Robert Sparks | 21 May 22:01 2015

Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker-02.txt

FYI


-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Date: From: To:
New Version Notification for draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker-02.txt
Thu, 21 May 2015 11:52:30 -0700
internet-drafts <at> ietf.org
Tero Kivinen <kivinen <at> iki.fi>, Robert Sparks <rjsparks <at> nostrum.com>, Tero Kivinen <kivinen <at> iki.fi>, Robert Sparks <rjsparks <at> nostrum.com>


A new version of I-D, draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker-02.txt has been successfully submitted by Robert Sparks and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker Revision: 02 Title: Tracking Reviews of Documents Document date: 2015-05-21 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 17 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker-02.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker-02 Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker-02 Abstract: Several review teams ensure specific types of review are performed on Internet-Drafts as they progress towards becoming RFCs. The tools used by these teams to assign and track reviews would benefit from tighter integration to the Datatracker. This document discusses requirements for improving those tools without disrupting current work flows. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat

--

-- 
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

Please report datatracker.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues or
send email to webmaster <at> tools.ietf.org
Stephen Farrell | 17 May 12:48 2015
Picon
Picon

new datatracker bug? - Version to which discuss relates...


Hiya,

I just modified my discuss text on a doc for the -10 version
but the ballot details page [1] still shows that as being on
version -09 even though the date displayed is correct.

The display is correct however when I look at the list of all
discusses. [2]

Presumably a bit of legacy code somewhere didn't carry over
that fixed up the header text above the discuss/comment text
boxes.

Thanks,
S.

[1]
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building/ballot/
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/iesg/discusses/

--

-- 
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

Please report datatracker.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues or
send email to webmaster <at> tools.ietf.org

Stephen Farrell | 17 May 12:48 2015
Picon
Picon

new datatracker bug? - Version to which discuss relates...


Hiya,

I just modified my discuss text on a doc for the -10 version
but the ballot details page [1] still shows that as being on
version -09 even though the date displayed is correct.

The display is correct however when I look at the list of all
discusses. [2]

Presumably a bit of legacy code somewhere didn't carry over
that fixed up the header text above the discuss/comment text
boxes.

Thanks,
S.

[1]
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building/ballot/
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/iesg/discusses/

--

-- 
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

Please report datatracker.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues or
send email to webmaster <at> tools.ietf.org

Michael Richardson | 11 May 16:43 2015
X-Face
Picon

Intended status


The ROLL WG has a template document that contains the structure for
current and future applicability statements.  The document represents
the consensus of the WG, but is not intended to be published.

I would like to express that intent, but I can't do that in the "Intended
Status" which insists that I can not leave the value as "(None)", while
still entering a comment.

In particular, I'd like to keep this document out of various cross-area
review queues.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF <at> sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
IETF ROLL WG co-chair.    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/

--

-- 
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

Please report datatracker.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues or
send email to webmaster <at> tools.ietf.org
Thomas Watteyne | 9 May 20:42 2015
Picon

suggestion: list interim meetings in "agendas" and "minutes" pages on WG tools page

All,

We have regular interim meetings (webex) in the 6TiSCH WG. We maintain agendas and minutes at http://www.ietf.org/meeting/interim/proceedings.html.

Our WG tools page (e.g. http://tools.ietf.org/wg/6tisch/) has convenient "agendas" and "minutes" links at the top. But these do not contain the interim meetings.

Is it possible to add interim meetings to pages such as http://tools.ietf.org/wg/6tisch/agenda and http://tools.ietf.org/wg/6tisch/minutes?

Thomas
--

-- 
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

Please report datatracker.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues or
send email to webmaster <at> tools.ietf.org
Murray S. Kucherawy | 5 May 21:15 2015
Picon

WG document page and shepherds

Hi there,

While loving on the new datatracker design, I noticed an anomaly: While the name of the Area Director is shown for a document that has one assigned, the document shepherd is only indicated via an email address.  I'm pretty sure this wasn't the case before.

Have a look here to see what I mean:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/appsawg/documents/

It kind of looks like Barry Leiba's email address is that of Scott Kitterman in one case.

Is this intentional, or is there a plan to fix it in some future version?

-MSK
--

-- 
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

Please report datatracker.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues or
send email to webmaster <at> tools.ietf.org
Jayantheesh S B | 30 Apr 18:50 2015

[Tools] IETF - Android app - Google Play Store

All,

 

We would like to add below features or write a new app with the below support and contribute to IETF community.

 

Kindly share your ideas, new features which will be useful for the end users, admins etc.

 

The idea of the proposed app:

 

1.       Should be able to login into the IETF account, managing account details.

2.       Should be able to view the submitted Drafts

3.       View the status of the submitted drafts

4.       View the active WG and its updates

5.       IETF Contact information

6.       Managing the Subscription for various Mailing list  like “Imapext”, “Lemonade”

7.       RFC Search and View the document

8.       Meetings and its information

9.       Available IETF tools information

10.   Latest drafts submitted and its details

 

Regards,

Jay

--

-- 
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

Please report datatracker.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues or
send email to webmaster <at> tools.ietf.org
Brian E Carpenter | 25 Apr 01:35 2015
Picon

Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker-01.txt

Robert,

Thanks for this!

One suggestion: add a short Appendix listing topics deferred for now.
The one I'm aware of is author-oriented features.

One typo: s/haitus/hiatus/

Origin of HIATUS: Latin, from hiare, to yawn. I enjoyed learning that ;-).

   Brian

--

-- 
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

Please reports datatracker.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
Please reports tools.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues or
send email to webmaster <at> tools.ietf.org

Robert Sparks | 24 Apr 19:01 2015

Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker-01.txt

All -

This version reflects feedback from several directorate secretaries and participants.
I think it's getting close to ready to move into implementation. Please review and identify anything that needs to change before that happens.

RjS


-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Date: From: To:
New Version Notification for draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker-01.txt
Fri, 24 Apr 2015 09:49:21 -0700
internet-drafts <at> ietf.org
Tero Kivinen <kivinen <at> iki.fi>, Robert Sparks <rjsparks <at> nostrum.com>, Tero Kivinen <kivinen <at> iki.fi>, Robert Sparks <rjsparks <at> nostrum.com>


A new version of I-D, draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker-01.txt has been successfully submitted by Robert Sparks and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker Revision: 01 Title: Tracking Reviews of Documents Document date: 2015-04-24 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 16 URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker-01.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker/ Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker-01 Diff: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker-01 Abstract: Several review teams ensure specific types of review are performed on Internet-Drafts as they progress towards becoming RFCs. The tools used by these teams to assign and track reviews would benefit from tighter integration to the Datatracker. This document discusses requirements for improving those tools without disrupting current work flows. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat

--

-- 
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

Please reports datatracker.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
Please reports tools.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues or
send email to webmaster <at> tools.ietf.org
Richard Barnes | 17 Apr 23:45 2015

www.ietf.org broken

On HTTPS, returns a Cloudflare page "Error 520"

On HTTP, returns a redirect loop:

curl -4 http://www.ietf.org/
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN"> <html><head> <title>302 Found</title> </head><body> <h1>Found</h1> <p>The document has moved <a href="http://www.ietf.org/">here</a>.</p> </body></html>
--

-- 
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

Please reports datatracker.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
Please reports tools.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues or
send email to webmaster <at> tools.ietf.org
Henrik Levkowetz | 15 Apr 16:35 2015

Re: FW: Subpoena to IETF / Authentication of Documents

Hi Brian,

On 2015-04-15 15:28, Brian Mack wrote:
> Henry,

Henrik, actually.

> We are outside lawyers for Metaswitch Networks and are involved in ongoing litigation in the Eastern
District of Texas.
> 
> We subpoenaed the Internet Society d/b/a the IETF and they provided us with a declaration authenticating
several IETF RFCs (and providing the date of publication (public availability)).
> 
> The IETF was unable to authenticate several documents hosted at tools.ietf.org (see below).  Would
someone who runs the "tools" page be able to provide us with a short declaration?  We could send over a draft
for you to review an sign.
> 
> These documents are very important to our case as prior art publications.

What I can assert about the documents is limited, given the date of the
documents (dates in 2000), as the dates are before I started fetching
documents directly from the IETF site.

There are 2 archives which started fetching documents earlier than I did,
and at least one of them is still up and running; hopefully you will have
better luck contacting the maintainer of that repository.

You can find the repository here:
  http://www.potaroo.net/ietf/

It is being run by Geoff Huston, <gih <at> apnic.net>.

If he has the documents in question in his repository, he may be able to
assert that he has copied them directly from the ietf site at the dates
indicated by the file system.  On my system, that's respectively

	2000-03-10 08:29 draft-kuthan-fcp-00.txt
	2000-06-15 09:42 draft-kuthan-fcp-01.txt
	2000-11-29 08:09 draft-kuthan-fcp-02.txt

but I am not in a position to assert that they were in my possession
with their current content at that time, unfortunately.

Best regards,

	Henrik

> 
> Please advise.
> 
> Thanks,
> Brian
> 
> 
> From: Jorge Contreras [mailto:contreraslegal <at> att.net]
> Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 10:23 AM
> To: Brian Mack
> Subject: Re: Subpoena to IETF / Authentication of Documents
> Importance: High
> 
> Dear Brian,
> 
> Please see the explanation that I received from the IETF records custodian below:
> 
> "The process of authenticating an Internet-Draft (I-D) includes a confirmation that we, the
Secretariat, can assert that we have had a solid chain of custody of the I-D in question from its initial
filing through today.  In the case of the I-Ds listed below, we cannot make that assertion.
> Specifically, the I-Ds listed as being present on "tools.ietf.org<http://tools.ietf.org/>" are not
able to be authenticated.  The "tools" servers are owned and operated by volunteers not under the direct
control of the IETF, and the authenticity of *any* I-Ds on those servers, while *likely* to be valid, can
never be *confirmed* to be valid.  Likewise the single I-D appearing in the
"www.ietf.org/archive/id<http://www.ietf.org/archive/id>" location is shown by our records to be a
copy of an I-D from the tools servers, and can therefore also not be authenticated.
> To be authentic, an I-D must be (a) on the actual www.ietf.org<http://www.ietf.org/> website and (b)
confirmed by AMS to be in our chain-of-custody line from its original submission and (c) be a direct match
for that source document, byte-for-byte.
> Since the I-Ds in the list below fail item (b) in the above process, AMS and the IETF cannot make any
representation as to the authenticity of those I-Ds."
> 
> Please let me know if you would like to discuss.
> 
> Best regards,
> Jorge
> 
> Jorge L. Contreras
> Contreras Legal Strategy LLC
> 1711 Massachusetts Ave. NW, No. 710
> Washington, DC 20036
> contreraslegal <at> att.net<mailto:contreraslegal <at> att.net>
> 
> The contents of this message may be attorney-client privileged and confidential.  If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete this message immediately.
> 
> 
> From: Brian Mack <brianmack <at> quinnemanuel.com<mailto:brianmack <at> quinnemanuel.com>>
> Date: Sunday, April 12, 2015 at 10:11 PM
> To: Jorge Contreras <contreraslegal <at> att.net<mailto:contreraslegal <at> att.net>>
> Subject: RE: Subpoena to IETF / Authentication of Documents
> 
> Jorge,
> 
> We received your response to our subpoena in the Genband v. Metaswitch Networks case (2:14-cv-33).
> 
> There are a few documents that were included in included in Attachment B of the Morris declaration that
could not be authenticated.  The declaration says these documents are not contained in the IETF records,
but many still appear on the IETF website and are dated on the face of the documents.  Can you check on the
following documents, and provide a declaration if possible on their authenticity as IETF documents (if
not also on public availability)?
> 
> If you'd like to chat, I am around tomorrow afternoon.  The documents in bold below are particularly
important to our case.
> 
> Thanks,
> Brian
> 
> 
> 
> "Firewall Control Protocol Framework and Requirements" <draft-kuthan-fcp-00.txt>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kuthan-fcp-00
> 
> 
> "Firewall Control Protocol Framework and Requirements" <draft-kuthan-fcp-01.txt>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kuthan-fcp-01
> 
> 
> "Middlebox Communication: Framework and Requirements" <draft-kuthan-fcp-02.txt>
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kuthan-fcp-02
> 
> 
> 
> "H.323 Firewall Control Interface (HFCI")
> 
> <draft-rfced-info-mercer-00.txt>
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-rfced-info-mercer-00.txt
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-rfced-info-mercer-00.txt
> 
> "The SIP INFO Method" <draft-ietf-mmusic-sip-info-method-00.pdf>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mmusic-sip-info-method-00
> "Mapping between ISUP and SIP" <draft-schulzrinne-ss7-00>
> http://www.cs.columbia.edu/sip/drafts/draft-schulzrinne-ss7-00.pdf
> "Media Gateway Control Protocol (MGCP) Call Flows" <draft-huitema-megaco-mgcp-flows-01>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-huitema-megaco-mgcp-flows-01
> The IP Network Address Translator (NAT)
> <draft-rfced-info-srisuresh-05.txt<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rfced-info-srisuresh-05.txt>>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rfced-info-srisuresh-05
> "A Proposal for Internet and Public Switched Telephone Networks (PSTN) Internetworking" [Dated March
1997 on Page 4]
> <draft-faynberg-telephone-sw-net-00.txt>
> http://tools.ietf.org/pdf/draft-faynberg-telephone-sw-net-00.pdf
> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-faynberg-telephone-sw-net-00.txt
> "Analysis of Services and Interfaces used when Interworking Between the Internet and the Intelligent
Network (I.N.)" [stating that "Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months"
and that the draft "Expires on 7 January 1998"]
> <draft-conroy-interfaces-in-net-00.txt>
> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-conroy-interfaces-in-net-00.txt
> http://tools.ietf.org/pdf/draft-conroy-interfaces-in-net-00.pdf
> "SIP for Click-To-Dial-Back and Third-Party Control" [dated November 20, 1997 on page 1]
> draft-ietf-pint-sip-00.txt
> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-pint-sip-00.txt
> http://tools.ietf.org/pdf/draft-ietf-pint-sip-00.pdf
> "Architectural Framework for Signaling Transport" [dated February 1999 on page 1]
> draft-ietf-sigtran-framework-arch-00.txt
> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-sigtran-framework-arch-00.txt
> http://tools.ietf.org/pdf/draft-ietf-sigtran-framework-arch-00.pdf
> "PSTN-Internet Internetworking - An Architecture Overview" [Dated November 1997 on page 1]
> <draft-ietf-pint-inweb-00.txt>
> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-pint-inweb-00.txt
> http://tools.ietf.org/pdf/draft-ietf-pint-inweb-00.pdf
> "Pre-PINT Callback Service Implementation Experiences"  [stating that "Internet-Drafts are draft
documents valid for a maximum of six months" and that the draft "Expires on 21 May 1998"]
> <draft-ietf-pint-internet-callcenter-00.txt>
> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-pint-internet-callcenter-00.txt
> http://tools.ietf.org/pdf/draft-ietf-pint-internet-callcenter-00.pdf
> "The PINT Profile of SIP and SDP: a Protocol for IP Access to Telephone Call Services" [dated August 7, 1998
on page 1]
> draft-ietf-pint-profile-00.txt
> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/42/I-D/draft-ietf-pint-profile-00.txt
> "RFC2458 - Toward the PSTN/Internet Inter-Networking--Pre-PINT Implementations" [dated March 1998
on page 1]
> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-pint-pre-implement-00.txt
> http://tools.ietf.org/pdf/draft-ietf-pint-pre-implement-02.pdf
> "A Proposal for Internet Call Waiting Service using SIP An Implementation Report" [dated November 1998
at the bottom of page 1]
> <draft-ietf-pint-icw-00.txt>
> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-pint-icw-00.txt
> "A proposal for the provisioning of PSTN initiated services running on the Internet" [dated March 1999 on
page 2]
> <draft-ietf-pint-saint-00.txt>
> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-pint-saint-00.txt
> http://tools.ietf.org/pdf/draft-ietf-pint-saint-00.pdf
> 
> From: Jorge Contreras [mailto:contreraslegal <at> att.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 7:42 AM
> To: Brian Mack
> Subject: Re: Subpoena to IETF / Authentication of Documents
> 
> Brian,
> 
> I can accept service.  For your records, please note our new address below (though email correspondence is
by far the most reliable way to communicate).
> 
> I will be in touch once I have reviewed the request with my client.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Jorge L. Contreras
> Contreras Legal Strategy LLC
> 1711 Massachusetts Ave. NW, No. 710
> Washington, DC 20036
> contreraslegal <at> att.net<mailto:contreraslegal <at> att.net>
> 
> The contents of this message may be attorney-client privileged and confidential.  If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete this message immediately.
> 
> 
> From: Brian Mack <brianmack <at> quinnemanuel.com<mailto:brianmack <at> quinnemanuel.com>>
> Date: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 at 9:30 PM
> To: Jorge Contreras <contreraslegal <at> att.net<mailto:contreraslegal <at> att.net>>
> Subject: Subpoena to IETF / Authentication of Documents
> 
> 
> Contreras Legal Strategy LLC
> P.O. Box 4752
> St. Louis, MO 63108
> E-mail: contreraslegal <at> att.net<mailto:contreraslegal <at> att.net>
> To whom it may concern:
> 
> Attached is a subpoena to The Internet Society d/b/a The Internet Engineering Take Force (IETF).  Please
let me know if you can accept email service of this subpoena.
> 
> Best,
> Brian
> 
> Brian Mack
> Associate,
> Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
> 
> 50 California Street, 22nd Floor
> San Francisco, CA 94111
> 415-875-6423 Direct
> 415.875.6600 Main Office Number
> 415.875.6700 FAX
> brianmack <at> quinnemanuel.com<mailto:brianmack <at> quinnemanuel.com>
> www.quinnemanuel.com<http://www.quinnemanuel.com>
> NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and
confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message may be an attorney-client communication
and/or work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message.
> 
> 
> 

--

-- 
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

Please reports datatracker.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
Please reports tools.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues or
send email to webmaster <at> tools.ietf.org

Gmane