headers
Julien Meuric | 3 Aug 2010 18:10

Adoption of draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01?

Hi all.

During the PCE meeting in Maastricht, we had a consensus in the room in 
favor of adopting draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01 as WG 
document. Considering that we already have the GMPLS requirements as WG 
draft and that it is a foundation for any WSON work which might follow 
the GMPLS extensions in CCAMP, now it is time to express your minds on 
this list.

Do you support the adoption of 
draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01 as WG document?

Properly argued answered are always valuable, especially in case of 
"no". As you are going to review the I-D before answering, any comments 
you will send to improve its content are very welcome.

Thanks,

Julien
Permalink | Reply | 13 comments |
headers
Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon | 3 Aug 2010 19:13

Re: Adoption of draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01?

Hi,
Yes, I support the adoption of the draft as a WG document. 
Best regards,
Nurit

-----Original Message-----
From: pce-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces <at> ietf.org] On Behalf Of
ext Julien Meuric
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 7:10 PM
To: pce <at> ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01?

Hi all.

During the PCE meeting in Maastricht, we had a consensus in the room in 
favor of adopting draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01 as WG 
document. Considering that we already have the GMPLS requirements as WG 
draft and that it is a foundation for any WSON work which might follow 
the GMPLS extensions in CCAMP, now it is time to express your minds on 
this list.

Do you support the adoption of 
draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01 as WG document?

Properly argued answered are always valuable, especially in case of 
"no". As you are going to review the I-D before answering, any comments 
you will send to improve its content are very welcome.

Thanks,
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Fatai Zhang | 4 Aug 2010 03:54
Favicon

Re: Adoption of draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01?

Hi Julien,

Yes, support.

Best Regards

Fatai

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Julien Meuric" <julien.meuric <at> orange-ftgroup.com>
To: <pce <at> ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 12:10 AM
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01?

> Hi all.
> 
> During the PCE meeting in Maastricht, we had a consensus in the room in 
> favor of adopting draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01 as WG 
> document. Considering that we already have the GMPLS requirements as WG 
> draft and that it is a foundation for any WSON work which might follow 
> the GMPLS extensions in CCAMP, now it is time to express your minds on 
> this list.
> 
> Do you support the adoption of 
> draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01 as WG document?
> 
> Properly argued answered are always valuable, especially in case of 
> "no". As you are going to review the I-D before answering, any comments 
> you will send to improve its content are very welcome.
>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Suresh | 4 Aug 2010 08:39
Favicon

Re: Adoption of draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01?

Support.

Regards
Suresh

____________________________________________________________________________
____
This e-mail and attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI,
which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed
above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including,
but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or
dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient's) is
prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by
phone or email immediately and delete it!

-----Original Message-----
From: pce-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces <at> ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien
Meuric
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 9:40 PM
To: pce <at> ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01?

Hi all.

During the PCE meeting in Maastricht, we had a consensus in the room in 
favor of adopting draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01 as WG 
document. Considering that we already have the GMPLS requirements as WG 
draft and that it is a foundation for any WSON work which might follow 
the GMPLS extensions in CCAMP, now it is time to express your minds on 
this list.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Dan Li | 4 Aug 2010 18:31
Favicon

Re: Adoption of draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01?

Yes, support!

Dan

在 2010-8-4，上午12:10， Julien Meuric 写道：

> Hi all.
> 
> During the PCE meeting in Maastricht, we had a consensus in the room in favor of adopting
draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01 as WG document. Considering that we already have the
GMPLS requirements as WG draft and that it is a foundation for any WSON work which might follow the GMPLS
extensions in CCAMP, now it is time to express your minds on this list.
> 
> Do you support the adoption of draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01 as WG document?
> 
> Properly argued answered are always valuable, especially in case of "no". As you are going to review the
I-D before answering, any comments you will send to improve its content are very welcome.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Julien
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce <at> ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce <at> ietf.org
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Quintin Zhao | 4 Aug 2010 21:06
Favicon

Re: Adoption of draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01?


Yes.

Quintin

? 2010-8-4???12:10? Julien Meuric ???

> Hi all.
> 
> During the PCE meeting in Maastricht, we had a consensus in the room in
favor of adopting draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01 as WG
document. Considering that we already have the GMPLS requirements as WG
draft and that it is a foundation for any WSON work which might follow the
GMPLS extensions in CCAMP, now it is time to express your minds on this
list.
> 
> Do you support the adoption of draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01
as WG document?
> 
> Properly argued answered are always valuable, especially in case of "no".
As you are going to review the I-D before answering, any comments you will
send to improve its content are very welcome.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Julien
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce <at> ietf.org
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Margaria, Cyril (NSN - DE/Munich | 5 Aug 2010 00:54

Re: Adoption of draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01?

Hi Julien,

Yes I support the adoption of the draft as a WG document.
(I am an editor of the document) 

Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards
Cyril Margaria

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pce-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces <at> ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of ext Julien Meuric
> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 6:10 PM
> To: pce <at> ietf.org
> Subject: [Pce] Adoption of 
> draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01?
> 
> Hi all.
> 
> During the PCE meeting in Maastricht, we had a consensus in 
> the room in favor of adopting 
> draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01 as WG document. 
> Considering that we already have the GMPLS requirements as WG 
> draft and that it is a foundation for any WSON work which 
> might follow the GMPLS extensions in CCAMP, now it is time to 
> express your minds on this list.
> 
> Do you support the adoption of
> draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01 as WG document?
> 
> Properly argued answered are always valuable, especially in
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Dhruv Dhody | 5 Aug 2010 06:22
Favicon

Re: Adoption of draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01?

Hi Julien,

 

Yes, I support adoption of the “draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01” as WG document.

 

Thanks & Regards,

Dhruv Dhody

 

 

***************************************************************************************

This e-mail and attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient's) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it!

 

-----Original Message-----
From: pce-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces <at> ietf.org] On Behalf Of Margaria, Cyril (NSN - DE/Munich)
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 4:25 AM
To: ext Julien Meuric; pce <at> ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01?

 

Hi Julien,

 

Yes I support the adoption of the draft as a WG document.

(I am an editor of the document)

 

Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards

Cyril Margaria

 

 

> -----Original Message-----

> From: pce-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces <at> ietf.org] On

> Behalf Of ext Julien Meuric

> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 6:10 PM

> To: pce <at> ietf.org

> Subject: [Pce] Adoption of

> draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01?

>

> Hi all.

>

> During the PCE meeting in Maastricht, we had a consensus in

> the room in favor of adopting

> draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01 as WG document.

> Considering that we already have the GMPLS requirements as WG

> draft and that it is a foundation for any WSON work which

> might follow the GMPLS extensions in CCAMP, now it is time to

> express your minds on this list.

>

> Do you support the adoption of

> draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01 as WG document?

>

> Properly argued answered are always valuable, especially in

> case of "no". As you are going to review the I-D before

> answering, any comments you will send to improve its content

> are very welcome.

>

> Thanks,

>

> Julien

>

> _______________________________________________

> Pce mailing list

> Pce <at> ietf.org

> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

>

_______________________________________________

Pce mailing list

Pce <at> ietf.org

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

<div>

<div class="Section1">

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>Hi Julien,<p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span><p>&nbsp;</p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>Yes, I support adoption of the &ldquo;draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01&rdquo;
as WG document. <p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span><p>&nbsp;</p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>Thanks &amp; Regards,<p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>Dhruv Dhody<p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span><p>&nbsp;</p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span><p>&nbsp;</p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>***************************************************************************************<p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>This e-mail and attachments contain confidential information from
HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed
above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but
not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by
persons other than the intended recipient's) is prohibited. If you receive this
e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and
delete it!<p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span><p>&nbsp;</p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>-----Original Message-----<br>
From: pce-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces <at> ietf.org] On Behalf Of Margaria,
Cyril (NSN - DE/Munich)<br>
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 4:25 AM<br>
To: ext Julien Meuric; pce <at> ietf.org<br>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01?</span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span><p>&nbsp;</p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>Hi Julien,<p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span><p>&nbsp;</p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>Yes I support the adoption of the draft as a WG document.<p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>(I am an editor of the document) <p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span><p>&nbsp;</p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>Mit freundlichen Gr&uuml;&szlig;en / Best Regards<p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>Cyril Margaria<p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>&nbsp;<p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span><p>&nbsp;</p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>&gt; -----Original Message-----<p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>&gt; From: pce-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces <at> ietf.org] On <p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>&gt; Behalf Of ext Julien Meuric<p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>&gt; Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 6:10 PM<p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>&gt; To: pce <at> ietf.org<p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>&gt; Subject: [Pce] Adoption of <p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>&gt; draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01?<p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>&gt; <p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>&gt; Hi all.<p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>&gt; <p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>&gt; During the PCE meeting in Maastricht, we had a consensus in <p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>&gt; the room in favor of adopting <p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>&gt; draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01 as WG document. <p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>&gt; Considering that we already have the GMPLS requirements as WG <p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>&gt; draft and that it is a foundation for any WSON work which <p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>&gt; might follow the GMPLS extensions in CCAMP, now it is time to <p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>&gt; express your minds on this list.<p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>&gt; <p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>&gt; Do you support the adoption of<p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>&gt; draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01 as WG document?<p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>&gt; <p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>&gt; Properly argued answered are always valuable, especially in <p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>&gt; case of "no". As you are going to review the I-D before <p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>&gt; answering, any comments you will send to improve its content <p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>&gt; are very welcome.<p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>&gt; <p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>&gt; Thanks,<p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>&gt; <p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>&gt; Julien<p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>&gt; <p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>&gt; _______________________________________________<p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>&gt; Pce mailing list<p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>&gt; Pce <at> ietf.org<p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>&gt; https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce<p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>&gt; <p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>_______________________________________________<p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>Pce mailing list<p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>Pce <at> ietf.org<p></p></span></p>

<p class="MsoPlainText"><span>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce<p></p></span></p>

</div>

</div>
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Udayasree | 5 Aug 2010 06:24
Favicon

Re: Adoption of draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01?

Yes.

Regards,
Udayasree

-----Original Message-----
From: pce-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces <at> ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien
Meuric
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 9:40 PM
To: pce <at> ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01?

Hi all.

During the PCE meeting in Maastricht, we had a consensus in the room in 
favor of adopting draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01 as WG 
document. Considering that we already have the GMPLS requirements as WG 
draft and that it is a foundation for any WSON work which might follow 
the GMPLS extensions in CCAMP, now it is time to express your minds on 
this list.

Do you support the adoption of 
draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01 as WG document?

Properly argued answered are always valuable, especially in case of 
"no". As you are going to review the I-D before answering, any comments 
you will send to improve its content are very welcome.

Thanks,

Julien

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Tomonori TAKEDA | 5 Aug 2010 08:51
Picon

Re: Adoption of draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01?

Hi,

In favor.

A few comments for clarification below (which can be addressed after
making it a WG document).

o Section 2 (message format) refers RFC 5440, but the content is more
related to P2MP (draft-ietf-pce-pcep-p2mp-extensions-11.txt). It would
be good to have an appropriate reference.

o Section 2.2 says "label restrictions on endpoint". I am wondering what
this is used for. It it for egress control (RFC4003) or fixed/restricted
wavelength tunable capability at the termination point in WSON?

o Section 2.2.2.5 says:

   The REQ-ADAP-CAP object from [I-D.ietf-pce-inter-layer-ext] can be
   used in case of mono-layer request, however in case of multilayer it
   is possible to have in the future more than one object, so it is
   better to have a dedicated TLV for the label (the scope is then more
   clear).

  Not sure what this means.

Thanks,
Tomonori Takeda

Julien Meuric wrote:
> Hi all.
> 
> During the PCE meeting in Maastricht, we had a consensus in the room in 
> favor of adopting draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01 as WG 
> document. Considering that we already have the GMPLS requirements as WG 
> draft and that it is a foundation for any WSON work which might follow 
> the GMPLS extensions in CCAMP, now it is time to express your minds on 
> this list.
> 
> Do you support the adoption of 
> draft-margaria-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-01 as WG document?
> 
> Properly argued answered are always valuable, especially in case of 
> "no". As you are going to review the I-D before answering, any comments 
> you will send to improve its content are very welcome.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Julien
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce <at> ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
> 
>
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane