Re: New Draft Notification for draft-zheng-pim-multicast-pm-config-00, please comment//
Vero Zheng <verozheng <at> huawei.com>
2010-07-20 07:40:34 GMT
Hi Rajiv,
Excuse this belated reply. I was away from the office for a few days.
Please see my answer in-line.
BR,
Vero
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva <at> cisco.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 8:24 PM
To: "Vero Zheng" <verozheng <at> huawei.com>; <pim <at> ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [pim] New Draft Notification for draft-zheng-pim-multicast-pm-config-00, please comment//
> Hi Vero,
>
> Your proposal achieves to similar to what is achieved by this WG draft:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pim-pop-count-02
>
> What's different?
Vero-> To my understanding, Pop Count attribute is used to *collect* the various accounting and statistic
information for a multicast tree or a sub-tree.
The Performance Monitoring Configuration (M-PMC) defined in our draft is used to *configure* different
measurement entities for a multicast tree or a sub-tree to be monitored.
The goal which these two drafts try to achieve is different.
> Cheers,
> Rajiv
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: pim-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:pim-bounces <at> ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>> Vero Zheng
>> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 8:17 AM
>> To: pim <at> ietf.org
>> Subject: [pim] New Draft Notification for
> draft-zheng-pim-multicast-pm-
>> config-00, please comment//
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We've submitted a new draft "PIM Multicast Performance Monitoring
>> Configuration (M-PMC) Join Attribute", here is the link:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-zheng-pim-multicast-pm-config-00.txt
>>
>> This draft introduces a new type of PIM Join Attribute which carries
>> measurement configuration TLVs, which are used for multicast
>> performance monitoring. It is based on [RFC5384], and specifies
>> additional procedures to process the Multicast Performance Monitoring
>> Configuration (M-PMC) attribute to implement automatic performance
>> monitoring configuration on multicast forwarding tree.
>>
>> Any comments and suggestions are appreciated!
>>
>> BR,
>> Vero