headers
The IESG | 10 Dec 2009 21:54
Picon
Favicon

Protocol Action: 'Sieve Email Filtering: Sieves and display directives in XML' to Proposed Standard

The IESG has approved the following document:

- 'Sieve Email Filtering: Sieves and display directives in XML '
   <draft-freed-sieve-in-xml-07.txt> as a Proposed Standard

This document is the product of the Sieve Mail Filtering Language Working Group. 

The IESG contact persons are Lisa Dusseault and Alexey Melnikov.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-freed-sieve-in-xml-07.txt

Technical Summary

The Sieve Email Filtering:  Sieves and display directives in XML
extension
provides a way to represent a SIEVE script and associated display
directives in
XML.

Working Group Summary

This document has been discussed and reviewed in the SIEVE Working Group.
There is consensus in the Working Group to publish this document
as a Proposed Standard.

Document Quality

A number of implementors have expressed interest in this specification.
At least one implementation already exists.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Дилян Палаузов | 13 Dec 2009 16:19

require [""]

Hello,

Is the following action valid, or not:

    require [""];

Със здраве,
   Дилян
_______________________________________________
sieve mailing list
sieve <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Hannah Schroeter | 13 Dec 2009 16:38
Picon

Re: require [""]

Hello!

On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 04:19:14PM +0100, ?????????? ???????????????? wrote:
>Is the following action valid, or not:

>   require [""];

I don't think so, unless you have an extension with capability name ""
(empty string) which one might enable using
  require "";
or
  require [""];
See RFC 5228, sec. 3.2.

However, I'm not aware of any public extension with that name, and
vendor defined extensions would have names starting with "vnd.", cf. RFC
5228, sec. 6.1.

Kind regards,

Hannah(s).
_______________________________________________
sieve mailing list
sieve <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
NED+mta-filters | 13 Dec 2009 18:42

Re: require [""]

> Hello,

> Is the following action valid, or not:

>     require [""];

That depends on what you mean by "valid". It's syntactically valid AFAIK so it
should not result in a syntax error. However, section 3.3 makes it pretty clear
that each argument to require is the name of an extension, and since there is
no registered extension with a blank name (and we'd probably never allow the
registration of such a thing), section 2.10.5 of RFC 5228 requires that the
script not execute. In our implementation at least while the error message is
different, there's not a lot of resulting behavior difference between a
syntactically invalid script and one that requires an unknown extension.

				Ned
_______________________________________________
sieve mailing list
sieve <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane