headers
Liam Quin | 8 Sep 2005 18:49
Picon
Favicon

W3C Last Call and Media Type request for comments: XSLT 2.0

[
    Notes:

    We slipped up in not sending this along with the Last Call
    announcement; please caaept our apologies.

    We are using bugzilla to track comments on this document;
    comments on the MIME-related part of the document may be made
    on the ietf-types mailing list or in Bugzilla.  See the
    "Status of this Document" section for further information.

    We are following
    http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-freed-media-type-reg-05.txt
    here, and the text is written to be part of a larger document.

    Finally, as for XQuery, we'll probably expand the Security
    Considerations after gaining more implementation experience.

]

Registration of MIME Media Type application/xslt+xml
----------------------------------------------------

MIME media type name: application
   MIME subtype name: xslt+xml
 Required parameters: None.
 Optional parameters: charset
    This parameter has identical semantics to the charset parameter
    of the application/xml media type as specified in [RFC3023].
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Scott Hollenbeck | 8 Sep 2005 18:54

RE: W3C Last Call and Media Type request for comments: XSLT 2.0


Liam,

The "Published specification" section of the template should include a
pointer (a URL is OK) to the published specification that describes the
media type.

-Scott-

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Liam Quin [mailto:liam <at> w3.org] 
> Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 12:50 PM
> To: ietf-types <at> iana.org
> Cc: ietf-xml-mime <at> imc.org; public-qt-comments <at> w3.org
> Subject: W3C Last Call and Media Type request for comments: XSLT 2.0
> 
> [
>     Notes:
> 
>     We slipped up in not sending this along with the Last Call
>     announcement; please caaept our apologies.
> 
>     We are using bugzilla to track comments on this document;
>     comments on the MIME-related part of the document may be made
>     on the ietf-types mailing list or in Bugzilla.  See the
>     "Status of this Document" section for further information.
> 
>     We are following
>     
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-freed-media-type-reg-05.txt
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
'Liam Quin' | 8 Sep 2005 20:06
Picon
Favicon

Re: W3C Last Call and Media Type request for comments: XSLT 2.0


On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 12:54:46PM -0400, Scott Hollenbeck wrote:
> The "Published specification" section of the template should include a
> pointer (a URL is OK) to the published specification that describes the
> media type.

The specification is a draft, but my fault for omitting the link!!

The text is at: http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-xslt20-20050404/

The latest public version of the XSLT 2 specification
is always at http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/
(the links get you the same result right now, of course)

Liam

--

-- 
Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Scott Hollenbeck | 8 Sep 2005 20:12

RE: W3C Last Call and Media Type request for comments: XSLT 2.0


> -----Original Message-----
> From: 'Liam Quin' [mailto:liam <at> w3.org] 
> Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 2:07 PM
> To: Scott Hollenbeck
> Cc: ietf-types <at> iana.org; ietf-xml-mime <at> imc.org; 
> public-qt-comments <at> w3.org
> Subject: Re: W3C Last Call and Media Type request for 
> comments: XSLT 2.0
> 
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 12:54:46PM -0400, Scott Hollenbeck wrote:
> > The "Published specification" section of the template 
> should include a
> > pointer (a URL is OK) to the published specification that 
> describes the
> > media type.
> 
> The specification is a draft, but my fault for omitting the link!!
> 
> The text is at: http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-xslt20-20050404/
> 
> The latest public version of the XSLT 2 specification
> is always at http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/
> (the links get you the same result right now, of course)

Thanks, but my point is that you need to put this info in the template
itself.

-Scott-
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
'Liam Quin' | 8 Sep 2005 20:48
Picon
Favicon

Re: W3C Last Call and Media Type request for comments: XSLT 2.0

On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 02:12:43PM -0400, Scott Hollenbeck wrote:
> Thanks, but my point is that you need to put this info in the template
> itself.
OK, noted.

Note that the information is also elsewhere in the published
specification -- it's at the beginning of the document -- since
this Internet Type information is being published as part
of a larger document.

Liam

--

-- 
Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Chris Lilley | 8 Sep 2005 22:29
Picon
Favicon

Re: W3C Last Call and Media Type request for comments: XSLT 2.0

On Thursday, September 8, 2005, 8:48:53 PM, 'Liam wrote:

LQ> On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 02:12:43PM -0400, Scott Hollenbeck wrote:
>> Thanks, but my point is that you need to put this info in the template
>> itself.
LQ> OK, noted.

LQ> Note that the information is also elsewhere in the published
LQ> specification -- it's at the beginning of the document -- since
LQ> this Internet Type information is being published as part
LQ> of a larger document.

LQ> Liam

Liam,

this has come up before as W3C uses the new process. The requirement to
make the registration template an appendix in the spec means that people
tend to forget that the appendix also has the be read as an independent
document by the people here.

The appendix has to make sense as a standalone registrations, so rather
than saying "this document" say "the document at (url) called (title)".

--

-- 
 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris <at> w3.org
 Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead
 Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Bjoern Hoehrmann | 8 Sep 2005 22:40
Picon

Re: W3C Last Call and Media Type request for comments: XSLT 2.0


* 'Liam Quin' wrote:
>Note that the information is also elsewhere in the published
>specification -- it's at the beginning of the document -- since
>this Internet Type information is being published as part
>of a larger document.

My understanding is that IANA will maintain a copy of the template, see
e.g. <http://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/application/xop+xml>.
--

-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern <at> hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
'Liam Quin' | 9 Sep 2005 02:46
Picon
Favicon

Re: W3C Last Call and Media Type request for comments: XSLT 2.0


On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 10:29:26PM +0200, Chris Lilley wrote:
> On Thursday, September 8, 2005, 8:48:53 PM, 'Liam wrote:
> 
> LQ> On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 02:12:43PM -0400, Scott Hollenbeck wrote:
> >> Thanks, but my point is that you need to put this info in the template
> >> itself.
> LQ> OK, noted.
> 
> LQ> Note that the information is also elsewhere in the published
> LQ> specification -- it's at the beginning of the document -- since
> LQ> this Internet Type information is being published as part
> LQ> of a larger document.
> 
> LQ> Liam
> 
> Liam,
> 
> this has come up before as W3C uses the new process. The requirement to
> make the registration template an appendix in the spec means that people
> tend to forget that the appendix also has the be read as an independent
> document by the people here.
> 
> The appendix has to make sense as a standalone registrations, so rather
> than saying "this document" say "the document at (url) called (title)".

Thanks (Chris and Scott and Paul) --

We will publish another round of draft documents very soon, but the set
after that will reflect these and any other comments, and yes, will
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Martin Duerst | 9 Sep 2005 20:25
Picon
Gravatar

Re: W3C Last Call and Media Type request for comments: XSLT 2.0

At 05:29 05/09/09, Chris Lilley wrote:

 >this has come up before as W3C uses the new process. The requirement to
 >make the registration template an appendix in the spec means that people
 >tend to forget that the appendix also has the be read as an independent
 >document by the people here.

Just a small point:
There is no requirement that the template be an *appendix*. For many
specs, making the template an appendix will work out fine, but it could
as well be a section or subsection if that works better for the spec
in question.

 >The appendix has to make sense as a standalone registrations, so rather
 >than saying "this document" say "the document at (url) called (title)".

Yes, indeed. It will be self-referencing :-).

Regards,   Martin.
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane