Songhaibin (A | 30 Oct 04:40 2014

Router backdoor threat model

Hi,

We have submitted a draft on router backdoor threat model. The main target is the threat model at the
beginning. It is a little limited to the device level instead of the routing system level. Some threats are
common to other devices as well. We would like to know if there are people interested in this work or can give
some constructive comments or input. Any related discussion in the list or with the authors is welcome : )

Here is the link for the draft.
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-song-router-backdoor-00.txt

Best Regards!
-Haibin
Lucy yong | 28 Oct 16:51 2014

FW: New Version Notification for draft-yong-rtgwg-igp-multicast-arch-00.txt

Hello,

We upload this new draft and like to get your comments.

The subject was proposed to IS-IS WG first. AD suggested splitting the original proposal into two: IGP
multicast architecture and IS-IS protocol extension, and work out the architecture in RTG WG. 

We will present this in Honolulu.

Thanks,
Lucy

-----Original Message-----
From: internet-drafts <at> ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts <at> ietf.org] 
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 4:54 PM
To: Andrew Qu; Jon Hudson; Lucy yong; Haoweiguo; Lucy yong; Donald Eastlake; Andrew Qu; Donald E. Eastlake
3rd; Jon Hudson; Haoweiguo
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-yong-rtgwg-igp-multicast-arch-00.txt

A new version of I-D, draft-yong-rtgwg-igp-multicast-arch-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Lucy Yong and posted to the IETF repository.

Name:		draft-yong-rtgwg-igp-multicast-arch
Revision:	00
Title:		IGP Multicast Architecture
Document date:	2014-10-27
Group:		Individual Submission
Pages:		13
URL:            http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-yong-rtgwg-igp-multicast-arch-00.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yong-rtgwg-igp-multicast-arch/
(Continue reading)

William Atwood | 28 Oct 04:53 2014
Picon
Picon

Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-atwood-rtgwg-secure-rtg-00.txt

We have posted draft-atwood-rtgwg-secure-rtg, and requested a slot to
present it in Hawaii.  We solicit comments from the working group.

We consider routing from the perspective of four layers:
1 Routing Protocol           (exchange of routing packets)
2 Keys and Security Protocol (how to provide authentication
                             and integrity)
3 Key and Security Association Management
                             (how to negotiate the keys that
                             will be used)
4 Configuration Management   (how to push the parameters for
                             Layer 3 onto the router)

Many routing protocols are defined (layer 1).
Many routing protocols have a security option defined in their
specification (layer 2).
Some key negotiation protocols have been proposed, but no method for
conveniently managing them has been put forth (layer 3).
No work has been done (to our knowledge) specifically on configuring
security for routing protocols (general configuration approaches clearly
exist) (layer 4).

We use the Crypto-Key-Table (CKT) defined in RFC 7210.  We define two
additional databases, the Router Security Parameter Database (RSPD) and
the Router Peer Authorization Database (RPAD).  Together these form the
Routing Protocol Security (RPsec) framework.

We have defined YANG modules to correspond to the contents of the CKT,
the RSPD and the RPAD.  Version -00 of the draft contains most of the
motivation.  Version -01 will contain details of the proposed RSPD and
(Continue reading)

liu.bin21 | 28 Oct 02:52 2014
Picon

Soliciting comments for new version for draft-sl-rtgwg-far-dcn-02.txt


Greeting all,

We updated the far draft with 02 version, and we hope to get valuable comments of experts in the routing group on our draft.

Best regards,
Richard Bin Liu


A new version of I-D, draft-sl-rtgwg-far-dcn-02.txt
has been successfully submitted by Bin Liu and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:                                  draft-sl-rtgwg-far-dcn
Revision:                 02
Title:                                  Generic Fault-avoidance Routing Protocol for Data Center Networks
Document date:                 2014-10-27
Group:                                  Individual Submission
Pages:                                  30
URL:            http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sl-rtgwg-far-dcn-02.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sl-rtgwg-far-dcn/
Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sl-rtgwg-far-dcn-02
Diff:           http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-sl-rtgwg-far-dcn-02

Abstract:
  This draft proposes a generic routing method and protocol for a
  regular data center network, named as the fault-avoidance routing
  (FAR) protocol.  FAR protocol provides a generic routing method for
  all types of network architectures that are proposed for large-scale
  cloud-based data centers over the past few years.  FAR protocol is
  well designed to fully leverage the regularity in the topology and
  compute its routing table in a simplistic manner.  Fat-tree is taken
  as an example architecture to illustrate how FAR protocol can be
  applied in real operational scenarios.
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
rtgwg <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
Alvaro Retana (aretana | 27 Oct 22:54 2014
Picon

IETF 91 Draft Agenda (rtgwg)

HI!

I just published the draft agenda:  http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/91/agenda/agenda-91-rtgwg

We still have plenty of meeting time for other requests.. In a couple of cases we still haven’t settled on the topic, so I didn’t include you.

Note that the final agenda has to be in on Nov/3.  Let me know if I missed any request.

Thanks!

Alvaro.
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
rtgwg <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
Pushpasis Sarkar | 27 Oct 18:09 2014
Picon

FW: New Version Notification for draft-psarkar-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-00.txt

Hi RTGWG members,

Please comment and provide your feedback.

Thanks and Regards,
-Pushpasis

On 10/27/14, 10:37 PM, "internet-drafts <at> ietf.org"
<internet-drafts <at> ietf.org> wrote:

>
>A new version of I-D, draft-psarkar-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-00.txt
>has been successfully submitted by Pushpasis Sarkar and posted to the
>IETF repository.
>
>Name:		draft-psarkar-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa
>Revision:	00
>Title:		LFA selection for Multi-Homed Prefixes
>Document date:	2014-10-27
>Group:		Individual Submission
>Pages:		9
>URL:            
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-psarkar-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-
>lfa-00.txt
>Status:         
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-psarkar-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa
>/
>Htmlized:       
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-psarkar-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-00
>
>
>Abstract:
>   This document shares experience gained from implementing algorithms
>   to determine Loop-Free Alternates for multi-homed prefixes.  In
>   particular, this document provides explicit inequalities that can be
>   used to evaluate neighbours as a potential alternates for multi-homed
>   prefixes.  It also provides detailed criteria for evaluating
>   potential alternates for external prefixes advertised by OSPF ASBRs.
>
>
>                  
>        
>
>
>Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>submission
>until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
>The IETF Secretariat
>
David Lamparter | 20 Oct 22:40 2014
Picon

dst/src routing drafts (for IETF-91 rtgwg)

Hi rtgwg,

freshly submitted & soliciting for feedback are the following drafts:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lamparter-rtgwg-routing-extra-qualifiers/?include_text=1
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lamparter-rtgwg-dst-src-routing/?include_text=1

These are distilled version of the SADR stuff that has been coming in
from homenet; they describe the hop-by-hop forwarding behaviour
independent of the dynamic routing protocol du jour.  The first one
describes general considerations of adding things ("extra qualifiers")
to destination longest-match, the second one does the specifics for
source match.  They're derived from baker-ipv6-isis-dst-src-routing, and
are essentially write-ups of e-mail threads with Fred.  (Thanks!)

These are -00, so there's a lot of things to be fixed still (I'm not
even sure whether this should be 2 drafts or 1, and some bits should be
moved from -dst-src to -extra-qualifiers if it stays separate.)

I believe rtgwg is the "best" wg for this, looking at the charter this
fits "Enhancements to hop-by-hop distributed routing", though admittedly
it's neither FRR nor LFA.  I'll happily accept a redirect to another wg
(6man? homenet?) if that's deemed more appropriate.

Last but not least, I'd like to request a slot at the IETF 91 rtgwg
meeting to present these drafts.

Cheers & Thanks in advance for feedback,

-David
Uma Chunduri | 16 Oct 01:31 2014
Picon

FW: New Version Notification for draft-chunduri-rtgwg-lfa-extended-procedures-00.txt

Dear RTGWG,

Your comments and suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

--
Uma C.

-----Original Message-----
From: internet-drafts <at> ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts <at> ietf.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 4:22 PM
To: Uma Chunduri; Jeff Tantsura; Uma Chunduri; Jeff Tantsura
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-chunduri-rtgwg-lfa-extended-procedures-00.txt

A new version of I-D, draft-chunduri-rtgwg-lfa-extended-procedures-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Uma Chunduri and posted to the IETF repository.

Name:		draft-chunduri-rtgwg-lfa-extended-procedures
Revision:	00
Title:		Extended procedures and considerations for evaluating Loop-Free Alternates
Document date:	2014-10-15
Group:		Individual Submission
Pages:		8
URL:            http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-chunduri-rtgwg-lfa-extended-procedures-00.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chunduri-rtgwg-lfa-extended-procedures/
Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chunduri-rtgwg-lfa-extended-procedures-00

Abstract:
   This document provide few clarifications and extended procedures to
   IP Fast Reroute using Loop-Free Alternates as defined in RFC 5286.

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and
diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat
IETF Secretariat | 15 Oct 19:49 2014
Picon

Milestones changed for rtgwg WG

Changed milestone "Submit Remote LFA (link protection) for publication
as Proposed Standard", set state to active from review, accepting new
milestone.

Changed milestone "Submit Document on Operational Experience of using
BGP in a Data Center for publication as Informational", set state to
active from review, accepting new milestone.

Changed milestone "Submit Operational Management for LFA for
publication as Proposed Standard", set state to active from review,
accepting new milestone.

Changed milestone "Submit Remote LFA (node protection) for publication
as Proposed Standard", set state to active from review, accepting new
milestone.

Changed milestone "Submit MIB for IP Fast-Reroute for publication as
Proposed Standard", set state to active from review, accepting new
milestone.

URL: http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/rtgwg/charter/
IETF Secretariat | 15 Oct 19:44 2014
Picon

Milestones changed for rtgwg WG

Changed milestone "Submit Composite-Link Requirements to IESG for
publication as Informational", set due date to March 2015 from
November 2012, added draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-use-cases to milestone.

Changed milestone "Submit initial Internet Draft on Multicast IP Fast
Reroute Architecture", set due date to March 2015 from November 2012,
added draft-ietf-rtgwg-mofrr to milestone.

Changed milestone "Submit Composite-Link Framework to IESG for
publication as Informational", set due date to March 2015 from
November 2012, added draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-framework to milestone.

Changed milestone "Submit specification on Advanced IP Fast Reroute
mechanism to IESG for publication as Proposed Standard", set due date
to July 2015 from April 2013, added
draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-architecture,
draft-ietf-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm to milestone.

URL: http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/rtgwg/charter/
Alvaro Retana (aretana | 11 Oct 13:28 2014
Picon

IETF 91 Agenda Items (rtgwg)

Hi!

The preliminary agenda for Honolulu was posted yesterday (https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/91/agenda.txt), and rtgwg is scheduled to meet as follows:
WEDNESDAY, November 12, 2014 0900-1130 Morning Session I Coral 2 RTG rtgwg Routing Area Working Group WG
From here on the dates look like this:
  • 2014-10-27 (Monday): Internet Draft submission cut-off (for all drafts, including -00) 
  • 2014-10-27 (Monday): Draft Working Group agendas due 
  • 2014-11-03 (Monday): Revised Working Group agendas due 
Note that the ID submission cut-off and the Draft WG Agendas are due on the same day.  Please reply to this email with any requests by Friday Oct/24 to be included in the Draft WG Agenda.  Note that the ID MUST have already been published to be considered.

For a draft to be considered for the Final  WG Agenda:
  1. It MUST have been published already.
  2. The authors SHOULD start a discussion on the list highlighting the main points of the draft (don’t just send a copy of the announcement and/or paste the abstract).
  3. Slides MUST be provided to the chairs by EOD on Monday Nov/10.
We will prioritize existing WG items first, followed by work explicitly identified in the WG charter.  Other items may be considered if we have time; we will give preference to items for which there has been a discussion on the list on a first-come basis.  As we recently discussed on the list, the Charter was modified:  http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/rtgwg/charter/   Jeff and I are working on updating the milestones.

Thanks!

Alvaro + Jeff
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
rtgwg <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Gmane