6 Apr 2002 04:20
Re: [Diffserv] Re: why i should like pibs
Walter Weiss <w.weiss <at> attbi.com>
2002-04-06 02:20:42 GMT
2002-04-06 02:20:42 GMT
John, Sorry for the late reply. I missed your posting. Comments follow inline. regards, -Walter ---------- [snip] > The fundamental problem with distributing policy to traffic-forwarding > devices rather than translating policy into configurations under the > constraints of the composition (topology) and capabilities of the > devices in the path of the traffic remains. It is essentially wishful > thinking that individual devices can determine the correct configuration > of their local parameters without the domain-wide information. I have > not been persuaded that the capability-exchange between the PEP and PDP > solves this problem. There are hints of importance of the domain-wide > context in DiffServ's per-domain behavior (PDB) specifications. > I can't speak for others but the capabilities aspects of COPS-PR have always troubled me although for slightly different reasons. It is my view that capabilities are abstractions of implementations. However, it is difficult to decide where to stop. It is fine to say that a router supports classification. But it is not that simple. A policy server (and I use the term very loosely :) would also like to know how many classifiers, whether ranges or lists are supported, and where classifiers can be placed in a datapath. There is far more complexity in representing capabilities than it(Continue reading)
RSS Feed