Paul Hoffman / IMC | 13 Feb 03:12 2002
Picon

Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-church-dns-mail-sender-01.txt


Of interest to this list....

>To: IETF-Announce: ;
>From: Internet-Drafts <at> ietf.org
>Reply-to: Internet-Drafts <at> ietf.org
>Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-church-dns-mail-sender-01.txt
>Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 07:35:15 -0500
>Sender: nsyracus <at> cnri.reston.va.us
>
>
>
>A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
>directories.
>
>
>	Title		: Authoritative Mail Sender DNS Resource Record
>	Author(s)	: A. Church
>	Filename	: draft-church-dns-mail-sender-01.txt
>	Pages		: 5
>	Date		: 07-Feb-02
>
>This document defines a new experimental DNS resource record type,
>Authoritative Mail Sender (MS), which can be used to verify the
>authenticity of the domain name provided in the sender address of a
>mail message and help to prevent forgery of sender addresses.
>
>A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-church-dns-mail-sender-01.txt
>
(Continue reading)

Paul Hoffman / IMC | 22 Feb 16:44 2002
Picon

Fwd: Regarding rfc2821


[[ Forwarded from the ietf-822 list ]]

>Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 00:54:07 +0000
>From: Olafur Osvaldsson <oli <at> isnic.is>
>To: ietf-822 <at> imc.org
>Subject: Regarding rfc2821
>Sender: owner-ietf-822 <at> mail.imc.org
>List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-822/mail-archive/>
>List-ID: <ietf-822.imc.org>
>List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-822-request <at> imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
>
>
>Hi,
>This is my second and last attempt to send this question to this mailing list,
>this I do only because my last one went unanswered.
>
>I found this list address in the last drums archive.
>
>I have been unable to contact the editor of RFC 2821 so I ask you this.
>I'm not on the list so please send Cc of any replies to me.
>
>I was going through this rfc and found several references wich point to
>section 2.4.1 but this section does not exist.
>Can you tell me if this section was left out and why, or if it was forgotten
>and then I need to know how this can be corrected.
>
>My understanding is that this section covers the fact that servers should not
>edit the body of emails, but I may be wrong.
>
(Continue reading)


Gmane