=JeffH | 3 Jan 2012 22:17

online rfcdiff bug: no diff when file 1 a URI and file 2 is uploaded

online rfcdiff bug: no diff when file 1 a URI and file 2 is uploaded:

using: https://www.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/    ( version 0.11)

for file 1, "enter URL" -- fill in with known-good URI for an RFC or I-D

for file 2, "Upload file:" --  browse & select local known-good file

click on "Generate diff"

Results:

an overlying dialog is rendered containing message "File 1 seems to be empty." 
and an [OK] button. <https://www.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/rfcdiff.pyht> is now in 
location bar.

Click OK. Rendered view remains denoted as 
<https://www.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/rfcdiff.pyht>, and differs from 
<https://www.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/> primarily in that the left sidebar is 
absent.

<https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff> yields similar results except that the URI in 
location bar remains static.

tested in Firefox 7 and Chrome 16 with same results.

HTH,

=JeffH
(Continue reading)

=JeffH | 10 Jan 2012 20:39

tools.ietf.org/html/rfc-index ?

Is there html-ified rfc-index, a la the tools.ietf.org/html regime, whose links 
are to tools.ietf.org/html RFCs ?

If not, as seems the case (tools.ietf.org/html/rfc-index 404's), it'd be pretty 
useful. There could be a link to it from <https://tools.ietf.org/html/>, plus 
the "New RFCs" rfc-index blurbs that are listed on the latter view could be 
more fully html-ified.

thanks,

=JeffH
Julian Reschke | 10 Jan 2012 20:49
Picon
Picon

Re: tools.ietf.org/html/rfc-index ?

On 2012-01-10 20:39, =JeffH wrote:
> Is there html-ified rfc-index, a la the tools.ietf.org/html regime,
> whose links are to tools.ietf.org/html RFCs ?
>
> If not, as seems the case (tools.ietf.org/html/rfc-index 404's), it'd be
> pretty useful. There could be a link to it from
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/>, plus the "New RFCs" rfc-index blurbs
> that are listed on the latter view could be more fully html-ified.
>
> thanks,
> ...

That's very easy to do with XSLT based on the XML version of the RFC 
index; do you want to give it a try if I start with a simple (ugly) 
version for you to complete?
=JeffH | 10 Jan 2012 21:01

Re: tools.ietf.org/html/rfc-index ?

Julian replied..
 > On 2012-01-10 20:39, =JeffH wrote:
 >> Is there html-ified rfc-index, a la the tools.ietf.org/html regime,
 >> whose links are to tools.ietf.org/html RFCs ?
 >>
 >> If not, as seems the case (tools.ietf.org/html/rfc-index 404's), it'd be
 >> pretty useful. There could be a link to it from
 >> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/>, plus the "New RFCs" rfc-index blurbs
 >> that are listed on the latter view could be more fully html-ified.
 >>
 >> thanks,
 >> ...
 >
 > That's very easy to do with XSLT based on the XML version of the RFC
 > index;

ah, good idea.

 >  do you want to give it a try if I start with a simple (ugly)
 > version for you to complete?

don't have cycles to hack on xslt at the moment unfortunately

thanks,

=JeffH
Stephen Farrell | 10 Jan 2012 23:29
Picon
Picon

list welcome mails (was: Fwd: Welcome to the "antitrust-policy" mailing list)


I just subscribed to this new list. I've not seen JavaScript
in outbound mail before and am not sure that's the best idea
for us really if that's what this is trying to do. It also
doesn't render very well in my MUA (just as seen below).

Anyone know what's up?

S.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Welcome to the "antitrust-policy" mailing list
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:26:38 -0800
From: antitrust-policy-request <at> ietf.org
To: stephen.farrell <at> cs.tcd.ie

Welcome to the antitrust-policy <at> ietf.org mailing list! Logo

     transparent chat button
     Home
     About the IETF
     Mission
     Standards Process
     Note Well
     NomCom
     Info for Newcomers
     Internet-Drafts
     Datatracker
     Search
     Submit
(Continue reading)

Brian E Carpenter | 11 Jan 2012 02:51
Picon

Re: list welcome mails

This is presumably a configuration bug in mailman. It never used
to do this.

