Quintin Zhao | 21 May 2013 22:28
Favicon

FW: Last IPR Check on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures


-----Original Message-----
From: Quintin Zhao [mailto:quintin.zhao <at> huawei.com] 
Sent: 2013年5月21日 11:59
To: 'Julien Meuric';
'draft-ietf-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures <at> tools.ietf.org'
Subject: RE: Last IPR Check on
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures

Dear Julien,

I am not aware any other IPR other than the IPR disclosed already.

Thanks,
Quintin

-----Original Message-----
From: Julien Meuric [mailto:julien.meuric <at> orange.com] 
Sent: 2013年5月21日 4:54
To: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures <at> tools.ietf.org
Cc: pce <at> ietf.org
Subject: Last IPR Check on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures

Dear authors of the aforementioned document,

Has all IPR that applies to
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures been disclosed in
compliance with IETF IPR rules? (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more
details)

(Continue reading)

IETF Secretariat | 21 May 2013 13:01
Picon
Favicon

Milestones changed for pce WG

Changed milestone "Submit the stateful PCE document(s) to the IESG",
set state to active from review, accepting new milestone.

URL: http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/pce/charter/
Julien Meuric | 21 May 2013 10:53

Last IPR Check on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures

Dear authors of the aforementioned document,

Has all IPR that applies to 
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures been disclosed in 
compliance with IETF IPR rules? (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for 
more details)

Note that an associated IPR was disclosed in last February.

A response from each of you is expected.

Regards,

JP & Julien

Julien Meuric | 21 May 2013 10:42

WG Last Call of draft-ietf-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures

Hi all.

This message ignites a two-week period to collect feedback on 
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures-04. Please send your 
comments on the document to the PCE mailing list by Tuesday June 4, noon 
UTC.

Regards,

JP & Julien

The IESG | 17 May 2013 18:01
Picon
Favicon

WG Action: Rechartered Path Computation Element (pce)

The Path Computation Element (pce) working group in the Routing Area of
the IETF has been rechartered. For additional information please contact
the Area Directors or the WG Chairs.

Path Computation Element (pce)
------------------------------------------------
Current Status: Active Working Group

Chairs:
  JP Vasseur <jpv <at> cisco.com>
  Julien Meuric <julien.meuric <at> orange.com>

Secretaries:
  Daniel King <daniel <at> olddog.co.uk>

Assigned Area Director:
  Adrian Farrel <adrian <at> olddog.co.uk>

Mailing list
  Address: pce <at> ietf.org
  To Subscribe: http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
  Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce/

Charter of Working Group:

  The PCE Working Group is chartered to specify the required protocols so
  as to enable a Path Computation Element (PCE)-based architecture for the
  computation of paths for MPLS and GMPLS Point to Point and Point to
  Multi-point Traffic Engineered LSPs.

(Continue reading)

Adrian Farrel | 16 May 2013 19:07
Picon

Recharter approved

Hi,

The IESG has just approved your recharter without sending it for external
review. The charter page will be updated in due course.

Thanks,
Adrian

internet-drafts | 15 May 2013 09:16
Picon
Favicon

I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures-04.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
 This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element Working Group of the IETF.

	Title           : PCE-based Computation Procedure To Compute Shortest Constrained P2MP Inter-domain Traffic
Engineering Label Switched Paths
	Author(s)       : Quintin Zhao
                          Dhruv Dhody
                          Zafar Ali
                          Daniel King
                          Ramon Casellas
	Filename        : draft-ietf-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures-04.txt
	Pages           : 21
	Date            : 2013-05-15

Abstract:
   The ability to compute paths for constrained point-to-multipoint
   (P2MP) Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths (TE LSPs) across
   multiple domains has been identified as a key requirement for the
   deployment of P2MP services in MPLS and GMPLS networks.  The Path
   Computation Element (PCE) has been recognized as an appropriate
   technology for the determination of inter-domain paths of P2MP TE
   LSPs.

   This document describes an experiment to provide procedures and
   extensions to the PCE communication Protocol (PCEP) for the
   computation of inter-domain paths for P2MP TE LSPs.

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures
(Continue reading)

Julien Meuric | 13 May 2013 10:56

Fwd: RE: Last IPR Check on draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-req-07

FYI

-------- Original message --------
Date: 	Thu, 9 May 2013 20:15:02 +0900
From: 	Ogaki, Kenichi <ke-oogaki <at> kddi.com>

Dear Julien,

Sorry for this late reply.

On behalf of KDDI and KDDI R&D Labs., I want to tell you we don't have any
IPR to be disclosed.

Thanks,
Kenichi

--
Kenichi Ogaki
KDDI | IP Transport Network Development Dept.
+81-(0)80-5945-9138 | www.kddi.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julien Meuric [mailto:julien.meuric <at> orange.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 6:13 PM
> To: draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-req <at> tools.ietf.org
> Cc: pce <at> ietf.org
> Subject: Last IPR Check on draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-req-07
>
> Dear authors of the aforementioned I-D,
>
(Continue reading)

Adrian Farrel | 12 May 2013 21:23
Picon

Progressing PCEP Vendor Constraints

Hi,

No-one came back to me on the list or in private in the last (almost) three
weeks with any comments. 

Maybe everyone is happy/shy/vacationing.

Anyway, the authors have no more work in the queue for this I-D and believe it
is cooked.

Chairs, over to you.

Thanks,
Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pce-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces <at> ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian
> Farrel
> Sent: 23 April 2013 06:01
> To: pce <at> ietf.org
> Subject: [Pce] Revising PCEP Vendor Constraints
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I spent some time discussing changes to draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints with
> Ina and Fatai. It turns out that the main change is to rename the object and
TLV
> from "vendor constraints" to "vendor information". The scope of *this* draft
> still remains vendor constraints, but largely through this renaming, we make
the
(Continue reading)

internet-drafts | 10 May 2013 18:58
Picon
Favicon

I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-04.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
 This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element Working Group of the IETF.

	Title           : PCEP Extensions for Stateful PCE
	Author(s)       : Edward Crabbe
                          Jan Medved
                          Ina Minei
                          Robert Varga
	Filename        : draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-04.txt
	Pages           : 54
	Date            : 2013-05-10

Abstract:
   The Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) provides
   mechanisms for Path Computation Elements (PCEs) to perform path
   computations in response to Path Computation Clients (PCCs) requests.

   Although PCEP explicitly makes no assumptions regarding the
   information available to the PCE, it also makes no provisions for
   synchronization or PCE control of timing and sequence of path
   computations within and across PCEP sessions.  This document
   describes a set of extensions to PCEP to enable stateful control of
   MPLS-TE and GMPLS LSPs via PCEP.

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce

There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-04
(Continue reading)

Julien Meuric | 30 Apr 2013 11:12

Last IPR Check on draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-req-07

Dear authors of the aforementioned I-D,

Are you aware of any other IPR that applies to 
draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-req? If so, has all this IPR been disclosed in 
compliance with IETF IPR rules? (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for 
more details)

Note that an IPR was disclosed on this I-D last summer.

A response from each of you is expected.

Regards,

JP & Julien


Gmane