Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5709 (2989)
Acee Lindem <acee.lindem <at> ericsson.com>
2011-10-11 22:19:32 GMT
Hi Alice,
Thanks for the information. In the hopes of dispensing of this matter quickly, I have opened a tools ticket
on this issue:
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/tools/trac/ticket/6
Can you close this errata as "Rejected"? If not, I'll advise Steward to do it (WG chairs don't have the
authority).
Thanks,
Acee
On Oct 11, 2011, at 5:51 PM, Alice Hagens wrote:
> Acee, Manav,
>
> The HTML versions of RFCs available from tools.ietf.org (e.g., http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5709)
are created and maintained by the Tools Team, not the RFC Editor. They are automatically created by
running rfcmarkup (http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/) on the text of the RFC. In short, the link
on http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5709 was automatically created based on parsing the string "RFC
2328, Appendix D".
>
> As noted on http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php, errata are for the RFCs as available from
rfc-editor.org, e.g., http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5709.txt.
>
> The verifiers (Area Directors) have the ability to edit the contents of the errata report. Perhaps the
Corrected Text could convey the intended correction, maybe "Keyed-MD5 (defined in RFC 2328, Appendix D,
as updated by this document)", and the content of the Notes could be removed.
>
> Thank you.
> RFC Editor/ah
>
> On Oct 10, 2011, at 9:21 PM, Acee Lindem wrote:
>
>> RFC-Editor(s),
>> Can you simply update the html link as Manav suggests?
>> Thanks,
>> Acee
>> On Oct 10, 2011, at 8:59 PM, Bhatia, Manav (Manav) wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, the link is incorrect in the HTML version of the RFC. I don't remember giving the URL and don't know
how it was inserted in the HTML version. Cant we just fix the HTML page to point to RFC 2328 Appendix D instead
of pointing to RFC 5709 Appendix D (which does not even exist!)?
>>>
>>> There is no problem with the TXT version of the RFC.
>>>
>>> Cheers, Manav
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor <at> rfc-editor.org]
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 6:21 AM
>>>> To: Bhatia, Manav (Manav); vishwas <at> ipinfusion.com;
>>>> mfanto <at> aegisdatasecurity.com; riw <at> cisco.com;
>>>> mjbarnes <at> cisco.com; tony.li <at> tony.li; rja <at> extremenetworks.com;
>>>> stbryant <at> cisco.com; adrian <at> olddog.co.uk;
>>>> acee.lindem <at> ericsson.com; akr <at> cisco.com
>>>> Cc: dai.wenjie <at> zte.com.cn; ospf <at> ietf.org; rfc-editor <at> rfc-editor.org
>>>> Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5709 (2989)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5709,
>>>> "OSPFv2 HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentication".
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>> You may review the report below and at:
>>>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5709&eid=2989
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>> Type: Editorial
>>>> Reported by: Dai Wenjie (David Jet) <dai.wenjie <at> zte.com.cn>
>>>>
>>>> Section: 3.
>>>>
>>>> Original Text
>>>> -------------
>>>> With the additions in this document, the currently valid
>>>> algorithms (including mode) for OSPFv2 Cryptographic
>>>> Authentication include: Keyed-MD5
>>>> (defined in RFC 2328, Appendix D)
>>>>
>>>> Corrected Text
>>>> --------------
>>>> With the additions in this document, the currently valid
>>>> algorithms (including mode) for OSPFv2 Cryptographic
>>>> Authentication include: Keyed-MD5
>>>> (defined in RFC 2328, Appendix D)
>>>>
>>>> Notes
>>>> -----
>>>> The link 'Appendix D' referenced is incorrect. It is now
>>>> 'http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5709#appendix-D', and it
>>>> should be 'http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2328#appendix-D'.
>>>> Pay attention to the difference of the numbers in links,please.
>>>>
>>>> Instructions:
>>>> -------------
>>>> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary,
>>>> please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be
>>>> verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the
>>>> verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and
>>>> edit the report, if necessary.
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>> RFC5709 (draft-ietf-ospf-hmac-sha-07)
>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>> Title : OSPFv2 HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentication
>>>> Publication Date : October 2009
>>>> Author(s) : M. Bhatia, V. Manral, M. Fanto, R.
>>>> White, M. Barnes, T. Li, R. Atkinson
>>>> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD
>>>> Source : Open Shortest Path First IGP
>>>> Area : Routing
>>>> Stream : IETF
>>>> Verifying Party : IESG
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OSPF mailing list
>>> OSPF <at> ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>>
>
Hi Alice,
Thanks for the information. In the hopes of dispensing of this matter quickly, I have opened a tools ticket
on this issue:
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/tools/trac/ticket/6
Can you close this errata as "Rejected"? If not, I'll advise Steward to do it (WG chairs don't have the
authority).
Thanks,
Acee
On Oct 11, 2011, at 5:51 PM, Alice Hagens wrote:
> Acee, Manav,
>
> The HTML versions of RFCs available from tools.ietf.org (e.g., http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5709)
are created and maintained by the Tools Team, not the RFC Editor. They are automatically created by
running rfcmarkup (http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/) on the text of the RFC. In short, the link
on http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5709 was automatically created based on parsing the string "RFC
2328, Appendix D".
>
> As noted on http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php, errata are for the RFCs as available from
rfc-editor.org, e.g., http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5709.txt.
>
> The verifiers (Area Directors) have the ability to edit the contents of the errata report. Perhaps the
Corrected Text could convey the intended correction, maybe "Keyed-MD5 (defined in RFC 2328, Appendix D,
as updated by this document)", and the content of the Notes could be removed.
>
> Thank you.
> RFC Editor/ah
>
> On Oct 10, 2011, at 9:21 PM, Acee Lindem wrote:
>
>> RFC-Editor(s),
>> Can you simply update the html link as Manav suggests?
>> Thanks,
>> Acee
>> On Oct 10, 2011, at 8:59 PM, Bhatia, Manav (Manav) wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, the link is incorrect in the HTML version of the RFC. I don't remember giving the URL and don't know
how it was inserted in the HTML version. Cant we just fix the HTML page to point to RFC 2328 Appendix D instead
of pointing to RFC 5709 Appendix D (which does not even exist!)?
>>>
>>> There is no problem with the TXT version of the RFC.
>>>
>>> Cheers, Manav
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor <at> rfc-editor.org]
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 6:21 AM
>>>> To: Bhatia, Manav (Manav); vishwas <at> ipinfusion.com;
>>>> mfanto <at> aegisdatasecurity.com; riw <at> cisco.com;
>>>> mjbarnes <at> cisco.com; tony.li <at> tony.li; rja <at> extremenetworks.com;
>>>> stbryant <at> cisco.com; adrian <at> olddog.co.uk;
>>>> acee.lindem <at> ericsson.com; akr <at> cisco.com
>>>> Cc: dai.wenjie <at> zte.com.cn; ospf <at> ietf.org; rfc-editor <at> rfc-editor.org
>>>> Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5709 (2989)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5709,
>>>> "OSPFv2 HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentication".
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>> You may review the report below and at:
>>>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5709&eid=2989
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>> Type: Editorial
>>>> Reported by: Dai Wenjie (David Jet) <dai.wenjie <at> zte.com.cn>
>>>>
>>>> Section: 3.
>>>>
>>>> Original Text
>>>> -------------
>>>> With the additions in this document, the currently valid
>>>> algorithms (including mode) for OSPFv2 Cryptographic
>>>> Authentication include: Keyed-MD5
>>>> (defined in RFC 2328, Appendix D)
>>>>
>>>> Corrected Text
>>>> --------------
>>>> With the additions in this document, the currently valid
>>>> algorithms (including mode) for OSPFv2 Cryptographic
>>>> Authentication include: Keyed-MD5
>>>> (defined in RFC 2328, Appendix D)
>>>>
>>>> Notes
>>>> -----
>>>> The link 'Appendix D' referenced is incorrect. It is now
>>>> 'http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5709#appendix-D', and it
>>>> should be 'http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2328#appendix-D'.
>>>> Pay attention to the difference of the numbers in links,please.
>>>>
>>>> Instructions:
>>>> -------------
>>>> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary,
>>>> please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be
>>>> verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the
>>>> verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and
>>>> edit the report, if necessary.
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>> RFC5709 (draft-ietf-ospf-hmac-sha-07)
>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>> Title : OSPFv2 HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentication
>>>> Publication Date : October 2009
>>>> Author(s) : M. Bhatia, V. Manral, M. Fanto, R.
>>>> White, M. Barnes, T. Li, R. Atkinson
>>>> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD
>>>> Source : Open Shortest Path First IGP
>>>> Area : Routing
>>>> Stream : IETF
>>>> Verifying Party : IESG
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OSPF mailing list
>>> OSPF <at> ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>>
>
RSS Feed