Regards
   Brian

On 2012-01-11 11:29, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> 
> I just subscribed to this new list. I've not seen JavaScript
> in outbound mail before and am not sure that's the best idea
> for us really if that's what this is trying to do. It also
> doesn't render very well in my MUA (just as seen below).
> 
> Anyone know what's up?
> 
> S.
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Welcome to the "antitrust-policy" mailing list
> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:26:38 -0800
> From: antitrust-policy-request <at> ietf.org
> To: stephen.farrell <at> cs.tcd.ie
> 
> Welcome to the antitrust-policy <at> ietf.org mailing list! Logo
> 
>     transparent chat button
>     Home
>     About the IETF
>     Mission
>     Standards Process
(Continue reading)

Stephen Farrell | 11 Jan 2012 02:58
Picon
Picon

Re: list welcome mails


Yep, cut'n'paste error only. Steve young replied a
few minutes after the original mail. Problem should
be gone now.

S

On 01/11/2012 01:51 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> This is presumably a configuration bug in mailman. It never used
> to do this.
>
> Regards
>     Brian
>
> On 2012-01-11 11:29, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>>
>> I just subscribed to this new list. I've not seen JavaScript
>> in outbound mail before and am not sure that's the best idea
>> for us really if that's what this is trying to do. It also
>> doesn't render very well in my MUA (just as seen below).
>>
>> Anyone know what's up?
>>
>> S.
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Welcome to the "antitrust-policy" mailing list
>> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:26:38 -0800
>> From: antitrust-policy-request <at> ietf.org
>> To: stephen.farrell <at> cs.tcd.ie
(Continue reading)

Henrik Levkowetz | 11 Jan 2012 13:57

Re: tools.ietf.org/html/rfc-index ?

Hi Jeff,

On 2012-01-10 20:39 =JeffH said:
> Is there html-ified rfc-index, a la the tools.ietf.org/html regime, whose links
> are to tools.ietf.org/html RFCs ?

There's http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/, which has existed for a long time.  I just
put up a new page too, http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfcs, which is more in the
style of http://tools.ietf.org/html/

> If not, as seems the case (tools.ietf.org/html/rfc-index 404's), it'd be pretty
> useful. There could be a link to it from<https://tools.ietf.org/html/>, plus
> the "New RFCs" rfc-index blurbs that are listed on the latter view could be
> more fully html-ified.

I'll look at fixing that next.

Best regards,

	Henrik
Fred Baker | 18 Jan 2012 22:00
Picon
Favicon

Re: Updating of Datatracker E-mail aliases


On Jan 18, 2012, at 10:59 AM, Tom Taylor wrote:

> I recently changed my E-mail address. Thanks to the global change interface at
> 
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/<wgname>/<your E-mail address>
> 
> (login required per our monthly reminder E-mails), it was quick and easy to change my address for all the
lists to which I am subscribed. I've also updated my address when submitting updates to the drafts I'm
working on. However, the Datatracker E-mail aliases for those drafts still seem to reflect my old
address, and I'm now failing to receive messages from ADs or the system relating to them.
> 
> Is this a process glitch?
> 
> Tom Taylor

Copying tools-discuss <at> . The datatracker.ietf.org and tools.ietf.org are different systems with
different databases. Sounds like an API glitch between them.
Henrik Levkowetz | 19 Jan 2012 16:19

Re: Updating of Datatracker E-mail aliases

Hi Tom, Fred,

On 2012-01-18 22:00 Fred Baker said:
> 
> On Jan 18, 2012, at 10:59 AM, Tom Taylor wrote:
> 
>> I recently changed my E-mail address. Thanks to the global change interface at
>>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/<wgname>/<your E-mail address>
>>
>> (login required per our monthly reminder E-mails), it was quick and easy to change my address for all the
lists to which I am subscribed. I've also updated my address when submitting updates to the drafts I'm
working on. However, the Datatracker E-mail aliases for those drafts still seem to reflect my old
address, and I'm now failing to receive messages from ADs or the system relating to them.
>>
>> Is this a process glitch?
>>
>> Tom Taylor
> 
> Copying tools-discuss <at> . The datatracker.ietf.org and tools.ietf.org are different systems with
different databases. Sounds like an API glitch between them.

There's no coupling from email changes for the Mailman lists and email
changes for drafts in general.

I've checked the draft alias list, and for a number of drafts, the aliases
reflect the new <tom.tailor.stds <at> gmail.com>, but there are still some where
the old address is present.  I've now added an entry to my fixup-table so
that on the next generation of the alias list the old <tom.tailor <at> rogers.com>
address will be replaced with the new one.
(Continue reading)


Gmane