Jun Cheng DR | 18 Nov 13:46 2014
Picon

Re: IETF WG state changed to In WG Last Call from WG Document [rev. 08]

Hi TSV Working Group, 

 

I have read the WGLC version of the PF draft i.e. Quick Failover Algorithm in SCTP draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-failover-08,

and I support its progression to RFC.

 

The SCTP PF function is running successfully in various variants in the deployment of the signaling products to alleviate congestion at SCTP path failure. When this WGLC becomes RFC, we will fulfill the RFC in Ericsson’s product lines.  

 

Many thanks  for the WG work on this draft!

 

Best regards

 

Jun

Jun Cheng, Ph.D.

Ericsson AB

DU Core Networks, PDU Evolved Infrastructure

Kistavägen 25

164 80 Stockholm, Sweden

Pearl Liang via RT | 14 Nov 19:50 2014

[IANA #792302] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-prpolicies-05.txt> (Additional Policies for the Partial Reliability Extension of the Stream Control Transmission Protocol) to Proposed Standard

(BEGIN IANA LAST CALL COMMENTS)

IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:

IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-prpolicies-05, which is currently in Last Call, and has the
following comments:

We understand that, upon approval of this document, there are no IANA Actions that need completion.

While it is helpful for the IANA Considerations section of the document to remain in place upon
publication, if the authors prefer to remove it, IANA doesn't object.

If this assessment is not accurate, please respond as soon as possible.

Thanks,

Pearl Liang
ICANN

(END IANA LAST CALL COMMENTS)

On Mon Nov 10 19:11:05 2014, iesg-secretary <at> ietf.org wrote:
> 
> The IESG has received a request from the Transport Area Working Group WG
> (tsvwg) to consider the following document:
> - 'Additional Policies for the Partial Reliability Extension of the
>    Stream Control Transmission Protocol'
>   <draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-prpolicies-05.txt> as Proposed Standard
> 
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> ietf <at> ietf.org mailing lists by 2014-12-1. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to iesg <at> ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> 
> Abstract
> 
> 
>    This document defines two additional policies for the Partial
>    Reliability Extension of the Stream Control Transmission Protocol
>    (PR-SCTP) allowing to limit the number of retransmissions or to
>    prioritize user messages for more efficient send buffer usage.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The file can be obtained via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-prpolicies/
> 
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-prpolicies/ballot/
> 
> 
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
> 
> 

Black, David | 15 Nov 04:48 2014

Draft Honolulu minutes posted

... before I get on the plane out of here!

http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/91/minutes/minutes-91-tsvwg

Many thanks to Aaron Falk and Joel Halpern for taking notes, as
there were lively discussions in both sessions that were not easy
to follow.  They captured everything important.

Here are some important items that people should know about:

1) There are a number of expired WG drafts that need author attention:
	ECN Encapsulation Guidelines
	NAT Behavioral Requirements Updates
	RSVP Multiple Instance Object
	SCTP NAT Support

2) The sense of the room in Honolulu was to adopt the following two
	drafts as WG drafts:

      DiffServ interconnection classes and practice
	draft-geib-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-geib-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon/

      UDP Usage Guidelines
      draft-eggert-tsvwg-rfc5405bis
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eggert-tsvwg-rfc5405bis/

      Absent objection on the list, these drafts will be adopted.
      Please comment by November 30.

3) The meeting determined that there is no WG rough consensus
      for requiring use of the full UDP checksum for GRE-in-UDP
      with IPv6.  The design team will continue work on when
      zero checksum is acceptable (as well as congestion
      considerations).

4) See the minutes for the lengthy and interesting discussion of the
      tunnel congestion feedback draft.  There is one important issue
	that needs to be followed up across the TSVWG and AQM WGs (aqm
      list cc:'d for this reason):

      OPEN ISSUE *1: Should ECN indications (CE) be treated as equivalent
      to drops?  This also came  up in AQM.  This is primarily about
      endpoint (or tunnel egress) reaction to CE.

Enjoy,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
david.black <at> emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------

IETF Secretariat | 14 Nov 20:06 2014
Picon

ID Tracker State Update Notice: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-prpolicies-05.txt>

IANA review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed
ID Tracker URL: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-prpolicies/

internet-drafts | 13 Nov 17:03 2014
Picon

I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-03.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
 This draft is a work item of the Transport Area Working Group Working Group of the IETF.

        Title           : DSCP and other packet markings for RTCWeb QoS
        Authors         : Subha Dhesikan
                          Cullen Jennings
                          Dan Druta
                          Paul E. Jones
                          James Polk
	Filename        : draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-03.txt
	Pages           : 8
	Date            : 2014-11-13

Abstract:
   Many networks, such as service provider and enterprise networks, can
   provide treatment for individual packets based on Differentiated
   Services Code Points (DSCP) on a per-hop basis.  This document
   provides the recommended DSCP values for browsers to use for various
   classes of traffic.

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-03

A diff from the previous version is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-03

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

Black, David | 12 Nov 23:29 2014

Honolulu Agenda updated

I've uploaded a slightly revised agenda, plus all of the
presentations that I've received to date (please note that
the GRE in UDP presentation was replaced w/a completely 
new one).

Thanks,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
david.black <at> emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------

Ruediger.Geib | 12 Nov 11:54 2014
Picon

WG: New Version Notification for draft-geib-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon-08.txt

Hi Gorry,

as draft -07 refers to two annexes, but doesn't contain them, I've re-submitted version -08 of Diffserv Intercon.

The core text of the draft has not been changed. The annexes are intended to explain some of the issues which
led to this draft. If they are felt to be controversial, not necessary or create a significant amount of
questions, I'd rather like to remove them.

I'll contact some carrier representatives and ask them for comments with version -08.

Regards,

Ruediger

 

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: internet-drafts <at> ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts <at> ietf.org] 
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. November 2014 11:44
An: Geib, Rüdiger; David L. Black; David L.Black; Geib, Rüdiger
Betreff: New Version Notification for draft-geib-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon-08.txt


A new version of I-D, draft-geib-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon-08.txt
has been successfully submitted by Ruediger Geib and posted to the IETF repository.

Name:		draft-geib-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon
Revision:	08
Title:		DiffServ interconnection classes and practice
Document date:	2014-11-12
Group:		Individual Submission
Pages:		22
URL:            http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-geib-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon-08.txt

Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-geib-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon/

Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-geib-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon-08

Diff:           http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-geib-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon-08


Abstract:
   This document proposes a limited and well defined set of DiffServ
   PHBs and codepoints to be applied at (inter)connections of two
   separately administered and operated networks.  Many network
   providers operate MPLS using Treatment Aggregates for traffic marked
   with different DiffServ PHBs, and use MPLS for interconnection with
   other networks.  This document offers a simple interconnection
   approach that may simplify operation of DiffServ for network
   interconnection among providers.

                                                                                  


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and
diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat

Joe Touch | 12 Nov 06:40 2014
Picon

Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-use-06.txt

Hi, all,

This version incorporates final input from WGLC:

- corrections to some obsoleted references

- addition of intra-machine use case

Joe

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-use-06.txt
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 19:54:23 -0800
From: internet-drafts <at> ietf.org
To: Dr. Joseph D. Touch <touch <at> isi.edu>, Joe Touch <touch <at> isi.edu>

A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-use-06.txt
has been successfully submitted by Joe Touch and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:		draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-use
Revision:	06
Title:		Recommendations for Transport Port Number Uses
Document date:	2014-11-11
Group:		tsvwg
Pages:		21
URL:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-use-06.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-use/
Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-use-06
Diff:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-use-06

Abstract:
   This document provides recommendations to application and service
   designers on how to use the transport protocol port number space. IT
   complements (but does not update) RFC6335, which focuses on IANA
   process.

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat

IETF Secretariat | 10 Nov 20:10 2014
Picon

ID Tracker State Update Notice: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-prpolicies-05.txt>

Last call has been made for draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-prpolicies and state has been changed to In Last Call
ID Tracker URL: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-prpolicies/

The IESG | 10 Nov 20:10 2014
Picon

Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-prpolicies-05.txt> (Additional Policies for the Partial Reliability Extension of the Stream Control Transmission Protocol) to Proposed Standard


The IESG has received a request from the Transport Area Working Group WG
(tsvwg) to consider the following document:
- 'Additional Policies for the Partial Reliability Extension of the
   Stream Control Transmission Protocol'
  <draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-prpolicies-05.txt> as Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf <at> ietf.org mailing lists by 2014-12-1. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to iesg <at> ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract

   This document defines two additional policies for the Partial
   Reliability Extension of the Stream Control Transmission Protocol
   (PR-SCTP) allowing to limit the number of retransmissions or to
   prioritize user messages for more efficient send buffer usage.

The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-prpolicies/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-prpolicies/ballot/

No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.

IETF Secretariat | 10 Nov 19:03 2014
Picon

ID Tracker State Update Notice: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-prpolicies-05.txt>

IESG state changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup
ID Tracker URL: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-prpolicies/


Gmane