headers
Hollenbeck, Scott | 24 Sep 2008 14:25
Picon
Favicon

Document Progression?

It's been 16 months since RFCs 4930 - 4934 were published as Draft
Standards in May 2007.  Is anyone interested in seeing the document set
advance to Standard status?  We've long since passed the minimum
requirements for consideration described in RFC 2026:

"A specification shall remain at the Draft Standard level for at least
four (4) months, or until at least one IETF meeting has occurred,
whichever comes later."

-Scott-
Permalink | Reply | 5 comments |
headers
Edward Lewis | 24 Sep 2008 15:08
Favicon

Re: Document Progression?

I think acheiving Full Standard would be a worthy goal.  Certainly no 
roadblocks to it from our experience.

I'm curious - have there been fresh deployments of EPP since Draft Standard?

At 8:25 -0400 9/24/08, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
>It's been 16 months since RFCs 4930 - 4934 were published as Draft
>Standards in May 2007.  Is anyone interested in seeing the document set
>advance to Standard status?  We've long since passed the minimum
>requirements for consideration described in RFC 2026:
>
>"A specification shall remain at the Draft Standard level for at least
>four (4) months, or until at least one IETF meeting has occurred,
>whichever comes later."
>
>-Scott-

--

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis                                                +1-571-434-5468
NeuStar

Never confuse activity with progress.  Activity pays more.
Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
Patrick Mevzek | 24 Sep 2008 15:51

Re: Document Progression?

Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis <at> Neustar.biz> 2008-09-24 15:28
> I think acheiving Full Standard would be a worthy goal.  Certainly no 
> roadblocks to it from our experience.
> 
> I'm curious - have there been fresh deployments of EPP since Draft Standard?

Many ccTLDs are currently transitioning over to EPP or starting to
deply EPP services.
Some examples I worked on in the last few months: NO, UK, ES, FR
(some already started to switch to EPP, others still working on it)
So this should probably count as new EPP deployments, and there are
also many EPP extensions in various TLDs.

I also think achieving Full Standard would be good,
as past critics of EPP have now been mostly converted :-)

--

-- 
Patrick Mevzek <pm <at> dotandco.com>
Dot and Co <http://www.dotandco.com/>
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Eric Brunner-Williams | 24 Sep 2008 17:34

Re: Document Progression?

Scott,

I'm not opposed to progressing the current set.

Eric

Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> It's been 16 months since RFCs 4930 - 4934 were published as Draft
> Standards in May 2007.  Is anyone interested in seeing the document set
> advance to Standard status?  We've long since passed the minimum
> requirements for consideration described in RFC 2026:
>
> "A specification shall remain at the Draft Standard level for at least
> four (4) months, or until at least one IETF meeting has occurred,
> whichever comes later."
>
> -Scott-
>
>
>
>
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Marc Groeneweg | 29 Sep 2008 10:21
Picon

RE: Document Progression?

Hi all,

> > I'm curious - have there been fresh deployments of EPP since Draft
> Standard?
> 
> Many ccTLDs are currently transitioning over to EPP or starting to
> deply EPP services.
> Some examples I worked on in the last few months: NO, UK, ES, FR
> (some already started to switch to EPP, others still working on it)
> So this should probably count as new EPP deployments, and there are
> also many EPP extensions in various TLDs.
Just for the record: also SIDN (.nl) will switch to the EPP standard

Regards,
Marc Groeneweg
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Patrik Fältström | 29 Sep 2008 11:36
Picon
Favicon

Re: Document Progression?

On 29 sep 2008, at 10.21, Marc Groeneweg wrote:

>>> I'm curious - have there been fresh deployments of EPP since Draft  
>>> Standard?
>>
>> Many ccTLDs are currently transitioning over to EPP or starting to
>> deply EPP services.
>> Some examples I worked on in the last few months: NO, UK, ES, FR
>> (some already started to switch to EPP, others still working on it)
>> So this should probably count as new EPP deployments, and there are
>> also many EPP extensions in various TLDs.
> Just for the record: also SIDN (.nl) will switch to the EPP standard

.SE is switching in March 2009. Testing with registrars have started.

    Patrik
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane