Wijnen, Bert (Bert | 4 Apr 15:54 2003
Picon

RE: draft-ietf-rap-feedback-fr-pib-05.txt submission

Sorry that it took so long to re-review this.

I am ready to take this to IESG if the WG is OK that I
propose it for publication as Informational RFC.

However, 
I would still suggest that we also rename the 
   FEEDBACK-FRAMEWORK-PIB PIB-DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
into
   FRAMEWORK-FEEDBACK-PIB PIB-DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
that seems much more inline with the whole module.

I also need to have RFC2578, RFC2863 as Normative References,
because you do IMPORT from those RFCs.

To be fully compliant with latest Copy-right ploicy, the
DESCRIPTION clause also needs a copyright statement,
aka

      DESCRIPTION
              "The PIB module containing the base set of policy rule
              classes that are required for support of all policy
              usage  monitoring, tracking and reporting policies"

Should become

      DESCRIPTION
              "The PIB module containing the base set of policy rule
              classes that are required for support of all policy
              usage  monitoring, tracking and reporting policies.
(Continue reading)

Martin Bokaemper | 4 Apr 17:37 2003
Picon

RE: draft-ietf-rap-feedback-fr-pib-05.txt submission

Hello Bert!

> I am ready to take this to IESG if the WG is OK that I
> propose it for publication as Informational RFC.
[... skipped changes ...]
> Let me know (asap) if the above is OK and if Martin can quickly 
> spin a new revision.

All the changes are fine with me and I will produce a
new revision of the draft. I plan to send it to the
list and internet-drafts <at> ietf.org later today.

Thanks,
Martin.
--

-- 

Wijnen, Bert (Bert | 4 Apr 17:49 2003
Picon

RE: draft-ietf-rap-feedback-fr-pib-05.txt submission

Great, thanks

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Bokaemper [mailto:mbokaemper <at> juniper.net]
> Sent: vrijdag 4 april 2003 17:37
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); Rap-wg (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: draft-ietf-rap-feedback-fr-pib-05.txt submission
> 
> 
> Hello Bert!
> 
> > I am ready to take this to IESG if the WG is OK that I
> > propose it for publication as Informational RFC.
> [... skipped changes ...]
> > Let me know (asap) if the above is OK and if Martin can quickly 
> > spin a new revision.
> 
> All the changes are fine with me and I will produce a
> new revision of the draft. I plan to send it to the
> list and internet-drafts <at> ietf.org later today.
> 
> Thanks,
> Martin.
> -- 
> 

(Continue reading)

Rawlins, Diana | 4 Apr 17:55 2003

RE: draft-ietf-rap-feedback-fr-pib-05.txt submission

Martin, 

Yes I agree and thanks for getting this out.

-Diana

-----Original Message-----
From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:bwijnen <at> lucent.com] 
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 9:49 AM
To: Martin Bokaemper; Wijnen, Bert (Bert); Rap-wg (E-mail)
Subject: RE: draft-ietf-rap-feedback-fr-pib-05.txt submission

Great, thanks

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Bokaemper [mailto:mbokaemper <at> juniper.net]
> Sent: vrijdag 4 april 2003 17:37
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); Rap-wg (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: draft-ietf-rap-feedback-fr-pib-05.txt submission
> 
> 
> Hello Bert!
> 
> > I am ready to take this to IESG if the WG is OK that I
> > propose it for publication as Informational RFC.
> [... skipped changes ...]
> > Let me know (asap) if the above is OK and if Martin can quickly 
(Continue reading)

Kwok Ho Chan | 4 Apr 18:16 2003

RE: draft-ietf-rap-feedback-fr-pib-05.txt submission

Bert and draft co-authors:
These changes are OK for me.
Thanks!
-- Kwok --

At 03:54 PM 4/4/03 +0200, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
>Sorry that it took so long to re-review this.
>
>I am ready to take this to IESG if the WG is OK that I
>propose it for publication as Informational RFC.
>
>However,
>I would still suggest that we also rename the
>    FEEDBACK-FRAMEWORK-PIB PIB-DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
>into
>    FRAMEWORK-FEEDBACK-PIB PIB-DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
>that seems much more inline with the whole module.
>
>I also need to have RFC2578, RFC2863 as Normative References,
>because you do IMPORT from those RFCs.
>
>To be fully compliant with latest Copy-right ploicy, the
>DESCRIPTION clause also needs a copyright statement,
>aka
>
>       DESCRIPTION
>               "The PIB module containing the base set of policy rule
>               classes that are required for support of all policy
>               usage  monitoring, tracking and reporting policies"
>
(Continue reading)

Martin Bokaemper | 4 Apr 22:12 2003
Picon

draft-ietf-rap-feedback-fr-pib-06.txt submission

I would like to submit an updated Internet Draft. This draft is a work of
the Resource Allocation Protocol (RAP) WG. The details are as follows:

       Title     :  Framework Policy Information Base for Usage Feedback
       Filename  :  draft-ietf-rap-feedback-fr-pib-06.txt

Please let me know if there are any problems.

Thanks,
Martin.
-- 

    Internet Draft                                        Diana Rawlins 
    Expiration: October 2003                                   WorldCom 
    File: draft-ietf-rap-feedback-fr-pib-06.txt           Amol Kulkarni 
                                                                  Intel 
                                                           Kwok Ho Chan 
                                                        Nortel Networks 
                                                       Martin Bokaemper 
                                                       Juniper Networks 
                                                            Dinesh Dutt 
                                                                  Cisco 
       
           Framework Policy Information Base for Usage Feedback 
                                      
                       Last Updated April 4, 2003 
            
Status of this Memo   
(Continue reading)

Martin Bokaemper | 4 Apr 22:31 2003
Picon

RE: draft-ietf-rap-feedback-fr-pib-05.txt submission

Hello,

The updated version of the draft that just went
out has the changes suggested by Bert (see his 
email below) and the following additional 
modifications:
- updated dates for 'last updated' and 'expiration'
  of the draft and 'LAST-UPDATED' and 'REVISION'
  in the PIB.
- updated the 'Informational References':
  draft-ietf-rap-cops-tls has a new revision and
  diffserv-pib is now RFC 3317.
- minor typos in the references, ',"' vs. '",'

Sorry about the first submission with the 
non-ascii data at the end.

Thanks,
Martin.

-----Original Message-----
From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:bwijnen <at> lucent.com]
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 8:55 AM
To: Martin Bokaemper; Rap-wg (E-mail)
Cc: 'Wijnen, Bert (Bert)'
Subject: RE: draft-ietf-rap-feedback-fr-pib-05.txt submission

Sorry that it took so long to re-review this.

I am ready to take this to IESG if the WG is OK that I
(Continue reading)

Martin Bokaemper | 4 Apr 22:25 2003
Picon

RE: draft-ietf-rap-feedback-fr-pib-06.txt submission

Hello!

A formatting mistake occured in the file - on the last
page a block of non-ascii data was inserted.
Please use the attached file instead of the one
in the previous email.

Thank you very much,
Martin.

PS.: <....> unquotable comments about MS Word deleted.

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Bokaemper 
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 3:13 PM
To: Internet-Drafts <at> ietf.org
Cc: rap <at> ops.ietf.org
Subject: draft-ietf-rap-feedback-fr-pib-06.txt submission

I would like to submit an updated Internet Draft. This draft is a work of
the Resource Allocation Protocol (RAP) WG. The details are as follows:

       Title     :  Framework Policy Information Base for Usage Feedback
       Filename  :  draft-ietf-rap-feedback-fr-pib-06.txt

Please let me know if there are any problems.

Thanks,
Martin.
--

-- 
(Continue reading)

Wijnen, Bert (Bert | 4 Apr 22:56 2003
Picon

RE: draft-ietf-rap-feedback-fr-pib-05.txt submission

You made one typo in the [SMI2] reference.
You type RFC 2587 instead of RFC 2578.
I can handle that with a note-to-rfcEditor.
Pls keep an eye on it, so that we check it during 
RFC-Editor 48-hour author call.

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Bokaemper [mailto:mbokaemper <at> juniper.net]
> Sent: vrijdag 4 april 2003 22:31
> To: Rap-wg (E-mail)
> Cc: Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> Subject: RE: draft-ietf-rap-feedback-fr-pib-05.txt submission
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> The updated version of the draft that just went
> out has the changes suggested by Bert (see his 
> email below) and the following additional 
> modifications:
> - updated dates for 'last updated' and 'expiration'
>   of the draft and 'LAST-UPDATED' and 'REVISION'
>   in the PIB.
> - updated the 'Informational References':
>   draft-ietf-rap-cops-tls has a new revision and
>   diffserv-pib is now RFC 3317.
> - minor typos in the references, ',"' vs. '",'
(Continue reading)

Wijnen, Bert (Bert | 5 Apr 17:02 2003
Picon

FW: Last Call: Textual Conventions for IPv6 Flow Label to Propos ed Standard

FYI and possible comment.
Send comments to iesg/ietf mailing lists, or for discussions
join mibs <at> ops.ietf.org

Thanks,
Bert 

-----Original Message-----
From: The IESG [mailto:iesg-secretary <at> ietf.org]
Sent: zaterdag 5 april 2003 0:49
Subject: Last Call: Textual Conventions for IPv6 Flow Label to Proposed
Standard

The IESG has received a request from the Operations & Management 
Open Area Working Group to consider Textual Conventions for IPv6 
Flow Label <draft-ietf-ops-ipv6-flowlabel-00.txt> as a Proposed 
Standard.  

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action.  Please send any comments to the 
iesg <at> ietf.org or ietf <at> ietf.org mailing lists by 2003-5-4.

Files can be obtained via http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ops-ipv6-flowlabel-00.txt


Gmane