Erik van der Velden | 6 Jul 2010 08:39
Picon
Favicon

CPIM example in RFC 4975 is incorrect

Hello all,

We have found what we think is a (minor) error in the CPIM example in section 11.4 of RFC 4975.
According to the RFC 3862, there must be an extra cr/lf between the CPIM headers and the content-type header of the embedded mime content.
Before sending this as an errata, I'd like this mailinglist to confirm this.

More specifically. The example in 11.4 shows the following:       MSRP d93kswow SEND To-Path: msrp://bobpc.example.com:8888/9di4eae923wzd;tcp From-Path: msrp://alicepc.example.com:7654/iau39soe2843z;tcp Message-ID: 12339sdqwer Byte-Range: 1-137/148 Content-Type: message/cpim To: Bob <sip:bob <at> example.com> From: Alice <sip:alice <at> example.com> DateTime: 2006-05-15T15:02:31-03:00 Content-Type: text/plain ABCD       -------d93kswow+ But this should be (according to RFC 3862):

      MSRP d93kswow SEND To-Path: msrp://bobpc.example.com:8888/9di4eae923wzd;tcp From-Path: msrp://alicepc.example.com:7654/iau39soe2843z;tcp Message-ID: 12339sdqwer Byte-Range: 1-137/148 Content-Type: message/cpim To: Bob <sip:bob <at> example.com> From: Alice <sip:alice <at> example.com>       DateTime: 2006-05-15T15:02:31-03:00 Content-Type: text/plain ABCD       -------d93kswow+ This is extra confusing since also the examples in RFC 5547 seem to make exactly the same mistake.

Thanks, Erik
_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
Simple <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple
Peter Saint-Andre | 6 Jul 2010 22:15
Favicon

Re: CPIM example in RFC 4975 is incorrect

Do feel free to report it:

http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php

On 7/6/10 12:39 AM, Erik van der Velden wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> We have found what we think is a (minor) error in the CPIM example in
> section 11.4 of RFC 4975.
> According to the RFC 3862, there must be an extra cr/lf between the CPIM
> headers and the content-type header of the embedded mime content.
> Before sending this as an errata, I'd like this mailinglist to confirm this.
> 
> More specifically. The example in 11.4 shows the following:
> 
>       MSRP d93kswow SEND
>       To-Path: msrp://bobpc.example.com:8888/9di4eae923wzd;tcp
>       From-Path: msrp://alicepc.example.com:7654/iau39soe2843z;tcp
>       Message-ID: 12339sdqwer
>       Byte-Range: 1-137/148
>       Content-Type: message/cpim
> 
>       To: Bob <sip:bob <at> example.com>
>       From: Alice <sip:alice <at> example.com>
>       DateTime: 2006-05-15T15:02:31-03:00
>       Content-Type: text/plain
> 
>       ABCD
>       -------d93kswow+
> 
> 
> But this should be (according to RFC 3862):
> 
>       MSRP d93kswow SEND
>       To-Path: msrp://bobpc.example.com:8888/9di4eae923wzd;tcp
>       From-Path: msrp://alicepc.example.com:7654/iau39soe2843z;tcp
>       Message-ID: 12339sdqwer
>       Byte-Range: 1-137/148
>       Content-Type: message/cpim
> 
>       To: Bob <sip:bob <at> example.com>
>       From: Alice <sip:alice <at> example.com>
>       DateTime: 2006-05-15T15:02:31-03:00
> 
>       Content-Type: text/plain
> 
>       ABCD
>       -------d93kswow+
> 
> 
> This is extra confusing since also the examples in RFC 5547 seem to make
> exactly the same mistake.
> 
> Thanks, Erik
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Simple mailing list
> Simple <at> ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple

Attachment (smime.p7s): application/pkcs7-signature, 6820 bytes
_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
Simple <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple
Ben Campbell | 7 Jul 2010 03:20
Favicon

Re: CPIM example in RFC 4975 is incorrect

[as individual, and RFC author]

My quick scan of the relevant RFCs seems to support your findings. An errata entry would be reasonable. 

Thanks!

Ben.

On Jul 6, 2010, at 1:39 AM, Erik van der Velden wrote:

> Hello all,
> 
> We have found what we think is a (minor) error in the CPIM example in section 11.4 of RFC 4975.
> According to the RFC 3862, there must be an extra cr/lf between the CPIM headers and the content-type
header of the embedded mime content.
> Before sending this as an errata, I'd like this mailinglist to confirm this.
> 
> More specifically. The example in 11.4 shows the following:
>       MSRP d93kswow SEND
>       To-Path: msrp://bobpc.example.com:8888/9di4eae923wzd;tcp
>       From-Path: msrp://alicepc.example.com:7654/iau39soe2843z;tcp
>       Message-ID: 12339sdqwer
>       Byte-Range: 1-137/148
>       Content-Type: message/cpim
> 
>       To: Bob <sip:bob <at> example.com>
>       From: Alice <sip:alice <at> example.com>
>       DateTime: 2006-05-15T15:02:31-03:00
>       Content-Type: text/plain
> 
>       ABCD
>       -------d93kswow+
> 
> But this should be (according to RFC 3862):
> 
>       MSRP d93kswow SEND
>       To-Path: msrp://bobpc.example.com:8888/9di4eae923wzd;tcp
>       From-Path: msrp://alicepc.example.com:7654/iau39soe2843z;tcp
>       Message-ID: 12339sdqwer
>       Byte-Range: 1-137/148
>       Content-Type: message/cpim
> 
>       To: Bob <sip:bob <at> example.com>
>       From: Alice <sip:alice <at> example.com>
>       DateTime: 2006-05-15T15:02:31-03:00
> 
>       Content-Type: text/plain
> 
>       ABCD
>       -------d93kswow+
> 
> This is extra confusing since also the examples in RFC 5547 seem to make exactly the same mistake.
> 
> Thanks, Erik
> _______________________________________________
> Simple mailing list
> Simple <at> ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple

Gmane