headers
Vidyut Kale | 23 May 2013 10:42
Picon
Gravatar

Re: [IAC#RG] Appointment of new CAG challenged in SC

your point on identity of person filing petition is noted, and is important.

The ad hominem attacks detract from our credibility and should be avoided as far as possible, in my opinion. If the objection makes sense, the identity of the person making it should not be an issue, or the method they use, unless the method is illegal.

Vidyut


On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
Dear IAC members / patriotic friends on other channels

The appointment of the new CAG has been challenged in the Supreme Court a few hours back by Advocate Manoharlal Sharma (the original Petitioner in COALGATE). After mentioning before the Vacation Bench today it was directed the PIL be listed to be taken up on 01.07.2013 the moment the court resumes after summer vacations.

Although the petition has been filed by Adv. Sharma, the mainstream media channels like CNN are blanking out his name to imply it is filed by Prashant Bhushan (whose Aam Aadmi Party is the B-team of Congress Party) who left IAC under circumstances which are too well known to repeat.

The Writ (a copy of which is with the IAC), highlights important questions of law and essentially seeks parity for appointing CAGs with the appointment of the Supreme Court judges in terms of Arts 142 and 148-151 etc.

IAC fully expects proxies like Prashant Bhushan to file more copycat Petitions on behalf of Congress Party (like was done in CoalGate using dummies like Common Cause and the usual clutch of by now professional Congi PILers and retired anti-nationals like Magsaysay awardee Admiral Ramdas, Admiral Tahiliani, CEC Gopalswami etc.).

Watch this space

Sarbajit
National Convenor IAC




Post: "indiaresists-3hfIC0tI0F+k/GrYEfjPQg@public.gmane.org"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe-3hfIC0tI0F+k/GrYEfjPQg@public.gmane.org"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in



--
Vidyut
Twitter: <at> Vidyut
Phone: Allergic
Telephone: Forget it.
Mobile phone: Forgot
Post: "indiaresists@..."
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@..."
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" 
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
M.N.Seshadri | 23 May 2013 11:02
Picon

RE: [IAC#RG] Appointment of new CAG challenged in SC

It is well known fact that the Defence Secretary and the Army Hq. never got along well and we can now expect quite a lot of Audit  Para concerning Army and connected  welfare measures like canteen and ECHS and so on!!  Will someone point this out quickly before more damage is done to the Army and India .

 

From: indiaresists-request-3hfIC0tI0F+k/GrYEfjPQg@public.gmane.org [mailto:indiaresists-request-3hfIC0tI0F+k/GrYEfjPQg@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Sarbajit Roy
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 1:58 PM
To: indiaresists
Subject: [IAC#RG] Appointment of new CAG challenged in SC

 

Dear IAC members / patriotic friends on other channels

The appointment of the new CAG has been challenged in the Supreme Court a few hours back by Advocate Manoharlal Sharma (the original Petitioner in COALGATE). After mentioning before the Vacation Bench today it was directed the PIL be listed to be taken up on 01.07.2013 the moment the court resumes after summer vacations.

Although the petition has been filed by Adv. Sharma, the mainstream media channels like CNN are blanking out his name to imply it is filed by Prashant Bhushan (whose Aam Aadmi Party is the B-team of Congress Party) who left IAC under circumstances which are too well known to repeat.

The Writ (a copy of which is with the IAC), highlights important questions of law and essentially seeks parity for appointing CAGs with the appointment of the Supreme Court judges in terms of Arts 142 and 148-151 etc.

IAC fully expects proxies like Prashant Bhushan to file more copycat Petitions on behalf of Congress Party (like was done in CoalGate using dummies like Common Cause and the usual clutch of by now professional Congi PILers and retired anti-nationals like Magsaysay awardee Admiral Ramdas, Admiral Tahiliani, CEC Gopalswami etc.).

Watch this space

Sarbajit
National Convenor IAC

 

Post: "indiaresists@..."
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@..."
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" 
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Sarbajit Roy | 23 May 2013 10:27
Picon

[IAC#RG] Appointment of new CAG challenged in SC

Dear IAC members / patriotic friends on other channels

The appointment of the new CAG has been challenged in the Supreme Court a few hours back by Advocate Manoharlal Sharma (the original Petitioner in COALGATE). After mentioning before the Vacation Bench today it was directed the PIL be listed to be taken up on 01.07.2013 the moment the court resumes after summer vacations.

Although the petition has been filed by Adv. Sharma, the mainstream media channels like CNN are blanking out his name to imply it is filed by Prashant Bhushan (whose Aam Aadmi Party is the B-team of Congress Party) who left IAC under circumstances which are too well known to repeat.

The Writ (a copy of which is with the IAC), highlights important questions of law and essentially seeks parity for appointing CAGs with the appointment of the Supreme Court judges in terms of Arts 142 and 148-151 etc.

IAC fully expects proxies like Prashant Bhushan to file more copycat Petitions on behalf of Congress Party (like was done in CoalGate using dummies like Common Cause and the usual clutch of by now professional Congi PILers and retired anti-nationals like Magsaysay awardee Admiral Ramdas, Admiral Tahiliani, CEC Gopalswami etc.).

Watch this space

Sarbajit
National Convenor IAC



Post: "indiaresists@..."
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@..."
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" 
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Sarbajit Roy | 22 May 2013 15:05
Picon

[IAC#RG] NIA deletes Sadhvi Pragya, Col Purohit names

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Malegaon-blast-Col-Purohit-Aseemanand-and-Sadhvi-Pragyas-names-missing-from-chargesheet/articleshow/20208843.cms

Malegaon blast: Col Purohit, Aseemanand and Sadhvi Pragya's names missing from chargesheet

PTI | May 22, 2013, 05.57 PM IST
Post: "indiaresists@..."
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@..."
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" 
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Sarbajit Roy | 22 May 2013 09:50
Picon

Re: [IAC#RG] RadioOne - Public apology and enquiry

STAGE-1
Its very nice to know that RadioOne has finally understood the power
of their consumers and agreed to give a public apology on air to
Purobi. In the long term it will only benefit RadioOne.

STAGE-2
To make Govt also realise that we are their gods and not the other way around.

Sarbajit

>> On 20-May-2013, at 18:22, naveen.saxena@... wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Purobi:
>>>
>>> Absolutely accepted that the apology should be made public and we are
>>> doing the same tomorrow morning. Please tune in to Radio one between the
>>> time band of 7 to 8 AM and Hrishi would be making the apology on Air.
>>>
>>> Also please share your number with us so Hrishi could speak to you
>>> personally.
>>>
>>> Thank you very much.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Naveen
>>> Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Purobi Ghosh Mohan <purobi1@...>
>>> Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 15:58:41
>>> To: <naveen.saxena@...><naveen.saxena@...>
>>> Cc: <anil.machado@...><anil.machado@...>;
>>> <complaintcell-ncw@...><complaintcell-ncw@...>;
>>>
<manoj.gujaran@...><manoj.gujaran@...>; Sarbajit
>>> Roy<sroy.mb@...>
>>> Subject: Re: RadioOne -  Public apology and enquiry
>>>
>>> Dear Mr Saxena,
>>>
>>> Reference your mail dated May 17, 2013.
>>>
>>> Apology to me takes away the seriousness of the issue. The comments
>>> require a public acknowledgement of trespass of sensibilities.
>>>
>>> AIR code of conduct clearly states no obscenities to be broadcast.
>>>
>>> As regards your stating that the channel is not responsible for the views
>>> of an individual, you could hardly call the statements 'a view'. It is
>>> about having the right personalities on Air and being careful about what
>>> you broadcast.
>>>
>>> A channel such as yours cannot set up such precedents.
>>>
>>> Kindly do the needful.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Purobi Ghosh Mohan
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>
>>> On 17-May-2013, at 17:44, "Naveen Saxena" <naveen.saxena@...>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear Purobi:
>>>>
>>>> We refer to your email dated May 17, 2013 asking for a public apology
>>>> and
>>>> enquiry pertaining to an incident related to our morning program on May
>>>> 13,
>>>> 2013.
>>>>
>>>> Kindly accept our sincere apologies for the said incident.
>>>>
>>>> Post an internal enquiry conducted by us, we have strengthened our
>>>> systems
>>>> to ensure that going forward such sexist comments are not aired on our
>>>> FM
>>>> radio station.
>>>>
>>>> We hereby state that Radio One and/ or its hosts do not endorse views of
>>>> any
>>>> of the guests that appear on any of its shows and strictly follow the
>>>> AIR
>>>> code of conduct and discourages disrespect to any individual, gender or
>>>> community.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Naveen Saxena
>>>> Station Director - Mumbai
>>>> 94.3 Radio One
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Purobi Ghosh Mohan [mailto:purobi1@...]
>>>> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 11:35 AM
>>>> To: naveen.saxena@...
>>>> Cc: anil.machado@...; complaintcell-ncw@...
>>>> Subject: RadioOne - Public apology and enquiry
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Naveen Saxena,
>>>>
>>>> This reference to my tweet sent to  <at> 943RadioOne on May 13, 2013
>>>> regarding
>>>> the radically sexiest comment made by some comedian Mr. Sorabh
>>>> ( <at> hankypanty)
>>>> on a morning program of yours. And your request for the details.
>>>>
>>>> The incident goes like this:
>>>>
>>>> "On May 13, 2013, in the morning program of Mr. Rishi K, some comedian
>>>> called Sorabh, invited on the show, between 07.30 am and 7.42 am, went
>>>> on to
>>>> discuss about cheer leaders in IPL describing them in a language and
>>>> manner
>>>> unacceptable on a public radio channel.
>>>>
>>>> His last comment, to which Mr. Rishi K never objected to, and which I
>>>> for
>>>> one cannot let pass, was that 'he would like to see women nanga'."
>>>>
>>>> The fact that this went on air unabated and uncontrolled has left me
>>>> with no
>>>> choice but to demand an inquiry into this incident and a public
>>>> apology.
>>>>
>>>> I would request you to take a stern action in this matter and under
>>>> advise
>>>> to the undersigned.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Purobi Ghosh Mohan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPad=
>>>>
>

Post: "indiaresists@..."
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@..."
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" 
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Sarbajit Roy | 21 May 2013 22:19
Picon

[IAC#RG] 2 "polls" say Manmohan tottering, NaMo & Clown Prince rising

2 polls released on 4th anniversary of UPA-II and also BJP's Parliamentary Affairs meeting.

The first is an Urban Poll conducted on behalf of CNN-IBN with 2,700 respondents in 12 cities.
The 2nd is touted as an all-India Poll with 1.2 lakh respondents across 540 LS constituencies conducted by HeadlinesToday and C-Voter.

 
Post: "indiaresists@..."
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@..."
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" 
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Permalink | Reply | 13 comments |
headers
Rajesh Jadon | 20 May 2013 21:16
Picon
Gravatar

[IAC#RG] Corruption in recruitment of Assistant Professor at Jiwaji University

Dear IAC members,

Please suggest me to whom I can contact regarding the Corruption in recruitment of Assistant Professor at Jiwaji University
Fact: there is more than 200 candidates that had applied for the post of asst professor. to short list the candidates Vise Chancellor has organised a screening test. and the question paper was set by the two professors of the same department, contains 50 question each. professors leaked question to near and dear ones who is working in the same department. and candidates got 94, 92 and 88 out of 100.

--
Rajesh S Jadon
9300631006 
Post: "indiaresists@..."
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@..."
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" 
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Permalink | Reply | 8 comments |
headers
Joyprakash Chhetry | 20 May 2013 00:12
Picon
Favicon

Re: [IAC#RG] Complaint on behalf of India Against Corruption

Dear Above named Addressees,
This is un Urgent Request from the India Resists Grp. that we want to know why the genuine letter of  Mr. Sarbajit Roy's letter to YOU ALL. dO reply soon.
Joy P. Chhetry
Pkoenix, Arizona, USA.
 

From: Sarbajit Roy <srosun
Ministry of Home Affairs
Union of India

Date: 19-May-2013

Kind Attn:  Mr. R.K. Singh/Secretary(MHA)

Sir

Sub: Complaint concerning the Criminal Laws Amendment Ordinance 2013

Kindly refer to IAC's  appended request for suo-moto disclosure concerning the subject ordinance submitted to the Hon'ble President of India on 07.02.2013 which was thereafter forwarded by CPIO/Rashtrapati Bhawan to eventually land on desk of Mr. J.L.Chugh, Joint Secretary (Judicial Division) MHA about 2 months back.

As we have not heard anything from MHA or Mr. J.L.Chugh in the matter, the India Against Corruption presumes that the Union Home Ministry has played a fraud on the Hon'ble President of India, and thereby on the citizens, to get this ordinance issued for corrupt reasons.

Accordingly, India Against Corruption would be obliged if you would kindly look into this complaint personally to inform us forthwith if there were in fact any emergent circumstances requiring the said ordinance to be issued along with the specifics thereof.

With best wishes

yours faithfully

Er. Sarbajit Roy

National Convenor
India Against Corruption jan andolan

B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024
Tel : 09311448069
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date: Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:21 AM
Subject: Request for "suo-moto" information dissemination u/s 4(1)(c) RTI Act 2005
To: ds.office-Nmo00qXqng//PtFMR13I2A@public.gmane.org, indiaresists <indiaresists-3hfIC0tI0F+k/GrYEfjPQg@public.gmane.org>


To:
Shri Saurabh Vijay,
(Central Public Information Officer)
The President’s Secretariat,
Rashtrapati Bhavan,
New Delhi-110004

Date: 07-Feb-2013
BY EMAIL
Sir,
Sub: Request for "suo-moto" information u/s 4(1)(c) RTI Act 2005 in larger public interest.
I am sending this email seeking information u/s 4(1)(c) of the RTI Act on behalf of the subscribers to India Against Corruption jan andolan.
I refer to the Criminal Law (Amendment) Ordinance 2013, or suchlike, approved by his Eminence the Hon'ble President of India very recently, and which contained, inter-alia, the following text in its preamble.
"AND WHEREAS Parliament is not in session and the President is satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessary for him to take immediate action to give effect to the provisions of the said Bill with certain modifications;"
Accordingly, the subscribers of India Against Corruption people's movement would like to be properly informed about the specific and exact circumstances, based on the records,  which existed rendering it necessary for the Hon'ble President of India to act immediately to give effect to the provisions of the Bill cited.
It is pertinent to mention that India Against Corruption had responded to the public notice issued for the Justice J.S.Verma Committee on Criminal Law amendments to ensure safety of women against sexual assault, and we are interested in everything connected with the process of amending the Criminal Laws of India to ensure the safety of women.
I would be obliged if the information is urgently conveyed to me by return email in view of the large public interest involved. Alternatively, it is requested that the same may kindly be uploaded to your website, under intimation to the undersigned,  for wide dissemination.
Looking forward to your reply
yours faithfully

( Sarbajit Roy )
National Convenor,
India Against Corruption,
B-59 Defence Colony,
New Delhi 110024
Tel : 09311448069


Post: "indiaresists-3hfIC0tI0F+k/GrYEfjPQg@public.gmane.org"
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe-3hfIC0tI0F+k/GrYEfjPQg@public.gmane.org"
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists"
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in/

Post: "indiaresists@..."
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@..."
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" 
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Gaur J K | 20 May 2013 09:23
Picon
Favicon

RE: [IAC#RG] Complaint on behalf of India Against Corruption

20/5/13
Dear Sir,
Thanks for keeping members informed.
It is worth pursuing this ordinance. There were no exceptional circumstances warranting issue of the ordinance.
It is how the Govt. evades discussion in Parliament.
JKGaur 
 
Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 19:56:17 +0530
From: sroy.mb-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
To: hshso-R9E+szwozl8@public.gmane.org; ds.office-Nmo00qXqng//PtFMR13I2A@public.gmane.org; indiaresists-3hfIC0tI0F+k/GrYEfjPQg@public.gmane.org
Subject: [IAC#RG] Complaint on behalf of India Against Corruption

To:
The Secretary,
Ministry of Home Affairs
Union of India

Date: 19-May-2013

Kind Attn:  Mr. R.K. Singh/Secretary(MHA)

Sir

Sub: Complaint concerning the Criminal Laws Amendment Ordinance 2013

Kindly refer to IAC's  appended request for suo-moto disclosure concerning the subject ordinance submitted to the Hon'ble President of India on 07.02.2013 which was thereafter forwarded by CPIO/Rashtrapati Bhawan to eventually land on desk of Mr. J.L.Chugh, Joint Secretary (Judicial Division) MHA about 2 months back.

As we have not heard anything from MHA or Mr. J.L.Chugh in the matter, the India Against Corruption presumes that the Union Home Ministry has played a fraud on the Hon'ble President of India, and thereby on the citizens, to get this ordinance issued for corrupt reasons.

Accordingly, India Against Corruption would be obliged if you would kindly look into this complaint personally to inform us forthwith if there were in fact any emergent circumstances requiring the said ordinance to be issued along with the specifics thereof.

With best wishes

yours faithfully

Er. Sarbajit Roy

National Convenor
India Against Corruption jan andolan

B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024
Tel : 09311448069
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Sarbajit Roy <sroy.mb-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date: Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:21 AM
Subject: Request for "suo-moto" information dissemination u/s 4(1)(c) RTI Act 2005
To: ds.office-Nmo00qXqng//PtFMR13I2A@public.gmane.org, indiaresists <indiaresists-3hfIC0tI0F+k/GrYEfjPQg@public.gmane.org>


To:
Shri Saurabh Vijay,
(Central Public Information Officer)
The President’s Secretariat,
Rashtrapati Bhavan,
New Delhi-110004

Date: 07-Feb-2013
BY EMAIL

Sir,
Sub: Request for "suo-moto" information u/s 4(1)(c) RTI Act 2005 in larger public interest.
I am sending this email seeking information u/s 4(1)(c) of the RTI Act on behalf of the subscribers to India Against Corruption jan andolan.
I refer to the Criminal Law (Amendment) Ordinance 2013, or suchlike, approved by his Eminence the Hon'ble President of India very recently, and which contained, inter-alia, the following text in its preamble.
"AND WHEREAS Parliament is not in session and the President is satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessary for him to take immediate action to give effect to the provisions of the said Bill with certain modifications;"
Accordingly, the subscribers of India Against Corruption people's movement would like to be properly informed about the specific and exact circumstances, based on the records,  which existed rendering it necessary for the Hon'ble President of India to act immediately to give effect to the provisions of the Bill cited.
It is pertinent to mention that India Against Corruption had responded to the public notice issued for the Justice J.S.Verma Committee on Criminal Law amendments to ensure safety of women against sexual assault, and we are interested in everything connected with the process of amending the Criminal Laws of India to ensure the safety of women.
I would be obliged if the information is urgently conveyed to me by return email in view of the large public interest involved. Alternatively, it is requested that the same may kindly be uploaded to your website, under intimation to the undersigned,  for wide dissemination.

Looking forward to your reply
yours faithfully


( Sarbajit Roy )
National Convenor,
India Against Corruption,

B-59 Defence Colony,
New Delhi 110024


Tel : 09311448069


Post: "indiaresists-3hfIC0tI0F+k/GrYEfjPQg@public.gmane.org" Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe-3hfIC0tI0F9QRWznG6P0Og@public.gmane.orget" Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Post: "indiaresists@..."
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@..."
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" 
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Anamika R | 20 May 2013 15:47
Picon

[IAC#RG] Fwd: SANJAY DUTT: MY GUN LICENCE: MOST HONEST ARMS DEALER

Begin forwarded message:

From: Janhit Manch <janhitmanch-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date: 20 May 2013 12:23:09 IST


SANJAY DUTT: MY GUN LICENCE: MOST HONEST ARMS DEALER

It was about 1981.

Julio Rebeiro, the Mumbai Police Commissioner was a guest speaker in a breakfast meeting of Lions Club of Juhu at a five star hotel. He spoke on crime, underworld, law and order, security and protection of people and so on.

His speech as usual followed Q-A session.

I shot a question:

Sanjay Dutt, a film hero and the son of famous actor couple Nargis and Sunil Dutt, fires several round in the air, scaring the residents in the Bandra neighbourhood and frightening the birds and animals, your men simply picks him up, take to police station and release him after warning.

How such ruffian gets an arm licence when I being in a risky real estate business (then) and the only male member in my family struggling for a licence since long but not getting?

Mr.Rebeiro turned speechless for a monent and then asked me to meet him the next day.

When I met him, my file was on his table and he said that since I had already approached State's Home Minister, he couldn't help.

Within a week thereafter, I received an interview call from the office of Vilasrao Deshmukh, the then Home Minister of Maharashtra. I was warmly received by him and after patiently hearing my representation, granted the licence.

In 1982, I purchased a .32 bore french make pistol for Rs.25000, got trained at Mazgaon Police, joined Bombay Rifle Club and went for practice regularly at worli's Maharashtra Rifle Assoiation.

But during 25 years of holding the licence, I couldn't kill a mosquito let alone a dacoit.

The most interesting story comes now.

When I went to sell off this pistol to an arms dealer at Crawfford Marked in 2007, he asked me how much I expected. I reluctantly quoted Rs.35000 assuming to get atleast my original cost of Rs.25000 after negotiation.

He said I was fool! It was worth Rs.1.25 lakh and he would pay that much. This was a big shock and a pleasant surperise for me to know that any businessman can be that honest. But he kept his word and I walked out with five times the original price of the gun after keeping for 25 years and he completed the procedure of getting my licence cancelled.

Bhagvanji Raiyani, Mumbai.



Post: "indiaresists@..."
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@..."
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" 
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |
headers
ankit khetan | 17 May 2013 15:13
Picon
Favicon

[IAC#RG] We Want Justice

Whether we will get justice? Some say we are approx 3 crore. Whether really we are only 3 crore, we don’t know. You Citizen of India are lucky that you have census, which counts each one of you. But we are not counted by any one.

 We are those pending cases in Court of India who doesn’t know that whether we will get justice any day or not. Most of us are those unlucky one who doesn’t know that whether we can see the person who has registered us till end of case.

India is no more a place where dreams are fulfilled we all are accepting this fact sooner or later. But it is also no more a place where justice is delivered.

Oh you are thinking that your case solved but when solving a case takes more than 20 years than it is not solved case rather it is closed case.

Why Law makers, Bureaucrates forgets the situation before joining service which they have to face?

Who will give us justice?

Whether we the devdasis will remain it forever?

Whether Rapists, Acid attackers, porn site host……runs their business freely?

Why people forget the cry of serial blast?

 Whether Goondaraj will remain forever?

Where the children are vanishing? Who are kidnapping them?

Who have done the riots?

Why you people first donate crores of rupees to temple and then few days later you ask the authority from where those money come?

Who will give us justice? Post of Judges are vacant…no recruitment are there for years on years…..The development is being done in advertisement and paper works….Whether we the common people will get justice?

Politicians are getting their defence from foreign helicopter…But who will give us justice…

There are 100s of black army protecting single politician……who will protect the person who have registered us….

Whether we will get justice or the cases will be closed outside the court on account of settlement on the nib of gun……….

Give us Justice we want Justice…….



Pending Cases
India
Post: "indiaresists@..."
Exit: "indiaresists-unsubscribe@..."
Quit: "https://lists.riseup.net/www/signoff/indiaresists" 
Help: https://help.riseup.net/en/list-user
WWW : http://indiaagainstcorruption.net.in
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |

Gmane