Glenn Parsons | 4 Nov 2002 06:50

WG Last Call on VPIM Directory

Folks,

This is a two week Working Group last call notice for the VPIM Directory draft to end on Nov 15th.  This draft is proposed to go to Proposed Standard RFC status.  

This draft has seen quite a bit of clean-up and alignment based on implementation experience by the author and feedback from the LDAP directorate.  We've had this in process for a while and it is time to push this document out the door...

The draft is in the Internet repositories:

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-vpim-vpimdir-04.txt

Thanks in advance for your help in reviewing this document.

Cheers,
Glenn Parsons
VPIM WG chair


Glenn Parsons | 4 Nov 2002 06:55

Request for AD review of IVM

Ned,

The VPIM WG completed a last call on the core IVM document in August.  No comments were received.  The document is:

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-vpim-ivm-04.txt

Now that the dependent documents have cleared, I would like to request AD review of this draft and subsequent IESG review.

Cheers,
Glenn.

Glenn Parsons | 12 Nov 2002 22:46

VPIM WG Agenda

Folks,

Here is what I propose for the VPIM agenda.  Note that we will be meeting jointly with FAX and that we will be second (probably starting around 10:15am).

If there are any comments on the agenda, let me know.  I'll be sending it in on Thursday.

If everything aligns with document publication, I suspect this will be the last VPIM meeting.

Cheers,
Glenn.
 
 

IETF VPIM WG - 55th IETF
Chair:   Glenn Parsons <gparsons <at> nortelnetworks.com>

WEDNESDAY, November 20, 2002
0900-1130 Morning Sessions
Salon A APP     fax&vpim        Joint Internet Fax WG & Voice Profile for Internet Mail WG

Agenda Bashing - 5 minutes

VPIM Charter & Milestones review - 5 minutes

VPIM v2 r2  - 5 minutes

        Voice Profile for Internet Mail - version 2  (Greg Vaudreuil)

      draft-ietf-vpim-vpimv2r2-05.txt  
      draft-ietf-vpim-vpimv2r2-32k-03.txt    
      draft-ietf-vpim-vpimv2r2-dur-03.txt    

        MDN drafts (Tony Hansen/Greg Vaudreuil )

        draft-vaudreuil-mdnbis-03.txt    

        DSN drafts (Greg Vaudreuil)

        draft-moore-rfc1891bis-02.txt     

        draft-vaudreuil-1892bis-02.txt     
        draft-vaudreuil-1893bis-03.txt    
        draft-vaudreuil-1894bis-02.txt
    

VPIM Addressing - 5 minutes (Glenn Parsons)

        VPIM Addressing

        draft-ietf-vpim-address-03.txt         

VPIM Directory - 15 minutes (Greg Vaudreuil)

        Voice Messaging Directory Service  (schema)

        draft-ietf-vpim-vpimdir-04.txt 

        Voice Message Routing Service  (ENUM) 

        draft-ietf-vpim-routing-03.txt 

IVM  - 10 minutes

        Goals for Internet Voice Mail  (Emily Candell)

        draft-ietf-vpim-ivm-goals-03.txt       

        Internet Voice Messaging  (Stuart McRae)

        draft-ietf-vpim-ivm-04.txt             

        Critical Content of Internet Mail  (Eric Burger)

        draft-ietf-vpim-cc-08.txt                      

        Message Context for Internet Mail (Eric Burger)

        draft-ietf-vpim-hint-08.txt            


VPIM Addenda - 20 minutes

        Binary & channel IMAP extensions for VPIM Messages  (Lyndon Nerenberg)

        draft-nerenberg-imap-binary-08.txt  
        draft-nerenberg-imap-channel-02.txt    
        draft-burger-imap-chanuse-01.txt     

        Calling Line Identification for VPIM Messages  (Glenn Parsons)

        draft-ema-vpim-clid-05.txt             

        Voice Messaging IMAP Client Behaviour  (Glenn Parsons)

        draft-ema-vpim-cb-02.txt               

        SNAP (Noam Shapira)

        draft-shapira-snap-05.txt  



Wrap Up - 5 minutes




NED+vpim | 10 Nov 2002 19:03

Additional AD review comments on draft-ema-vpim-clid-05.txt

I just reviewed the newly posted -05 version of this document. All of my
review comments have been dealt with except one: The need for an IANA
considerations section.

Unfortunately this really needs to be dealy with before the document is
last called, so please add one and reissue the document. I explained how
this is done in my previous review:

> This document defines an IANA-administered registration space for
> numbering plans and defines two initial entries in this registry:
> local and e164, but does not contain an IANA considerations section
> defining the registry. This needs to be added. The section needs
> to give the registry a name, reiterate the two initial entries in
> the registry, and repeat that additional entries in the registry
> require a standards track RFC.

Thanks!
	
				Ned
----------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent to you, since you are subscribed to
vpim <at> lists.neystadt.org. You can manage your subscription at
http://www.neystadt.org/cgi-bin/majordomo

Pete Resnick | 18 Nov 2002 22:47

Re: VPIM WG Agenda

Sorry for the late reply.

On 11/12/02 at 4:46 PM -0500, Glenn Parsons wrote:

VPIM Addenda - 20 minutes

        Binary & channel IMAP extensions for VPIM Messages  (Lyndon Nerenberg)
        draft-nerenberg-imap-binary-08.txt  
        draft-nerenberg-imap-channel-02.txt    
        draft-burger-imap-chanuse-01.txt     
[...[
        SNAP (Noam Shapira)
        draft-shapira-snap-05.txt  

These two look solidly to be LEMONADE issues. Is there a reason to do them in VPIM at all?
-- --
Pete Resnick <mailto:presnick <at> qualcomm.com>
QUALCOMM Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102

---------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent to you, since you are subscribed to vpim <at> lists.neystadt.org. You can manage your subscription at http://www.neystadt.org/cgi-bin/majordomo

Glenn Parsons | 25 Nov 2002 19:01

IETF 55 VPIM WG minutes

Folks,

Please find the VPIM WG minutes from this week's IETF meeting.

Let me know if you have any comments.

Note the slides are available on http://www.vpim.org

Cheers,
Glenn.

VPIM WG meeting, 55th IETF, Atlanta, Georgia
============================================

Chair & Scribe:  Glenn Parsons <gparsons <at> nortelnetworks.com>

The VPIM WG met during the second half of a joint session.  The first 'half'
of the session was occupied by the Internet Fax WG.


Voice Profile for Internet Mail v2:
-----------------------------------

VPIM v2 - drafts are still in the RFC Editor's queue waiting for the DSN/MDN
references to clear.  These drafts are the following:

     Voice Profile for Internet Mail - version 2
          <draft-ietf-vpim-vpimv2r2-05.txt>
     Toll Quality Voice - 32 kbit/s ADPCM MIME Sub-type Registration
          <draft-ietf-vpim-vpimv2r2-32k-03.txt>
     Content Duration MIME Header Definition
          <draft-ietf-vpim-vpimv2r2-dur-03.txt>

DSN/MDN references status:

     DSN:  IANA actions are now complete.  Ned expects AUTH48 from RFC-EDITOR
     shortly.  The drafts in question are the following:

     SMTP Service Extension for Delivery Status Notifications
          <draft-moore-rfc1891bis-02.txt>
     The Multipart/Report Content Type for the Reporting of Mail System
     Administrative Messages
          <draft-vaudreuil-1892bis-02.txt>
     Enhanced Mail System Status Codes
          <draft-vaudreuil-1893bis-03.txt>
     An Extensible Message Format for Delivery Status Notifications
          <draft-vaudreuil-1894bis-02.txt>

     MDN:  Greg's interop report had to be changed to be in the proper format.
     It is now waiting for Ned's report and will likely be added to the next
     ISEG telechat before progressing to IETF last call.
     The draft is question is the following:

          Message Disposition Notification <draft-vaudreuil-mdnbis-03.txt>


VPIM (Voice Profile for Internet Mail) Addressing
<draft-ietf-vpim-address-03.txt> - 
  RFC Editor's queue waiting form references

Voice Messaging Directory Service <draft-ietf-vpim-vpimdir-04.txt> - draft
was updated as a result of LDAP directorate review.  The syntax has changed.
WG last call has completed.  However, one more pass will be made on the 
document to cover ID nits before forwarding to Ned for AD review.

Voice Message Routing Service <draft-ietf-vpim-routing-03.txt> - waiting for the
ENUM WG to stabilize the service specification syntax.  Thuis has happened at 
this meeting.  Greg will revise the document ASAP and we will begin a WG last
call.


Internet Voice Messaging:
-------------------------

Goals for Internet Voice Mail <draft-ietf-vpim-ivm-goals-03.txt> - advanced to
AD review before being presented to IESG

Internet Voice Messaging <draft-ietf-vpim-ivm-04.txt> - advanced to
AD review before being presented to IESG

Critical Content MIME Parameter     <draft-ietf-vpim-cc-08.txt> - in RFC 
Editor's Queue at EDIT state

Message Context for Internet Mail <draft-ietf-vpim-hint-08.txt> - in the
RFC Editor's queue waiting for References


VPIM Addenda:
-------------

IMAP Extensions status

IMAP4 Binary Content Extension <draft-nerenberg-imap-binary-07.txt> - approved
by RFC Editor, awaiting RFC number assignment
     
IMAP4 Channel Transport Mechanism <draft-nerenberg-imap-channel-02.txt>
IMAP4 Channel USe Cases <draft-burger-imap-chanuse-01.txt>
- agreed to punt these to LEMONADE BOF/WG

Calling Line Identification for Voice Mail Messages <draft-ema-vpim-clid-03.txt>
- IESG review resulted in requirement for IANA section, this will be added after
the meeting.  IETF Last Call will occur after this.

Voice Messaging Client Behaviour <draft-ema-vpim-cb-02.txt> - in the RFC 
Editor's queue waiting for references.

Simple Notification and Alarm Protocol (SNAP) <draft-shapira-snap-04.txt> -
This WG has beed tracking this document but has not included it as a WG
document.  Since the author has proposed the work is complete, the
options forward (given some concern was expressed) were discussed.  The
options are simply either going to 4 week IETF last call or punting to 
LEMONDAE BOF/WG.  Decided to discuss with Ned and other interested 
players offline and present preference to LEMONADE BOF meeting.

Are we done?
-------------

Glenn indicated that if everything aligned with the IESG and RFC Editor's
process for the publication of the VPIMv2 & IVM documents, we would be done.
It was agreed that there is no need to keep the WG open to progress these
to Draft or Full standard.

As a result, this is likely the final VPIM WG meeting.

Applause.

Gmane