headers
Daryl Malas | 3 Nov 2008 17:43
Favicon

Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-speermint-requirements-07.txt

All,

Those of you waiting for the requirements draft to be completed to
continue your drafts, I have good news for you; it's done!  We completed
WGLC on this draft and received no comments, so Jean-Francois updated
the draft with the final comments from Dublin and included it in this
revision.  Let's move forward.  Please update the remaining drafts based
on this version.

Regards,

Daryl

----------------
Daryl Malas
CableLabs
(o) +1 303 661 3302
(f) +1 303 661 9199
mailto:d.malas@...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: speermint-bounces@... 
> [mailto:speermint-bounces@...] On Behalf Of 
> Internet-Drafts@...
> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 5:45 AM
> To: i-d-announce@...
> Cc: speermint@...
> Subject: [Speermint] I-D 
> Action:draft-ietf-speermint-requirements-07.txt
>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Livingood, Jason | 3 Nov 2008 17:42
Picon

Re: SPEERMINT Security Threts and suggested countermeasures

We've had this draft discussed at the last couple of WG meetings, and it
seems of interest to the WG.  Many of you have expressed an interest in
making this an official WG draft.

Are there any objections to doing so at this time?

Regards
Jason 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: speermint-bounces@... 
> [mailto:speermint-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Saverio Niccolini
> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 3:41 PM
> To: speermint@...
> Subject: [Speermint] SPEERMINT Security Threts and suggested 
> countermeasures
> 
> Dear SPEERMINT folks,
> 
> I just wanted to let you know that we just submitted an 
> updated draft of our "SPEERMINT Security Threts and suggested 
> countermeasures"
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-niccolini-speermint-voipthreats-05.txt
> 
> We worked on addressing the recent feedback received, we are 
> looking forward to receiving comments.
> 
> Cheers,
> Saverio
>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Uzelac, Adam | 3 Nov 2008 21:42

Re: SPEERMINT Security Threts and suggested countermeasures

I feel there's merit to have this as an official WG draft.  No objection here.

Adam

> -----Original Message-----
> From: speermint-bounces@...
[mailto:speermint-bounces@...] On
> Behalf Of Livingood, Jason
> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2008 11:43 AM
> To: Saverio Niccolini; speermint@...; Daryl Malas
> Subject: Re: [Speermint] SPEERMINT Security Threts and suggested
> countermeasures
>
> We've had this draft discussed at the last couple of WG meetings, and
> it
> seems of interest to the WG.  Many of you have expressed an interest in
> making this an official WG draft.
>
> Are there any objections to doing so at this time?
>
> Regards
> Jason
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: speermint-bounces@...
> > [mailto:speermint-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Saverio Niccolini
> > Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 3:41 PM
> > To: speermint@...
> > Subject: [Speermint] SPEERMINT Security Threts and suggested
> > countermeasures
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Internet | 4 Nov 2008 01:30
Picon
Favicon

I-D Action:draft-ietf-speermint-architecture-07.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Session PEERing for Multimedia INTerconnect Working Group of the IETF.

	Title           : SPEERMINT Peering Architecture
	Author(s)       : S. Khan
	Filename        : draft-ietf-speermint-architecture-07.txt
	Pages           : 21
	Date            : 2008-11-03

This document defines the SPEERMINT peering architecture, its 
functional components and peering interface functions. It also 

 
 describes the steps taken to establish a session between two peering 
domains in the context of the functions defined.

Conventions used in this document 

The key words "must", "must NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", 
"should", "should NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this 
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC-2119[1]

A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-speermint-architecture-07.txt

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Internet | 4 Nov 2008 01:45
Picon
Favicon

I-D Action:draft-ietf-speermint-flows-04.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Session PEERing for Multimedia INTerconnect Working Group of the IETF.

	Title           : SPEERMINT Routing Architecture Message Flows
	Author(s)       : H. Kaplan, et al.
	Filename        : draft-ietf-speermint-flows-04.txt
	Pages           : 23
	Date            : 2008-11-03

This document describes example message flows associated with the 

  SPEERMINT routing architecture, relative to various peering 

  scenarios.  

  Conventions used in this document 

  The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", 

  "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this 

  document are to be interpreted as described in RFC-2119 [1].  The

A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-speermint-flows-04.txt

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Livingood, Jason | 4 Nov 2008 21:40
Picon

draft-ietf-speermint-srv-naptr-use-02

Now that we're ready to look at this draft again, I will update the doc.  I am going to up-rev to -03 and the only change will be to move the document to XML.  I will then issue a -04 with changes from the discussion of -02, and you will start to see some list traffic on this soon.  Due to the pre-IETF 73 blackout on new I-Ds, you will not see an update until 11/18.
 
Regards
Jason
_______________________________________________
Speermint mailing list
Speermint@...
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/speermint
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Livingood, Jason | 4 Nov 2008 21:41
Picon

Re: Question of draft-ietf-speermint-srv-naptr-use-02

Good question.  I will highlight this as a discussion point for the WG.
 
Jason

From: speermint-bounces-EgrivxUAwEY@public.gmane.org [mailto:speermint-bounces-EgrivxUAwEY@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Raman Chan
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2008 10:57 PM
To: speermint-EgrivxUAwEY@public.gmane.org
Subject: [Speermint] Question of draft-ietf-speermint-srv-naptr-use-02

Hi,
 
The last sentence of Section 3
  "It MUST NOT specify the port"
 
any one can tell me why?
_______________________________________________
Speermint mailing list
Speermint@...
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/speermint
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Livingood, Jason | 4 Nov 2008 21:43
Picon

Re: Updating draft-ietf-speermint-srv-naptr-use-02

Good idea, Benny.  If you or anyone else could propose some text, that'd
be great.

Jason 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: speermint-bounces@... 
> [mailto:speermint-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Rodrig, Benny (Benny)
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 6:11 PM
> To: Livingood, Jason; speermint@...
> Subject: Re: [Speermint] Updating 
> draft-ietf-speermint-srv-naptr-use-02
> 
> Jason,
> 
> You may want to add some more description of how this works 
> in the indirect/transit case. The draft states that it is the 
> same as the direct case, but the details and the assumptions 
> may not be obvious.
> 
> Thanks,
> Benny 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: speermint-bounces@... 
> [mailto:speermint-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Livingood, Jason
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 4:03 PM
> To: speermint@...
> Subject: [Speermint] Updating draft-ietf-speermint-srv-naptr-use-02
> 
> I am planning to work on an update of this I-D soon.  Anyone 
> have any glaring issues that need to be fixed in or addressed 
> by the draft that they wish to point out?
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-speermint-srv-n
> aptr-use-0
> 2.txt
> 
> Thanks
> Jason
> _______________________________________________
> Speermint mailing list
> Speermint@...
> http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/speermint
> _______________________________________________
> Speermint mailing list
> Speermint@...
> http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/speermint
>
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Livingood, Jason | 6 Nov 2008 21:03
Picon

Draft IETF 73 Agenda

Please advise of any requested changes.
 
Session PEERing for Multimedia INTerconnect (Speermint)
 
Thursday, November 20, 2008, 1520 - 1720 (Afternoon Session II)
Room Name: Salon C
==============================================================================================
 
CHAIRS:          Jason Livingood   <jason_livingood <at> cable.comcast.com>
   Daryl Malas  <d.malas-AwJHAePZ/FCakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
 
SECRETARY:    Alexander Mayrhofer  <alexander.mayrhofer-VLepVd+IIy8@public.gmane.org>
 
RAI AREA DIRECTORS: Cullen Jennings  <fluffy-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
   Jon Peterson   <jon.peterson-3faZrbwzjXmpwFb5G8XvHQ@public.gmane.org>
 
RAI AREA ADVISOR: Jon Peterson   <jon.peterson-3faZrbwzjXmpwFb5G8XvHQ@public.gmane.org>
 

