• New Members 2

• New Members 2

Hi

I am Sarbajit (one who has conquered everything)

Funnily, this question was put to me too by the CIC when I sent my email complaint. I explained to them as follows:-

a) That "complaints" form the heart of the CIC's 'Soo-moto" powers - see 18(2).

b) That inquiry into "complaints" take precedence over disposal of appeals per the scheme of the RTI Act.

c) That there is no provision in the RTI Act to restrict in any way the form, nature or content of a complaint to the Commission (unlike appeals).

d) That I did not recognise the CIC's illegal Management Regulations which were drafted and approved by idiots (ie, legally deficient morons).

e) That whereas the duly notified rules for APPEALS to the CIC provided for "verification" (which requires a signature), there is no such requirements for complaints - which can be unsigned (and hence do not require a digital / electronic signature to be sent over email).

f) That I demanded parity with Ms Aruna Roy, Commodre Lokesh Batra, Mr Shekhar Singh etc who regularly use emails to get their work done at CIC through Mr Habibullah.

Sarbajit

--- In rti_india <at> yahoogroups.com, C K Jam <rtiwanted <at> ...> wrote:
>
> Dear Mr Sarbajit,
>
> It seems that you have either started a "free lubricant supply" business of your own or you have got into the good books of the CIC by floating a CIA (or Chinese) funded NGO !
>
> How come CIC gives you special treatment and also ignores its own legal cell in the process ?
>
> As per the following order of the CIC, your Complaint sent via email was taken cognizance of by the CIC:
>
> http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/SS-18112009-01.pdf
>
> Sh. Sarbjit Roy filed a complaint via email before the Commission alleging that UIDAI, constituted by the notification of the Govt. of India , hence being a public authority has not implemented the RTI Act, 2005 and he requested the Commission to give appropriate directions to the UIDAI to implement the RTI Act in its true spirit. The Commission issued notices to the CPIO, Planning Commission and DG-UIDAI to appear before the Commission.
>
> This clearly contravenes CIC's own directions:
>
> http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Minutes/Minutes03032009.pdf
>
> Agenda 1:- A note from legal cell as to whether a complaint on an appeal received
> through email is legally valid or should it be registered.
> Commission directed that the citizens, filing their appeal/complaints on email be
> advised to file their appeal / complaints online. They may do so by visiting the link
> RTI Complaint & Appeal. This site is linked through CIC as well.
> The officer of the Registry, who is designated for Public Authorities, may advise the
> citizens regarding the same. Commission however clarified that the appeal/complaint
> received through email cannot be registered unless filed online or otherwise.
>
>
>
> Mr Sarbajit, as a initiator of the responsible RTI concept and in the interest of equitable awareness, please share with the group as to how are you suddenly getting such undue favors from the CIC ?
>
> Note to CIC WH:
> ===============
>
> Sir, the writ of our Moderator is restricted to this Yahoo group, of which you are a member. However, on the 2nd Floor of the AK Bhawan, you are the Boss !
>
> PS: Is it Sarbjeet or Sarbjit or Sarbajit ?
>
> Confused RTIwanted
>

• New Members 2

Oops,

I clarify that I do not classify Commodore L.Batra in category of those who get work done in CIC.

I had included his name as an example of another person whose emails the CIC has taken cognisance of.

Sarbajit

--- In rti_india <at> yahoogroups.com, "sarbajitr" <sroy1947 <at> ...> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I am Sarbajit (one who has conquered everything)
>
> Funnily, this question was put to me too by the CIC when I sent my email complaint. I explained to them as follows:-
>
> a) That "complaints" form the heart of the CIC's 'Soo-moto" powers - see 18(2).
>
> b) That inquiry into "complaints" take precedence over disposal of appeals per the scheme of the RTI Act.
>
> c) That there is no provision in the RTI Act to restrict in any way the form, nature or content of a complaint to the Commission (unlike appeals).
>
> d) That I did not recognise the CIC's illegal Management Regulations which were drafted and approved by idiots (ie, legally deficient morons).
>
> e) That whereas the duly notified rules for APPEALS to the CIC provided for "verification" (which requires a signature), there is no such requirements for complaints - which can be unsigned (and hence do not require a digital / electronic signature to be sent over email).
>
> f) That I demanded parity with Ms Aruna Roy, Commodre Lokesh Batra, Mr Shekhar Singh etc who regularly use emails to get their work done at CIC through Mr Habibullah.
>
> Sarbajit
>

• New Members 2

CIC WH,

I also demand parity !
None of my work gets done in the CIC through emails,
even though you are kind enough to answer them !

RTIwanted

--- In rti_india <at> yahoogroups.com, "sarbajitr" <sroy1947 <at> ...> wrote:

> > f) That I demanded parity with Ms Aruna Roy, Commodre Lokesh Batra, Mr Shekhar Singh etc who regularly use emails to get their work done at CIC through Mr Habibullah.
> >
> > Sarbajit

• New Members 2

Wish you the same.

Regards - Mohammed Afzal.

__________________________________________________

• New Members 2

Dear Sh.Sarbajit Royji and all,

I filed complaint online in cic website on 10-12-09.Today , when I checked its current status, It is showing message "signed copy awaited".

Please suggest whether it is really necessary for compaints.

With regards
Manoj K.Kamra

• New Members 2

• New Members 2

happy new year Rakeshji; 

• New Members 2