headers
Bob Van Zant | 15 Nov 05:44
Favicon

Re: New URI scheme for review

I figured I'd follow up for the purposes of the archives and let everyone know that IANA did approve our request for the provisional uri scheme com-eventbrite-attendee. After the feedback in this thread IANA asked no follow up questions and simply approved the request. The process truly was painless.


Thanks for the feedback and discussion.


-Bob


On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:26 PM, "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst <at> it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote:
I made this a ticket at http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/100. Please continue discussion of general registration issues on the IETF WG IRI list, public-iri <at> w3.org.

Regards,    Martin.


On 2011/10/25 14:21, Frank Ellermann wrote:
On 24 October 2011 07:32, Bob Van Zant wrote:

In any case I submitted our registration request to
IANA before this occurred.

Maybe 4395bis should pick two instead of four weeks
for reviews.  It works on another list with the same
expert.  IANA or expert can always bounce a request
if they feel that it needs more tuning, but generally
your intuitive approach (silence =>  submit) should be
good enough.

-Frank
_______________________________________________
Uri-review mailing list
Uri-review <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review


_______________________________________________
Uri-review mailing list
Uri-review <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Martin J. Dürst | 15 Nov 09:20
Picon
Gravatar

Re: New URI scheme for review

Hello Bob,

As one of those who suggested you try it, I'm very happy to hear it went 
well. Also, thanks a lot for reporting it here.

Regards,   Martin.

On 2011/11/15 13:44, Bob Van Zant wrote:
> I figured I'd follow up for the purposes of the archives and let everyone
> know that IANA did approve our request for the provisional uri scheme
> com-eventbrite-attendee. After the feedback in this thread IANA asked no
> follow up questions and simply approved the request. The process truly was
> painless.
>
> Thanks for the feedback and discussion.
>
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/prov/com-eventbrite-attendee
>
> -Bob
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:26 PM, "Martin J. Dürst"
> <duerst <at> it.aoyama.ac.jp>wrote:
>
>> I made this a ticket at http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/**
>> iri/trac/ticket/100<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/100>.
>> Please continue discussion of general registration issues on the IETF WG
>> IRI list, public-iri <at> w3.org.
>>
>> Regards,    Martin.
>>
>>
>> On 2011/10/25 14:21, Frank Ellermann wrote:
>>
>>> On 24 October 2011 07:32, Bob Van Zant wrote:
>>>
>>>   In any case I submitted our registration request to
>>>> IANA before this occurred.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Maybe 4395bis should pick two instead of four weeks
>>> for reviews.  It works on another list with the same
>>> expert.  IANA or expert can always bounce a request
>>> if they feel that it needs more tuning, but generally
>>> your intuitive approach (silence =>   submit) should be
>>> good enough.
>>>
>>> -Frank
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> Uri-review mailing list
>>> Uri-review <at> ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/uri-review<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Uri-review mailing list
> Uri-review <at> ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review
_______________________________________________
Uri-review mailing list
Uri-review <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Ira McDonald | 22 Nov 23:18
Picon

Request for review of draft-mcdonald-ipps-uri-scheme

Hi,

Please review and send us comments on the IPP over HTTPS Transport
Binding and 'ipps' URI Scheme available at:

  http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-mcdonald-ipps-uri-scheme-04.txt

Many thanks to the IPP WG members of the IEEE-ISTO PWG for their
careful review of the previous draft (see Change History appendix).

Abstract:

   This memo defines the Internet Printing Protocol (IPP) over HTTPS
   transport binding and the corresponding 'ipps' URI scheme, that is
   used to designate the access to the network location of a secure IPP
   print service or a network resource (for example, a print job)
   managed by such a service. 
  
   This memo is published by the IETF on behalf of the Internet Printing
   Protocol Working Group of the IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group. 
  
   This memo updates RFC 2910 and RFC 2911. 

Background:

   This memo is published by IETF on behalf of the Internet Printing
   Protocol Working Group of the IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group, as
   part of their IPP Everywhere [IPPEVE] project for mobile, ubiquitous
   printing with generic drivers. 
  
   The following versions of IPP are currently defined: 
   - 1.0 in [RFC2566] (obsolete)
   - 1.1 in [RFC2911]
   - 2.0 in [PWG5100.12]
   - 2.1 in [PWG5100.12]
   - 2.2 in [PWG5100.12]

Cheers,
- Ira McDonald (Co-Chair of IPP WG in IEEE-ISTO PWG)

References:

[IPPEVE]  McDonald, I.  and M.  Sweet, "PWG IPP Everywhere 1.0",
           work-in-progress, August 2011. 
           <http://www.pwg.org/ipp>

[PWG5100.12]  Bergman, R., Lewis, H., McDonald, I., and M.  Sweet,
           "Internet Printing Protocol Version 2.0 Second Edition
           (IPP/2.0 SE)", PWG 5100.12, February 2011. 
           <http://www.pwg.org/standards.html>

[RFC2911]  Hastings, T., Ed., Herriot, R., deBry, R., Isaacson, S.,
           and P.  Powell, "Internet Printing Protocol/1.1:  Model
           and Semantics", RFC 2911, September 2000.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Chair - TCG Embedded Systems Hardcopy SG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto:blueroofmusic <at> gmail.com
Winter  579 Park Place  Saline, MI  48176  734-944-0094
Summer  PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839  906-494-2434
_______________________________________________
Uri-review mailing list
Uri-review <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Bjoern Hoehrmann | 28 Nov 19:08
Picon

The 'jar' scheme

Hi,

  I was wondering if the 'jar' scheme could be defined in an hour or so,
and so I experimented a bit, comparing the implementation in Firefox and
the Sun Java implementation I had laying around, and they are nothing a-
like when it comes to parsing; simple example `jar:...!/...?example`; in
this case, Firefox ignores the "?example" string while Java treats it as
part of the file name. At best one could define a tiny profile that does
not allow any "special" cases like that without creating some ficition,
or for that matter simply refer to the Java documentation which does not
address these things and leave it at that.

regards,
--

-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern <at> hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane