David Meyer | 15 Jan 00:34 2004
Picon

mboned: Closing the MSDP WG


	Alex/Bill,

	The MSDP WG has concluded its work on the MSDP spec (the
	MSDP MIB will be finished in the MBONED WG). As such, I'm
	requesting that you close the MSDP WG. 

	I want to thank all of you who worked on MSDP for your
	hard work, attention to detail, and perseverance. Well
	done all. 

	Thanks,

	Dave
_______________________________________________________________
user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/mboned.html
web archive:  http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/mboned/

David Meyer | 17 Dec 16:43 2003
Picon

mboned: MSDP MIB

	Folks,

	In our never-ending quest to close the MSDP working
	group, we've come up against the question of what to do
	with the MSDP MIB (in particular, where to finish
	it). The current thinking is to close the MSDP WG and
	finish the MIB in MBONED.  
	
	Please speak up now if you have issues or concerns about
	this approach.

	Thanks,

	Dave
_______________________________________________________________
user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/mboned.html
web archive:  http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/mboned/

David Meyer | 17 Oct 22:36 2003
Picon

mboned: Multicast Source Discovery Protocol (MSDP) - RFC 3618


	Since RFC 3618 is about to be published, I wanted to
	thank all of you for the hard and thoughful work you have
	done in getting MSDP to this point. 

	Congratulations all on sticking with this and on work
	well done. 

	Dave

__________________________________________________________
web archive:  http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/mboned/

Hidetoshi Ueno | 29 Aug 04:40 2003
Picon

MSDP implementations

Dear all,

I'm interested in multicast routing protocols, and I've just started to investigate MSDP.
Let me ask a quick question. Are there any implementations of MSDP?

I appreciate your any feedback.

Thank you

Hidetoshi Ueno
NTT DoCoMo, Inc.

David Meyer | 11 Aug 19:41 2003
Picon

WG last calls ending today, 08.11.2003


	Folks,

	Just a reminder: MBONED WG last calls ending today:
	
	  draft-ietf-mboned-msdp-deploy-02.txt 
	  draft-ietf-mboned-ipv4-mcast-bcp-01.txt

	Please forward comments to the MBONED list.

	Thanks,

	Dave

David Meyer | 22 Jul 20:10 2003
Picon

draft-ietf-mboned-msdp-deploy-03.txt posted


	Folks,

	I just posted draft-ietf-mboned-msdp-deploy-03.txt
	(including Pekka's comments) to internet-drafts, and have
	put it up on http://www.1-4-5.net/~dmm/draft-ietf-mboned-msdp-deploy-03.txt
  	so folks can get a look.   
	
	I will start the WG last call as soon it turns up on the
	ID directory.

	Dave

	

David Meyer | 21 Jul 16:50 2003
Picon

[MSDP/MBONED] WG last call for draft-ietf-mboned-msdp-deploy-02.txt


	This note begins the WG Last Call period for
	draft-ietf-mboned-msdp-deploy-02.txt. The last call will 
	expire on 08.11.2003. Please send comments to the list or
	to the authors.

	Thanks,

	Dave

David Meyer | 24 Jun 18:02 2003
Picon

Draft Agenda for 57 IETF


	Please forward questions, comments, or additional agenda
	items to me. 

	Thanks,

	Dave

-----

        MBONE Deployment WG (MBONED)
        ============================

        Tuesday, July 15, 2003 (0900-1130 Morning Sessions)

        Draft Agenda
        ------------

        Agenda Bashing                                              5 minutes
        Meyer/All

        Embedding the Address of RP in IPv6 Multicast Address      20 minutes
        draft-savola-mboned-mcast-rpaddr-03.txt         
        Pekka Savola

        Multicast Source Discovery Protocol Deployment Scenarios   20 minutes
        draft-ietf-mboned-msdp-deploy-02.txt
        Mike McBride

        MSDP Spec Update
(Continue reading)

Bill Fenner | 11 Jun 04:18 2003
Picon

MSDP MIB questions


A couple of brief MSDP MIB questions:

1. Has anyone implemented the draft -06 or -07 (or, for that matter,
   any version)?  I'm curious if renumbering the OIDs would affect
   anyone.

2. In the Requests table, does it make sense for longest-match to
   happen first, or highest priority first?

3. I'm planning to delete msdpPeerEncapsulationType,
   msdpPeerInNotifications, msdpPeerOutNotifications, msdpPeerLastError
   to reflect evolution of the MSDP spec.  Can anyone think of any other
   changes relevant to the structure of the MIB?

Thanks,
  Bill

Bill Fenner | 4 Jun 07:59 2003
Picon

MSDP MIB


I just republished the MSDP MIB.  Since MSDP is now approved, let's get
this finished up to go with it.  Here are the open issues from the
draft.  Some of them are irrelevant now since they applied to pieces
that we removed to get to the current version.  Comments are welcome.

--
We need Components to describe multiple instances of MSDP in the same
box (similar to the PIM MIB)

Need a static RPF-peer table (see spec, section 14.3)

Do we need an msdpPeerLastErrorSent, too, for what notification I last
sent to this peer?

The Backwards Transition notification won't trigger on established ->
disabled.  Is that desired?

A table to express policy was suggested on the MSDP mailing list.  More
discussion is required before including this in the MIB.  (Some of the
more discussion: other than filtering announcements at an RP, policy in
MSDP == black holes; policy should be in MBGP)

An OID for control of encapsulation (e.g. SA-encapsulate the first N
packets sent to this group?) was suggested, although it might be more
appropriate to be a table for fine-grained control.

Is the RowStatus object in the SACache appropriate?  (e.g. used to flush
potentially bad state)

(Continue reading)

David Meyer | 29 May 19:30 2003
Picon

[MSDP] MSDP approved for Experimental by the IESG

	Folks,

	MSDP was approved for Experimental by the IESG. 
	Congratulations to all for the hard work. We still have
	the MIB to work on, and Bill has just refreshed that
	draft. 

	I don't plan to have MSDP meet in Vienna; rather, we'll
	handle any issues in MBONED (and I'll cross post to both
	lists).

	Again, congratulations to all on the hard work and
	perseverance. It only took 4 years longer than we though
	it might :-)

	Dave


Gmane