headers
santhosh | 2 Jul 2007 13:21
Favicon

call rate

Hi All,

How calls per rate is calculated ? Whether it includes the media time or not ?

Thanks in advance

Regards,
Santhosh

EMAIL DISCLAIMER : This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for
the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Any unauthorised distribution or copying
is strictly prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply
email and then destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do
not relate to official business of Mascon shall be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by Mascon.
Any information contained in this email, when addressed to Mascon clients is subject to the terms and
conditions in governing client contract.

Whilst Mascon takes steps to prevent the transmission of viruses via e-mail, we can not guarantee that any
email or attachment is free from computer viruses and you are strongly advised to undertake your own
anti-virus precautions. Mascon grants no warranties regarding performance, use or quality of any
e-mail or attachment and undertakes no liability for loss or damage, howsoever caused.
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Eric Nielsen | 2 Jul 2007 23:35
Favicon

Looking for standard interpretation of RFC 3603 on use of P-DCS-LAES header

Section 8 of RFC 3603 describes using the P-DCS-LAES header in order to
facilitate legal intercept.

For tracing simple "A calls B" scenarios a P-DCS-LAES in an INVITE or
18X or 200 message is clear.

The specification does not include a means to stop the tracing, or
suggest a behavior if two P-DCS-LAES headers are received.

My assumption is that once such a header is received, that call tracing
should continue until there is a BYE on the call.  

My questions:

 * Is there any condition prior to a BYE that call content tracing can
stop?

 * If a second P-DCS-LAES header is sent in the same INVITE or a
subsequent INVITE, then should multiple copies of the call content be
forwarded?

My ultimate goal is to know what the standard behavior should be when
two traced calls are merged.  My belief is that both call traces should
continue, one copy for each of the traced parties, until a BYE is
received.

Thanks,

Eric
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
madan mohan | 3 Jul 2007 16:57
Favicon

Tightly Coupled Conference

Hi AllCurrently I am implementing the tightly Coupled Conference. As per available Conference RFCs, the
Focus has to attach a isfocus parameter in the Contact field in the 200 OK response sent to the UA\'s
INVITEs.But, Sip Servlet APIs suggest that applications should not try to alter system headers like
CONTACT,Can anyone please advise me on this ???ThanksMadan Mohan
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Madan Mohan | 4 Jul 2007 06:26
Picon

Information needed regarding Conference implementation

Hi All

Currently I am implementing the Tightly Coupled Conference application on
WebLogic Sip Server platform.

As per Conference RFC 4353, the Conference server [Focus] should add
'isfocus' parameter in the Contact header in the OK response sent to the
INVITEs, for conference aware User Agent's INVITE.

But as per SIP Servlet APIs, the application should not try to alter the
System Header such as CONTACT header.

Can anyone please help me out in this situation.

Thanks

Madan Mohan. B
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Santosh Yadawad | 4 Jul 2007 09:00
Favicon

Question regarding default proxy

 Hi,
               I just want to know that weather the default proxy
(outbound proxy) configured only for the entity acting as UA or both for
UA and NS (proxy server). Because I heard some where that the entity
acting as statefull proxy has configured the outbound proxy .IN some
situation where there are more then one sip proxy involved between the
two nodes (UA) its required outbound proxy to locate the next hop proxy.
I am confused weather I am correct?  Please provide solution for me.

Regards
Santosh Yadawad
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
varun | 4 Jul 2007 11:41
Picon
Favicon

Privacy and P-asserted Identity headers

Hi,
I tried to understand the use of privacy and
P-asserted Identity headers in SIP but not really
clear about these.
Could somebody explain in simple terms the use of
these two headers.

Need this info ASAP, would be really helpful if
somebody could reply.

Regards
varun

       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Building a website is a piece of cake. Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the tools to get online.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/webhosting
Permalink | Reply | 8 comments |
headers
varun | 4 Jul 2007 12:53
Picon
Favicon

Re: Privacy and P-asserted Identity headers

Could somebody reply please~!

--- varun <dreamz_dollar <at> yahoo.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> I tried to understand the use of privacy and
> P-asserted Identity headers in SIP but not really
> clear about these.
> Could somebody explain in simple terms the use of
> these two headers.
> 
> Need this info ASAP, would be really helpful if
> somebody could reply.
> 
> 
> Regards
> varun
> 
> 
>        
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> Building a website is a piece of cake. Yahoo! Small
> Business gives you all the tools to get online.
> http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/webhosting 
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> Sip-implementors <at> lists.cs.columbia.edu
>
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |
headers
Madan Mohan | 4 Jul 2007 14:08
Picon

FW: Information needed regarding Conferenceimplementation

Can anyone please help me out ???? 

-----Original Message-----
From: sip-implementors-bounces <at> lists.cs.columbia.edu
[mailto:sip-implementors-bounces <at> lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Madan
Mohan
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 9:57 AM
To: sip-implementors <at> lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [Sip-implementors] Information needed regarding
Conferenceimplementation

Hi All

Currently I am implementing the Tightly Coupled Conference application on
WebLogic Sip Server platform.

As per Conference RFC 4353, the Conference server [Focus] should add
'isfocus' parameter in the Contact header in the OK response sent to the
INVITEs, for conference aware User Agent's INVITE.

But as per SIP Servlet APIs, the application should not try to alter the
System Header such as CONTACT header.

Can anyone please help me out in this situation.

Thanks

Madan Mohan. B           

_______________________________________________
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
sunilkumar.verma | 4 Jul 2007 14:25

Re: Privacy and P-asserted Identity headers


Hi Varun,

  To my knowledge p-asserted Identity and privacy go together
  p-asserted Identity is used for call ID display but based on Privacy
level 
  Present in the privacy header.

Regards
Sunil Verma

-----Original Message-----
From: sip-implementors-bounces <at> lists.cs.columbia.edu
[mailto:sip-implementors-bounces <at> lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of
varun
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 4:24 PM
To: varun; sip-implementors <at> cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Privacy and P-asserted Identity headers

Could somebody reply please~!

--- varun <dreamz_dollar <at> yahoo.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> I tried to understand the use of privacy and
> P-asserted Identity headers in SIP but not really
> clear about these.
> Could somebody explain in simple terms the use of
> these two headers.
>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
Patel Nishant-JTPD86 | 4 Jul 2007 15:06

Re: Privacy and P-asserted Identity headers

You can check it out in this IMS book I found useful:

http://www.amazon.com/IMS-Multimedia-Concepts-Services-Mobile/dp/product
-description/047087113X

Regards,

Nishant 

-----Original Message-----
From: sip-implementors-bounces <at> lists.cs.columbia.edu
[mailto:sip-implementors-bounces <at> lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of
varun
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 3:11 PM
To: sip-implementors <at> cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [Sip-implementors] Privacy and P-asserted Identity headers

Hi,
I tried to understand the use of privacy and P-asserted Identity headers
in SIP but not really clear about these.
Could somebody explain in simple terms the use of these two headers.

Need this info ASAP, would be really helpful if somebody could reply.

Regards
varun

       
________________________________________________________________________
____________
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane