Hi Everyone, There will be an IDN-over-EPP BOF at the IETF Meetings in Washington DC. Those interested please check out: TUESDAY, November 9, 2004 1700-1800 Afternoon Sessions IV Hemisphere APP idnprov IDN-over-EPP BOF http://www.ietf.org/ietf/04nov/idnprov.txt Edmon
FYI: I sent this erratum to the RFC Editor earlier this week. It was first described on this list by Jim Gould in August: http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2004-08/msg00001.html -(Continue reading)Scott- -----Original Message----- From: Scott Hollenbeck [mailto:sah <at> 428cobrajet.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 1:22 PM To: rfc-editor <at> rfc-editor.org Cc: sah <at> 428cobrajet.net; iesg <at> ietf.org Subject: RFC 3730 Erratum Ii has been brought to my attention and I have confirmed a small error in the text of RFC 3730, "Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)". The error can be found towards the end of section 2.9.2.3 on numbered page 30 of the RFC. The current text says this: "A <poll> acknowledgement response notes the number of messages remaining in the queue and the ID of the next message available for retrieval." The text should say this: "A <poll> acknowledgement response notes the ID of the message that has been acknowledged and the number of messages remaining in the queue." The correct text appeared in an earlier version of the Internet-Draft that became RFC 3730. I can not recall what led to the change, and I can not find any record of a discussion in the mailing list archives to document the
Scott, > FYI: I sent this erratum to the RFC Editor earlier this week. > It was first > described on this list by Jim Gould in August: SNAP > The text should say this: > > "A <poll> acknowledgement response notes the ID of the > message that has been > acknowledged and the number of messages remaining in the queue." In my opnion, that's not the only text that should be changed: The example <poll> acknowledgment response gives the ID of the next message and the number of messages in the queue. Shouldn't this be changed also? Sorry for noting this not earlier. Regards, Marc Groeneweg
> In my opnion, that's not the only text that should be changed: > > The example <poll> acknowledgment response gives the ID of the next > message and the number of messages in the queue. Shouldn't this be > changed also? Sorry for noting this not earlier. What text are you looking at? I can't find anything in RFC 3730 that matches "The example <poll> acknowledgment response gives the ID of the next message and the number of messages in the queue". -Scott-
Scott, > What text are you looking at? I can't find anything in RFC 3730 that > matches "The example <poll> acknowledgment response gives the > ID of the next > message and the number of messages in the queue". It's the example coding from the S-side where line 10 gives: S: <msgQ count="4" id="12346"/> Shouldn't this be: S: <msgQ count="4" id="12345"/> ? Ok, it's a minor one, but in context with the changed text. Regards, Marc
Hi Scott, I think Marc is referring to the example on page 29 of RFC 3730. In the poll ack response, you have the line: S: <msgQ count="4" id="12346"/> when the request said: C: <poll op="ack" msgID="12345"/> Cheers, Asbjorn On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 14:48, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > > In my opnion, that's not the only text that should be changed: > > > > The example <poll> acknowledgment response gives the ID of the next > > message and the number of messages in the queue. Shouldn't this be > > changed also? Sorry for noting this not earlier. > > What text are you looking at? I can't find anything in RFC 3730 that > matches "The example <poll> acknowledgment response gives the ID of the next > message and the number of messages in the queue". > > -(Continue reading)Scott- -- -- Asbjorn Steira The Global Name Registry, Limited _____________________________________________________
Ning Zhang privately answered my question of Marc Groeneweg's question. Here's a revised erratum as just sent to the RFC Editor: It has been brought to my attention and I have confirmed a small error in the text of RFC 3730, "Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)". The error can be found towards the end of section 2.9.2.3 on numbered page 30 of the RFC. The current text says this: "A <poll> acknowledgement response notes the number of messages remaining in the queue and the ID of the next message available for retrieval." The text should say this: "A <poll> acknowledgement response notes the ID of the message that has been acknowledged and the number of messages remaining in the queue." Additionally, the last example at the bottom of page 30 must be revised to map correctly to the new text. The line: S: <msgQ count="4" id="12346"/> should be changed to: S: <msgQ count="4" id="12345"/> The correct text appeared in an earlier version of the Internet-Draft that became RFC 3730. I can not recall what led to the change, and I can not find any record of a discussion in the mailing list archives to document the change. Unfortunately this change was not detected and corrected during the review periods that took place prior to publication as an RFC.(Continue reading)
RSS Feed29 | |
|---|---|
61 | |
44 | |
27 | |
42 | |
72 | |
7 | |
16 | |
6 | |
73 | |
1 | |
2 | |
39 | |
82 | |
26 | |
161 | |
35 | |
8 | |
27 | |
17 | |
64 | |
20 | |
19 | |
3 | |
1 | |
9 | |
4 | |
3 | |
7 | |
2 | |
15 | |
48 | |
108 | |
16 | |
35 | |
34 | |
1 | |
11 | |
8 | |
33 | |
30 | |
5 | |
6 | |
4 | |
2 | |
5 | |
3 | |
13 | |
16 | |
1 | |
36 | |
7 | |
19 | |
9 | |
11 | |
4 | |
2 | |
15 | |
28 | |
32 | |
4 | |
5 | |
18 | |
5 | |
52 | |
30 | |
68 | |
27 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
7 | |
20 | |
2 | |
3 | |
1 | |
4 | |
24 | |
16 | |
10 | |
24 | |
7 | |
7 | |
4 | |
2 | |
15 | |
10 | |
28 | |
132 | |
135 | |
37 | |
87 | |
106 | |
95 | |
121 | |
68 | |
114 | |
87 | |
47 | |
21 | |
25 |