GENERAL (15 minutes)
 
1 - Welcome & Introduction to SPEERMINT / Administrivia    5 minutes
 
 
   - Scribe (jabber)
  
   - Blue Sheets
 
2 - Progress Report                                           5 minutes
 - Review of Completed Documents
 - Review of Document Flow / Priority of Upcoming Submissions
 Daryl Malas
 
3 - Agenda Bashing                                           5 minutes
      Jason Livingood
 
REVIEW PRIMARY WG DRAFTS (75 minutes)
 
4 - FINAL FEEDBACK AND WRAP-UP --> SPEERMINT Peering Architecture 20 minutes
 http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-speermint-architecture-07
 Reinaldo Penno
 
5 - DETAILED REVIEW --> SPEERMINT Message Flows    20 minutes
 http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-speermint-flows-04
 Hadriel Kaplan
 
6 - DETAILED REVIEW --> Use of DNS SRV and NAPTR Records for SPEERMINT 15 minutes
 http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-speermint-srv-naptr-use-04
 Jason Livingood and Tom Creighton
 
7 - SPEERMINT Security Threats and Suggested Countermeasures  20 minutes  
 http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-niccolini-speermint-voipthreats-05
 Saverio Niccolini
 
REVIEW INDIVIDUAL DRAFTS (15 minutes)
 
8 - SPEERMINT Background      15 minutes
 http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-lendl-speermint-background-02.txt
 Alex Mayrhofer presenting
 

OPEN DISCUSSION (30 minutes)                                     15 minutes
 * Next WGLC drafts
 * New implementer-specific drafts coming?
 * New indivdual drafts coming?
 
_______________________________________________
Speermint mailing list
Speermint@...
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/speermint
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Daryl Malas | 10 Nov 2008 19:47
Favicon

[drinks] RE: FW: I-D Action:draft-schumacher-drinks-luf-lrf-diff-01.txt

All,

I really think this draft is primarily dealing with a lack of a solid
definition and description of these two functions in the Speermint
architecture draft.  The discussion of this draft should result in
further definition of these functions in the Speermint architecture
draft as it relates to understanding the separation of the function's
use.  If it relates to the provisioning of data into the two functions
and the variables associated with the data, then DRINKS is the place.

Regards,

Speermint WG Chair

----------------
Daryl Malas
CableLabs
(o) +1 303 661 3302
(f) +1 303 661 9199
mailto:d.malas@...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: drinks-bounces@... 
> [mailto:drinks-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Richard Shockey
> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 8:31 AM
> To: drinks@...
> Subject: [drinks] FW: I-D 
> Action:draft-schumacher-drinks-luf-lrf-diff-01.txt
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: i-d-announce-bounces@... 
> [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@...]
> On Behalf Of Internet-Drafts@...
> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2008 7:00 PM
> To: i-d-announce@...
> Subject: I-D Action:draft-schumacher-drinks-luf-lrf-diff-01.txt 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line 
> Internet-Drafts directories.
> 
> 	Title           : Look Up Function vs. Location Routing Function
> discussion
> 	Author(s)       : G. Schumacher, H. Kaplan
> 	Filename        : draft-schumacher-drinks-luf-lrf-diff-01.txt
> 	Pages           : 8
> 	Date            : 2008-11-03
> 
> This document provides a comparison between the Look Up Function 
> 
>   (LUF) and the Location Routing Function (LRF) as used for inter and 
> 
>   intra-domain SIP session routing.  It also develops the 
> relationship 
> 
>   between the two functions.  This document is meant for discussion 
> 
>   purposes only. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   Schumacher
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Expires May 3, 2009
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  [page 1] 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   Look Up Function vs. Location Routing Function discussion
> 
> Nov 2008
> 
> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-schumacher-drinks-lu
> f-lrf-diff-01.
> txt
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail 
> reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII 
> version of the Internet-Draft.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> drinks mailing list
> drinks@...
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/drinks
>
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane