Benoit Claise | 16 Jun 13:46 2015
Picon

rsync help

Dear all,

I try to download only the .txt drafts and RFCs.
As mentioned at http://www.rfc-editor.org/rsync-help.html, I'm using:
    rsync -avz --delete ftp.rfc-editor.org::rfcs-text-only my-rfc-mirror

The issue is that the results contain some .txt.p7s, some .xml extension.
What do I do wrong?

rsync ftp.rfc-editor.org::
everything-ftp     Everything FTP
refs               References
rfcs               Contents of in-notes including subdirectories std, bcp, fyi, and ien
rfcs-text-only     Only the text files from the directories in [rfcs]
rfc-ed-all         Entire repository (excluding internet-drafts)
internet-drafts    Internet Drafts
ids-text-only      Only text files from the Internet Drafts mirror
rfcs-pdf-only      PDF versions of ASCII RFCs to ensure correct page breaks, etc

rsync.ietf.org apparently doesn't help for my request

$ rsync  rsync.ietf.org::
charter            - Repository of WG Charters
concluded-wg-ietf-mail-archive    - Older list text archives
conflict-reviews    - Repository of Conflict Review documents
everything-ftp     - The entire IETF FTP Archive
iana               - IANA assignments
iana-timezone      - IANA Time Zone Datatbase (see also http://www.iana.org/time-zones)
id-archive         - The Internet Draft Archive (both active and expired drafts)
iesg-minutes       - IESG Minutes
internet-drafts    - The Internet Draft Repository (currently active drafts)
legacy-files       - Legacy material supporting long-lived URLs
mailman-archive    - Repository of Mailing List Text Archives
proceedings        - Repository of Proceedings
rfc                - Repository of RFCs
slides             - Repository of Slide Documents
status-changes     - Repository of Status Change Documents
$


Regards, Benoit
--

-- 
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

Please report datatracker.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues or
send email to webmaster <at> tools.ietf.org
Michael Richardson | 10 Jun 21:26 2015
X-Face
Picon

Re: [Netconf] extracting yang models from RFC


Kent Watsen <kwatsen <at> juniper.net> wrote:
    > See rfcstrip located here:
    > http://www.yang-central.org/twiki/pub/Main/YangTools/rfcstrip

    > Just do 'rfcstrip <i-d or rfc file>' and you'll get the extracted YANG
    > modules (and more).

okay, sure, I knew such things existed (but I hadn't found it)
But, what should I do on the input side of things to make rfcstrip
work better?
I guess I can round trip it until I get it right... let's try.

okay, back to my original question. rfcstrip results in empty
output from the ID in question, so I'm back to my original question: what do
I put in to make rfcstrip work?
(and where is that documented?)

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [
]     mcr <at> sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [

--

-- 
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

Please report datatracker.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues or
send email to webmaster <at> tools.ietf.org

Michael Richardson | 10 Jun 15:46 2015
X-Face
Picon

extracting yang models from RFC


Please excuse me if this is a FAQ, but a scan of 6020 didn't reveal any
advice.  I'm also mostly ignorant of MIB or YANG authoring, I'm just trying
to help get a more consistent experience.  I know that we have tools to
extract MIBs from RFCs, and I assume that we have the same for YANG models.

I also googled for "how to format yang model in rfc", and I looked
at: https://tools.ietf.org/wg/netconf/trac/wiki, and
looked at:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?q=netconf+how+to+format+yang+in+internet-draft&f_list=netconf

What is the recommended way to embed the YANG definition into an ID?
Should it be as a single section, with a single <figure><artwork>,
or should/can it be split up into multiple figures?

I'm writing a makefile/sed pipeline to insert the raw .yang file into
the XML to reduce editing errors.  <> must be escaped as &lt; in
<artwork>, but I'm unaware of any other stuffing that must be done.

Probably this is a solved problem...

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF <at> sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

--

-- 
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

Please report datatracker.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues or
send email to webmaster <at> tools.ietf.org
Benson Schliesser | 2 Jun 04:20 2015
Picon

Proposed Statement on "HTTPS everywhere for the IETF"

Reading the IESG statement on HTTPS Everywhere (link forwarded below), 
something remains unclear to me. I'm hopeful that somebody on this 
list has an informed view of this question. Otherwise I can ask on the 
IETF list.

My overall impression is that the IESG's intent is to go beyond simply 
making everything available via HTTPS, and to actually make everything 
*default* to HTTPS so that it is the preferred mechanism. In specific 
practice, I could imagine this as something like 1) redirect HTTP gets 
of the web root to the HTTPS equivalent, and 2) change tools and 
documents so that all embedded links are HTTPS.

However the IESG statement also says that people and/or tools that wish 
to use HTTP will continue to be able to do so. Is this as simple as just 
making everything simultaneously available via HTTP? I note that this 
would potentially require the client to translate embedded links from 
HTTPS back to HTTP. Or is something more complicated required, such as a 
per-user setting (profile, cookie, or whatever), webhost regex, client 
request header, etc?

It's not entirely clear to me how we are going to implement this. Has 
somebody already figured this out? I'd be glad to learn that the answer 
is obvious and simple, and that my question is naive.

Thanks,
-Benson

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: *The IESG* <iesg <at> ietf.org 
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','iesg <at> ietf.org');>>
Date: Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 12:43 PM
Subject: Proposed Statement on "HTTPS everywhere for the IETF"
To: IETF Announcement List <ietf-announce <at> ietf.org 
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ietf-announce <at> ietf.org');>>

Hi All,

The IESG are planning to agree an IESG statement on "HTTPS Everywhere
for the IETF," please see [1] for the current text.

We are seeking community feedback on this and welcome assistance
from the community in identifying any cases where a change or
additional guidance is needed to put this into effect.

The IESG plans to finalise this statement just after IETF-93 in Prague.

* Please send general feedback intended for discussion to ietf <at> ietf.org 
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ietf <at> ietf.org');>

* Comments about specific issues arising can be sent to iesg <at> ietf.org 
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','iesg <at> ietf.org');>
or tools-discuss <at> ietf.org 
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','tools-discuss <at> ietf.org');> as appropriate 
(use iesg <at> ietf.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','iesg <at> ietf.org');> if 
not sure)

Regards,
Terry & Stephen (for the IESG)

[1] https://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/HttpsEverywhere

--

-- 
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

Please report datatracker.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues or
send email to webmaster <at> tools.ietf.org

Robert Sparks | 21 May 22:01 2015

Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker-02.txt

FYI


-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Date: From: To:
New Version Notification for draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker-02.txt
Thu, 21 May 2015 11:52:30 -0700
internet-drafts <at> ietf.org
Tero Kivinen <kivinen <at> iki.fi>, Robert Sparks <rjsparks <at> nostrum.com>, Tero Kivinen <kivinen <at> iki.fi>, Robert Sparks <rjsparks <at> nostrum.com>


A new version of I-D, draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker-02.txt has been successfully submitted by Robert Sparks and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker Revision: 02 Title: Tracking Reviews of Documents Document date: 2015-05-21 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 17 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker-02.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker-02 Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker-02 Abstract: Several review teams ensure specific types of review are performed on Internet-Drafts as they progress towards becoming RFCs. The tools used by these teams to assign and track reviews would benefit from tighter integration to the Datatracker. This document discusses requirements for improving those tools without disrupting current work flows. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat

--

-- 
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

Please report datatracker.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues or
send email to webmaster <at> tools.ietf.org
Stephen Farrell | 17 May 12:48 2015
Picon
Picon

new datatracker bug? - Version to which discuss relates...


Hiya,

I just modified my discuss text on a doc for the -10 version
but the ballot details page [1] still shows that as being on
version -09 even though the date displayed is correct.

The display is correct however when I look at the list of all
discusses. [2]

Presumably a bit of legacy code somewhere didn't carry over
that fixed up the header text above the discuss/comment text
boxes.

Thanks,
S.

[1]
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building/ballot/
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/iesg/discusses/

--

-- 
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

Please report datatracker.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues or
send email to webmaster <at> tools.ietf.org

Stephen Farrell | 17 May 12:48 2015
Picon
Picon

new datatracker bug? - Version to which discuss relates...


Hiya,

I just modified my discuss text on a doc for the -10 version
but the ballot details page [1] still shows that as being on
version -09 even though the date displayed is correct.

The display is correct however when I look at the list of all
discusses. [2]

Presumably a bit of legacy code somewhere didn't carry over
that fixed up the header text above the discuss/comment text
boxes.

Thanks,
S.

[1]
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building/ballot/
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/iesg/discusses/

--

-- 
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

Please report datatracker.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues or
send email to webmaster <at> tools.ietf.org

Michael Richardson | 11 May 16:43 2015
X-Face
Picon

Intended status


The ROLL WG has a template document that contains the structure for
current and future applicability statements.  The document represents
the consensus of the WG, but is not intended to be published.

I would like to express that intent, but I can't do that in the "Intended
Status" which insists that I can not leave the value as "(None)", while
still entering a comment.

In particular, I'd like to keep this document out of various cross-area
review queues.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF <at> sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
IETF ROLL WG co-chair.    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/

--

-- 
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

Please report datatracker.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues or
send email to webmaster <at> tools.ietf.org
Thomas Watteyne | 9 May 20:42 2015
Picon

suggestion: list interim meetings in "agendas" and "minutes" pages on WG tools page

All,

We have regular interim meetings (webex) in the 6TiSCH WG. We maintain agendas and minutes at http://www.ietf.org/meeting/interim/proceedings.html.

Our WG tools page (e.g. http://tools.ietf.org/wg/6tisch/) has convenient "agendas" and "minutes" links at the top. But these do not contain the interim meetings.

Is it possible to add interim meetings to pages such as http://tools.ietf.org/wg/6tisch/agenda and http://tools.ietf.org/wg/6tisch/minutes?

Thomas
--

-- 
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

Please report datatracker.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues or
send email to webmaster <at> tools.ietf.org
Murray S. Kucherawy | 5 May 21:15 2015
Picon

WG document page and shepherds

Hi there,

While loving on the new datatracker design, I noticed an anomaly: While the name of the Area Director is shown for a document that has one assigned, the document shepherd is only indicated via an email address.  I'm pretty sure this wasn't the case before.

Have a look here to see what I mean:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/appsawg/documents/

It kind of looks like Barry Leiba's email address is that of Scott Kitterman in one case.

Is this intentional, or is there a plan to fix it in some future version?

-MSK
--

-- 
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

Please report datatracker.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues or
send email to webmaster <at> tools.ietf.org
Jayantheesh S B | 30 Apr 18:50 2015

[Tools] IETF - Android app - Google Play Store

All,

 

We would like to add below features or write a new app with the below support and contribute to IETF community.

 

Kindly share your ideas, new features which will be useful for the end users, admins etc.

 

The idea of the proposed app:

 

1.       Should be able to login into the IETF account, managing account details.

2.       Should be able to view the submitted Drafts

3.       View the status of the submitted drafts

4.       View the active WG and its updates

5.       IETF Contact information

6.       Managing the Subscription for various Mailing list  like “Imapext”, “Lemonade”

7.       RFC Search and View the document

8.       Meetings and its information

9.       Available IETF tools information

10.   Latest drafts submitted and its details

 

Regards,

Jay

--

-- 
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-discuss <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

Please report datatracker.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues or
send email to webmaster <at> tools.ietf.org

Gmane