internet-drafts | 28 Jun 13:55 2016
Picon

I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain-06.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Routing Area Working Group of the IETF.

        Title           : Routing Key Chain YANG Data Model
        Authors         : Acee Lindem
                          Yingzhen Qu
                          Derek Yeung
                          Ing-Wher Chen
                          Jeffrey Zhang
                          Yi Yang
	Filename        : draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain-06.txt
	Pages           : 21
	Date            : 2016-06-28

Abstract:
   This document describes the key chain YANG data model.  A key chain
   is a list of elements each containing a key, send lifetime, accept
   lifetime, and algorithm.  By properly overlapping the send and accept
   lifetimes of multiple key chain elements, keys and algorithms may be
   gracefully updated.  By representing them in a YANG data model, key
   distribution can be automated.  Key chains are commonly used for
   routing protocol authentication and other applications.  In some
   applications, the protocols do not use the key chain element key
   directly, but rather a key derivation function is used to derive a
   short-lived key from the key chain element key.

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain/

(Continue reading)

Benoit Claise | 28 Jun 08:51 2016
Picon

draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain: YANG compilation

Dear draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain-03,

The YANG module compilation in your draft fails with the following warning:
ietf-routing-key-chain <at> 2016-06-27.yang:1: warning: unexpected modulename 
"ietf-key-chain" in ietf-routing-key-chain <at> 2016-06-27.yang, should be 
ietf-routing-key-chain
See http://www.claise.be/IETFYANGPageCompilation.html

The previous version 02 was fine in that regards.

This warning should have been flagged in idnits. Let me know if this was 
not the case.
www.yangvalidator.com can also be useful.

Regards, Benoit
internet-drafts | 25 Jun 23:25 2016
Picon

I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model-00.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Routing Area Working Group of the IETF.

        Title           : Network Instance Model
        Authors         : Lou Berger
                          Christan Hopps
                          Acee Lindem
                          Dean Bogdanovic
	Filename        : draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model-00.txt
	Pages           : 15
	Date            : 2016-06-23

Abstract:
   This document defines a network instance module.  This module along
   with the logical network element module can be used to manage the
   logical and virtual resource representations that may be present on a
   network device.  Examples of common industry terms for logical
   resource representations are Logical Systems or Logical Routers.
   Examples of common industry terms for virtual resource
   representations are Virtual Routing and Forwarding (VRF) instances
   and Virtual Switch Instances (VSIs).

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model-00

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
(Continue reading)

internet-drafts | 25 Jun 23:24 2016
Picon

I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-lne-model-00.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Routing Area Working Group of the IETF.

        Title           : Logical Network Element Model
        Authors         : Lou Berger
                          Christan Hopps
                          Acee Lindem
                          Dean Bogdanovic
	Filename        : draft-ietf-rtgwg-lne-model-00.txt
	Pages           : 13
	Date            : 2016-06-23

Abstract:
   This document defines a logical network element module.  This module
   along with the network instance module can be used to manage the
   logical and virtual resource representations that may be present on a
   network device.  Examples of common industry terms for logical
   resource representations are Logical Systems or Logical Routers.
   Examples of of common industry terms for virtual resource
   representations are Virtual Routing and Forwarding (VRF) instances
   and Virtual Switch Instances (VSIs).

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-lne-model/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-lne-model-00

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
(Continue reading)

"IETF Secretariat" | 24 Jun 18:00 2016
Picon

rtgwg - Requested sessions have been scheduled for IETF 96

Dear Jeff Tantsura,

The session(s) that you have requested have been scheduled.
Below is the scheduled session information followed by
the original request. 

rtgwg Session 1 (2:00:00)
    Tuesday, Afternoon Session I 1400-1600
    Room Name: Potsdam III size: 250
    ---------------------------------------------
    rtgwg Session 2 (2:30:00)
    Wednesday, Morning Session I 1000-1230
    Room Name: Potsdam III size: 250
    ---------------------------------------------

Request Information:

---------------------------------------------------------
Working Group Name: Routing Area Working Group
Area Name: Routing Area
Session Requester: Jeff Tantsura

Number of Sessions: 2
Length of Session(s):  2 Hours, 2.5 Hours
Number of Attendees: 150
Conflicts to Avoid: 
 First Priority: isis mpls ospf pce idr spring
 Second Priority: bess l3sm bier teas ccamp i2rs
 Third Priority: bfd detnet lime nvo3 pim netmod

(Continue reading)

Jeff Tantsura | 23 Jun 18:13 2016
Picon

RTGWG presentation slot requests for Berlin

Dear RTGWG

It's that time again!

The preliminary agenda for IETF 96 has been published; you can find it at https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/96/agenda.html

RTGWG will be meeting:

-14:00 – 16:00 on Tuesday July 19 in Potsdam III

-10:00 - 12:30 on Wednesday July 20 in Potsdam III

If you'd like a slot to present a draft, please send a request to Chris and I by July 8. Please note the dates below, in particular, the deadline for draft submission is UTC 23:59, July 8.

We kindly request to send your slides for presentations by Friday, July 15.

