to fill in the blanks.

Consider this, no bank mentioned, no names of donor(s) mentioned, all
FCR deposits only from India, Column A (1.24 CR) and Column B (nil)
add up to rs. 2.5+ Cr. Date of transactions are 31.03.2013 so these
are probably both book entries to cover up missing funds.  Now RGF
will be screwed if somebody asks MHA for the bank transaction details.

Sarbajit

On 3/31/14, devinder.thakur@...
<devinder.thakur@...> wrote:
> If the money has come into the trust for disbursement of outstanding
> expenses, incurred essentially for the and on behalf of the trust, why
> should the amount appear in any one's personal account or  why should it
> reflect as his/her income or asset. The trust law is very clear on this.
> Devinder
>
>
>>________________________________
Post: "indiaresists@..."
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@..."
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" 
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Sarbajit Roy | 30 Mar 21:46 2014
Picon

[IAC#RG] Information on FC Donation of Rs. 1.24 Crs in cash

To:
Mr. Ajay Sharma,
Rajiv Gandhi Foundation
Jawahar Bhawan, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Road
New Delhi 110001

Dear Sir

We have come to know that a cash deposit in foreign currency for about
Rs.1.24 crores was credited into account of M/s RGF on 31-03.2013 to
reconcile certain personal expenses incurred abroad for Office
Bearer(s) of RGF and is now in form of FD with Bank.

We would be obliged to know if the said amount will be reflected in
the personal name(s) of the concerned office bearer / trustee if
he/she is standing for the Parliamentary elections, and also the
source of the foreign currency/funds.

Kindly revert ASAP as India Against Corruption is preparing its
profile-list of Parliamentary candidates for circulation among its
membership.

With best wishes

Sarbajit
National Convenor
India Against Corruption

cc: to all IAC members
Post: "indiaresists@..."
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@..."
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" 
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Venkatraman Ns | 29 Mar 12:33 2014
Picon

[IAC#RG] IAC GIVES HOPE AND SHOULD MEET THE EXPECTATIONS

To
 
India Agains Corruption
 
 

         IAC GIVES HOPE AND SHOULD MEET THE EXPECTATIONS

 

While Anna Hazare  left the anti corruption movement in confused state, Kejriwal  completely destroyed it.   Being widely suspected of lacking in integrity  himself, (such suspicion convincingly reinforced by his unwillingness  to vacate the official quarters after resigning the Delhi Chiefministership giving a lame excuse that the premise is required until his children would complete their examination – thus revealing his quality clearly that he is self centred and want comforts  which aam aadmi in the country do not get), Kejriwal has brought the anti corruption movement to ridicule.

Now, the overwhelming segment of thinking and educated population in the country seem to be of the view  that the next central government should be one with total commitment to developments and growth.  In such circumstances, corruption may further increase , as industries and business men would get greater say  and have  big influence in the name of promoting economic activities.

In such scenario,  India Against Corruption (IAC)  should be  a bulwark against corruption at any level in the country in the post election scenario.

 

N.S.Venkataraman

nsvenkatchennai-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org

Post: "indiaresists@..."
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@..."
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" 
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Sarbajit Roy | 28 Mar 04:41 2014
Picon

[IAC#RG] POORNA SWARAJ (the real Swaraj)

Friends

The ideology of the IAC is "Poorna Swaraj", ie the Swaraj demanded by
the "Garam Dal" of the Freedom movement. Unfortunately that true
Freedom is still to be achieved because we are an easily divided
people with vast tolerance for parasitic rule, and do not unite unless
there is violent external aggression.
[http://www.tribuneindia.com/2011/20110508/edit.htm#1]

In 1947 Indian's accomplished the completion of the first phase of
India's Liberation Movement in which the seat of power was transferred
from London to Delhi. India was supposed to became free from slavery
of direct foreign rule.

The second phase of Liberation Movement requires a mass upliftment and
transformation of the Indian people to emerge on the world as a single
nation. This shall only be achieved by first bringing about moral and
cultural transformation based on spiritual foundations in society, to
improve the quality of man so that he becomes the supreme value in
himself and the ultimate end of all development. This is the only way
to remove ills from national life and build a great and glorious
India.

Selfishness, exploitation, corruption and other associated problems
are the symptoms of a much deeper national malady which is the real
cause and source of all problems. Until the capacity of man to exploit
other men is not removed, India cannot be transformed

There are no short cuts in life. To correct the course of life India
will have to return to the point where it had taken a wrong turn. That
is what some of us are endeavouring to do, to bring the nation back on
the track of natural progress and future development by regenerating
its citizens with the power to create a Glorious India, and to
overcome the powerful forces which are intent on derailing us.

The wind of change is blowing across the country. Old structures need
shattering so new ones can take their place. There is an atmosphere of
confusion and uncertainty everywhere as humans are uncomfortable with
and dread change. But, in the background there is also a sense of hope
and expectancy for something new and different to emerge. This is the
call of time-spirit which requires a Mahayagya of national
reconstruction and transformation without any reserve, without any
expectation and without any motive of self and pelf since this action
on your part in itself is the greatest fulfilment of life, it is most
sacred, most divine and most noble.

Sarbajit
Post: "indiaresists@..."
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@..."
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" 
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
MAULIK BHARAT | 27 Mar 15:06 2014
Picon

[IAC#RG] मौलिक भारत के प्रयासों को मिली सफलता

मौलिक भारत के प्रयासों को मिली सफलता

चुनाव आयोग की विज्ञान  भवन में आयोजित चुनावों की घोषणा से संबंधित पे्रस कांफ्रेंस में डायलॉग इंडिया के सक्वपादक एवं मौलिक भारत के राष्ट्रीय महासचिव अनुज अग्रवाल द्वारा मुख्य चुनाव आयुक्त बी.एस. सम्पत से पूछा गया प्रश्न कि बिना शपथ पत्रों की जाँच की स्थायी व्यवस्था के आप कैसे स्वतंत्र एवं निष्पक्ष चुनावों का दावा कर सकते हैं के बाद लगता है चुनाव आयेाग कुछ हरकत में आया है और उसने जहाँ ई-फाइलिंग पर जोर देना शुरू किया है (यद्यपि इसे अनिवार्य नहीं बनाया है) वहीं यह भी घोषित किया है कि चुनावों के बाद उम्मीदवारों के शपथ पत्र आयकर विभाग को दिये जायेंगे जिससे वह उम्मीदवारों के आय व सम्पत्ति के दावों की वास्तविकता को परख सकें।
    इस पे्रस वार्ता को देश-विदेश के 300 से अधिक चैनल लाईव दिखा रहे थे और करोड़ों लोग सुन रहे थे जिस कारण पूरे देश को पता चल गया कि अरविन्द केजरीवाल ने झूठा शपथपत्र भरा था व शपथ पत्र महत्वपूर्ण कानूनी दस्तावेज होता है और इसका मुख्य प्रायोजन आम मतदाता तक चुनाव लडऩे वाले प्रत्याशी का bio - data ,अपराध आय व सम्पत्ति के लेखा-जोखा पहुँचाना है। जिससे मतदाता के मतदान करने से पूर्व प्रत्याशी के बारे में अपना मत/विचार बना सके और इसमें गलत जानकारी देने पर निर्वाचन रद्ध हो सकता है व जेल भी हो सकती है। इसके बाद देशके विभिन्न भागों मे ंलोगों ने अनेकों प्रत्याशियों के शपथ पत्र चुनौती देने शुरू कर दिये हैं और किरण खेर, नवीन पटनायक, राव वीरेन्द्र सिंह, शाजिया इल्मी आदि के शपथ पत्र गलत सूचना देने के कारण जाँच के दायरे में आ गये हैं। मौलिक भारत ने चुनाव आयोग से कुछ महत्वपूर्ण सवाल भी पूछे हैं-

    -- द्जिलों में उम्मीदवारों के नामंकन स्वीकार करने वाले निर्वाचन अधिकारी अगर गलत नामांकन भी सही बता कर स्वीकार कर लेते हैं तो उनकी क्या जवाबदेही होती है और उन्हे ंक्या सजा दी जाती है                क्योंकि उनकी गैर जिम्मेदारी से लोकतंत्र की जड़ें कमजोर होती हैं।
 --   नामांकन व शपथपत्र में मतदाता बनने के बाद से नामांकन भरने के बीच के वर्षों में उम्मीदवार के पद, व्यापार, जीवनवृत्त आदि की जानकारी क्यों नहीं ली जाती है? जबकि सभी सरकारी पदों के लिए यह            जरूरी होता है।
--     अगर उम्मीदवार पहले भीचुनाव लड़ चुका है तो उसके पिछले शपथ पत्रों का नये शपथ पत्रों से मिलान क्यों नहीं किया जाता?
--     चुनाव आयोग सभी शपथ पत्रों की समयबद्ध जाँच की व्यवस्था करने के निर्देश क्यों नहीं दे रहा?
       मौलिक भारत का आरोप है कि कहीं न कहीं सरकार व चुनाव आयोग आपसी मिली-भगत से ही देश में लोकतंत्र के वास्तविक क्रियान्वयन की राह में रोड़ा है। किन्तु इतना स्पष्ट है कि राजनीति को धनतंत्र          व बाहुतंत्र से मुक्त करने की लड़ाई अब निर्णायक दौर में पहुँच चुकी है।


मौलिक भारत के अनुत्तरित प्रश्न 
न्यायालय और चुनाव आयोग
3 मार्च 2014 को दिल्ली के कांस्टिट्यूशन क्लब में 'मौलिक भारत के द्वारा जब 'लोकतंत्र को धोखतंत्र में बदलता चुनाव आयोग विषय पर अपना प्रस्तुतीकरण देश, जनता, पत्रकारों व बृद्धिजीवियों के सामने तो रखा गया तो दर्शक स्तब्ध रह गये। सिलसिलेवार परत दर परत जब संजीव गुप्ता एवं नीरज सक्सेना ने दस्तावेजों के साथ चुनाव आयोग के कार्यप्रणाली पर गंभीर प्रश्नचिन्ह खड़े किये तो यकायक ही देश में लोकतंत्र की उपस्थिति पर से ही विश्वास सा ही उठ गया। दो घंटे की प्रस्तुतीकरण से जिसका विवरण आगे दिया गया है, स्पष्ट होता गया कि देश में चुनाव सुधारों की आवाज उठाने से पहले चुनाव आयोग की कार्यप्रणाली में व्यापक सुधारों की आवश्यकता है। इसे अधिक जवाबदेह, पारदर्शी और अधिकारयुक्त बनाना समय की माँग है। सच्चाई यह है कि यह संवैधानिक संस्था अपनी साख खो चुकने के कगार पर है और इसके ढ़ांचे व कार्यपद्धति में आमूलचूल परिवर्तन की आवश्यकता है। बकौल मौलिक भारत के महासचिव अनुज अग्रवाल ''चुनाव आयोग सीबीआई की तरह से ही पिंजरे में बंद तोता है जिसका इस्तेमाल सत्तारूढ़ सरकारे अपने हितों के अनुरूप कर रही है।
    चुनाव आयोग की अक्षमता और गैर जवाबदेही उस दिन भी स्पष्ट हुई जब विज्ञान भवन में दिनांक 7 मार्च 2014 को चुनाव आयुक्तों ने लोकसभा चुनावों की घोषणा के समय मीडिया से बातचीत की थी और डायलॉग इंडिया के संपादक अनुज अग्रवाल ने तीन बार यह प्रश्न मुख्य चुनाव आयुक्त बी.एस.सम्पत से पूछा कि 'दिल्ली विधानसभा के चुनावों के समय प्रत्याशी के रूप में आम आदमी पार्टी के अरविंद केजरीवाल ने जो अपना शपथ पत्र दाखिल किया था एवं जिसकी प्रति मैं आपको दिखा रहा हूँ वह पूर्णत: गलत/फर्जी है और उसमें बहुत सारी जानकारियां गलत है। इसको लेकर जब मौलिक भारत ट्रस्ट दिल्ली उच्च न्यायालय में गया तब चुनाव आयोग के वकील ने न्यायालय से कहा कि हमारे पास शपथ पत्रों की जाँच की कोई व्यवस्था ही नहीं है ऐसे में कृप्या स्पष्ट करें-
(अ) अरविंद केजरीवाल के फर्जी शपथपत्र के विरुद्ध आपने अभी तक क्या कार्यवाही की है?
(ब) क्या आयोग ने उम्मीदवारों के शपथपत्रों की जांच के लिए कोई स्थायी व्यवस्था शुरू की है?
(स)    यदि नहीं तो बिना उपयुक्त व्यवस्था के लोकसभा चुनावों, जिनकी अपने अभी घोषणा की है किस प्रकार स्वतंत्र एवं निष्पक्ष कराये जा सकते हैं?
    दु:खद यह रहा कि संपत्त साहब के पास कोई स्पष्ट व संतुष्ट करने वाला जवाब नहीं था और वे इधर-उधर जबाव देकर प्रश्न को टाल गये। ऐसे गैर जवाबदेह चुनाव आयोग के रहते देश में लोकतंत्र की कल्पना व्यर्थ है।
    अरविंद केजरीवाल के फर्जी शपथपत्र के संबंध में दिल्ली उच्च न्यायालय के निर्देशों के अनुरूप पटियाला हाउस, दिल्ली में मौलिक भारत के पदाधिकारियों नीरज सक्सेना एवं अनुज अग्रवाल की 'आपराधिक शिकायत पर 10 मार्च 2014 को सुनवाई के दौरान न्यायालय ने नीरज सक्सेना के बयान दर्ज किये एवं अन्य गवाहों को नोटिस जारी कर 7 मई 2014 को उपस्थित होने के आदेश दिये। इतने महत्वपूर्ण मामले पर इतना समय लगना खासा बेचैन कर देता है।
    10 मार्च को ही उच्चतम न्यायालय ने एक ऐतिहासिक निर्णय दिया कि जिस भी विधायक या सांसद पर अपराधिक मामले चल रहे है, उन पर आरोप पत्र दािखल होने के एक वर्ष के अंदर प्रतिदिन के आधार पर सुनवाई कर अदालती प्रक्रिया पूरी की जाये और इसमें किसी भी देरी के लिए निचली अदालतें जवाबदेह होंगी। राजनीति के बढ़ते अपराधिकरण को रोकने की दिशा में यह आदेश महत्वपूर्ण सिद्ध होगा। इसी केस की सुनवाई के दौरान चुनाव आयोग की सहमति से विधि आयोग ने 'गलत शपथ पत्र भरने को भ्रष्टाचार को श्रेणी में रखने एवं इस मामले में आरेाप सिद्ध हो जाने पर सजा छह माह एवं जुर्माने से बढ़ाकर दो वर्ष का गंभीर अपराध की श्रेणी में रखने की सिफारिश की जो 'मौलिक भारत ट्रस्ट द्वारा किये जा रहे प्रयासों के कारण संभव हो सका है।
    झूठे शपथ पत्रों के भरने के संबंध में भारतीय मीडिया द्वारा अधिक महत्व न दिये जाने व उदासीन रहने से उनका खोखलापन ही अधिक नजर आया और वे कारपोरेट समूहों व सत्तारूढ़ दलों के प्रभाव में किस प्रकार महत्वपूर्ण मुद्दों को दरकिनार करते हैं, यह भी स्पष्ट हुआ। किंतु मौलिक भारत ट्रस्ट अपने प्रयासों में लगा हुआ है और अब वह केजरीवाल के झूठे शपथ पत्र संबंधित शिकायत को तीव्र सुनवाई के लिए उच्च न्यायालय से अनुरोध करने जा रहा है वहीं शपथ पत्रों की जाँच के लिए स्थायी प्रक्रिया के निर्माण संबंधी आदेश के लिए उच्चतम न्यायालय में याचिका डालने पर विचार कर रहा है। दुखद है कि मौलिक भारत द्वारा किये गये प्रयासों को मीडिया सही प्रकार से जनता तक नहीं पहुँचा रहा है। मौलिक भारत के प्रयासों का ही नतीजा भी उम्मीदवार के शपथ पत्र को चुनौती देने की शक्ति दे दी हैं किंतु प्रसार के अभाव में देश का मतदाता अपनी इस शक्ति से परिचित ही नहीं हैं।

 धन्यवाद।
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   दिनांक: 27.03.2014

               भवदीय

          
राष्ट्रीय संरक्षकः   पवन सिन्हा  ,राष्ट्रीय अध्यक्ष -  गजेन्द्र सोलंकी , राष्ट्रीय महासचिव-  अनुज अग्रवाल, मार्गदर्शक चुनाव सुधार - नीरज सक्सेना, संजीव गुप्ता, 

मौलिक भारत आंदोलन

       बेवसाईट: www.maulikbharat.org
Post: "indiaresists@..."
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@..."
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" 
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

Gmane