Mukesh.Gupta | 5 Oct 01:43 2004
Picon

VRRP WG Last Call: draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec-07.txt

Hi All,

The chairs think that the VRRPv3 draft is mature
enough to start a WG LC.  

This email starts a 2 week VRRP Working Group Last 
Call on the following draft:

    Title         : Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol for IPv6
    Author        : R. Hinden
    Filename      : draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec-07.txt
    Pages         : 31

The draft is planned to be advanced as a Proposed Standard.

Please send the comments to vrrp <at> ietf.org.

The Last Call will end on Oct. 18th 2004.

Regards,
Radia & Mukesh
VRRP WG WG co-chairs

PS: For quicker access, here is the direct URL of the
draft.
http://ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec-07.txt

_______________________________________________
vrrp mailing list
vrrp <at> ietf.org
(Continue reading)

Mukesh.K.Gupta | 10 Oct 19:14 2004
Picon

No WG Meeting in Washington (IETF 61st)

Hi All,

As there are no agenda items for the WG meeting, VRRP WG will
not be meeting in Washington (IETF 61st).

If you have anything that you would like to discuss, please let
the chairs know as soon as possible.

Regards
Radia & Mukesh

_______________________________________________
vrrp mailing list
vrrp <at> ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp

Steve Bates | 11 Oct 18:25 2004
Picon

Comments on draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-mib-01.txt

Kalyan,

I have the following comments.

In the diagram on the line of IP addresses for the virtual routers there is
a superfluous "|" following IP A.  Also on the line of host IP addresses
H4's IP B is missing a ")".

There needs to be some consistency with the interfaces shown in the diagram
and displayed in the tables.  Interfaces 3 and 4 should be added to the
diagram and the tables updated accordingly.

In the VrId textual convention I'm not what the second sentence adds to the
definition considering that VRRPv3 is supported as well.

Several typos on deprecated:
Top of Page 9 "  --  Depricated VRRP Oper Table"
Page 15 "--  Drprecated VRRP Associated IP Address Table"

Steve Bates
Alcatel Internetworking
801-287-8934

_______________________________________________
vrrp mailing list
vrrp <at> ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp

Kalyan.Tata | 15 Oct 21:24 2004
Picon

RE: Comments on draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-mib-01.txt

Hi Steve, Thanks a lot for reviewing the draft. I will incorporate the changes.

thanks
kalyan

-----Original Message-----
From: ext Steve Bates [mailto:Steve.Bates <at> ind.alcatel.com]
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 9:25 AM
To: Tata Kalyan (Nokia-ES/MtView)
Cc: vrrp <at> ietf.org
Subject: Comments on draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-mib-01.txt

Kalyan,

I have the following comments.

In the diagram on the line of IP addresses for the virtual routers there is
a superfluous "|" following IP A.  Also on the line of host IP addresses
H4's IP B is missing a ")".

There needs to be some consistency with the interfaces shown in the diagram
and displayed in the tables.  Interfaces 3 and 4 should be added to the
diagram and the tables updated accordingly.

In the VrId textual convention I'm not what the second sentence adds to the
definition considering that VRRPv3 is supported as well.

Several typos on deprecated:
Top of Page 9 "  --  Depricated VRRP Oper Table"
Page 15 "--  Drprecated VRRP Associated IP Address Table"
(Continue reading)

Mukesh.K.Gupta | 19 Oct 20:31 2004
Picon

VRRPv3 draft ready for AD review

Alex/Bill,

The WG Last Call on the VRRPv3 draft ended yesterday.

The chairs think that the draft is ready for your review.

Please review the draft and let us know your comments.

Regards
Radia & Mukesh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: vrrp-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:vrrp-bounces <at> ietf.org]On Behalf Of
> ext Mukesh.Gupta <at> nokia.com
> Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 4:44 PM
> To: vrrp <at> ietf.org
> Cc: radia.perlman <at> sun.com
> Subject: [VRRP] VRRP WG Last Call: draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec-07.txt
> 
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> The chairs think that the VRRPv3 draft is mature
> enough to start a WG LC.  
> 
> This email starts a 2 week VRRP Working Group Last 
> Call on the following draft:
> 
>     Title         : Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol for IPv6
>     Author        : R. Hinden
(Continue reading)

Steve Bates | 22 Oct 19:10 2004
Picon

FW: VRRPv6 Draft 7 Inconsistencies

Hi Bob,

Sorry for the two copies, I don't think the first will make it to the
mailing list.

These comments might be a little late, but I have a few questions about VRRP
for IPv6 Internet Draft 7.

1) In section 6.4.2 it states that when the Master_Down_Timer fires a backup
virtual router should join the Solicited-node multicast address for all of
its IPv6 addresses, but in section 6.4.3 it states that a Master router must
be a member for the link local address.  Is there a subtle distinction I'm
missing here based around the "must"?  It seems that the virtual router
ought to become a member for all its IP addresses.

2) Conversely, in section 6.4.3 it states that the master must respond to
neighbor solicitation messages for its IPv6 addresses, but in section 6.4.2
when the Master_Down_Timer fires an unsolicited neighbor advertisement is
only sent for the link local address of the virtual router.  Shouldn't an
advertisement be sent for all the virtual router's IPv6 addresses?

3) The second paragraph of section 7.4 says that the spec tells how to
resolve the VRRP routers IPv6 link local address into the virtual router MAC
but after several readings of the spec I'm struggling with what the virtual
router's link local address is supposed to look like.  The preceeding
paragraph tells us what an IPv6 router cannot do to generate an interface
address, but could the virtual router's link local address be created by
generating an Interface Identifier from the virtual router mac?  The draft
doesn't say.  Obviously for an IP address owner this is not the case, but a
backup must obtain the virtual router's link local address through a
(Continue reading)


Gmane