headers
ono | 2 Apr 2003 10:26

Re: VRRPv3 Review

Hi all,

I have implemented VRRPv3 for {Free,Net,Open}BSD/KAME and I have some
comments to 'draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec-03.txt'. 

Most of them seems good for me. I have some comments below.

I suggest that a sentence to mention DAD should be included in this draft.

ex:
  Duplicated Address Detection(DAD) for IPv6 link-local address
  associated with the virtual routerSHOULD(?) be suppressed about .  

>6.4.1   Initialize
>       o Send an unsolicited ND Neighbor Advertisement with the Router
>         Flag (R) set, the Solicited Flag (S) unset, the Override flag
>         (O) set, the Target Address set to the IPv6 link-local address
>         of the Virtual Router, and the Target Link Layer address set to
>         the virtual router MAC address.

"IPv6 link-local address of the Virtual Router"
sould be
"IPv6 link-local address associated with the Virtual Router"
There is a same sentence at 6.4.2.

>6.4.2   Backup
>       o Compute and join the Solicited-Node multicast address [ADD-ARH]
>         for the link-local IPv6 address of the Virtual Router.

This sentence doesn't appear at 6.4.1.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Mukesh.Gupta | 2 Apr 2003 20:00
Picon

RE: VRRPv3 Review

Hi Hideki,

Thanks for the comments.

Have you implemented any security related features (clear text password or IPsec AH) in VRRPv3 ? I am asking
this because we are removing the security from the draft soon.

regards
Mukesh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext ono <at> kame.net [mailto:ono <at> kame.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 12:26 AM
> To: vrrp <at> ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [VRRP] VRRPv3 Review
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I have implemented VRRPv3 for {Free,Net,Open}BSD/KAME and I have some
> comments to 'draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec-03.txt'. 
> 
> Most of them seems good for me. I have some comments below.
> 
> I suggest that a sentence to mention DAD should be included 
> in this draft.
> 
> ex:
>   Duplicated Address Detection(DAD) for IPv6 link-local address
>   associated with the virtual routerSHOULD(?) be suppressed about .
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 501 comments |
headers
ono | 3 Apr 2003 00:53

Re: VRRPv3 Review

> Have you implemented any security related features (clear text password or IPsec AH) in VRRPv3 ? I am
asking this because we are removing the security from the draft soon.

My implementation is based on freevrrpd which has the featrure of
clear text password but not IPsec AH.  So, clear text password is also
available in my implementation.  I have no plan to implement IPsec AH. 

I have no objection to remove the security stuff from the draft.
--
Hideki ONO
_______________________________________________
vrrp mailing list
vrrp <at> ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp
Permalink | Reply | 501 comments |
headers
Mukesh.Gupta | 28 Apr 2003 22:36
Picon

WG Milestones.

Hi All,

I am planning to update the WG milestones with the following. If any of you disagree or have any comments,
please let me know.

DONE      Charter Working Group.
DONE      Issue new Internet Drafts for IPv4 version of the protocol.
DONE      Issue Internet Draft for IPv6 version of VRRP.
DONE      Review and finalize IPv4 Internet Drafts.
DONE      Submit revised IPv4 Internet Drafts to IESG for proposed standard.
DONE      Issue VRRP MIB drafts.
DONE      Issue revised draft for IPv6 version of VRRP.
DONE      Finalize MIB draft and submit to IESG.
DONE      Resolve open issues with authentication methods.
MAY 03    Issue VRRPv3 (VRRP for IPv6) MIB drafts.
JUN 03    Submit updated version of VRRP (IPv4) to IESG for Draft Standard.
AUG 03    Submit VRRPv3 (VRRP for IPv6) for Proposed Standard.
SEP 03    Submit VRRPv3 MIB for Proposed Standard.
DEC 03    Review the WG goals and future potential.

regards
Mukesh
_______________________________________________
vrrp mailing list
vrrp <at> ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane