Mgrayson | 9 Aug 2004 21:23
Picon
Favicon

(no subject)

price


Attachment (new_price.zip): application/octet-stream, 5932 bytes
_______________________________________________
Pppext mailing list
Pppext <at> ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext
Mgrayson | 9 Aug 2004 23:01
Picon
Favicon

(no subject)

new price


Attachment (new_price.zip): application/octet-stream, 5932 bytes
_______________________________________________
Pppext mailing list
Pppext <at> ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext
Fred | 9 Aug 2004 23:34
Picon
Favicon

(no subject)

price


Attachment (new__price.zip): application/octet-stream, 5932 bytes
_______________________________________________
Pppext mailing list
Pppext <at> ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext
Florent Bersani | 16 Aug 2004 16:36
Picon

Removing EAP-TTLS from the PPPEXT Internet-Draft list

Hi James,

May I respectfully suggest that EAP-TTLS be removed from the PPPEXT 
Internet-Draft list (http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/pppext-charter.html)?

This is IMHO a relic of the ancient time when PPPEXT hosted much of the 
EAP debate (because EAP RFC 2284 has originally been developed within 
PPPEXT).

It is my understanding that since the creation of the EAP WG (it seemed 
that this goes back to 2002), PPPEXT has handed over all work related to 
EAP.

BR,

Florent

P.S: In addition, depending on long the weather conditions make EAP-TTLS 
authors take to have this method publish as an RFC (to be more precise, 
the three RFCs that Paul mentioned at IETF 60), I would suggest renaming 
the EAP-TTLS Internet-Draft from a WG I-D (its current name is 
draft-ietf-pppext-eap-tlls-XX) to an individual submission I-D (i.e. sth 
like draft-funk-eap-ttls-YY). See e.g., 
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg30778.html for 
some discussion on I-D naming conventions.
James Carlson | 16 Aug 2004 19:47
Picon

Re: Removing EAP-TTLS from the PPPEXT Internet-Draft list

Florent Bersani writes:
> May I respectfully suggest that EAP-TTLS be removed from the PPPEXT 
> Internet-Draft list (http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/pppext-charter.html)?

That'd certainly be fine with me.  In fact, I believe I suggested the
very same thing when it was proposed.  It doesn't seem to belong in
PPPEXT.

What I think needs to be fixed here is EAP, not PPPEXT.  EAP isn't
accepting per-method drafts yet.  (And perhaps not at all.  It's not
clear to me that this is really a settled issue.)

> It is my understanding that since the creation of the EAP WG (it seemed 
> that this goes back to 2002), PPPEXT has handed over all work related to 
> EAP.

We'd like to, but I think EAP perhaps needs a new charter.

--

-- 
James Carlson, IP Systems Group                <james.d.carlson <at> sun.com>
Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive         71.234W   Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757   42.497N   Fax +1 781 442 1677

_______________________________________________
Pppext mailing list
Pppext <at> ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext


Gmane