Any WG draft not being discussed/presented needs to a status update sent to the list by Sunday July 10.

As always – we would appreciate your help in taking notes and jabber, please do volunteer!

Looking forward to seeing you in Berlin!

Cheers,

Jeff and Chris

 

 

 

_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
rtgwg <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
tanxuefei 00203118 | 22 Jun 09:06 2016

New draft for networking request for comments and look for interested people, thank you.

Dear All,
The posted document at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tan-rtgwg-proactive-routing-network-arch/ propose a
new networking mechanism to:
1) Provide deterministic network service for users.
2) Simplify the service management, fault location and help operators for more accurate billing.
3) Solve the addressing issue for vendors. 
Proactive Routing Network (PRN), provides a set of E2E Pipes for the two End Systems of communication named
Requester and Source. 
The E2E Pipe have deterministic path learned from the trace of the Request, and is QOS guaranteed by
resource reservation. 
Addressing issue is solved by recording the labeled interfaces or Local Pipes taken along with the Request
to the Source. 
Each Pipe is protocol oblivious, application aware, elastic and visible for users and operators.

We greatly appreciate your reviews, questions, comments, and suggestions.

Thanks,
Tan Xuefei
tanxuefei at Huawei.com

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: internet-drafts <at> ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts <at> ietf.org] 
发送时间: 2016年6月22日 14:39
收件人: tanxuefei 00203118 <tanxuefei <at> huawei.com>; tanxuefei 00203118 <tanxuefei <at> huawei.com>
主题: New Version Notification for draft-tan-rtgwg-proactive-routing-network-arch-00.txt


A new version of I-D, draft-tan-rtgwg-proactive-routing-network-arch-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Tan Xuefei and posted to the IETF repository.

Name:		draft-tan-rtgwg-proactive-routing-network-arch
Revision:	00
Title:		Proactive Routing Network Architecture
Document date:	2016-06-22
Group:		Individual Submission
Pages:		21
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-tan-rtgwg-proactive-routing-network-arch-00.txt

Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tan-rtgwg-proactive-routing-network-arch/

Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tan-rtgwg-proactive-routing-network-arch-00



Abstract:
   Proactive Routing Network (PRN), which runs on conventional
   network, is user and service experience oriented; and provides a
   set of E2E Pipes for the two End Systems of communication named
   Requester and Source. The E2E Pipe have deterministic path learned
   from the trace of the Request sent by Requester, and is QOS
   guaranteed by resource reservation. Addressing issue is solved by
   recording the labeled interfaces or Local Pipes taken along with
   the Request to the Source. Each Pipe is protocol oblivious,
   application aware, elastic and visible for users and operators.

   PRN is not a new network, rather, it is a service attached to the
   conventional network. Therefore it does not affect the operation
   business of the conventional networks, so it is very conducive to
   the deployment and smooth evolution.

   PRN is valuable for users who want deterministic network service,
   and is helpful for operators to simplify the service management
   and easy for fault location and billing, and is helpful for
   vendors to solve the addressing issue which is one of the biggest
   challenges of increasing device throughput at a reasonable cost.

                                                                                  


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and
diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat

_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
rtgwg <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
bensons | 21 Jun 20:20 2016
Picon
Gravatar

very good news

Hi,

 

My dear friend I've got such a good news for you, just take a look at http://ndychycroge.thedatingsolution.com/aecwv

 

Sent from a prehistoric stone tablet, bensons <at> queuefull.net

_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
rtgwg <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
internet-drafts | 21 Jun 18:26 2016
Picon

I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-pic-01.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Routing Area Working Group of the IETF.

        Title           : Abstract
        Authors         : Ahmed Bashandy
                          Clarence Filsfils
                          Prodosh Mohapatra
	Filename        : draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-pic-01.txt
	Pages           : 25
	Date            : 2016-06-21

Abstract:
In the network comprising thousands of iBGP peers exchanging millions
of routes, many routes are reachable via more than one next-hop.
Given the large scaling targets, it is desirable to restore traffic
after failure in a time period that does not depend on the number of
BGP prefixes. In this document we proposed an architecture by which
traffic can be re-routed to ECMP or pre-calculated backup paths in a
timeframe that does not depend on the number of BGP prefixes. The
objective is achieved through organizing the forwarding data
structures in a hierarchical manner and sharing forwarding elements
among the maximum possible number of routes. The proposed technique
achieves prefix independent convergence while ensuring incremental
deployment, complete automation, and zero management and provisioning
effort. It is noteworthy to mention that the benefits of BGP-PIC are
hinged on the existence of more than one path whether as ECMP or
primary-backup.

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-pic/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-pic-01

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-pic-01

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
IETF Secretariat | 21 Jun 15:47 2016
Picon

The RTGWG WG has placed draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-lne-model in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"


The RTGWG WG has placed draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-lne-model in state 
Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Jeff Tantsura)

The document is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-lne-model/
IETF Secretariat | 21 Jun 15:47 2016
Picon

The RTGWG WG has placed draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-ni-model in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"


The RTGWG WG has placed draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-ni-model in state 
Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Jeff Tantsura)

The document is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-ni-model/

Gmane